Research Article  Open Access
Extension of Cherenkov Light LDF Approximation for Yakutsk EAS Array
Abstract
The simulation of the Cherenkov light lateral distribution function (LDF) in extensive air showers (EAS) was performed using CORSIKA code for configuration of Yakutsk EAS array at high energy range for different primary particles (p, Fe, and O_{2}) and different zenith angles. Depending on BreitWigner function a parameterization of Cherenkov light LDF was reconstructed on the basis of this simulation as a function of primary energy. A comparison of the calculated Cherenkov light LDF with that measured on the Yakutsk EAS array gives the possibility of identification of the particle initiating the shower and determination of its energy in the knee region of the cosmic ray spectrum. The extrapolation of approximated Cherenkov light LDF for high energies was obtained for primary proton and iron nuclei.
1. Introduction
Study of the energy spectrum and mass composition of primary cosmic rays (PCRs) in the energy range 10^{13}–10^{17} eV is of a special interest in connection with observed index change of PCR spectrum close to PeV which is called the “knee” region [1, 2]. The Cherenkov light emitted in the atmosphere by relativistic electrons of cosmic rays (CRs) in EAS carries important information about the shower development and PCR particles. The Cherenkov light LDF depends on energy and type of the primary particle, observation level, height of the first interaction, and direction of shower axis [3]. The Monte Carlo method is one of the necessary tools of numerical simulation for investigation of EAS characteristics and experimental data processing and analysis (determination of the primary particle energy type and direction of shower axis from the characteristics of Cherenkov radiation of secondary charged particles).
Agnetta et al. [4] have discussed the simulation and the experimental setup with detailed information on the detection of Cherenkov light method in EAS. On the other side, Akchurin et al. [5] have presented detailed measurements of highenergy electromagnetic and hadronic shower profiles. The Cherenkov light LDF generated in the shower development process was measured for electrons in the energy range 8–200 GeV. The Cherenkov light profiles are discussed and compared with results of Monte Carlo simulations. Berezhnev et al. [6] have installed the Cherenkov light EAS array (Tunka133). This array permits a detailed study of cosmic ray energy spectrum and mass composition in the energy range 10^{16}–10^{18} eV with a uniform method. The analysis of LDF and time structure of EAS Cherenkov light allowed estimating the depth of the EAS maximum .
In the present work the simulation of Cherenkov light LDF for conditions and configurations of Yakutsk EAS array [7, 8] is performed with the CORSIKA code [9, 10] using two models for simulation of hadronic processes which are QGSJET [11] and GHEISHA [12] models and EGS4 code for the simulation of the EAS electromagnetic component and Cherenkov light radiation. The approximation of the results of numerical simulation of Cherenkov light density was performed on the bases on BreitWigner functions [13, 14], an approach to the description of the lateral distribution of EAS Cherenkov light, and analyzes the possibility of its application for the reconstruction of the events registered on the Yakutsk array. The main advantage of this approach is to reconstruct the events of Cherenkov radiation measured with Yakutsk array. The comparison of the approximated Cherenkov light LDF with the reconstructed EAS events registered with Yakutsk EAS Cherenkov array has shown a good opportunity of primary particle identification and definition of its energy around the knee region.
2. Simulation of Cherenkov Light LDF
The simulation of Cherenkov light LDF from EAS was performed using the CORSIKA (COsmic Ray SImulations for KAscade) software package [9, 10] within two models: QGSJET (Quark Gluon String model with JETs) code [11] to model interactions of hadrons with energies exceeding 80 GeV and GHEISHA (Gamma Hadron Electron Interaction SHower) code [12] for energies lower than 80 GeV. The CORSIKA code simulates the interactions and decays of various nuclei, hadrons, muons, electrons, and photons in the atmosphere. The particles are tracked through the atmosphere until they undergo reactions with an air nucleus or, in the case of unstable secondary particles, they decay [9]. The result of the simulations is detailed about the type, energy, momenta, location, and arrival time of the produced secondary particles at a given selected altitude above sea level.
The Yakutsk EAS array consists of 48 Cherenkov light detectors (500 m spacing between detectors); the observation level was assumed to be 100 m above sea level (1020 g/cm^{2}) and wavelength range from 300 to 600 nm [8].
