Table of Contents
Journal of Anesthesiology
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 901903, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/901903
Clinical Study

McGrath Video Laryngoscope May Take a Longer Intubation Time Than Macintosh Laryngoscope

Department of Anaesthesiology, Seth G. S. Medical College & KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012, India

Received 1 August 2015; Revised 27 October 2015; Accepted 8 November 2015

Academic Editor: Young-Chang P. Arai

Copyright © 2015 Prerana N. Shah and Kaveri Das. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. Shippey, D. Ray, and D. McKeown, “Case series: the McGrath videolaryngoscope—an initial clinical evaluation,” Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 307–313, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. “Aircraft Medical, McGrath Brochure,” 2014, http://www.aircraftmedical.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=263&Itemid=180, http://www.aircraftmedical.com.
  3. B. Shippey, D. Ray, and D. McKeown, “Use of the McGrath video laryngoscope in the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 116–119, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. C. Ray, C. Billington, P. K. Kearns et al., “A comparison of McGrath and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice users: a manikin study,” Anaesthesia, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 1207–1210, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Walker, W. Brampton, M. Halai et al., “Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetists,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 440–445, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. S. Cormack and J. Lehane, “Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics,” Anaesthesia, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1105–1111, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Piepho, K. Weinert, F. M. Heid, C. Werner, and R. R. Noppens, “Comparison of the McGrath Series 5 and GlideScope Ranger with the Macintosh laryngoscope by paramedics,” Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, vol. 19, no. 1, article 4, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. M. Taylor, M. Peck, S. Launcelott et al., “The McGrath Series 5 Series 5 videolaryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomised, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway,” Anaesthesia, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 142–147, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. R. R. Noppens, S. Möbus, F. Heid, I. Schmidtmann, C. Werner, and T. Piepho, “Evaluation of the McGrath series 5 videolaryngoscope after failed direct laryngoscopy,” Anaesthesia, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 716–720, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus