Table of Contents
Journal of Astrophysics
Volume 2013, Article ID 590171, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/590171
Research Article

Field Independent Cosmic Evolution

1Department of Physics, University of Kalyani, Nadia 741235, India
2Department of Physics, Jangipur College, Murshidabad 742213, India

Received 26 April 2013; Accepted 3 September 2013

Academic Editors: M. Biesiada, K. Bolejko, G. Chincarini, M. S. Dimitrijevic, D. Mota, and E. Saridakis

Copyright © 2013 Nayem Sk and Abhik Kumar Sanyal. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: from F(R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models,” Physics Reports, vol. 505, no. 2–4, pp. 59–144, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Capozziello and M. de Laurentis, “Extended theories of gravity,” Physics Reports, vol. 509, no. 4-5, pp. 167–321, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. S. Stelle, “Renormalization of higher-derivative quantum gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 953–969, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. Biswas, E. Gerwick, T. Koivisto, and A. Mazumdar, “Towards singularity- and ghost-free theories of gravity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 108, no. 3, Article ID 031101, 4 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Biswas, T. Koivisto, and A. Mazumdar, “Nonlocal theories of gravity:the flat space propagator,” Proceedings of the Barcelona Postgrad Encounters on Fundamental Physics, 2013.
  6. S. Capozziello and G. Lambiase, “Selection rules in minisuper space quantum cosmology,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 673–696, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Capozziello, A. Stabile, and A. Troisi, “Spherically symmetric solutions in F(R) gravity via the Noether symmetry approach,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 24, no. 8, article 013, pp. 2153–2166, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Capozziello and A. De Felice, “F(R) cosmology by Noether's symmetry,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2008, 22 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. B. Vakili, “Noether symmetry in f(R) cosmology,” Physics Letters B, vol. 664, pp. 16–20, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  10. B. Vakili, “Noether symmetric f(R) quantum cosmology and its classical correlations,” Physics Letters B, vol. 669, no. 3-4, pp. 206–211, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. S. Capozziello, P. Martin-Moruno, and C. Rubano, “Dark energy and dust matter phases from an exact F (R)-cosmology model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 664, no. 1-2, pp. 12–15, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Capozziello, P. Martin-Moruno, and C. Rubano, “Exact f(R)-cosmological model coming from the request of the existence of a Noether symmetry,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1122, pp. 213–216, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  13. K. Sarkar, S. K. Nayem, S. Ruz, S. Debnath, and A. K. Sanyal, “Why Noether symmetry of F(R) theory yields three-half power law?” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1515–1531, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  14. K. Sarkar, S. K. Nayem, S. Debnath, and A. K. Sanyal, “Viability of Noether symmetry of F(R) theory of gravity,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1194–1213, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  15. I. Hussain, M. Jamil, and F. M. Mahomed, “Noether gauge symmetry approach in F(R) gravity,” Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 337, no. 1, pp. 373–377, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. Sk and A. K. Sanyal, “Revisiting Noether gauge symmetry for F(R) theory of gravity,” Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 342, pp. 549–555, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  17. M. Jamil, F. M. Mahomed, and D. Momeni, “Noether symmetry approach in F(R)-tachyon model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 702, no. 5, pp. 315–319, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Sen, “Space—like branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 0204, 23 pages, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  19. A. Sen, “Tachyon matter,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 0207, 14 pages, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  20. A. Sen, “Supersymmetric world volume action for nonBPS D-branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 9910, 16 pages, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  21. M. R. Garousi, “Tachyon couplings on non-BPS D-branes and dirac-born-infeld action,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 584, no. 1-2, pp. 284–299, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. R. Garousi, “On shell S matrix and tachyonic effective actions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 647, pp. 117–130, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  23. M. R. Garousi, “Slowly varying tachyon and tachyon potential,” Journal Of High Energy Physics, vol. 0305, 11 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. E. A. Bergshoeff, M. de Roo, T. C. de Wit, E. Eyras, and S. Panda, “T duality and actions for non BPS D-branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 0005, 10 pages, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  25. J. Kluson, “Proposal for non—BPS D—brane action,” Physical