Table of Contents
Journal of Biophysics
Volume 2013, Article ID 697529, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/697529
Research Article

The Principle of Stationary Action in Biophysics: Stability in Protein Folding

1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
2Department of Mathematics, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA

Received 22 May 2013; Revised 18 October 2013; Accepted 1 November 2013

Academic Editor: Kuo-Chen Chou

Copyright © 2013 Walter Simmons and Joel L. Weiner. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. L. Eyink, “Action principle in nonequilibrium statistical dynamics,” Physical Review E, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 3419–3435, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. N. Onuchic and P. G. Wolynes, “Theory of protein folding,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 70–75, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. G. Wolynes, “Recent successes of the energy landscape theory of protein folding and function,” Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 405–410, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Oliveberg and P. G. Wolynes, “The experimental survey of protein-folding energy landscapes,” Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 245–288, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. A. Dill, S. B. Ozkan, M. S. Shell, and T. R. Weikl, “The protein folding problem,” Annual Review of Biophysics, vol. 37, pp. 289–316, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. W. Plaxco, K. T. Simons, I. Ruczinski, and D. Baker, “Topology, stability, sequence, and length: defining the determinants of two-state protein folding kinetics,” Biochemistry, vol. 39, no. 37, pp. 11177–11183, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. A. Goldbeck, Y. G. Thomas, E. Chen, R. M. Esquerra, and D. S. Kliger, “Multiple pathways on a protein-folding energy landscape: kinetic evidence,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 2782–2787, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. T. Leeson, F. Gai, H. M. Rodriguez, L. M. Gregoret, and R. B. Dyer, “Protein folding and unfolding on a complex energy landscape,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 2527–2532, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. G. Gray and E. F. Taylor, “When action is not least,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 434–458, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. I. M. Gelfand and S. V. Fomin, Calculus of Variations, Dover, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  11. R. Gilmore, Catastrophe Theory for Scientists and Engineers, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1981.
  12. M. V. Berry, “Waves and Thom’s theorem,” Advances in Physics, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 1, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  13. M. V. Berry and C. Upstill, “IV catastrophe optics: morphologies of caustics and their diffraction patterns,” Progress in Optics C, vol. 18, pp. 257–346, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. E. Makarov and K. W. Plaxco, “The topomer search model: a simple, quantitative theory of two-state protein folding kinetics,” Protein Science, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. Poston and I. Stewart, Catastrophe Theory and Its Applications, Pitman, London, UK, 1978.
  16. R. Zwanzig, “Two-state models of protein folding kinetics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 148–150, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. Kaya and H. S. Chan, “Origins of Chevron Rollovers in non-two-state protein folding kinematics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 90, no. 25, Article ID 258104, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. W. Simmons and J. Weiner, “Protein folding: a new geometric analysis,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.2079.
  19. S. C. Harrison, “Forty years after,” Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1305–1306, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. W. Plaxco, K. T. Simons, and D. Baker, “Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 277, no. 4, pp. 985–994, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. Chou and C. Zhang, “Predicting protein folding types by distance functions that make allowances for amino acid interactions,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 269, no. 35, pp. 22014–22020, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Fersht, Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
  23. D. A. Debe, M. J. Carlson, and W. A. Goddard III, “The topomer-sampling model of protein folding,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 2596–2601, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. T. Saunders, An Introduction to Catastrophe Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1980.
  25. A. Okninski, “Catastrophe theory,” in Chemical Kinetics, R. G. Compton, Ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  26. L. S. Schulman, Techniques and Applications of Path Integration, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1981.
  27. A. V. Finkelstein and O. B. Ptitsyn, Protein Physics, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
  28. M. Karplus, “Aspects of protein reaction dynamics: deviations from simple behavior,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 11–27, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. A. Scheraga, M. Khalili, and A. Liwo, “Protein-folding dynamics: overview of molecular simulation techniques,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, vol. 58, pp. 57–83, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. K. C. Chou and C. T. Zhang, “Prediction of protein structural classes,” Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 275–349, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. W. Simmons and J. Weiner, “Toward a theory on the stability of protein folding: challenges for folding models,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.6190.
  32. J. Tyedmers, M. L. Madariaga, and S. Lindquist, “Prion switching in response to environmental stress,” PLoS Biology, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 2605–2613, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus