Research Article
EBOC: Ensemble-Based Ordinal Classification in Transportation
Table 5
The comparison of REPTree based ordinal and ensemble learning methods in terms of classification accuracy.
| Dataset | REPTree (%) | Ord.REPTree (%) | Ada.Ord. | Bag.Ord. | REPTree | REPTree | (%) | (%) |
| Auto MPG | 75.38 | 76.63 | 81.91 | 81.16 |
| Automobile | 63.41 | 66.83 | 83.90 | 72.20 |
| Bike Sharing | 84.96 | 85.27 | 88.75 | 88.12 |
| Car Evaluation | 87.67 | 90.91 | 98.67 | 93.63 |
| Car Sale Advertisements | 80.70 | 80.42 | 82.52 | 82.30 |
| NYS Air Passenger Traffic | 84.34 | 84.91 | 86.74 | 87.31 |
| Road Traffic Accidents (2017) | 84.66 | 85.02 | 80.07 | 84.57 |
| SF Air Traffic Landings Statistics | 98.04 | 98.10 | 99.12 | 98.57 |
| SF Air Traffic Passenger Statistics | 90.39 | 90.49 | 90.97 | 91.25 |
| Smart City Traffic Patterns | 84.66 | 85.06 | 85.33 | 86.38 |
| Statlog (Vehicle Silhouettes) | 72.34 | 69.62 | 77.54 | 73.17 |
| Traffic Volume Counts (2012-2013) | 80.57 | 88.75 | 86.39 | 89.37 |
| Average | 82.26 | 83.50 | 86.83 | 85.67 |
|
|