Research Article
Modelling Road User Perceptions towards Safety, Comfort, and Chaos at Shared Space: The via Maqueda Case Study, Italy
Table 3
Ordered logit models for safety perception.
| Variables | Coefficient | value | Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval for odds ratio | Lower | Upper |
| Model 1. Walking | Perception of infrastructure | 0.50 | ≤0.001 | 1.65 | 1.20 | 2.25 | Gender | 0.67 | 0.02 | 1.96 | 1.13 | 3.41 | Age group | −0.30 | 0.03 | 0.74 | 0.57 | 0.96 | Road use frequency | 0.19 | 0.18 | 1.21 | 0.92 | 1.59 |
| Model 2. Cycling | Perception of infrastructure | 0.31 | 0.04 | 1.36 | 1.02 | 1.82 | Gender | 0.28 | 0.32 | 1.32 | 0.77 | 2.28 | Age group | 0.98 | 0.45 | 1.10 | 0.85 | 1.42 | Road use frequency | 0.34 | 0.02 | 1.40 | 1.07 | 1.84 |
| Model 3. Using micromobility | Perception of infrastructure | 0.13 | 0.35 | 1.14 | 0.86 | 1.51 | Gender | −0.10 | 0.72 | 0.91 | 0.53 | 1.55 | Age group | −0.18 | 0.16 | 0.83 | 0.64 | 1.07 | Road use frequency | −0.27 | 0.05 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.00 |
|
|
Statistically significant at 95% confidence level. |