Review D, vol. 62, Article ID 126003, 7 pages, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  26. G. W. Gibbons, “Cosmological evolution of the rolling tachyon,” Physics Letters B, vol. 537, no. 1-2, pp. 1–4, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. A. Mazumdar, S. Panda, and A. Pérez-Lorenzana, “Assisted inflation via tachyon condensation,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 614, no. 1-2, pp. 101–116, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Fairbairn and M. H. G. Tytgat, “Inflation from a tachyon fluid?” Physics Letters B, vol. 546, no. 1-2, pp. 1–7, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Feinstein, “Power-law inflation from the rolling tachyon,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 6, Article ID 063511, 3 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. M. Sami, P. Chingangbam, and T. Qureshi, “Aspects of tachyonic inflation with an exponential potential,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 4, Article ID 043530, 5 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. Sami, “Implementing power law inflation with tachyon rolling on the brane,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 691–697, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Y. S. Piao, R. G. Cai, X. m. Zhang, and Y. Z. Zhang, “Assisted tachyonic inflation,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 12, Article ID 121301, 3 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. L. R. W. Abramo and F. Finelli, “Cosmological dynamics of the tachyon with an inverse power-law potential,” Physics Letters B, vol. 575, no. 3-4, pp. 165–171, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. D.-J. Liu and X.-Z. Li, “Cosmological perturbations and noncommutative tachyon inflation,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, no. 12, Article ID 123504, 10 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. G. M. Kremer and D. S. M. Alves, “Acceleration field of a universe modeled as a mixture of scalar and matter fields,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 2039–2051, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. D. A. Steer and F. Vernizzi, “Tachyon inflation: tests and comparison with single scalar field inflation,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, no. 4, Article ID 43527, 15 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. Campuzano, S. Del Campo, and R. Herrera, “Curvaton reheating in tachyonic inflationary models,” Physics Letters B, vol. 633, no. 2-3, pp. 149–154, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R. Herrera, S. Del Campo, and C. Campuzano, “Tachyon warm inflationary universe models,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, no. 10, article 009, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. H. Xiong and J. Zhu, “Tachyon field in loop quantum cosmology: inflation and evolution picture,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 8, Article ID 084023, 8 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. L. Balart, S. del Campo, R. Herrera, P. Labraña, and J. Saavedra, “Tachyonic open inflationary universes,” Physics Letters B, vol. 647, no. 5-6, pp. 313–319, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. L. Kofman and A. Linde, “Problems with tachyon inflation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2002, no. 7, article 4, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. T. Padmanabhan, “Accelerated expansion of the universe driven by tachyonic matter,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 2, Article ID 021301, 4 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. J. S. Bagla, H. K. Jassal, and T. Padmanabhan, “Cosmology with tachyon field as dark energy,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 6, Article ID 063504, 11 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. J. Hao and X. Li, “Reconstructing the equation of state of the tachyon,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 8, Article ID 087301, 4 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. L. R. W. Abramo and F. Finelli, “Cosmological dynamics of the tachyon with an inverse power-law potential,” Physics Letters B, vol. 575, no. 3-4, pp. 165–171, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. J. M. Aguirregabiria and R. Lazkoz, “A note on the structural stability of tachyonic inflation,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 927–930, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. Z. K. Guo and Y. Z. Zhang, “Cosmological scaling solutions of multiple tachyon fields with inverse square potentials,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2004, no. 8, article 10, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. E. J. Copeland, M. R. Garousi, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, “What is needed of a tachyon if it is to be the dark energy?” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 43003–43011, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. S. Del Campo, R. Herrera, and D. Pavon, “Soft coincidence in late acceleration,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 12, Article ID 123529, 11 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. A. Das, S. Gupta, T. D. Saini, and S. Kar, “Cosmology with decaying tachyon matter,” Physical Review D, vol. 72, no. 4, Article ID 043528, 6 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. G. Panotopoulos, “Cosmological constraints on a dark energy model with a non-linear scalar field,” http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0606249v2.
