Journal of Chemistry

Journal of Chemistry / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 189464 |

Sulekh Chandra, Kusum Sharma, Adarsh Kumar, "Mg(II) Selective PVC Membrane Electrode Based on Methyl Phenyl Semicarbazone as an Ionophore", Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2013, Article ID 189464, 7 pages, 2013.

Mg(II) Selective PVC Membrane Electrode Based on Methyl Phenyl Semicarbazone as an Ionophore

Academic Editor: Tingyue Gu
Received27 Jun 2012
Revised11 Oct 2012
Accepted16 Oct 2012
Published21 Jan 2013


A PVC-membrane-based Mg(II) selective electrode was constructed using methyl phenyl semicarbazone (MPS) as a neutral carrier. The sensor exhibits a Nernstian response for Mg(II) ion over a wide concentration range   to   M with the slope of 28.4 mV/per decade having detection limit  M. It was relatively a fast response time ( s for concentration and  s for concentration of  M) and can be used for 8 months without any considerable divergence in potentials. The proposed sensor revealed relatively good selectivity and high sensitivity for Mg(II) over a mono-, di-, and trivalent cation and can be used in a pH range of 1.0–9.5. It was also successfully used as an indicator electrode in potentiometer titration and in the analysis of concentration of magnesium in various real samples.

1. Introduction

Analytical methods for determining the alkaline earth metal ion have been studied extensively due to their importance in biological process [1, 2]. Polymeric membrane ion-selective electrode (ISE) provides one of the most powerful sensing methods because it is possible to select various sensory elements according to the charge and size of the target ion in clinical and environmental assays [310]. The ISEs dynamic response is generated by selective complexation of the target ion by ionophores dispersed in a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) matrix. The quick determination of minute quantities of ionic species by simple method has great importance in analytical chemistry. Potentiometric detection based on ion-selective electrode (ISE) is the simplest method; it has an advantage such as simple design and operation, reasonable selectivity, fast response applicability to colored, and turbid solution. Schiff’s base with N and O donor atoms is well known [11, 12] to form strong complexes with alkaline earth metal ion. Some of the Schiff bases were reported which forms strong complexes with a specific ion due to geometric factor. Schiff base complexes have attracted much attention in solvent extraction [13, 14] as ion exchanger [15] as catalyst [16]. Magnesium is found in dairy products, fish meat, and seafood. Besides this an adult human normally has 20 mg magnesium of which half is found in bones and the other half within cells. It has been observed that the activity of in blood serum decreases during liver transplantation due to accumulation of citrate and concomitant chelation of . Low activities were also found for certain suffering of acute migraine and headaches and in patient with cardiac diseases. The availability of ISEs with sufficient selectivity for has recently initiated a number of clinical investigations [17, 18]. Zhang et al. [19] reported magnesium-selective electrodes based on ETH 5504 as well as bis and tris (malondiamides) derivatives [20]. A review by Maj-Zurawaska [21] presented the ion magnesium-selective electrodes and their applications in analytical chemistry. However, most of the developed electrodes suffer from narrow working concentration range and severe interference from calcium. O’Donnell et al. [22] developed electrodes using various octaethylene bis(malonic acid diamides) and tris(malonic acid diamides) in PVC with 2-nitrophenyl octyl ether as solvent mediator. Saleh [23] reported a PVC-based electrode using phenylenebis(ditolyl) phosphine oxide as ionophore. The electrode gives an excellent discrimination of in the concentration range to  M.

Preliminary studies show that methyl phenyl semicarbazone (MPS) tends to show affinity for magnesium. Taking into consideration all the above facts that methyl phenyl semicarbazone (MPS) has been studied as an electroactive phase in PVC matrix for the fabrication of -selective electrode, and the results are presented in this paper. The present electrode shows good selectivity for as compared to other cations.

2. Experimental

2.1. Chemicals

Reagent grade high molecular weight PVC, tetrahydrofuran (THF), acetophenone, semicarbazidehydrochloride, (Aldrich, Delhi) were used as received. Tris(2-ethylehexyl) phosphate (TEP), dioctylphthalate (DOP), n-benzyl acetate (NBA), Tri-n-butylphthalate (TNBP), nitrobenzene (NB), Dibutylphthalate (DBP), and sodium tetraphenyl borate (NaTPB) and nitrate of all metal used (Merck) were of highest purity available and used without any further purification. Throughout double distilled deionized water was used.

2.2. Physical Measurement

The C, H, and N were analyzed on a carlo-Erba 1106 elemental analysis. Electron impact mass spectra were recorded on JEOL, JMS, DX-303 mass spectrophotometer; 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Hitachi FT-NMR, Model R-600 spectrophotometer using CDCl3 as solvent. Chemical shift is given in ppm relative to tetra methylsilane. IR spectra (CsI) were recorded on a Bruker FT-IR spectrophotometer Model no. TEN 50R-27 spectrophotometer.

2.3. Synthesis of Ionophore

In (Figure 1) the hot ethanolic solutions (20 mL) of acetophenone (1.12 mL 0.01 m mol), semicarbazide hydrochloride (1.12 g 0.01 mol), and sodium acetate (0.82 g, 0.01 mol) were mixed with contant stirring [24]. On cooling a yellowish coloured compound has separated out. It was filtered, washed several times with cold EtOH, and dried in vacuum over P4O10.

2.4. Methylphenylsemicarbazone

Yield (85.0%), M.P: 165°C, Anal calc. for (%) = C9H11N3O : C,61.02; H, 6.21N, 23.72; Found: (%) : 61.36; H, 6.25; N, 23.86; Mass. (m/z): 176() FT-IR(CsI): υ(NH2) 3479 (b), υ(NH) 3148 (b), υ(C=N) 1584, υ(C=O) 1742;   1HNMR (CDCl3 300 MHz): δ ppm = 3.36 (2H, s, ); 6.48–7.79 (Ar-H); 2.43–2.5 (3H, CH3).

2.5. Potential Measurements

All the membrane electrode potential measurements were performed at constant temperature (°C) using digital pH meter, potentiometer (ELICO L1-10, India) in conjugation with saturated calomel electrodes as reference electrodes. The representation of electrochemical cell for the EMF measurements is as follows.

3. External Reference Electrode (SCE) Internal Solution  M Mg  PVC Membrane Test Solution Internal (SCE) Reference Solution

The membranes were prepared using the basic method given by Craggs et al. [25], with certain variations in composition of PVC, ionophore, and plasticizers/solvent mediators like DBP, NB, DOP, and TNBP. The PVC membrane solution was prepared by mixing of ionophore (5%wt.), TNBP as plasticizer (60%wt.), PVC (30%wt.), and NaTBP (5%wt.) dissolved in THF. The resulting mixture was poured into a petri dish. The THF was allowed to evaporate at room temperature. A flexible membrane with a thickness of 0.2–0.4 mm was obtained. The discs of 6 mm diameter were cut and pasted to a Pyrex glass-tube with the help of Araldite. After getting dried, this tube was filled with  M internal solution of magnesium and immersed in the  M magnesium nitrate solution, at least for 2-3 days prior to use. It is known [26] that the sensitivity, linearity, and selectivity obtained for a given ionophore depend significantly on the membrane composition and nature of the plasticizer used. Thus, the ratio of membrane ingredients, time of contact, and concentration of equilibrating solution were optimized after a good deal of experimentation. Membranes, which generate reproducibility and stable potentials, have been studied. The blank membrane having only PVC as membrane ingredients was also prepared and studied. While membrane having PVC with plasticizer generated small potential with slope of ~5 mV/decade.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Response of the Cations

The plasticized PVC-based membrane electrode containe (MPS) as the neutral ion-carrier generated stable potential responses in solutions containing magnesium. Therefore, we studied in detail the performance of the membrane electrodes based on this carrier (MPS) for magnesium(II) ion in aqueous solutions. In preliminary experiment, membranes with and without carriers were constructed. The membranes with no carrier displayed insignificant selectivity toward magnesium(II) ion, and its response was not reliable, whereas, in the presence of the proposed carrier, the optimized membranes demonstrated Nernstian response and remarkable selectivity for magnesium(II) ion over a wide variety of metal ions, including alkali (, , , ), alkaline-earth (, ), and transition and heavy metal ions (, , , , , , , ). Some of them gave zero potential. The potentiometric response curves obtained for individual ions with ionophore (MPS) under identical conditions are given in Figure 2. Among these ions, except for Mg(II) ion, for all other ions the slope of the corresponding potential versus log [] plots is much lower than the expected Nernstian slopes of 59.0, 29.5 mV per decade for the univalent and divalent cations, respectively, with very narrow linear ranges of concentration. This is likely due to the high selectivity of the ionophore for magnesium ions over other ions and rapid exchange kinetics of the resulting Mg(II)-ionophore (MPS) complex. It has been observed that the membrane performs best with as the response is linear over a wide concentration ( to  M). Thus, membranes are used as sensor.

4.2. Working Concentration Range and Slope of Mg2+ Sensor

Before starting any experimentation, the membranes were equilibrated with  M solution. The experiments have shown that 2 days equilibration time is required for generating reproducible and stable potential. The working concentration range and slope have been evaluated from these plots and summarized in Table 1. It is seen from Figure 2 that the membrane without plasticizer (sensor no. 1) has composition (5 : 30 : 5-MPS : PVC : NaTPB) (w/w%); the concentration range is to  M with a slope of 35.5 mV/decade of activity. Since the nature of plasticizer influences the dielectric constant of the membrane phase, the mobility of the ionophore molecular and state of compound [26], it were expected to play a key role in determining the ion-selective characteristics. So various plasticizers viz.DBP, NB, and TNBP were added in varying amounts to the membranes, and ion-selective characteristics were studied. Also, the optimization of permselectivity of the membrane sensor is known to be highly dependent on the incorporation of additional membrane components [26, 27], therefore, NaTPB has also been added to the membranes with aim to improve the performance of the electrode. As shown in Table 1, the addition of NB plasticizer (sensor no. 3) reduces the slope to 22.0 mV/decade of activity, whereas the performance of the membrane with DPB plasticizer (sensor no. 2) is almost the same as that of membrane without plasticizer (sensor no. 1). The best performance is obtained with TNBP plasticizer with membrane (sensor no. 4) having composition 5 : 30 : 5 : 60 (MPS : PVC : NaTPB : NTBP) (w/w; mg). This sensor exhibits linear response to for wide working concentration range of to  M and detection limit  with a near-Nernstian slope of 28.4 mV/decade of activity.

Sensor no. Component in membranes (w/w) Working Conc range (M) Slope (±mv/decade of activity)

153051.0 × 10−5 to 1.0 × 10−135.5
25305601.0 × 10−4 to 1.0 × 10−134
35305601.0 × 10−5 to 1.0 × 10−122
45305601.0 × 10−8 to 1.0 × 10−128.4

The pH dependence of the electrode potential was tested over the range 1.0–9.5 for in this concentration shown in Figure 3. The pH of the solutions was adjusted by the addition of dilute hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide. It is clear from Figure 3 that the useful pH range is 1.0–9.5, as the potentials remain constant in this range. The sharp change in potentials at higher pH values may be due to the hydrolysis of , while at lower pH values ions start contributing to the charge transport process of the membrane, thereby, causing interference.

The performance of the sensor (no. 4) was also investigated in partially nonaqueous medium using methanol-water, ethanol-water, and acetone-water mixtures. The membrane worked satisfactorily in nonaqueous medium up to 20% (v/v) nonaqueous content as in these mixtures; the working concentration range and slope remained unaffected as shown in Table 2. However, above 20% (v/v) nonaqueous content, slope, and working concentration range was reduced, and potentials show drift. It is worth mentioning that the lifetime of the membranes did not alter in nonaqueous solutions.

