|
S. no. | Parameter measured | NDT method | Advantages | Limitations | Principle |
|
1 | Concrete quality, cracks, defects, and voids | Visual inspection | Rapid, economical | Expertise is required, superficial, and depends upon skill of viewer | Based on the visual defects on the surface |
Image Pro Plus (IPP) | Simple, rapid, cheaper | Slow results | Comparing colors of different objects |
Acoustic emission (AE) | Fast results, detect changes in materials | Costly, defects already present are not detected | Sudden distribution of stresses generates elastic waves |
Impact echo | Able to detect condition of concrete accessible from one side only, quick, accurate, and reliable | Interpretation is difficult, reliability decreases with increase in thickness, and accuracy depends on impact duration | Transmission and reflection of electromagnetic waves |
Infrared thermography | Easy interpretation, simple, safe, no radiation, rapid setup, and portable | No information about depth or thickness of defects, and results affected by environmental conditions | Surface temperature variation |
One-sided signal wave transmission measurements | Used to detect structures accessible from one side only such as pavements | Large thickness affects the results | Propagation velocity of signal waves |
Impulse response | Simple, easy to handle | Depends on the skill of user, and deep damages influence the results | Based on stress wave test method |
Radiography | Thickness and composition can be easily detected, and rebars can be located | Expensive, hazardous, and limited to low thickness | Velocity of X and gamma rays and its attenuation |
Petrographic testing | Provides information about alkali-silica reaction, alkali carbonation reaction, sulfate attack, freezing, and thawing | Required high skill for the interpretation of result | Samples are examined through a petrological microscope using reflected or transmitted light |
Lamb Wave Theory (LWT) | Relatively accurate | Difficult interpretation | Based on guided wave theory |
|
2 | Compressive strength, surface hardness, adhesion | Rebound hammer | Simple, quick, and inexpensive | Not so reliable, smoothness, age of concrete, carbonation, and moisture content can affect results | Rebound of plunger when strucked with concrete indicates strength |
Ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) | Quick, portable, large penetration depth, Simple interpretation, and moderate cost | Not very reliable, moisture variation and presence of reinforcement can affect results | Ultrasonic wave velocity and its attenuation |
CAPO test | Correlation between pull out force and compressive strength is reliable | Damage to the surface | Expanded ring in the cored hole is pulled out |
Probe penetration | Simple, needs less training, and low maintenance | Leave a hole in concrete surface, and coarse aggregates affect the penetration | Penetration of probe is measured and related to strength |
microcoring | Good correlation between test results and compressive strength | Depends on the preparation of specimens | Extraction of microcore samples from a concrete structure is used for analysis |
Pull off test | Fast results, evaluate adhesion, and tensile strength which can be converted to compressive strength | Damage to the surface | A disc is bonded to the testing surface, and when disc is pulled off, force required is used to obtain pull off strength |
|
3 | Chloride concentration | Quantab test | Fast and accurate | Expensive, hazardous, limited to low thickness | Reaction of silver dichromate with chloride ion produces white column on the strips |
Potentiometric titration | Reliable | Requires skilled personal | Using acid or water soluble methods, the final volume will indicate chloride content |
Rapid chloride test | Portable, simple, and quick | Variation in results by the presence of certain materials | Potential difference of unknown solution is compared with potential difference of solutions with known chloride concentration |
|
4 | Corrosion rate, percentage of corrosion, corrosion progress | Galvanostatic pulse method | Measures half-cell potential and electrical resistance simultaneously | Unstabilized readings | Based on the polarization of rebar by means of small constant current |
Linear polarization resistance (LPR) | Rapid, requires only localized damage, more detailed information | Measurements are affected by temperature and humidity | Electrical conductivity of fluid can be related to its corrosiveness |
