Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Advanced Transportation
Volume 2018, Article ID 2385936, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2385936
Research Article

Research on Taxi Driver Strategy Game Evolution with Carpooling Detour

School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Ruichun He; moc.361@namnart

Received 9 October 2017; Accepted 31 December 2017; Published 28 January 2018

Academic Editor: Giulio E. Cantarella

Copyright © 2018 Wei Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Zhang, T. He, Y. Liu, S. Lin, and J. A. Stankovic, “A carpooling recommendation system for taxicab services,” IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 254–266, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Javid, A. Nejat, and M. Salari, “The environmental impacts of carpooling in the United States,” in Proceedings of the Transportation, Land and Air Quality Conference, 2016.
  3. J. Jamal, A. E. Rizzoli, R. Montemanni, and D. Huber, “Tour planning and ride matching for an urban social carpooling service,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Transportation and Traffic Engineering (ICTTE '16), Switzerland, July 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. W. Shen, C. V. Lopes, and J. W. Crandall, “An online mechanism for ridesharing in autonomous mobility-on-demand systems,” in Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 475–481, New York, USA, 2016.
  5. S. Galland, L. Knapen, A.-U.-H. Yasar et al., “Multi-agent simulation of individual mobility behavior in carpooling,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 45, pp. 83–98, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. S.-K. Chou, M.-K. Jiau, and S.-C. Huang, “Stochastic set-based particle swarm optimization based on local exploration for solving the carpool service problem,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1771–1783, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. Aissat and A. Oulamara, “Dynamic ridesharing with intermediate locations,” in Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Vehicles and Transportation Systems (CIVTS '14), pp. 36–42, USA, December 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. Santi, G. Resta, M. Szell, S. Sobolevsky, S. H. Strogatz, and C. Ratti, “Quantifying the benefits of vehicle pooling with shareability networks,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. 37, pp. 13290–13294, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. Shinde and B. Thombre, “An effective approach for solving carpool service problems using genetic algorithm approach in cloud computing,” International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 29–33, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  10. W. He, K. Hwang, and D. Li, “Intelligent carpool routing for urban ridesharing by mining GPS trajectories,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 2286–2296, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Nourinejad and M. J. Roorda, “Agent based model for dynamic ridesharing,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 64, pp. 117–132, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S.-C. Huang, M.-K. Jiau, and C.-H. Lin, “A genetic-algorithm-based approach to solve carpool service problems in cloud computing,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 352–364, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Xia, K. M. Curtin, W. Li, and Y. Zhao, “A new model for a carpool matching service,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 6, Article ID e0129257, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S.-Y. Chiou and Y.-C. Chen, “A mobile, dynamic, and privacy-preserving matching system for car and taxi pools,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 579031, 10 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. M. Boukhater, O. Dakroub, F. Lahoud, M. Awad, and H. Artail, “An intelligent and fair GA carpooling scheduler as a social solution for greener transportation,” in Proceedings of the 2014 17th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON '14), pp. 182–186, Lebanon, April 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Q. Xiao, R.-C. He, W. Zhang, and C.-X. Ma, “Algorithm research of taxi carpooling based on fuzzy clustering and fuzzy recognition,” Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 119–125, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. Mallard, Bounded rationality and behavioral economics, Routledge Press, London, UK, 2015.
  18. P. van den Berg and F. J. Weissing, “Evolutionary Game Theory and Personality,” in Evolutionary Perspectives on Social Psychology, Evolutionary Psychology, pp. 451–463, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. M. S. Eid, I. H. El-Adaway, and K. T. Coatney, “Evolutionary stable strategy for postdisaster insurance: Game theory approach,” Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 31, no. 6, Article ID 04015005, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Wu, Y. Pei, and J. Gao, “Evolution game model of travel mode choice in metropolitan,” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 2015, Article ID 638972, 11 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. S. Gokhale and A. Traulsen, “Evolutionary multiplayer games,” Dynamic Games and Applications, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 468–488, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, “Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 297–323, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. Wang and T. Sun, “Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making method based on prospect theory,” in Proceedings of the Proceeding of the International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering (ICIII '08), vol. 1, pp. 288–291, Taipei, Taiwan, December 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. A. de Castro, A. . Barreto Teodoro, L. I. de Castro, and S. Parsons, “Expected utility or prospect theory: which better fits agent-based modeling of markets?” Journal of Computational Science, vol. 17, no. part 1, pp. 97–102, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. W. Zhang and R. C. He, “Dynamic route choice based on prospect theory,” in Proceedings of the, vol. 138, pp. 159–167.
  26. M. Abdellaoui, H. Bleichrodt, O. L’Haridon, and D. van Dolder, “Measuring loss aversion under ambiguity: a method to make prospect theory completely observable,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. A. Prashanth, J. Cheng, F. Michael, M. Steve, and S. Csaba, “Cumulative prospect theory meets reinforcement learning: prediction and control,” in Proceedings of the 33th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 2112–2121, New York, NY, USA, 2016.