Research Article  Open Access
Yun Wang, Yu Zhou, Xuedong Yan, "Optimizing TrainSet Circulation Plan in HighSpeed Railway Networks Using Genetic Algorithm", Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 2019, Article ID 8526953, 12 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8526953
Optimizing TrainSet Circulation Plan in HighSpeed Railway Networks Using Genetic Algorithm
Abstract
As a sustainable transportation mode, highspeed railway (HSR) has been developing rapidly during the past decade in China. With the formation of dense HSR network, how to improve the utilization efficiency of trainsets (the carrying tools of HSR) has been a new research hotspot. Moreover, the emergence of railway transportation hubs has brought great challenges to the traditional trainsets’ utilization mode. Thus, in this paper, we address the issue of trainsets’ utilization problem with the consideration of railway transportation hubs, which consists of finding an optimal Trainset Circulation Plan (TCP) to complete trip tasks in a given Train Diagram (TD). An integer programming TCP model is established to optimize the trainset utilization scheme, aiming to obtain the onetoone correspondence relationship among sets of trainsets, trip tasks, and maintenances. A genetic algorithm (GA) is designed to solve the model. A case study based on Nanjing and Shanghai HSR transportation hubs is made to demonstrate the practical significance of the proposed method. The results show that a more efficient TCP can be formulated by introducing trainsets being dispatched among different stations in the same hub.
1. Introduction
During the past decade, great developments have been achieved in the highspeed railway (HSR) in China. Being acknowledged as high efficiency, high capacity, and low energy, HSR has been one of the most influential travel modes [1, 2]. As the main carrier of HSR, trainsets play a vital role in the operation and management of HSR, and the trainsets should be utilized under complicated maintenance and inspection regulation. Due to the high cost of acquisition, trainsets are a longterm capital investment for railway operator which cannot be changed frequently [3]. Therefore, the efficiency of trainset utilization is one main objective in railway operation. When a Train Diagram (TD) is drawn up, trainsets are dispatched to complete the trip tasks in the given TD. To guide the trainsets’ application, a Trainset Circulation Plan (TCP) should be formulated, which determines the onetoone correspondence relationships between trip tasks and trainsets as well as the connection relationships between trip tasks and maintenances. Once a TCP is drawn up, the amount of needed trainsets can be obtained. Thus, the TCP is a vital factor influencing the trainsets’ utilization efficiency, which also has a great impact on operating costs of HSR. Besides, complex HSR networks have been gradually formed in China. On the one hand, a huge number of HSR stations have been, which means that the distances between stations have been shortened. On the other hand, many cities, especially metropolis, have built or planned to build more than one HSR stations. Generally, cities with several stations can be treated as railway transportation hubs, and these stations are usually connected by connection rails. With the emergence of railway transportation hubs, the traditional trainsets’ utilization mode (i.e., for a set of trip tasks undertaking by a trainset, the departure station of the latter trip should be the same with the arriving station of former trip) will greatly reduce the trainsets’ utilization efficiency, which has been detail demonstrated in Section 3.1.
Thus, this paper addresses the issues of the TCP problem with the consideration of railway transportation hubs and maintenance requirements, which is one of the most significant aspects in the railway operation and management studies. Roughly speaking, it consists of finding the optimal assignment of trainsets so as to complete a set of trip tasks in the given TD with higher utilization efficiency, i.e., with less number of trainsets, and considering the maintenance requirements. The contribution of this study lies in the following aspects.
Firstly, an innovative trainset utilization mode is put forward to improve the trainsets’ utilization efficiency. In previous studies, trainsets can only undertake two adjacent trips when the departure station of the latter trip is the same with the arriving station of the former trip. In this case, when the time interval between the connected two trip tasks is long, trainsets must wait at the station for undertaking the next trip. Obviously, it will cause huge waste of the trainset capacity. In this paper, we propose an innovative trainset utilization mode that trainsets can be dispatched among different stations in the same railway transportation hub. Thus, a trainset can be dispatched to other stations to undertake trip tasks, instead of waiting a long time at its arriving station for the next trip task. Clearly, by relieving the constraint that the departure station of latter trip must be the same with the arriving station of the former trip, the flexibility and the efficiency of trainset utilization can be significantly enhanced. This utilization mode turns out to be more suitable to be applied in the dense HSR network.
Secondly, an integer programming TCP model is proposed to optimize the trainset utilization scheme with the consideration of maintenance requirements. Accumulated variables have been introduced to represent the running distance and running time of trainsets. The model aims to obtain an optimal TCP that determines the onetoone correspondence relationship among sets of trainsets, trip tasks, and maintenances. Thus, the dispatcher can determine each trip should be undertaken by which trainset, the sequence of the trips undertaking by the same trainset, and when and where each trainset should be maintained. The objective of the model is set to simultaneously minimize the number of using trainsets and the total maintenances costs.
