Evaluating the Performance of Connected and Automated Vehicles in Fixed Signal-Controlled Conventional Intersections and Superstreets with Platooning-Based Trajectory Planning

Table 6

Average fuel consumption improvement magnitudes of superstreet compared to the equivalent conventional intersection with different CAV Features.

CAV features	Peak demand scale
	25%	50%	75%	100%
IDM	5%	4%	3%	8%
IDM with platooning	5%	5%	5%	4%
IDM with trajectory planning	−15%	−6%	2%	10%
IDM with platooning-based trajectory planning	−14%	−10%	−8%	−5%