3. Parameterization of Cherenkov Radiation Density in EAS
The Cherenkov LDF is a function to describe the lateral variation of Cherenkov flux with the core distance that is widely used in event reconstruction, aiming to obtain information about primary particles. Integration over the total range of core distance of LDF results in the shower size, that is, total number of particles. Estimating of core position and age parameter is also made by using the total number of Cherenkov photons radiated by electrons in EAS which is directly proportional to the primary energy [15]: where is the critical energy of electrons which equals 81.4 MeV. The experimental measurement of this magnitude is rather difficult, so one can use the density of Cherenkov radiation, the number of photons per unit detector area , which appears as a function of energy and distance from the shower axis [16]: where is the distance from the shower axis.
Direct measurements of Cherenkov light showed that the fluctuation of LDF in EAS is essentially less than the total number of photons [1]. For parameterization of simulated Cherenkov light LDF, we used the proposed function as a function of distance from shower axis, depth of shower maximum, and energy of the initial primary particle, which depends on four parameters , , , and : where is defined as where is the normalization constant [3] and , , , and are parameters of Cherenkov light LDF. The estimation of Cherenkov light density was performed in the energy range 10^{13}–10^{17} eV for different primary particles and different zenith angles. The energy dependence of LDF parameters is approximated as where , , , and are coefficients that depend on the type of primary particles and the zenith angle (see Tables 1 and 2).


The obtained Cherenkov light LDF in EAS due to various cosmic ray particles (p and Fe) below and in the region of the “knee” are presented in Figure 1. It demonstrates the results of the simulated (solid lines) and parameterized (dashed lines) Cherenkov light LDF for vertical showers for primary proton and iron nuclei, respectively, at different primary energies.
(a)
(b)
The accuracy of the Cherenkov light LDF approximation with that simulated for primary proton is better than 18% at the distances 10–150 m from the shower axis and about 5–15% for the other distances. The accuracy of iron nuclei was found close to 15% at the distances 10–150 m from the core shower and about 5–10% at the other distances.
4. Comparison of the Approximated LDF with Yakutsk Measurements
The Yakutsk EAS array studies cosmic rays of extremely high energies, that is, in the field of cosmic ray astrophysics, an active area at the cutting edge of basic research. The construction of Yakutsk array depends on two main goals; the first is the investigation of cascades of elementary particles in atmosphere initiated by primary particles and the other is the reconstruction of astrophysical properties of the primaries: intensity, energy spectrum, mass composition, and their origin [8]. The main parameters of EAS measurements are zenith and azimuth angles, shower core location, individual LDF, and the density of Cherenkov radiation . The possibility for reconstruction of the type of EAS primary particles can be demonstrated in Figures 2 and 3.
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
Figure 2(a) demonstrates the comparison of approximated Cherenkov light LDF (dash lines) with that measured with Yakutsk EAS array (symbols) for three primaries (p, O_{2}, and Fe) at the distance 100 to 400 m from the shower core.
In Figure 2(b), one may see reasonable agreement between the approximated Cherenkov light LDF (dash lines) and measurements in Yakutsk array (symbols) for primary proton and iron nuclei at the primary energy 5 PeV and zenith angle .
The extrapolation of Cherenkov light LDF parameterization for higher energies (>10^{16} eV) can be seen in Figure 3, where Figure 3(a) displays the comparison of the approximated Cherenkov light LDF that extrapolated to 20 PeV (dash lines) and that LDF measured with Yakutsk EAS array (symbols) for iron nuclei at two zenith angles and 30°. To illustrate more vividly the errors in approximation (3), the function in Figure 3(a) was multiplied by 0.8 for . Figure 3(b) shows the comparison of the approximated Cherenkov light LDF that extrapolated to 50 and 100 PeV (dash lines) and LDF measured with Yakutsk EAS array (symbols) for primary proton at vertical showers. The good agreement between the model parameters of extrapolated Cherenkov light LDF as a function of primary energy of different primaries with that measured with Yakutsk array shows that this model is adequate and is usable for different Cherenkov arrays.
The parameterized Cherenkov light LDF in Figures 2 and 3 slightly differs from the LDF measured with the Yakutsk EAS array; at the distance interval 100–400 m, the distinction is about 5–20% for primary proton, 3–11% for primary oxygen, and 5–13% for iron nuclei for vertical showers. For inclined showers, the distinction at the same distance interval is about 15–20% at for primary proton and about 8–20% at for primary proton and iron nuclei.
