Research Article

A Comparative Study of Passenger Multitasking Activities on Commuting and Leisure Electrified Intercity Railways

Table 5

Logistic regression results of multitasking activities.

TypeExplanatory variable
TotalLine attribute (leisure line: 1, commuting line: 2)Gender (male: 1, female: 2)Age (youth: 1, the middle-aged and elderly: 2)Availability of seats (yes: 1, no: 2)

Synchronous multitasking0.6300.3700.462
Resting3.6251.8200.101
Being in a daze/looking around2.7051.736
Wearing headphones0.4220.208
Using the mobile phone0.437
Computer use
Talking with other passengers0.2880.087
Eating5.611

Leisure line
Synchronous multitasking0.380.14
Resting1.3
Being in a daze/looking around12.12
Wearing headphones0.260.132.27
Using the mobile phone0.18
Computer use
Talking with other passengers
Eating

Commuting line
Synchronous multitasking0.450.37
Resting0.1
Being in a daze/looking around1.741.9
Wearing headphones0.510.21
Using the mobile phone0.55
Computer use
Talking with other passengers5.10

Note. Only significant models at 10% level tested using logistic regression are shown. , , and .