Research Article
Accelerated Failure Time Model to Explore the Perception Response Times of Drivers in Simulated Car-Following Scenarios
Table 3
Parameter estimates of Weibull AFT models with heterogeneity.
| Variable | Estimate | S.E. | Z-test | 95% IC | Exp (β) | Percentage change (%) |
| Gender | Female versus male | −0.036 | 0.099 | −0.36 | (−0.230, 0.159) | 0.965 | −3.5 |
| Age group | Middle-aged versus young | −0.155 | 0.086 | −1.80 | (−0.324, 0.013) | 0.856 | −14.4 |
| Level of WMC | The top quartile versus the bottom quartile | −0.239 | 0.122 | −1.96 | (−0.478, 0.000) | 0.787 | −21.3 | The second quartile versus the bottom quartile | −0.250 | 0.119 | −2.10 | (−0.484, −0.016) | 0.779 | −22.1 | The third quartile versus the bottom quartile | −0.232 | 0.113 | −2.06 | (−0.453, −0.011) | 0.793 | −20.7 |
| Level of cognitive load | Cognitive load versus baseline load | 0.204 | 0.043 | 4.75 | (0.120, 0.288) | 1.226 | 22.6 |
| Lead vehicle’s deceleration rate | 0.6 g versus 0.3 g | −0.021 | 0.034 | −0.60 | (−0.089, 0.047) | 0.979 | −2.1 | THW | 0.072 | 0.034 | 2.10 | (0.005, 0.139) | 1.075 | 7.5 | Constant | 0.172 | 0.111 | 1.55 | (−0.045, 0.390) | | | (scale parameter) | 3.890 | 0.221 | 23.91 | (3.480, 4.348) | | | Theta | 1.562 | 0.287 | 2.42 | (1.089, 2.240) | | |
|
|
|