Table of Contents
Journal of Construction Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 5737160, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5737160
Research Article

Renovation versus New Construction and Building Decision Tool for Educational Facilities

1Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alabama, H.M. Comer Hall, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401, USA
2Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, University of Alabama, H.M. Comer Hall, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401, USA
3University of Alabama Facilities Department, 1205 14th Street, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA

Received 20 April 2016; Accepted 8 June 2016

Academic Editor: F. Pacheco-Torgal

Copyright © 2016 Carrie Pope et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. Nistorescu and C. Ploscaru, “Impact of economic and financial crisis in the construction industry,” Management and Marketing-Craiova, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–36, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  2. M. Keymer, Design strategies for new and renovation construction that increase the capacity of buildings to accommodate change [Ph.D. dissertation], Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000.
  3. R. Atkinson, L. Crawford, and S. Ward, “Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 687–698, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C.-S. Cho and G. E. Gibson Jr., “Building project scope definition using project definition rating index,” Journal of Architectural Engineering, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 115–125, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Geertman and J. Stillwell, “Planning support systems: an inventory of current practice,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 291–310, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Carlson, “Recession slows new building, but renovations a bright spot for construction contractors,” 2010, http://finance-commerce.com.
  7. A. Schoenfeld, How we Think: A Theory Of Goal-Oriented Decision Making and its Educational Applications, Routledge, New York, NY, USA, 2011.
  8. B. Wiley, Analysis and Decision Making in Uncertain Systems, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2003.
  9. R. Handfield, S. V. Walton, R. Sroufe, and S. A. Melnyk, “Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: a study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 70–87, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Yalcin, “GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations,” Catena, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. S.-W. Fong and S. K.-Y. Choi, “Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process,” Construction Management and Economics, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 547–557, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. David, F. David, and F. David, “The Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) applied to a retail computer store,” Coastal Business Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 42–52, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  13. J. C. Wayman, “Involving teachers in data-driven decision making: using computer data systems to support teacher inquiry and reflection,” Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 295–308, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. R. H. Horner, A. W. Todd, T. Lewis-Palmer, L. K. Irvin, G. Sugai, and J. B. Boland, “The school-wide evaluation tool (SET): a research instrument for assessing school-wide positive behavior support,” Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. F. Lunenburg, “The decision making process,” National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1–12, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  16. R. K. Norton, “Planning for school facilities: school board decision making and local coordination in Michigan,” Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 478–496, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Morelli, M. Harrestrup, and S. Svendsen, “Method for a component-based economic optimisation in design of whole building renovation versus demolishing and rebuilding,” Energy Policy, vol. 65, pp. 305–314, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. V. Martinaitis, E. Kazakevičius, and A. Vitkauskas, “A two-factor method for appraising building renovation and energy efficiency improvement projects,” Energy Policy, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 192–201, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. B. P. Goldstein, M. Herbøl, and M. J. Figueroa, “Gaps in tools assessing the energy implications of renovation versus rebuilding decisions,” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 244–250, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. Gram-Hanssen, “Existing buildings—users, renovations and energy policy,” Renewable Energy, vol. 61, pp. 136–140, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. B. Dong, C. Kennedy, and K. Pressnail, “Comparing life cycle implications of building retrofit and replacement options,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1051–1063, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. L. Užšilaityte and V. Martinaitis, “Search for optimal solution of public building renovation in terms of life cycle,” Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 102–110, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. L. Itard and G. Klunder, “Comparing environmental impacts of renovated housing stock with new construction,” Building Research and Information, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 252–267, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. O. Ortiz, F. Castells, and G. Sonnemann, “Sustainability in the construction industry: a review of recent developments based on LCA,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 28–39, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. K. Dixit, J. L. Fernández-Solís, S. Lavy, and C. H. Culp, “Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: a literature review,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1238–1247, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. Thormark, “A low energy building in a life cycle—its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential,” Building and Environment, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 429–435, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. B. V. Venkatarama Reddy and K. S. Jagadish, “Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 129–137, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. P. Hammond and C. I. Jones, “Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials,” Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers-Energy, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 87–98, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. G. Menzies, S. Turan, and P. Banfill, “Life-cycle assessment and embodied energy: a review,” Institute of Civil Engineers—Construction Materials, vol. 160, no. 4, pp. 135–143, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  30. J. M. Pearce, S. J. Johnson, and G. B. Grant, “3D-mapping optimization of embodied energy of transportation,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 435–453, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. A. Guggemos and A. Horvath, “Decision-support tool for assessing the environmental effects of constructing commercial buildings,” Journal of Architectural Engineering, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 187–195, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. Tian, T. Chen, H. Yang, and T.