Research Article

Before-and-After Field Investigation of the Effects on Pollutant Emissions of Replacing a Signal-Controlled Road Intersection with a Roundabout

Table 1

Summary of selected studies comparing vehicular emissions at intersections under different types of control (numbers in first column correspond to cited references) [4].

ReferenceMethod for estimation of emissionsPollutants consideredMain findings

[6, 7]Emission factors for observed speeds and accelerationsCO, Emissions for small RBT are lower than for SIG and slightly higher than for UNSIG.

[8]Instrumented vehicleCO, CO2, Results are dependent on local conditions and time of day; emissions tend to be generally lower for RBT than for SIG and higher for RBT than for UNSIG.

[9]aaSIDRA 2.0 softwareCO, CO2, HC, Emissions are reduced following conversion of stop-controlled intersections to RBTs.

[10]aaSIDRA 2.1 softwareCO, CO2, HC, Emissions of all considered pollutants are lower for RBT than for AWSC. They are also lower for RBT than for SIG, but only up to a threshold of total intersection demand volume.

[11]VISSIM softwareCO, , VOCConverting TWSC into RBT can reduce vehicle emissions under most traffic volume scenarios.

[12]INTEGRATION and VISSIM software; VT-Micro and CMEM emission modelsCO, CO2, HC, Emissions of all considered pollutants are higher for RBT than for SIG and TWSC.

[13]Paramics software; MOVES and CMEM emission modelsCO, Emissions of considered pollutants are higher for RBT than for SIG under both light and congested traffic conditions.

[14]Instrumented vehicleCO, CO2, HC, Emissions for RBT are often higher than for SIG and AWSC. Strong effect of driver behavior on emissions.

[15]INTEGRATION softwareCO, CO2, HC, Emissions of CO, HC, and are generally lower for RBT than for SIG and UNSIG; results for CO2 are dependent on overall demand and turning ratios.

[16]S-Paramics and AIRE software, PM10, Total CarbonEmissions for RBT are slightly lower than for SIG.

[17]Vehicle-specific power and observed speed trajectoriesCO, CO2, HC, Results of comparison of emissions for RBT and SIG depend on demand-to-capacity ratio and on quality of signal progression.

[18]VISSIM software; vehicle-specific power and EMEP-EEA emissions methodologiesCO, CO2, HC, , PMFor a sequence of intersections along an arterial, emissions are lower for RBT than for SIG and higher for RBT than for TWSC.

RBT: roundabout; SIG: signal-controlled intersection; UNSIG: unsignalized intersection; AWSC: all-way stop-controlled intersection; TWSC: two-way stop-controlled intersection; EMEP-EEA: European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme–European Environment Agency.