Research Article
Application of Modified NSGA-II to the Transit Network Design Problem
Table 11
Operator perspective results compared to other approaches for Mumford’s networks.
| Network | Parameters | Mumford [27] | John et al. [43] | Kılıç [42] | Ahmed and Lee [36] | Ahmed et al. [38] | NSGA-II with variable |R| |
| Mumford0 | D0 (%) | 18.42 | — | 25.51 | 16.99 | 14.61 | 39.96 | D1 (%) | 23.4 | — | 16.55 | 30.72 | 31.59 | 46.8 | d2 (%) | 20.78 | — | 21.38 | 28.92 | 36.41 | 13.23 | dun (%) | 37.4 | — | 36.55 | 23.38 | 17.37 | 0 | ATT | 32.4 | 30.06 | 40.8 | 33.41 | 26.32 | 25.23 | TRL | 111 | 95 | 112 | 107 | 94 | 95 |
| Mumford1 | d0 (%) | 16.35 | — | 19.7 | 22.39 | 18.02 | 29.08 | d1 (%) | 29.06 | — | 32.29 | 40.57 | 29.88 | 42.01 | d2 (%) | 29.93 | — | 30.01 | 34.33 | 31.9 | 23.57 | dun (%) | 24.66 | — | 18 | 2.71 | 20.19 | 5.34 | ATT | 34.69 | 47.14 | 41.67 | 31.15 | 39.45 | 46.75 | TRL | 568 | 448 | 572 | 567 | 408 | 276 |
| Mumford2 | d0 (%) | 13.76 | — | 15.62 | 15.32 | 13.63 | 16.06 | d1 (%) | 27.69 | — | 38.07 | 29.31 | 23.58 | 41.25 | d2 (%) | 29.53 | — | 33.7 | 31.08 | 23.94 | 32.39 | dun (%) | 29.09 | — | 12.62 | 24.29 | 38.82 | 10.29 | ATT | 36.54 | 35.08 | 35.87 | 34.52 | 46.86 | 43.67 | TRL | 2244 | 1691 | 2078 | 2305 | 1330 | 497 |
| Mumford3 | d0 (%) | 16.71 | — | 14.24 | 25.42 | 16.28 | 17.44 | d1 (%) | 33.69 | — | 33.44 | 41.26 | 24.87 | 44.22 | d2 (%) | 29.18 | — | 34.1 | 24.91 | 26.34 | 31.19 | dun (%) | 20.42 | — | 18.22 | 8.41 | 32.44 | 7.16 | ATT | 36.92 | 46.58 | 39.42 | 34.81 | 46.05 | 45.11 | TRL | 2830 | 2030 | 2782 | 2732 | 1746 | 663 |
|
|