Journal of Advanced Transportation

Peer Review Process

The following is the editorial workflow that every manuscript submitted to the journal undergoes during the course of the peer review process.

The entire editorial workflow is performed using our intuitive online manuscript tracking system. Once a manuscript is submitted for publication, the manuscript is checked by the journal’s editorial office to ensure the files are complete and that the relevant metadata are in order. The manuscript is then sent to the Chief Editor who assesses the suitability of the manuscript in terms of scope and quality and, if appropriate, assigns it to an Academic Editor.

The Academic Editor then performs an additional, more detailed, analysis before inviting a number of potential reviewers to provide a peer review report – the Academic Editor can reject a manuscript prior to review if they deem it unsuitable for the journal. Based on reports submitted by the reviewers, the Academic Editor makes one of the following recommendations:

·   Reject

·   Consider after Major Changes

·   Consider after Minor Changes

·   Publish Unaltered

If the Academic Editor recommends “Reject”, the authors are sent any review reports that have been received and are notified that their manuscript will no longer be considered for publication in the journal.

If the Academic Editor recommends “Consider after Major Changes”, the authors are notified of the Editor's request that they prepare and submit an updated version of their manuscript with the necessary changes suggested by the reviewers and Editor. This might require new data to be collected or substantial revision of the text. The manuscript is then reassessed by one or more of the original reviewers before the Academic Editor makes a new recommendation.

If the Academic Editor recommends “Consider after Minor Changes”, the authors are notified of the Editor's request that they prepare and submit a revised copy of their manuscript with the required minor changes suggested by the reviewers and Editor. Once the Editor is satisfied with the final manuscript, optionally having sought further advice from one or more of the reviewers, the Academic Editor can recommend “Publish”.

If the Academic Editor recommends “Publish”, the manuscript will undergo a final check by the journal’s Chief Editor and editorial office in order to ensure that the manuscript and its review process adhere to the journal’s guidelines and policies. Once completed, the authors will be notified of the manuscript’s acceptance.

The Chief Editor remains ultimately responsible for the Aims and Scope of the title and will be called upon to handle Appeals and other editorial issues as and when required.

Journal of Advanced Transportation
Publishing Collaboration
More info
Wiley Hindawi logo
 Journal metrics
Acceptance rate36%
Submission to final decision106 days
Acceptance to publication75 days
CiteScore3.000
Impact Factor1.670
 Submit