Non-aqueous content % (v/v)Working concentration range (m)Slope (±0.1 mv/decade of activity)


101.0 × 10−8 to 1.0 × 10−128.4
201.0 × 10−8 to 1.0 × 10−128.4
301.0 × 10−8 to 1.0 × 10−128.2


101.0 × 10−8 to 1.0 × 10−128.4
201.0 × 10−8 to 1.0 × 10−128.4
301.0 × 10−8 to 1.0 × 10−128.2


101.0 × 10−8 to 1.0 × 10−128.4
201.0 × 10−8 to 1.0 × 10−128.4
301.0 × 10−8 to 1.0 × 10−128.3

4.3. Potentiometric Selectivity

The selectivity is the most important characteristics, as it determines the extent of utility of a sensor in real sample measurement. The selectivity coefficient values were determined by fixed interference method (FIM) [28], which was proposed by Gadzekpo and Christian [29]. The selectivity coefficient values indicate that the electrode is moderately selective to over a number of other cations (Table 3). The potential of a cell comprising an ion-selective electrode and a reference electrode is measured with solutions of constant level of interference, , and varying activity of the primary ion, . The potential values obtained are plotted in contrast to the activity of the primary ion. The intersection of the extrapolation of the linear portions of this curve will indicate the value of which is to be used to calculate from the equation: where both and have the same signs, positive or negative. A value of selectivity coefficient equal to 1.0 indicates that the sensor responds equally to primary as well as interfering ion. However, values smaller then 1.0 indicate that membrane sensor is responding more to primary ion than to interfering ions and in such a case the sensor is said to be selective to primary ion over interfering ion. Further, smaller is the selectivity coefficient, higher is the selectivity order. A perusal of Table 3 shows that selectivity coefficient values for the present sensor are much smaller than 1.0 over a number of mono-, di-, and trivalent cations being studied. Hence, the sensor is sufficiently selective over these ions and can therefore be used to estimate magnesium in presence of these ions by direct potentiometry.

S. No.Interfering ion (B)Selectivity coefficients

1K+6.01 × 10−2
2 4.03 × 10−2
3Cd2+6.44 × 10−2
4Pb2+8.03 × 10−2
5Cu2+4.03 × 10−2
6Ni2+8.11 × 10−2
7Zn2+5.12 × 10−2
8Co2+2.01 × 10−2
9Ca2+1.06 × 10−2
10Sr2+3.01 × 10−2
11Cr3+1.01 × 10−2
12Al3+6.01 ×10−2

4.4. Response and Lifetime

The average time required for the ion sensor to reach a potential within mV of final equilibrium value after successive immersion of a series of magnesium(II) ion solutions, each having a 10-fold difference in concentration, was measured. The static response time of the membrane sensor thus obtained was <10 s, for concentration and <15 s for concentration of (Figure 4). The life time of the proposed sensor was evaluated and tested for 40 weeks, while during this period the sensors were used extensively (one hour per weeks). The obtained results are given in Figure 5. As it obvious, the significant changes in the slope of the sensor were happen after 36 weeks. Thus, the proposed sensor can be used for at least 36 weeks. During this time a slight gradual decrease in the slopes (from 28.4 to 24.3 mV per decade) will be observed. The lifetime of the membrane sensor was about 8 months, during which it could be used without any measurable divergence.

The time of contact and concentration of the equilibrium solution was also optimized so that the sensor generated stable and reproducible potentials at relatively short response time. It was found that an equilibrating solution of  M and contact time of  2 days were appropriate for smooth functioning of the electrode. Membranes were stored in  M  solution when being not used.

4.5. Comparison with Other Reported Electrodes

In Table 4, the response characteristics and the selectivity coefficients of the membrane electrode based on methyl phenyl acetophenonesemicarbazone of some potential interfering ions are compared with the corresponding values previously reported [18, 19, 23, 3051] for magnesium ion-selective membrane electrodes based on a variety of different ionophores. As can be seen, the linear range and the response time of the proposed electrode are superior to those reported for magnesium ion-selective electrodes, and its selectivity behavior is among.