Thirdly, a genetic algorithm (GA) is designed to solve the TCP optimization model. We use an innovative representation method to formulate the relationship between maintenance arcs and normal connection arcs. Furthermore, effective crossover and mutation processes have been designed. The TCP problem has been proved to be a traditional NPhard problem, which cannot be solved efficiently or directly by readymade software, especially in largescale cases. Thus, in the process of model solution, the GA is applied to search for a nearoptimal TCP. The results show that the proposed GA for TCP problem has obvious advantages over ant colony algorithm (ACA) and simulated annealing (SA) in the solution quality, and good performance can be found in both computational efficiency and stability.
Finally, a case study based on Nanjing and Shanghai HSR transportation hubs is carried out to demonstrate the practical significance of the proposed method. The results show that, by introducing trainsets being dispatched among different stations in the same hub, a more efficient TCP can be formulated compared with traditional utilization mode. To complete the same trip tasks, both the number of needing trainsets and the maintenance times can be reduced. Thus, such a mode is a feasible method to utilize trainsets with lower costs and high efficiency.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 reviews relevant studies in the literature. Section 3 develops a modeling framework for obtaining an optimal TCP, including problem description, basic assumption, and model formulation. Section 4 introduces the solution approach. In Section 5, a case study based on Nanjing and Shanghai HSR transportation hubs is performed to illustrate the model application. Finally, Section 6 provides conclusions.
2. Literature Review
The rolling stock planning (RSP) problem is one of the most significant aspects in the application and assignment problem of transportation vehicles. How to improve the utilization efficiency of transportation vehicles has always been the research hotspot in transportation management, including not only RSP in railway management, but also Aircraft Routing Problem (ARP) in the airline operation, Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) in the logistics filed, and so on. Specifically, extensive research on RSP problem has been carried out worldwide, leading to the development of various rolling stock utilization models and techniques. Interested readers can refer to Cacchiani et al. [4], who reviewed the main concepts and methods about railway (re)scheduling problem, especially about RSP problem, and summarized different models and algorithms for solving this problem.
Two main categories of RSP problem have been studied during different development stages of passenger railways. Before the emergence of HSR, the transportation vehicles used in the railways are carriages and locomotives. The former is a kind of vehicle without traction engines, which can be coupled individually and independently to a convoy. The latter is a necessary part of trains which can provide traction power and pull the convoy [3, 5]. Thus, most of previous research focused on the utilization planning of both locomotives and carriages. Ziarati et al. [6] solved the locomotive problem by using the method of modern branchandcut integer programming algorithms, and computational experiments were conducted using the actual data from the Canadian National Railway Company. Cordeau et al. formulated an integer programming model presenting the simultaneous assignment problem of locomotives and carriages and solved it by Benders decomposition [7]. An extend model was proposed by Cordeau et al. [8] with the consideration of reallife conditions, such as maintenance, and a heuristic branchandbound approach based on column generation was designed to solve the mode. Ahuja et al. [9] proposed a mixed integer programming model to guide the locomotive utilization and solved the model by CPLEX. But, the realtime changes were not taken into consideration and the execution time was long exceeding 10 hours. Vaidyanathan, Ahuja, and Orlin [10] modified the model considering refueling and maintenance and improved the solving computational efficiency by using an aggregation and disaggregation technique. Most of above studies defined the locomotive utilization problem as a largescale integer programming problem and model the problem based on a multicommodity flow formulation [6].
Then, with the rapid development of HSR, matched railway vehicles named trainsets have been introduced. Different from above traditional railway vehicles, the trainset is a kind of selfcontained trains with an engine and passenger seats, which means selfpropelled train units that are not required to be pulled by a locomotive. These units consist of a fixed number of carriages and have their own traction engines [5]. As a new and important branch of RSP problem, the topic of TCP problem has been receiving increasing attention. There are a few references considering the utilization of trainsets. Schrijver [11] firstly paid attention to the TCP problem. He proposed a mathematical model for a singleday workload based on integer linear programming (ILP), aiming to minimize the number of trainsets used, and solved the model by the software CPLEX. Different utilization modes of trainsets were discussed by Zhao et al. [12] and they found that the utilization efficiency of trainsets could be significantly improved when trainsets operated in unrestrained sections. Abbink et al. [13] explored the TCP problem in the peak period. He presented an ILP formulation with the objective of minimizing the number of shortage seats during the rush hours, and using CPLEX to obtain the solution. Yang et al. [14] built a trainset connection network model aiming to maximize the trainset utilization efficiency, and designed a genetic algorithm to solve the model. BenKhedher et al. [15] formulated a mathematical model considering a unique type of trainsets with the objective of maximizing the company’s profit and solved it by techniques of stochastic optimization, branchandbound and column generation. Alfieri et al. [16] addressed the TCP problem on a single train line and a single day for the case of multiple trainset types. They proposed an ILP model aiming to minimize the number of units and the carriagekilometers, and solved the problem by decomposing it into subproblems. Fioole et al. [17] put forward a mixed integer programming model based on widely absorbing previous research achievements, which can be seen as an extended version of the model proposed by Schrijver [11]. Several methods were applied to improve the continuous relaxation of the model, and the improved branchandbound algorithm was designed to obtain the optimization solution. Maróti and Kroon [18] proposed an integer programming model with the consideration of maintenance constraint, and they designed a heuristic algorithm to solve the model and obtain a feasible solution. Wang et al. [19] used the big M method to formulate the accumulated trainsets’ running distances and running time, which is the most intractable part in the trainset utilization problem. To improve the model’s solvability, a strategy is proposed to reduce the scale of the connection network.