5. Conclusion
The lateral distribution function of Cherenkov radiation from particles of extensive air showers initiated by primary proton, iron nuclei, and oxygen has been simulated in the energy range 10^{13}–10^{17} eV using CORSIKA code. On the basis of this simulation with depending on BreitWigner function; sets of approximating functions were constructed for different primary particles and different zenith angles. The comparison of the approximated Cherenkov light lateral distribution functions with that measured with Yakutsk EAS array has demonstrated the ability of identification of the particle initiating EAS showers and determination of its energy around and above the knee region of the cosmic ray spectrum. The extrapolation of the Cherenkov light lateral distribution function parameterization of the obtained data with CORSIKA program for the energies is obtained. The main advantage of the given approach is the opportunity of creation of a representative library of lateral distribution function patterns for a short time which could be utilized for analysis of real events detected with EAS arrays and reconstruction of primary cosmic ray energy spectrum and mass composition.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
Y. AlDouri would like to acknowledge the University of Malaysia Perlis for Grant no. 900700111 and TWASItaly for the full support of his visit to JUSTJordan under TWASUNESCO Associateship.
References
 G. B. Khristiansen, Y. A. Fomin, N. N. Kalmykov et al., “The primary cosmic ray mass composition around the knee of the energy spectrum,” Nuclear Physics B: Proceedings Supplements, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 235–241, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Amenomori, Z. Cao, B. Z. Dai et al., “The cosmicray energy spectrum between 10^{14.5} and 10^{16.3} eV covering the knee region,” The Astrophysical Journa, vol. 461, pp. 453–460, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 A. A. AlRubaiee, O. A. Gress, K. S. Lokhtin, Y. V. Parfenov, and S. I. Sinegovskii, “Modeling and parameterization of the spatial distribution of Čerenkov light from extensive air showers,” Russian Physics Journal, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1004–1011, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Agnetta, P. Assis, B. Biondo et al., “Extensive air showers and diffused Cherenkov light detection: The ULTRA experiment,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 570, pp. 22–35, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Akchurin, K. Carrell, J. Hauptman et al., “Comparison of highenergy electromagnetic shower profiles measured with scintillation and Cherenkov light,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 548, no. 3, pp. 336–354, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. F. Berezhnev, D. Besson, N. M. Budnev et al., “The Tunka133 EAS Cherenkov light array: status of 2011,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 692, pp. 98–105, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Knurenko, V. Kolosov, Z. Petrov, I. Sleptsov, and S. Starostin, in Proceedings of the 28th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC '03), pp. 177–179, Tsukuba, Japan, 2003.
 A. A. Ivanov, S. P. Knurenko, and I. Y. Sleptsov, “Measuring extensive air showers with Cherenkov light detectors of the Yakutsk array: the energy spectrum of cosmic rays,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 11, Article ID 065008, 30 pages, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Heck and T. Peirog, Extensive Air Shower Simulations at the Highest Energies—A User's Guide, Institut fur Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Germany, 2013.
 J. Knapp, D. Heck, S. J. Sciutto, M. T. Dova, and M. Risse, “Extensive air shower simulations at the highest energies,” Astroparticle Physics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 77–99, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Ostapchenko, “QGSJETII: towards reliable description of very high energy hadronic interactions,” Nuclear Physics B: Proceedings Supplements, vol. 151, pp. 143–146, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Heck and R. Engel, in Proceedings of the 28th International Cosmic Ray Conference, pp. 279–282, Tsukuba, Japan, 2003.
 S. C. Mavrodiev, A. L. Mishev, and J. N. Stamenov, “A method for energy estimation and mass composition determination of primary cosmic rays at the Chacaltaya observation level based on the atmospheric Cherenkov light technique,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 530, no. 3, pp. 359–366, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Mishev, “Analysis of lateral distribution of atmospheric cherenkov light at high mountain altitude towards event reconstruction,” ISRN High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, Article ID 906358, 12 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Aliev, T. Alimov, M. Kakhkharov et al., in Proceedings of the 18th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC '83), vol. 2, pp. 383–386, Bangalore, India, 1983.
 A. Mishev, I. Angelov, E. Duverger, R. Gschwind, L. Makovicka, and J. Stamenov, “Experimental study and Monte Carlo modeling of the Cherenkov effect,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 474, no. 2, pp. 101–107, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 A. A. AlRubaiee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.