Half-cell potential | Simple, portable, results in the form of equipotential contours | Needs preparation, saturation required, not very accurate, and time consuming | Electric potential of rebars is measured relative to half cell and indicates probability of corrosion |
Time domain reflectometry (TDR) | More robust, easy, locates corrosion, and identifies extent of damage | Less sensitive | By applying a sensor wire along side of the reinforcement a transmission line is created. Physical defects of the reinforcement will change the electromagnetic properties of the line |
Ultrasonic guided waves | Identifies location and magnitude of corrosion | Not very reliable | Based on propagation of ultrasonic waves |
X-Ray diffraction and atomic absorption | Simple and reliable | hazardous | Intensity of X-ray beams reduces while passing through a material |
|
5 | Carbonation depth, pH of concrete | Phenolphthalein indicator test | Simple, quick, and inexpensive | Inappropriate for dark aggregates, results affected by saturation | Carbonation reduces pH of the concrete |
Rainbow indicator | Quick, descriptive, and easy to use and interpret | Requires drilling of concrete surface up to rebar depth | Carbonation reduces pH of the concrete |
|
6 | Pavement inspection and subsurface condition | Ground-coupled penetrating radar (GPR) | Low cost, portable, effective | Complex results, difficult interpretations | Propagation of radiofrequency (0.5 to 2 GHZ) |
Hammer sounding | Simple, easy to handle | Depends on the skill of user, and deep damages influence the results | Surface is striked with hammer and hollow or dull tone indicates the existence of delamination |
Acoustic tomography | Useful results, moderate | Requires skill, high cost | Waves were received on opposite side, and wave velocity depends on material properties |
Falling weight deflect meter (FWD) | Useful results | Can provide misleading results and requires experience for interpretation | Load is produced by dropping a large weight to detect concrete |
|
7 | Flaw detection inside decks, delamination, location, and extent of damage in bridges | Chain drag | Simple, portable | Time consuming, tedious | Chain is dragged over surface for flaw detection |
Vibration based damage identification (VBDI) | Easy to implement, cost effective | Environmental factors, errors in measurements, and nonunique solutions | Based on changes in the dynamic characteristics of a structure |
|
8 | Entire depth of damage, percentage of damage, identification of deteriorating infrastructure | Seismic refraction method | Calibration is not necessary, more reliable | Valid for high speed for large depths | Seismic waves travel outward from a source and reach a detector |
Ultrasonic longitudinal waves (L-wave, P-wave) | Inspect also at large depths | Not appropriate as primary investigation method | Transmission and reflection of ultrasonic waves |
Ultrasonic continous spread spectrum signal | Improved sensitivity | Difficult interpretation | Signals are received by detectors and signal speed depends on defect |
|
9 | Permeability, water absorption | Water permeability test | Preparation and skill required, time consuming | Semidestructive type test | Assesses the ease with which water penetrates in concrete |
Initial Surface Absorption Test (ISAT) | Consistent results in laboratory | Problems in using in situ, affected by increase in temperature | Rate at which water is absorbed in concrete is measured |
Covercrete absorption test (CAT) | Not influenced by local surface attacks | Sensitive to W/C ratio, curing time and moisture content | Rate of absorption of concrete is measured |
|
10 | Concrete cover, rebar diameter, location of reinforcement | Cover meter | Portable | Slow, affected by deep cover and closely spaced bars | Electromagnetic induction |
Radioactive methods | Simple | Hazardous | Generates images of the structure of RC and steel |
|
13 | Load bearing capacity of bridge | Static truck load test | Reliable | Dangerous | Response of strain sensors under truck load indicates load bearing capacity |
|
14 | Relative conditions of brick masonry side walls | Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) | Reliable, fast and economical | Expensive, time consuming | Uses multiple sensors to record wave field |
|
15 | Detecting disbands | Microwave NDT method | Detects from one side, rapid, noncontact, and robust | Costly | Reflection and transmission coefficients are measured and related to material properties |
|
18 | Stress/strains sensor for monitoring composite beams | Fiber optic Bragg grating sensors | Suitable for long-term tests | Slow response | Monitors the response of structure subjected to full load |
|