  52. J. Ren and X. Meng, “Tachyon field-inspired dark energy and supernovae constraints,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 2325–2335, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. V. H. Cardenas, “Tachyonic quintessential inflation,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 10, Article ID 103512, 5 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. S. K. Srivastava, “Tachyon as a dark energy source,” High Energy Physics, Article ID 040907, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  55. C. de Souza and G. M. Kremer, “Constraining non-minimally coupled tachyon fields by the Noether symmetry,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 26, no. 13, Article ID 135008, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. A. K. Sanyal, B. Modak, C. Rubano, and E. Piedipalumbo, “Noether symmetry in the higher order gravity theory,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 407–417, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. H.-J. Schmidt and D. Singleton, “Isotropic universe with almost scale-invariant fourth-order gravity,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 54, Article ID 062502, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. N. Sk and A. K. Sanyal, “Revisiting conserved currents in F(R) theory of gravity via Noether symmetry,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 30, no. 2, Article ID 020401, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. A. K. Sanyal and B. Modak, “Quantum cosmology with a curvature squared action,” Physical Review D, vol. 63, no. 6, Article ID 064021, 6 pages, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. A. K. Sanyal and B. Modak, “Quantum cosmology with R+R2 gravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 515–525, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. A. K. Sanyal, “Quantum mechanical probability interpretation in the mini-superspace model of higher order gravity theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 542, no. 1-2, pp. 147–159, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. A. K. Sanyal, “Quantum mechanical formulation of quantum cosmology for brane world effective action,” in Focus on Astrophysics Research, L. V. Ross, Ed., pp. 109–117, Nova Science Publishers, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  63. A. K. Sanyal, “Hamiltonian formulation of curvature squared action,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1957–1983, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. A. K. Sanyal, S. Debnath, and S. Ruz, “Canonical formulation of the curvature-squared action in the presence of a lapse function,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 29, no. 21, Article ID 215007, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. G. T. Horowitz, “Quantum cosmology with a positive-definite action,” Physical Review D, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1169–1177, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. E. Dyer and K. Hinterbichler, “Boundary terms, variational principles, and higher derivative modified gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, no. 2, Article ID 024028, 20 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. A. Bhadra, K. Sarkar, D. P. Datta, and K. K. Nandi, “Brans-dicke theory: jordan versus Einstein frame,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 367–375, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. S. Capozziello, P. Martin-Moruno, and C. Rubano, “Physical non-equivalence of the Jordan and Einstein frames,” Physics Letters B, vol. 689, no. 4-5, pp. 117–121, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. A. K. Sanyal, “Scalar-tensor theory of gravity carrying a conserved current,” Physics Letters B, vol. 624, no. 1-2, pp. 81–92, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. A. K. Sanyal, “Study of symmetry in F(R) theory of gravity,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 25, no. 31, pp. 2667–2676, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. A. K. Sanyal and B. Modak, “Is the Nöther symmetric approach consistent with the dynamical equation in non-minimal scalar-tensor theories?” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 18, no. 17, pp. 3767–3774, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. A. K. Sanyal, “Noether and some other dynamical symmetries in Kantowski-Sachs model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 524, no. 1-2, pp. 177–184, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. A. F. Zakharov, A. A. Nucita, F. De Paolis, and G. Ingrosso, “Solar system constraints on Rn gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 10, Article ID 107101, 4 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. A. F. Zakharov, S. Capozziello, F. De Paolis, G. Ingrosso, and A. A. Nucita, “The role of dark matter and dark energy in cosmological models: theoretical overview,” Space Science Reviews, vol. 148, no. 1–4, pp. 301–313, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. S. Capozziello, V. F. Cardone, and A. Troisi, “Gravitational lensing in fourth order gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 10, Article ID 104019, 10 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. T. Clifton and J. D. Barrow, “The power of general relativity,” Physical Review D, vol. 72, Article ID 103005, 21 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar