Research Article
Modelling Road User Perceptions towards Safety, Comfort, and Chaos at Shared Space: The via Maqueda Case Study, Italy
Table 5
Ordered logit models for chaos perception.
| Variables | Coefficient | value | Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval for odds ratio | Lower | Upper |
| Model 1. Walking | Perception of infrastructure | 0.38 | 0.01 | 1.47 | 1.08 | 1.98 | Gender | 0.96 | ≤0.001 | 2.62 | 1.50 | 4.56 | Age groups | −0.11 | 0.37 | 0.89 | 0.70 | 1.15 | Road use frequency | 0.25 | 0.07 | 1.28 | 0.98 | 1.68 |
| Model 2. Cycling | Perception of infrastructure | −0.41 | 0.06 | 0.66 | 0.50 | 0.88 | Gender | 0.37 | 0.16 | 1.45 | 0.86 | 2.42 | Age groups | 0.08 | 0.50 | 1.08 | 0.86 | 1.37 | Road use frequency | 0.14 | 0.33 | 1.14 | 0.87 | 1.50 |
| Model 3. Using micromobility | Perception of infrastructure | −0.18 | 0.19 | 0.83 | 0.64 | 1.09 | Gender | −0.09 | 0.74 | 0.92 | 0.55 | 1.53 | Age groups | −0.13 | 0.31 | 0.88 | 0.68 | 1.13 | Road use frequency | −0.23 | 0.09 | 0.80 | 0.62 | 1.03 |
|
|
Statistically significant at 90% confidence level. Statistically significant at 95% confidence level. |