Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Aging Research
Volume 2016, Article ID 8569602, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8569602
Research Article

Robotic Seals as Therapeutic Tools in an Aged Care Facility: A Qualitative Study

1Nursing, Midwifery, and Nutrition, Centre for Nursing and Midwifery Research, College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia
2Nursing, Midwifery, and Nutrition, College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia
3Clinical Psychology, College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Singapore Campus, Singapore
4Aged Care Services Australia Group, Launceston, TAS, Australia
5Regis Aged Care, Townsville, QLD, Australia

Received 27 August 2016; Accepted 25 October 2016

Academic Editor: F. R. Ferraro

Copyright © 2016 Melanie Birks et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Department of Social Services, 2013-14 Report on the Operation of the Aged Care Act 1997, Department of Social Services, Canberra, Australia, 1997.
  2. L. F. Menna, M. Fontanella, A. Santaniello et al., “Evaluation of social relationships in elderly by animal-assisted activity,” International Psychogeriatrics, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1019–1020, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. V. Bernabei, D. De Ronchi, T. La Ferla et al., “Animal-assisted interventions for elderly patients affected by dementia or psychiatric disorders: a review,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 762–773, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. Moretti, D. De Ronchi, V. Bernabei et al., “Pet therapy in elderly patients with mental illness,” Psychogeriatrics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 125–129, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. W. D. Stiehl, J. Lieberman, C. Breazeal, L. Basel, L. Lalla, and M. Wolf, “Design of a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch,” in Proceedings of the 14th IEEE Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN '05), pp. 408–415, August 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. Mordoch, A. Osterreicher, L. Guse, K. Roger, and G. Thompson, “Use of social commitment robots in the care of elderly people with dementia: a literature review,” Maturitas, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 14–20, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. Pangka, Y. Hui, and A. Yan, “Robots in medicine,” University of Western Ontario Medical Journal, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 29–30, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  8. G. Wolbring and S. Yumakulov, “Social robots: views of staff of a disability service organization,” International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 457–468, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. S. Ahn, E. Broadbent, I. Han Kuo et al., “Long-term study of a healthcare robot system for senior people in rest homes, hospitals, and a dementia unit,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems Workshop on Assistive Robotics for Individuals with Disabilities: HRI Issues and Beyond, Chicago, Ill, USA, September 2014.
  10. J. A. Mann, B. A. Macdonald, I.-H. Kuo, X. Li, and E. Broadbent, “People respond better to robots than computer tablets delivering healthcare instructions,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 43, pp. 112–117, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Robinson, B. A. MacDonald, N. M. Kerse, and E. Broadbent, “Suitability of healthcare robots for a dementia unit and suggested improvements,” Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 34–40, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. R. Bemelmans, G. J. Gelderblom, P. Jonker, and L. de Witte, “Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness,” Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 114–120.e1, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Frennert and B. Östlund, “Review: seven matters of concern of social robots and older people,” International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 299–310, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Sharkey, “Robots and human dignity: a consideration of the effects of robot care on the dignity of older people,” Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 63–75, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Heerink, J. Albo-Canals, M. Valenti-Soler et al., “Exploring requirements and alternative pet robots for robot assisted therapy with older adults with dementia,” in Social Robotics, vol. 8239 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 104–115, Springer, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. E. Torta, F. Werner, D. O. Johnson et al., “Evaluation of a small socially-assistive humanoid robot in intelligent homes for the care of the elderly,” Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems: Theory and Applications, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 57–71, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. Kachouie, S. Sedighadeli, R. Khosla, and M.-T. Chu, “Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a mixed-method systematic literature review,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 369–393, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. PARO Robots US, PARO Therapeutic Robot, 2014, http://www.parorobots.com/.
  19. C. J. Calo, N. Hunt-Bull, L. Lewis, and T. Metzler, “Ethical implications of using the paro robot, with a focus on dementia patient care,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Human-Robot Interaction in Elder Care, WS-2011-2012, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2011.
  20. T. Shibata, Y. Kawaguchi, and K. Wada, “Investigation on people living with seal robot at home,” International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 53–63, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. Takayanagi, T. Kirita, and T. Shibata, “Comparison of verbal and emotional responses of elderly people with mild/moderate dementia and those with severe dementia in responses to seal robot, PARO,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 6, article 257, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. W.-L. Chang, S. Šabanović, and L. Huber, “Use of seal-like robot PARO in sensory group therapy for older adults with dementia,” in Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '13), pp. 101–102, IEEE Press, Tokyo, Japan, March 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Sabanovic, C. C. Bennett, W.-L. Chang, and L. Huber, “PARO robot affects diverse interaction modalities in group sensory therapy for older adults with dementia,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR '13), Seattle, Wash, USA, June 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. Robinson, E. Broadbent, and B. MacDonald, “Group sessions with Paro in a nursing home: structure, observations and interviews,” Australasian Journal on Ageing, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 106–112, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. N. Jøranson, I. Pedersen, A. M. M. Rokstad, and C. Ihlebæk, “Effects on symptoms of agitation and depression in persons with dementia participating in robot-assisted activity: a cluster-randomized controlled trial,” Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 867–873, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. Bemelmans, G. J. Gelderblom, P. Jonker, and L. de Witte, “Effectiveness of robot paro in intramural psychogeriatric care: A Multicenter Quasi-Experimental Study,” Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 946–950, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. Giusti and P. Marti, “Interpretative dynamics in human robot interaction,” in Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN '06), pp. 111–116, IEEE, Hatfield, UK, September 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. H.-C. Sung, S.-M. Chang, M.-Y. Chin, and W.-L. Lee, “Robot-assisted therapy for improving social interactions and activity participation among institutionalized older adults: a pilot study,” Asia-Pacific Psychiatry, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. E. Prato-Previde, G. Fallani, and P. Valsecchi, “Gender differences in owners interacting with pet dogs: an observational study,” Ethology, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 64–73, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Zilcha-Mano, M. Mikulincer, and P. R. Shaver, “An attachment perspective on human-pet relationships: conceptualization and assessment of pet attachment orientations,” Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 345–357, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. W. Taggart, S. Turkle, and C. D. Kidd, “An interactive robot in a nursing home: preliminary remarks,” in Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science, Workshop Paper, Cognitive Science Society, Stresa, Italy, 2005. View at Google Scholar