-M. Chung, “A generalized window energy rating system for typical office buildings,” Solar Energy, vol. 84, no. 7, pp. 1232–1243, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. T. Catalina, J. Virgone, and E. Blanco, “Development and validation of regression models to predict monthly heating demand for residential buildings,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1825–1832, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Kobes, I. Helsloot, B. De Vries, and J. G. Post, “Building safety and human behaviour in fire: a literature review,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. R. Shipley, S. Utz, and M. Parsons, “Does adaptive reuse pay? A study of the business of building renovation in Ontario, Canada,” International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 505–520, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. J. Milligan, “Buildings as history: the place of collective memory in the study of historic preservation,” Symbolic Interaction, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 105–123, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. I. Erdem and D. B. Peraza, “Challenges in renovation of vintage buildings,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 29, no. 6, Article ID 04014166, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. E. Steinberg, R. Selle, and T. Faust, “Connectors for timber-lightweight concrete composite structures,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 129, no. 11, pp. 1538–1545, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. Ebrahimpour and R. L. Sack, “A review of vibration serviceability criteria for floor structures,” Computers & Structures, vol. 83, no. 28–30, pp. 2488–2494, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. E. Gibson and M. Pappas, “Starting smart: key practices for developing scopes of work for facility projects,” Federal Facilities Council Technical Report 146, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  41. A. F. Griffith and G. E. Gibson Jr., “Alignment during preproject planning,” Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 69–76, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. L. Song and S. M. AbouRizk, “Quantifying engineering project scope for productivity modeling,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 360–367, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. P. Reddy, M. Sucur, and S. Ariaratnam, “Building renovation decision support model,” in Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, pp. 1547–1554, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  44. Y.-K. Juan, P. Gao, and J. Wang, “A hybrid decision support system for sustainable office building renovation and energy performance improvement,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 290–297, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. Y. Rosenfeld and I. M. Shohet, “Decision support model for semi-automated selection of renovation alternatives,” Automation in Construction, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 503–510, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. K. Alanne, “Selection of renovation actions using multi-criteria ‘knapsack’ model,” Automation in Construction, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 377–391, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. Medineckiene and F. Björk, “Owner preferences regarding renovation measures—the demonstration of using multi-criteria decision making,” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 284–295, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. L. Tupenaite, E. K. Zavadskas, A. Kaklauskas, Z. Turskis, and M. Seniut, “Multiple criteria assessment of alternatives for built and human environment renovation,” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 257–266, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. Y.-R. Wang and G. E. Gibson Jr., “A study of preproject planning and project success using ANNs and regression models,” Automation in Construction, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 341–346, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. A. F. Waly and W. Y. Thabet, “A virtual construction environment for preconstruction planning,” Automation in Construction, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 139–154, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. F. N. De Silva and R. W. Eglese, “Integrating simulation modelling and GIS: spatial decision support systems for evacuation planning,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 423–430, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. C. Cho and E. Gibson, “Development of a Project Definition Rating Index (PDRI) for general building projects,” in Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress, pp. 343–352, 2000.
  53. P. Dumont, E. Gibson, and J. Fish, “Scope management using the project definition rating index,” Journal of Construction Management Engineering, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 54–60, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  54. G. Weerasinghe, K. Soundararajan, and J. Ruwanpura, “LEED-PDRI framework for pre-project planning of sustainable building projects,” Journal of Green Building, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 123–143, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. S. Howard, E. Gibson, D. Whittington, and Q. Cui, “Analysis supporting front end planning for renovation and revamp projects, part I,” Report RR242, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  56. D. Whittington, E. Gibson, and Q. Cui, “Analysis supporting front end planning for renovation and revamp projects. Part 2,” Tech. Rep. 242, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  57. U.S. Green Building Council, “LEED rating system. U.S. Green Building Council,” 2015, http://www.usgbc.org/certification.
  58. International Living Future Institute, “Living building challenge,” 2015, http://living-future.org/lbc.
  59. Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure, “Envision sustainable infrastructure rating system. Harvard University Graduate School of Design and the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure,” 2015, https://www.sustainableinfrastructure.org.