S. No.Detection LimitpH rangeSlopeLiner rangeResponse (Sec)life timeReference

11.7 × 10−91.0–9.528.41.0 × 10−8 to 1.0 × 10−1108 monthsThis work
22.2–9.831.11.0 × 10−5 to 1.0 × 10−515.54 months[18]
41 × 10−528.61 weak[19]
5300.1 to 3.2 × 10−51 month[23]
63.5–7.829.29.4 × 10−6 to 1.0 × 10−113[31]
72.5–6.5291.9 × 10−6 to 1.0 × 10−115[32]

5. Analytical Applications

5.1. Potentiometric Titration

The membrane sensor could be successfully used in the potentiometric titration of with EDTA. A 20 mL ( M) solution of was titrated with  M EDTA (Figure 6). On the addition of EDTA, the concentration of ions decreases, causing a decrease in potential in line. However, the break point is sharp and corresponds to the stoichiometry of Mg(II)-EDTA complex. After the end-point, potentials are almost constant because now the sensor is not responding to small changes in concentration. Thus the electrode assembly can be used for magnesium ions determination by potentiometric titration.

6. Conclusion

The plasticized PVC-based membrane incorporating methyl phenyl semicarbazone as an ionophore, TNBP as solvent mediator, and NaTBP as anion excluder in a PVC matrix could be use to determine in the concentration range to  M. The membrane was prepared using the fixed ratio of 5 : 30 : 5 : 60 (w/w) (ionophore : PVC : NaTBP : NTBP). The detection limit was found to be with a slope of 28.4 mV/decade of activity. The sensor works in a wide pH range 1.0 to 9.5 with a response time of 10 s. The selectivity of the electrode towards is quite well understood over the other cation. The lifetime of the assembly is 8 months in both aqueous and nonaqueous medium. In addition, the membrane sensor can also be used as an indicator electrode in potentiometric titration involving magnesium(II) ions against EDTA.


The financial support provided by the Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO), New Delhi, India, is greatly acknowledged.


