Research Article
Application of Modified NSGA-II to the Transit Network Design Problem
Table 3
Initial solutions for Mandl’s network compared to other approaches.
| |R| | Parameters | Nikolic and Teodorovic [16] | Kilic and Gok [14] | RCA |
| 4 | d0 (%) | 80.47 | 77.71 | 91.71 | d1 (%) | 12.33 | 20.3 | 8.29 | d2 (%) | 0.51 | 1.99 | 0 | dun (%) | 6.69 | 0 | 0 | ATT | 10.22 | 12.57 | 11.01 | TRL | 99 | 114 | 116 |
| 6 | d0 (%) | 87.73 | 83.75 | 95.57 | d1 (%) | 11.75 | 15.22 | 4.43 | d2 (%) | 0.51 | 1.03 | 0 | dun (%) | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | ATT | 11.03 | 11.65 | 10.27 | TRL | 135 | 135 | 172 |
| 7 | d0 (%) | 90.62 | 75.47 | 97.5 | d1 (%) | 8.86 | 21.51 | 2.5 | d2 (%) | 0.51 | 3.02 | 0 | dun (%) | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | ATT | 10.57 | 11.89 | 10.16 | TRL | 152 | 151 | 206 |
| 8 | d0 (%) | 91.91 | 85.36 | 98.46 | d1 (%) | 7.58 | 14.19 | 1.54 | d2 (%) | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0 | dun (%) | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | ATT | 10.47 | 10.9 | 10.12 | TRL | 166 | 195 | 259 |
|
|