/ / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 4150210 | 7 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4150210

# Coefficient Bounds for Subclasses of Biunivalent Functions Associated with the Chebyshev Polynomials

Accepted26 Oct 2017
Published26 Nov 2017

#### Abstract

We introduce and investigate new subclasses of biunivalent functions defined in the open unit disk, involving Sălăgean operator associated with Chebyshev polynomials. Furthermore, we find estimates of the first two coefficients of functions in these classes, making use of the Chebyshev polynomials. Also, we give Fekete-Szegö inequalities for these function classes. Several consequences of the results are also pointed out.

#### 1. Introduction

Let denote the class of analytic functions of the form normalized by the conditions defined in the open unit disk Let be the subclass of consisting of functions of form (1) which are also univalent in Let and denote the well-known subclasses of , consisting of starlike and convex functions of order , respectively.

The Koebe one-quarter theorem  ensures that the image of under every univalent function contains a disk of radius . Thus every univalent function has an inverse satisfying A function is said to be biunivalent in if both and are univalent in . Let denote the class of biunivalent functions defined in the unit disk . Since has the Maclaurin series given by (1), a computation shows that its inverse has the expansion

An analytic function is subordinate to an analytic function , written as , provided there is an analytic function defined on with and satisfying .

Chebyshev polynomials, which are used by us in this paper, play a considerable role in numerical analysis. We know that the Chebyshev polynomials are four kinds. The most of books and research articles related to specific orthogonal polynomials of Chebyshev family contain essentially results of Chebyshev polynomials of first and second kinds and and their numerous uses in different applications; see Doha  and Mason .

The well-known kinds of the Chebyshev polynomials are the first and second kinds. In the case of real variable on , the first and second kinds are defined by where the subscript denotes the polynomial degree and . We consider the function We note that if , , then for all Thus, we write where , for , are the second kind of the Chebyshev polynomials. Also, it is known that The Chebyshev polynomials ,  , of the first kind have the generating function of the form

All the same, the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind and the second kind are well connected by the following relationship:

Several authors have introduced and investigated subclasses of biunivalent functions and obtained bounds for the initial coefficients (see ). In , making use of the Sălăgean  differential operator, defined by and further for functions of the form (4) Vijaya et al.  (also see ) defined and introduced two new subclasses of biunivalent functions. In this paper, we use Chebyshev polynomials to obtain the estimates on the coefficients and .

#### 2. Biunivalent Function Classes and

Motivated by recent works of Altinkaya and Yalcin  (also see ) and recent studies on biunivalent functions involving Sălăgean operator [11, 13], in this section, we introduce two new subclasses of Σ associated with Chebyshev polynomials and obtain the initial Taylor coefficients and for the function classes by subordination.

Definition 1. For and a function of form (1) is said to be in the class if the following subordination holds: where and is given by (4).

We note that by specializing the parameters and suitably fixing the values for in Definition 1, we introduce (had not been studied so far) the following new subclasses of as listed below.

Remark 2. Supposing and , then we denote(1),(2),(3),(4)

Due to Frasin and Aouf  and Panigarhi and Murugusundaramoorthy  (also see [11, 13]) we define the following new subclass involving the Sălăgean operator .

Definition 3. For and a function of form (1) is said to be in the class if the following subordination holds: where , , and are given by (4), (15), and (16), respectively.

In Definition 3, by specializing the parameters and suitably fixing the values for (had not been studied so far) the following new subclasses of are as listed below.

Remark 4. Supposing and , then we denote (1),(2),(3),(4)

In the following theorems we determine the initial Taylor coefficients and for the function classes and .

Theorem 5. Let given by (1) be in the class and Then where and

Proof. Let and Considering (17), we have Define the functions and by which are analytic in with and , , for all . It is well known that and then Using (22) and (23) in (20) and (21), respectively, we have In light of (1), (4), (10), (15), and (16) and from (26), we have This yields the following relations:From (28) and (30) it follows that Adding (29) to (31) and using (33), we obtain Applying (25) to the coefficients and and using (10) we have By subtracting (31) from (29) and using (32) and (33), we get Using (10), once again applying (25) to the coefficients , , , and , we get

By taking or and , one can easily state the estimates and for the function classes and , respectively.

Remark 6. Let given by (1) be in the class Then

Remark 7. Let given by (1) be in the class Then

For , Theorem 5 yields the following corollary.

