Research Article

The Efficacy of Functional and Traditional Exercise on the Body Composition and Determinants of Physical Fitness of Older Women: A Randomized Crossover Trial

Table 2

Efficacy of functional training (FT) and traditional training (TT) on the physical fitness related to daily activities and the quality of movement patterns of physically active elderly women.

MomentsTT ⟶ FT (n = 13)FT ⟶ TT (n = 19)SG (n = 16)

Sit and reach (cm)BaselineTT2.80 ± 6.92FT1.76 ± 6.292.62 ± 9.83
Post_12_w5.84 ± 7.04A4.71 ± 7.12A5.21 ± 11.42A
∆%—ES108.57–0.44167.61–0.4798.85–0.26
Post_20_wFT6.25 ± 5.78TT3.73 ± 7.843.50 ± 8.87
Post_32_w9.59 ± 5.21AC6.36 ± 7.70AC5.96 ± 9.42C
∆%—ES53.44–0.5870.51–0.3470.29–0.28

Back scratch (cm)BaselineTT−4.36 ± 6.68FT−4.60 ± 6.26−1.04 ± 6.59
Post_12_w−2.82 ± 6.29A−3.48 ± 6.31A0.08 ± 6.91A
∆%—ES54.61–0.2332.18–0.18107.69–0.17
Post_20_wFT−3.68 ± 6.63TT−6.24 ± 6.82B−0.73 ± 6.96
Post_32_w−1.95 ± 6.63C−4.30 ± 6.70C1.06 ± 7.09C
∆%—ES47.01–0.2631.09–0.28245.21–0.26

Time up go (sec)BaselineTT5.11 ± 0.69FT5.04 ± 0.544.82 ± 0.53
Post_12_w4.57 ± 0.48A+4.32 ± 0.36A+5.10 ± 0.61
∆%—ES10.57–0.7814.29–1.335.81 to −0.53
Post_20_wFT4.59 ± 0.54ATT4.65 ± 0.39B4.71 ± 0.56B
Post_32_w4.19 ± 0.63ABC+4.21 ± 0.35AC+4.76 ± 0.53B
∆%—ES8.71–0.749.46–1.131.06 to −0.09

Sit-to-stand (rep)BaselineTT16.38 ± 3.37FT15.68 ± 2.4515.95 ± 3.19
Post_12_w19.00 ± 4.22A20.89 ± 3.19A+16.50 ± 2.19
∆%—ES16.00–0.7833.23–2.133.45–0.17
Post_20_wFT18.23 ± 2.61TT18.26 ± 3.55AB17.25 ± 2.64
Post_32_w21.61 ± 3.54ABC+21.00 ± 4.59AC+16.50 ± 2.09
∆%—ES18.41–0.9515.01–0.77−4.35 to −0.28

Elbow flexion (rep)BaselineTT19.92 ± 4.28FT19.52 ± 3.6818.90 ± 3.44
Post_12_w22.73 ± 4.47A+23.39 ± 3.57A+18.68 ± 3.73
∆%—ES14.11–0.6619.83–1.05−1.16 to −0.06
Post_20_wFT22.46 ± 2.96ATT22.13 ± 3.36A22.71 ± 3.96AB
Post_32_w27.07 ± 3.08ABC+25.18 ± 3.46AC+21.67 ± 3.52AB
∆%—ES20.53–1.5613.78–0.91−4.58 to −0.26

Six-minute walk (m)BaselineTT536.93 ± 59.21FT551.33 ± 51.30549.59 ± 51.11
Post_12_w563.11 ± 51.47590.49 ± 40.27A+548.46 ± 54.79
∆%—ES4.88–0.447.10–0.76−0.21 to −0.02
Post_20_wFT553.74 ± 53.17TT572.41 ± 44.87566.73 ± 40.44
Post_32_w587.34 ± 48.62AC+593.47 ± 44.08AC+541.44 ± 50.66C
∆%—ES6.07–0.633.68–0.47−4.46 to −0.63

Functional Movement Screen (points)BaselineTT9.38 ± 2.29FT9.00 ± 2.648.75 ± 2.32
Post_12_w10.15 ± 2.3012.00 ± 2.02A+9.93 ± 2.54
∆%—ES8.21–0.3433.33–1.1413.49–0.51
Post_20_wFT10.23 ± 1.87TT9.36 ± 3.13B9.75 ± 2.95
Post_32_w11.53 ± 2.50A10.78 ± 2.78AC9.93 ± 3.02
∆%—ES12.71–0.7015.17–0.451.85–0.06

Values presented in mean and standard deviation (M ± SD). Post_12: 12 weeks of functional training, post_20: 8 weeks of no training, and post_32: 12 weeks of traditional training. A vs. baseline, B vs. post_12, C vs. post_20, + vs. SG, vs. TT, and # vs. FT. SG: stretching group. w: weeks. Δ%: percent change. ES: effect size: small: 0.2; median: 0.5; large: 0.8; very large: >1.3.