Defining Reserve Times for Metro Systems: An Analytical Approach

Table 7

Energy variations in the case of the 95th percentile.

[min]	NC				[kWh]	[kWh]	[kWh]	[kWh]	Reduction in energy consumption
5.5	14	0.0%	–	61	–	20.3	20.3	3,406.3	3.05%
5.5	14	34.0%	69	63	13.5	16.4	30.0	5,036.9	4.51%
5.5	14	100.0%	62	–	32.9	–	32.9	5,523.1	4.94%
6.0	13	0.0%	–	54	–	34.4	34.4	5,374.1	5.18%
6.0	13	42.7%	62	59	32.9	24.6	57.4	8,958.8	8.63%
6.0	13	100.0%	55	–	49.8	–	49.8	7,771.6	7.49%
7.0	11	0.0%	–	61	–	20.3	20.3	2,676.4	3.05%
7.0	11	34.0%	69	63	13.5	16.4	30.0	3,957.5	4.51%
7.0	11	100.0%	62	–	32.9	–	32.9	4,339.6	4.94%
8.0	10	0.0%	–	45	–	48.1	48.1	5,768.5	7.23%
8.0	10	46.5%	56	53	46.4	42.0	88.4	10,602.6	13.28%
8.0	10	100.0%	46	–	68.4		68.4	8,204.8	10.28%
9.0	9	0.0%	–	43	–	56.4	56.4	6,086.2	8.47%
9.0	9	47.2%	53	50	56.1	40.7	96.8	10,457.5	14.56%
9.0	9	100.0%	43	–	79.1	–	79.1	8,546.4	11.90%
10.0	8	0.0%	–	45	–	48.1	48.1	4,614.8	7.23%
10.0	8	46.5%	56	53	46.4	42.0	88.4	8,482.0	13.28%
10.0	8	100.0%	46	–.	68.4	–	68.4	6,563.8	10.28%
12.0	7	0.0%	–	37	–	67.6	67.6	5,202.5	10.16%
12.0	7	48.3%	47	45	69.2	48.1	117.2	9,026.7	17.62%
12.0	7	100.0%	38	–	96.4	–	96.4	7,421.4	14.49%
14.0	6	0.0%	–	37	–	67.6	67.6	4,459.3	10.16%
14.0	6	48.3%	47	45	69.2	48.1	117.2	7,737.2	17.62%
14.0	6	100.0%	38		96.4	–	96.4	6,361.2	14.49%
15.0	6	5.5%	62	30	32.9	90.1	123.0	7,379.2	18.49%
15.0	6	49.0%	39	38	80.3	70.7	150.9	9,056.9	22.69%
15.0	6	92.7%	31	59	108.0	24.6	132.5	7,952.5	19.92%