To ensure the operation safety of trainsets, maintenances should be carried out as long as a trainset has been utilized for certain time periods or accumulated running distances. Extensive research has focused on the rolling stock problem considering maintenance constraints. Maróti G and Kroon L are the pioneers in exploring the maintenance routing problem in railway management. A transition model was put forward [20] in order to formulate the maintenance constraint. Following the transition model, an improved [18] interchange model was proposed in 2007, and the numerical experiments proved that this approach is efficient when dealing with smallsize and medium size problem. Hong et al. [21] presented a twophased trainset routing algorithm to cover a weekly train timetable with minimal number trainsets. The maintenance requirements were firstly relaxed to obtain minimum cost routs by solving the polynomial relaxation, then, maintenancefeasible routes were generated from the crossovers of the minimum cost routes. Nishi et al. [22] formulated the rolling stock planning problem based on the setpartition problem with regular inspection constraints. Due to the characteristic of the formulation, a column generation based approached was put forward, and a number of experiments was carried out to verified the efficiency of this approach. It could be say that maintenance constraints are the vital requirements in rolling stock routing problem; a good circulation plan should lower the maintenance costs of the rolling stocks.
Another important issue which should be addressed in the trainset utilization procedure is how to estimate the time for two consecutive trips in terminal stations. In the operational stage, possible delays or fluctuations, which can occur during operations, will influence the connection between two trips. So compensating possible delays with the planned timetable is of great importance. Many scholars put forward approaches to estimate time rates involved in the preparation phase between two successive trips. D’Acierno et al. [23] proposed a method to estimate dwell time crowding level at platforms and related interaction between passengers and the rail service in terms of user behavior when a train arrives. Li et al. [24] put forward a dwell time estimation model in a generic condition and they coined a new predictor called “dwell time at the associated station” to evaluate the performance. Other factors also have great impact on the dwell time: gaps between the train and platform [25], interior layout of the carriages [26], and fare collection method [27]. Apart from dwell time, reverse time is another time rate which influences the procedure between two consecutive trips. D’ Acierno et al. [28] provided an analytical approach for determining the reverse time, which exploits layover times for energysaving purposes.
Recently, more and more scholars have shifted their attentions to the combination optimization of trainset utilization problem with other problems related to railway management. They argued that the trainset utilization problem should be simultaneously optimized with service demand prediction problem, timetabling problem, crew scheduling problem, etc. Wang et al. [29] studied the integration of rolling stock circulation problem under the timevarying passenger demands for a rail transit line. Some practical issues were incorporated: capacity of trains, number of available rolling stocks, and the entering/exiting depot operations. Three designed solution approach were implemented to cope with the multiobjective mixed integer nonlinear programming problem. Zhou and Teng [30] focused on simultaneous optimization of the passenger train routing and timetabling problem. The Lagrangian relaxation decomposition was applied to solve the complex model. In order to accelerate the solving process, a heuristic algorithm based framework was also introduced. The final experiments results demonstrate that the proposed approach has better performances in terms of minimizing both train travel time and computational times. Canca and Barrena [31] investigated the rolling stock plan by simultaneously considering the number and the location of depot facilities. A sequential solving approach was designed according to the problem structure. The test results showed the feasibility of proposed approach. These abovementioned literatures revealed a new trend in the field of rolling stock utilization problem. It is really practical and useful to enhance the efficiency in railway management.
Although a comprehensive body of literature on RSP is available, there still exist limitations and gaps in the aspect of TCP problem. Firstly, most of existing researches on TCP are suitable for the trainset utilization in Europe, which is quite different from that in China. In Europe, scholars exploring the TCP problem mainly focused on trainsets’ coupling and uncoupling so as to form trains to carry out trip tasks in a given TD. They sought to minimize the seat shortages as well as the empty train movements. But, in China, trainsets are fixed composition containing 8 trainsets or 16 trainsets, which are utilized as a whole. Thus, there is no need to consider the problem of trainsets’ coupling and uncoupling in China. Secondly, the approach proposed in previous studies cannot be applied directly in this paper while the trainset utilization modes are quite different. Most scenarios of existing research on TCP are set under the condition that trainsets’ departure station of the next trip should be the same with the arrive station of the former trip, while no studies are available for the utilization mode that trainsets can be dispatched among different stations in the same railway transportation hub. The former can obtain a feasible TCP only when the HSR network has not been formed and the distances between railway stations are a bit long. But, in China, a complex HSR network has been formed and the distribution density of railway stations is quite high, while there could be several railway stations in some metropolis. As thus, this study makes a new attempt about the issue on TCP.