Corollary 8. Let given by (1) be in the class Then where and

By taking in the above remarks we get the estimates and for the function classes and

Remark 9. Let given by (1) be in the class Then

Remark 10. Let given by (1) be in the class Then, for ,

Theorem 11. Let given by (1) be in the class and Then

Proof. Proceeding as in the proof of Theorem 5 we can arrive at the following relations:From (46) and (48) it follows that From (47), (49), and (51), we obtain Using (10) and (25) for the coefficients and , we immediately get the desired estimate on as asserted in (44).
By subtracting (49) from (47) and using (50) and (51), we get Again using (10) and (25) for the coefficients , , , and , we get the desired estimate on as asserted in (45).

Remark 12. Let given by (1) be in the class . Then

Remark 13. Let given by (1) be in the class . Then

By taking we deduce the following results.

Remark 14. Let given by (1) be in the class . Then

Remark 15. Let given by (1) be in the class Then

Remark 16. Let given by (1) be in the class Then

#### 3. Fekete-Szegö Inequality for the Function Classes and

Due to Zaprawa , in this section we obtain the Fekete-Szegö inequality for the function classes and

Theorem 17. Let given by (1) be in the class and . Then one has

Proof. From (29) and (31) where Then, in view of (10), we conclude thatTaking , we have the following corollary.

Corollary 18. If , then

Corollary 19. Let given by (1) be in the class and . Then one has Particularly, for if one obtains

Corollary 20. Let given by (1) be in the class and . Then one hasParticularly, for if one obtains

Theorem 21. Let given by (1) be in the class and . Then one has

Proof. From (29) and (31) where Then, in view of (10), we conclude thatTaking , we have the following corollary.

Corollary 22. If , then

Corollary 23. Let given by (1) be in the class and . Then one has Particularly, for if one obtains

Corollary 24. Let given by (1) be in the class and . Then one has Particularly, for if one obtains

#### Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

1. P. L. Duren, “Univalent Functions,” in Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 259, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
2. E. H. Doha, “The first and second kind chebyshev coefficients of the moments for the general order derivative on an infinitely differentiable function,” International Journal of Computer Mathematics, vol. 51, no. 1-2, pp. 21–35, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
3. J. C. Mason, “Chebyshev polynomial approximations for the L-membrane eigenvalue problem,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, vol. 15, pp. 172–186, 1967. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
4. D. A. Brannan, J. Clunie, and W. E. Kirwan, “Coefficient estimates for a class of star-like functions,” Canadian Journal of Mathematics, vol. 22, pp. 476–485, 1970. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
5. D. A. Brannan and T. S. Taha, “On some classes of bi-univalent functions,” Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai: Mathematica, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 70–77, 1986. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
6. M. Lewin, “On a coefficient problem for bi-univalent functions,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 18, pp. 63–68, 1967. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
7. E. Netanyahu, “The minimal distance of the image boundary from the origin and the second coefficient of a univalent function in z<1,” Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal, vol. 32, pp. 100–112, 1969. View at: Google Scholar
8. H. M. Srivastava, A. K. Mishra, and P. Gochhayat, “Certain subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1188–1192, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
9. Q.-H. Xu, H. M. Srivastava, and Z. Li, “A certain subclass of analytic and close-to-convex functions,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 396–401, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
10. X.-F. Li and A.-P. Wang, “Two new subclasses of bi-univalent functions,” International Mathematical Forum, vol. 7, no. 29–32, pp. 1495–1504, 2012. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
11. K. Vijaya, M. Kasthuri, and G. Murugusundaramoorthy, “Coefficient bounds for subclasses of bi-univalent functions defined by the Salagean derivative operator,” Boletin de la Asociaciton Matematica Venezolana, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
12. G. S. Salagean, “Subclasses of univalent functions,” in Proceedings of the 5th Romanian Finnish Seminar in Complex Analysis, pp. 362–372, Bucharest, Romania, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
13. G. Murugusundaramoorthy, C. Selvaraj, and O. S. Babu, “Coefficient estimates for Pascu-type subclasses of bi-univalent functions based on subordination,” International Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2015. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
14. S. Altinkaya and S. Yalcin, “On the Chebyshev polynomial bounds for classes of univalent functions,” Khayyam Journal of Mathematics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2016. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
15. J. Dziok, R. K. Raina, and J. Sokół, “Application of Chebyshev polynomials to classes of analytic functions,” Comptes Rendus Mathematique, vol. 353, no. 5, pp. 433–438, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
16. B. A. Frasin and M. K. Aouf, “New subclasses of bi-univalent functions,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1569–1573, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
17. T. Panigrahi and G. Murugusundaramoorthy, “Coefficient bounds for bi-univalent analytic functions associated with Hohlov operator,” Proceedings of the Jangjeon Mathematical Society. Memoirs of the Jangjeon Mathematical Society, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 91–100, 2013. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
18. P. Zaprawa, “On the Fekete-Szegö problem for classes of bi-univalent functions,” Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society - Simon Stevin, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 169–178, 2014. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. 