3. Modeling Framework
3.1. Problem Description
Figure 1 gives the outline of TCP design process, which includes information preparation, model formulation, model solution, and results. In the first stage, some basic information should be prepared, including the TD, the rules, and regulation of maintenance and station operation. In the second stage, a mathematical model should be developed based on integer programming (IP), mixed integer programming (MIP), travelling salesman problem (TSP), or other techniques. A specific optimization goal should be met and some constraints should be considered to find an optimal TCP. Generally, fewer trainsets, lower maintenance costs, or balance of trainset utilization are always chosen as the objective function, aiming to enhance the trainset utilization efficiency as well as reduce operational costs of HSR. As the TCP is designed to complete trip tasks in the given TD by utilizing limited trainsets, the obtained plan should satisfy some basic constraints, including diagram constraint, station constraint, passenger demand constraint, maintenance constraint, etc. In the third stage, when the TCP problem has been modeled, corresponding solution approaches need to be designed to solve the model according to the properties of the model. Based on previous research, there are mainly three kinds of solution methods, namely, solved by software directly, adopting mathematic technique, and designing heuristic algorithm. In the final stage, an optimized TCP can be obtained.
As previously mentioned, the expanded of HSR network and the construction of HSR transportation hubs have caused enormous complexity of trainset application, leading to a challenge for developing the optimal solution of algorithms. Compared with the traditional utilization mode that trainsets can only departure from stations they arrive, the trainset utilization efficiency can be considerably improved by introducing dispatching trainsets among different stations in the same transportation hub. Figure 2 illustrates a simple example. As shown, there are two transportation hubs, i.e., Transportation Hub M and N, which, respectively, include three and two HSR stations. Stations in the same hub are connected by connection railway lines, allowing trainsets to operate among these stations.
In the example, it is assumed that there are three trips needing to be undertaken, the basic information of which is as listed in Table 1. To complete the trip task , a trainset should departure from Station D at 12:00 and will arrive at Station A at 15:00. To complete the trip task , another trainset should departure from Station D at 15:00 and will arrive at Station B at 19:00. For different trainset utilization modes, different trainset dispatch scheme can be obtained to complete the trip task . When trainsets cannot be dispatched between different stations in the same hub, to undertake two adjacent trips, the departure station of the latter trip should be the same with the arrival station of the former trip. Thus, for the traditional utilization mode, the trainset arriving at Station A at 15:00 needs to wait for nearly five hours at Station A to undertake its next trip task . When introducing trainsets being dispatched between different stations in the same hub, the trainset arriving at Station B at 19:00 can be firstly dispatched to Station A and then departure from Station A at 20:00 to complete the trip task . That is to say, the trainset arriving at Station A at 15:00 will not need to wait for nearly five hours, which releases its ability to undertake other trip tasks in the hub. Obviously, the flexibility of trainset utilization has been significantly enhanced, as well as the utilization efficiency.

3.2. Basic Assumption
Several assumptions are made throughout the paper for simplicity of the model and are explained as follows:
Assumption 1. The TD of HSR are drawn up in pairs, which means that the number of arrival trains is equal to the number of departure trains in each station.
Assumption 2. We assume that only one type of trainset is taken into consideration.
Assumption 3. In practical operation, five levels of trainset maintenance standard are set to ensure the transportation safety according to trainsets’ accumulated travelling time and distances. But, in this paper, only maintenance of Level One is taken into consideration. It is because of that, the TCP is usually drawn up by treating one day or several days as a cycle, which is much shorter than the travelling time standard of maintenance of Level Two (a week) to Level Five (several years). Moreover, when trainsets’ accumulated travelling time and distances reach to the standard of maintenance of Level Two or above, a specific trainset maintenance plan will be formulated.
Assumption 4. We only consider a daily operation timetable; it means that means that the train timetable is the same every day.
Assumption 5. The time for passengers alighting and boarding at stations is determined.
3.3. Model Formulation
The following symbols are used in this paper:(i) represents the set of railway stations, , where is the total number of stations;(ii) represents the name of station ;(iii) represents the set of trainsets, , where is the total number of trainsets;(iv) is a binary variable identifying whether station is near the Repair and Inspection Depot () or not;(v) represents the running time from station to RID;(vi) represents the running time from station to station ;(vii) represents the minimum time for preparation work in station ;(viii) represents the accumulated travelling distances of trainset ;(ix) represents the accumulated travelling time of trainset ;(x) represents the travelling distance standard of Level One maintenance;(xi) represents the travelling time standard of Level One maintenance;(xii) represents the time needed for maintenance;(xiii) represents the fluctuation coefficient of maintenance standard.
3.3.1. TrainSet Utilization Network
The optimization model is based on a weighted directed graph . The node, arc, and weight are defined as follows.
Node. denotes the set of all trips in the given TD. Let represent a certain trip, which contains 9 attributes, including trip number , departure station , arrival station , departure transportation hub , arrival transportation hub , departure time , arrival time , running distance , and running time .
Arc. denotes the set of all arcs in the trainset utilization network, which also means the connection relationships between nodes. Specifically, let represent the arc from node to node . Variable denotes the weight of arc , which can be calculated by
Decision Variable. To draw up a TCP, the planners need to solve the following three problems: the connection relationship between trips, when the trainsets should be overhauled, and each trip should be undertaken by which trainset. Thus, three decision variables are defined here to obtain a TCP with a given TD. is a binary variable that represents the connection relationship between trip and trip . When trip is connected to trip , the value of is equal to one, otherwise zero. is a binary variable representing whether the trainset should be overhauled. Only when the trainset is overhauled after completing the task of trip and undertakes the task of trip after completing maintenance, the value of is equal to one, otherwise zero. is also a binary variable that represents the onetoone corresponding relationship between trainsets and trips. When the trainset undertakes trip , the value of is equal to one, otherwise zero.
3.3.2. Objective Function
When a TD is given, lots of different TCPs can be formulated to complete all the trip tasks. To obtain an optimal TCP, an objective needs to be proposed to improve the trainset utilization efficiency as much as possible on the premise of satisfying constraints. For a TCP, the number of needing trainsets is a crucial indicator to measure the quality of the plan. Planners always seek to complete the same number of trip tasks in the given TD with less trainsets. Moreover, the number of maintenance is also an important factor influencing the trainset utilization efficiency. When trainsets are overhauled, lots of time is spent on trainsets running between railway stations and inspection and repair depots, which will reduce the effective working time of trainsets. Thus, in this paper, both the number of using trainsets and the total number of maintenances are considered into the objective function. To deal with different situations in practical operation and expand the model’s scope of application, variables σ_{1} and σ_{2} are introduced as weight values to the number of using trainsets and the number of maintenances, respectively. Moreover, the sum of σ_{1} and σ_{2} is equal to one.
3.3.3. Constraints
Spatial Constraints. In the previous studies related to trainset utilization problem, the spatial constraints mean that the arriving station of the former trip should be the same with the departure station of the latter trip. It means that when trainsets complete a trip task, they have to stay at the station waiting for the next trip task. It is possible that trainsets need to wait for a long time. For example, in the offpeak hour, the time interval between the departure time of the latter trip and the arriving time of the former trip may be long due to the low frequency of train services. Thus, in this paper, we proposed a novel utilization mode that trips in the same transportation hub can be connected. It means that after completing a trip task, the trainset can be dispatched to undertake a new trip task departing from another station in the same hub. Obviously, there are two requirements for dispatching trainsets to another station in the same hub: firstly, there should be connection rail lines between these two stations; and secondly, the time interval between departure time of the latter trip and the arriving time of the former trip should satisfy corresponding requirements. Equation (3) means the spatial constraints, restraining that the departure transportation hub of the latter trip should be the same with the arrival transportation hub of the former trip .
Uniqueness Constraints. In this paper, the uniqueness constraints include two aspects: firstly, as shown in (4), each trip in the given TD must be undertaken by a trainset, and only one trainset can be allocated to complete the task; secondly, to avoid trainsets being idle after completing a trip task as well as formulate utilization circulation, (5) and (6) restrain that there must be one and only one trip task being assigned to trainsets; i.e., another trip must be connected with the former trip task.
Maintenance Constraints. To ensure the safe operation, trainsets must be strictly complied with the maintenance rules and standards. As previously mentioned, only the maintenance of Level One needs to be considered in this paper, which requires trainsets to be overhauled when their accumulated travelling time and distance reach up to 48 hours or 4,000 km. Additionally, in practical applications, a minor fluctuation compared with the standards are allowable. Equations (7) and (8) restrict that trainsets’ accumulated travelling time, , and distances, , must be smaller than the maintenance standard in the fluctuation range, where and , respectively, represent travelling distance and time standards of Level One maintenance and represents the fluctuation coefficient.
Basic Working Time Constraints. When a trainset arrives at the station after completing a trip task, some preparation works need to be carried out before departing for the next trip, such as the alighting and boarding of passengers, carriage cleaning, waste drainage, water and food supply, crew member change, shunting (if the next trip would departure from a different track), and so on [32]. As a crucial factor influencing the preparation time, the passenger flow should be considered when calculating the preparation time, especially when the flow is huge or operation fluctuation occur [33, 34]. But, due to the aim of this paper is to propose a novel utilization mode of TCP problem, we assume that the corresponding time for passenger alighting and boarding is determined and the fluctuation in the daily operation is not taken into consideration for simplification. In order to keep trainsets in good conditions and provide better services, the minimum preparation time should be guaranteed according to the official guidance. Thus, the time difference between the arrival time of the former trip and the departure time of the latter trip should be longer than the requirement of the minimal necessary working procedure duration (including the consideration time for passengers boarding and alighting), which is as shown in (9). Similarly, as shown in (10), when a maintenance needs to be conducted between two adjacent trip tasks, the time difference between the arrive time of the former trip and the departure time of the latter trip should be longer than the time duration for maintenance, including maintenance time and running time between stations and the Repair and Inspection Depot (RID).
4. Solution Approach
The TCP problem is a traditional NPhard problem. Due to the advantages over obtaining a feasible solution within a reasonable amount of time, intelligent algorithms are always used to solve this problem. Genetic algorithm (GA) has been proved that it can efficiently and effectively solve a variety of realworld issues, e.g., train timetabling problems, timetable rescheduling problems, and network design optimization problems. Thus, in this paper, a GA is designed to search for an optimal TCP. In general, the procedure of GA can be described as follows.
(i) Coding and Initialization. For TCP problem, the results should clearly point out the utilization details of each trainset, including the trips it should undertake, the order of these undertaking trips, and the maintenance information. Thus, in this paper, the encoding style of the GA chromosome should represent the above information. As shown in Figure 3, represents the trips the stainset should undertake, and the subscript denotes the order of these trips. A binary variable is introduced to the maintenance information. When the trainsets are overhauled after completing a trip, the number 1 should be inserted before the next trip. Otherwise, the number 0 should be inserted between two trips. It means that the number 0 denotes that the connection between two adjacent trips is a normal trip connection, while the number 1 denotes the maintenance connection.
Generally, the initial population is generated randomly, allowing the entire range of possible solutions.
(ii) Reproduction. Reproduction is a process in which individual strings are copied according to the fitness function value, which can represent a measure of the utility or goodness related to what we want to minimize. Copying chromosomes according to the fitness function value means that chromosomes with a high value, indicating a higher probability of contribution to one or more offspring in the next generation. In this paper, the fitness function is as shown in (12), where represents the total connection time. When the connection time is high, the fitness function value of the solution will be small, which means that the probability of reproducing the chromosomes is very low.
(iii) Crossover. The members reproduced in the new mating pool are mated randomly and afterward each pair of chromosomes undergoes a crosschange. In order to do this, an integer position (cut point) is selected uniformly at random in the chromosome between the first gene and the last gene. Two new chromosomes are created swapping all genes (with the corresponding allelic values) between the selected position and the end of the gene.
In this paper, the crossover process can be demonstrated as Figure 4. Firstly, randomly select a trip and two parents P1 and P2. Secondly, find the position of in the two parents, and let and represent the positions in P1 and P2, respectively. Thirdly, calculate the connection costs between trip and its next trip in P1 and P2, and, respectively, describe as and . Then, add the trip with smaller connection cost into the offspring. For example, when is smaller than , the trip after in the offspring should be the trip in the position of . Finally, delete trip from parents, and repeat above procedure with the new added trip in the offspring until the new offspring is fully generated.
(iv) Mutation. An irrecoverable loss of potentially useful information may occasionally occur in the process of reproduction and crossover. Moreover, in the process of iteration, there may be a high probability of finding a false peak. Therefore, the mutation should be conducted randomly to protect the useful information and guarantees the possibility of exploring the whole search space independently. Figure 5 shows the mutation process. Firstly, randomly choose a trip, , from the parent. Secondly, calculate the connection costs between trip with those trips with the departure station , but trip should not been included. Then, find the trip whose connection cost with trip is lowest, and swap the position of trip with trip . Finally, a new solution has been generated.
(v) Termination. The process should be terminated when the difference between the best solutions in two generations is less than a given parameter or a maximum number of iterations are reached.
The processes of crossover and mutation are two important operations in GA, which decide the quality of solutions.
5. Case Study
5.1. Basic Information
To evaluate the proposed model and algorithm, we used the HSR between Shanghai transportation hub and Nanjing transportation hub as a case study. Figure 6 illustrates the topological structure of the case study. As shown, there are two HSR lines between the two hubs, namely, HuNing HSR and JingHu HSR, the lengths of which are 301 kilometers and 295 kilometers, respectively. There are totally four railway stations in the two hubs, including Shanghai Station, Hongqiao Station, Nanjing Station, Nanjing, and South Station. All the four stations are near RID. Moreover, connection railway lines are built between Nanjing Station and Nanjing South Station as well as between Shanghai Station and Hongqiao Station. The trainsets of CRH380 series are utilized to complete the trip tasks. The number of trip tasks is listed in Table 2.

The parameters related to the TCP are set as follows:(i)Minimum time for preparation work in station minutes.(ii)Travelling distance standard of Level One maintenance: kilometers.(iii)Travelling time standard of Level One maintenance: days.(iv)Fluctuation coefficient: .(v)Running time from station , to station by the connection rail: the values of are listed in Table 3.(vi)Basic coefficients for GA: the population size is set as 80; the probability of crossover is set as 0.6; the probability of mutation is set as 0.01; and the maximum iteration times is set as 50.

5.2. Results
Based on the above information, we tested our proposed model and algorithm in the PC (WIN7, Intel Core i74779, 3.40GHz, and 16GRAM). Comparison experiments were conducted to evaluate whether introducing dispatching trainsets between different stations in the same hub can improve the trainset utilization efficiency. We tested 20 times for both conditions, and the best computational results are listed in Table 4.
 
The number in parentheses represents the average value for 20 times. 
From Table 4, it clearly shows that when trainsets can be dispatched between different stations in the same hub, the number of needing trainsets can be reduced. Particularly, to fulfill the same trip tasks, the best computational results show that 2 trainsets can be saved. Moreover, the times of maintenance can be also reduced on average. The utilization efficiency of trainsets is an important indicator measuring the quality of TCP. In this paper, a variable is introduced to quantitatively describe the trainset utilization efficiency. The value of can be calculated by (13), where denotes the total running time of all trips, is equal to 1440 minutes representing one day, is the maintenance time of railway lines in the midnight, usually being 240 minutes, and denotes the number of trainsets. The computational results reveal that, compared with traditional utilization mode, the mode allowing trainsets being dispatched between different stations in the same hub can formulate a more efficient TCP. The average trainset utilization efficiency of our proposed utilization mode is 45.1%, which is 5.5% higher than that of traditional utilization mode.
5.3. Convergence Test
To further illustrate the efficiency of the proposed approach, a convergence test of objective values is conducted. To reach the best found solution for the objective function, 30 iterations were performed. As shown in Figure 7, the objective values stop changing after 23 iterations. The results indicate that the algorithm can converge to a steady state within the given maximal iterations.
5.4. Comparison of Different Algorithms
In order to highlight the performance of this paper in improving the trainset utilization efficiency, we compared our algorithm with ACA [35] and SA [36], and detail comparison results are as listed in Table 5. Three important findings can be concluded.(1)GA can obtain a better TCP than ACA and SA. After 30 times computations, 25.3 trainsets are needed on average to finish the tasks, which are less than the results of ACA (28.8) and SA (30.1). The average trainset utilization efficiency by GA is much higher than that of ACA and SA, which means that the TCP obtained by GA can save more costs and serve more passengers with the same amount trainsets.(2)The computational time of GA is about 8 seconds, which is similar to SA (8 seconds) but longer than ACA (4 seconds). The reason is that the operations of crossover and mutation are timeconsuming.(3)Figure 8 demonstrates the convergence curves the three algorithms. The results reveal that ACA has the fastest convergence speed, followed by GA and finally SA. Moreover, the curves of GA and ACA are smooth, while the SA is fluctuating.

Based on the above analyses, it can be found that the GA for TCP has obvious advantages in the solution quality, and its computational efficiency and stability also have good performances. Thus, it can be said that the method proposed in this paper is a new way to utilizing trainsets with lower costs and high efficiency.
6. Conclusions
With the rapid development of HSR in China, the TCP problem, as a fundamental and vital part of railway management, has been receiving increasing attention. How to efficiently utilize the trainsets in the complex HSR network becomes a hotspot. With the emergence of the transportation hub in China, the higher challenge is faced by all corresponding scholars and operators. To cope with this new development trend, this paper aims to put forward a novel utilization mode to enhance the utilization efficiency of the trainset. We modified the traditional trainsets’ utilization mode that trainsets can only undertake trips that the departure stations are the same with the arriving stations of the trips the trainsets have just completed. Instead, an innovative trainset utilization mode is put forward that trainsets can be dispatched among railway stations in the same hub. We formulate an integer programming TCP model with the objective of simultaneously minimizing the number of using trainsets and the total maintenances times. In order to deal with the complicated maintenance constraints, accumulated variables have been introduced to represent the running distance and running time of the trainset. To obtain the optimal TCP, a genetic algorithm (GA) is designed. What makes the GA more unique is that our expression of the solution which considers the maintenance arc and connection arc and the crossover process makes good use of characteristics of maintenance constraints. In order to deal with the complicated maintenance constraints, accumulated variables have been introduced to represent the running distance and running time of the trainset. To obtain the optimal TCP, a genetic algorithm (GA) is designed. What makes the GA unique is our expression of the solution. The proposed GA considers the maintenance arc and connection arc, and the crossover process makes good use of characteristics of maintenance constraints. In order to verify the efficiency of the proposed utilization mode, numerical experiments and contrast experiments have been carried out based on the real data of Nanjing and Shanghai HSR transportation hubs. The results show that a highquality trainset utilization scheme can be obtained. It can guide dispatchers to determine each trip should be undertaken by which trainset, the sequence of the trips undertaking by the same trainset, and when and where each trainset should be maintained. Also, the flexibility and the efficiency of trainset utilization can be significantly enhanced, even though it may cause empty running. Additionally, the designed GA has obvious advantages over ACA and SA in both the solution quality and computational efficiency. Further research work is recommended in twofold: one is to take the fluctuation and perturbation in the real world into consideration when formulating the TCP problem and study the rescheduling problem of trainset utilization. The other is to consider the impacts of passengers flow on the TCP problem, which is a vital factor influencing the dwell time and travel time in the TCP problem.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
Authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91746201; 71621001).
References
 Y. Wang, X. D. Yan, Y. Zhou, and Q. W. Xue, “Influencing mechanism of potential factors on passengers' longdistance travel mode choices based on structural equation modeling,” Sustainability, vol. 9, no. 11, Article ID 1943, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
 H. R. Zhang, L. M. Jia, L. Wang, and X. Y. Xu, “Energy consumption optimization of train operation for railway systems: Algorithm development and realworld case study,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 214, pp. 1024–1037, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Cacchiani, A. Caprara, and P. Toth, “Solving a realworld trainunit assignment problem,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 124, no. 12, pp. 207–231, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 V. Cacchiani, D. Huisman, M. Kidd et al., “An overview of recovery models and algorithms for realtime railway rescheduling,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 63, pp. 15–37, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. T. Haahr, J. C. Wagenaar, L. P. Veelenturf, and L. G. Kroon, “A comparison of two exact methods for passenger railway rolling stock (re)scheduling,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 91, pp. 15–32, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Ziarati, F. Soumis, J. Desrosiers, and M.M. Solomon, “A branchfirst, cutsecond approach for locomotive assignment,” Management Science, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1156–1168, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 J.F. Cordeau, F. Soumis, and J. Desrosiers, “A benders decomposition approach for the locomotive and car assignment problem,” Transportation Science, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 133–149, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J.F. Cordeau, G. Desaulniers, N. Lingaya, F. Soumis, and J. Desrosiers, “Simultaneous locomotive and car assignment at VIA Rail Canada,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 767–787, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Ahuja, C. Cunha, and G. Sahin, “Network models in railroad planning and scheduling,” Mathematics of Operations Research, pp. 54–101, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
 B. Vaidyanathan, R. K. Ahuja, and J. B. Orlin, “The locomotive routing problem,” Transportation Science, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 492–507, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Schrijver, “Minimum circulation of railway stock,” CWI Quarterly, vol. 6, pp. 205–217, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
 P. Zhao, H. Yang, and A. Z. Hu, “Research on usage of HighSpeed passenger trains on uncertain railroad region,” Journal of the China Railway Society, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 15–19, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 E. Abbink, B. van den Berg, L. Kroon, and M. Salomon, “Allocation of railway rolling stock for passenger trains,” Transportation Science, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Yang, H. Yang, and H. B. Lu, “Application of genetic algorithm in optimizing DMU circulating model,” Railway Transport and Economy, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 65–68, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
 N. BenKhedher, J. Kintanar, C. Queille, and W. Stripling, “Schedule optimization at SNCF: from conception to day of departure,” Interfaces, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 6–23, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Alfieri, R. Groot, L. Kroon, and A. Schrijver, “Efficient circulation of railway rolling stock,” Transportation Science, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 378–391, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Fioole, L. Kroon, G. Maróti, and A. Schrijver, “A rolling stock circulation model for combining and splitting of passenger trains,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 174, no. 2, pp. 1281–1297, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Maróti and L. Kroon, “Maintenance routing for train units: the interchange model,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1121–1140, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Wang, Y. Gao, X. Yu, I. Hansen, and J. Miao, “Optimization model for highspeed train unit routing problems,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
 G. Maróti and L. Kroon, “Maintenance routing for train units: the transition model,” CWI Research Report PNAE0415, Amsterdam, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Hong, K. M. Kim, K. Lee, and B. Hwan Park, “A pragmatic algorithm for the trainset routing: the case of Korea highspeed railway,” Omega, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 637–645, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Nishi, A. Ohno, M. Inuiguchi, S. Takahashi, and K. Ueda, “A Combined column generation and heuristics for railway shortterm rolling stock planning with regular inspection constraints,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 81, pp. 14–25, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. D’Acierno, M. Botte, A. Placido, C. Caropreso, and B. Montella, “Methodology for determining dwell times consistent with passenger flows in the case of metro services,” Urban Rail Transit, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 73–89, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Li, Y. Yin, and H. He, “Testing the generality of a passenger disregarded train dwell time estimation model at short stops: Both comparison and theoretical approaches,” Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 2018, Article ID 8521576, 16 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Buchmuller, U. Weidmann, and A. Nash, “Development of a dwell time calculation model for timetable planning,” WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, vol. 103, pp. 525–534, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 N. G. Harris, “Train boarding and alighting rates at high passenger loads,” Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 249–263, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Fletcher and A. ElGeneidy, “The effects of fare payment types and crowding on dwell time: A finegrained analysis,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2351, pp. 124–132, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 L. D'Acierno, M. Botte, M. Gallo, and B. Montella, “Defining reserve times for metro systems: An analytical approach,” Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Wang, A. D’Ariano, J. Yin, L. Meng, T. Tang, and B. Ning, “Passenger demand oriented train scheduling and rolling stock circulation planning for an urban rail transit line,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 118, pp. 193–227, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Zhou and H. Teng, “Simultaneous passenger train routing and timetabling using an efficient trainbased Lagrangian relaxation decomposition,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 94, pp. 409–439, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Canca and E. Barrena, “The integrated rolling stock circulation and depot location problem in railway rapid transit systems,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 109, pp. 115–138, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 China Railway Corporation, The Regulation of Railway Management (High Speed Railway Part), China Railway Press, Beijing, China, 2014.
 L. D'Acierno, M. Gallo, B. Montella, and A. Placido, “Analysis of the interaction between travel demand and rail capacity constraints,” WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, vol. 128, pp. 197–207, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 L. D'Acierno, A. Placido, M. Botte, M. Gallo, and B. Montella, “Defining robust recovery solutions for preserving service quality during rail/metro systems failure,” International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1351–1372, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Zhou, L. Zhou, and Y. Wang, “Using improved ant colony algorithm to investigate EMU circulation scheduling problem,” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 2014, Article ID 767429, 13 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Chen, Research on the relative problems of motor trainset scheduling system [Master, thesis], Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China, 2007.
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Yun Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.