  1. P. Paker, McGraw-Hill Concise Encyclopaedia of Science and Technology, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  2. S. F. D'Souza, “Microbial biosensors,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 337–353, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. Shamsipur, A. Soleymanpour, M. Akhond, H. Sharghi, and A. R. Massah, “Uranyl-selective PVC membrane electrodes based on some recently synthesized benzo-substituted macrocyclic diamides,” Talanta, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 237–246, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Z. R. Zhang and R. Q. Yu, “The synthesis and membrane transport characteristics of macrocyclic polyether ligands composed of 1,10-phenanthroline as carriers for primary amine species,” Talanta, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 327–333, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  5. A. K. Singh, P. Saxena, S. Mehtab, and B. Gupta, “Strontium(II)-selective electrode based on a macrocyclic tetraamide,” Talanta, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 521–526, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. K. Singh, P. Saxena, and A. Panwar, “Manganese(II)-selective PVC membrane electrode based on a pentaazamacrocyclic manganese complex,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 377–381, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. R. Ganjali, T. Razavi, R. Dinarvand, S. Riahi, and P. Norouzi, “New diltiazem potentiometric membrane sensor stands on theoretical calculations as a useful device for diltiazem hydrochloride analysis in pharmaceutical formulation and urine,” International Journal of Electrochemical Science, vol. 3, pp. 1543–1558, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  8. M. R Ganjali, Z. Memari, F. Faridbod, and P. Norouzi, “Samarium microsensor: an asymetric potentiometric membrane sensor,” International Journal of Electrochemical Science, vol. 3, pp. 1169–1179, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  9. S. S. Beheshti and M. K. Amini, “A simple and selective flow-injection potentiometric method for determination of iodide based on a coated glassy carbon electrode sensor,” International Journal of Electrochemical Science, vol. 2, pp. 778–787, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  10. H. Zhang, Z. Zhang, J. Li, and Sh. Cai, “Effects of Mg2+ on supported bilayer lipid membrane on a glassy carbon electrode during membrane formation,” International Journal of Electrochemical Science, vol. 2, pp. 788–796, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  11. J. Reglinski, S. Morris, and D. E. Stevenson, “Supporting conformational change at metal centres. Part 2: four and five coordinate geometry,” Polyhedron, vol. 21, no. 21, pp. 2175–2182, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  12. S. Yamada, “Advancement in stereochemical aspects of Schiff base metal complexes,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 190, pp. 537–555, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Memon and M. Yilmaz, “An excellent approach towards the designing of a Schiff-base type oligocalix[4]arene, selective for the toxic metal ions,” Journal of Macromolecular Science, vol. 39 A, no. 1-2, pp. 63–73, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Z. Cimerman, N. Galic, and B. Bosner, “The Schiff bases of salicylaldehyde and aminopyridines as highly sensitive analytical reagents,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 343, no. 1-2, pp. 145–153, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. Šima, P. Fodran, J. Hledík, A. Kotočová, and D. Valigura, “Central atom exchange reactions in complexes with tetradentate thiominato schiff base ligand,” Inorganica Chimica Acta, vol. 81, pp. 143–146, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  16. P. G. Cozzi, “Metal-Salen Schiff base complexes in catalysis: practical aspects,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 410–421, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Maj-Zurawska, M. Rouilly, W. E. Morf, and W. Simon, “Determination of magnesium and calcium in water with ion-selective electrodes,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 218, pp. 47–59, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  18. V. K. Gupta, S. Chandra, and R. Mangla, “Magnesium-selective electrodes,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 86, no. 2-3, pp. 235–241, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. X. Zhang, A. Fakler, and U. E. Spichiger, “Development of magnesium-ion-selective microelectrodes based on a new neutral carrier ETHT 5504,” Electroanalysis, vol. 10, no. 17, pp. 1174–1181, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  20. W. Zhang, L. Jenny, and U. E. Spichiger, “A comparison of neutral Mg2+-selective ionophores in solvent polymeric membranes: complex stoichiometry and lipophilicity,” Analytical Sciences, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  21. M. Müller, M. Rouilly, B. Rusterholz, M. Maj-Zurawska, Z. Hu, and W. Simon, “Magnesium selective electrodes for blood serum studies and water hardness measurement,” Mikrochimica Acta, vol. 96, no. 1–6, pp. 283–290, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. O'Donnell, B. Rusterholz, B. Aebersold, D. Rüegg, W. Simon, and E. Pretsch, “Influence of structural changes on the ion selectivities of magnesium ionophores based on malonic acid diamides,” Mikrochimica Acta, vol. 113, no. 1-2, pp. 45–52, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Saleh, “Neutral carrier-based magnesium-selective electrode,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 373, no. 1-2, pp. 89–95, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  24. S. Brian Furniss Antony, J. Hannatord-Petter, W. G. Smith Austin, and R. Tachell, Book of Practical Organic Chemistry Vogel’s, 2004.
  25. A. Craggs, L. Keil, G. J. Moody, and J. D. R. Thomas, “An evaluation of solvent mediators for ion-selective electrode membranes based on calcium bis(dialkylphosphate) sensors trapped in poly(vinyl chloride) matrices,” Talanta, vol. 22, no. 10-11, pp. 907–910, 1975. View at: Google Scholar
  26. E. Bakker, P. Bühlmann, and E. Pretsch, “Carrier-based ion-selective electrodes and bulk optodes. 1. General characteristics,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 97, no. 8, pp. 3083–3132, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  27. S. Chandra, A. Rawat, and A. Sarkar, “Thiocyanate-selective PVC membrane electrode based on copper and nickel complexes of para-tolualdehydesemicarbazone as carrier,” Analytical Letters, vol. 41, no. 17, pp. 3058–3073, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. F. J. S. De Viteri and D. Diamond, “Determination and application of ion-selective electrode model parameters using flow injection and simplex optimization,” The Analyst, vol. 119, no. 5, pp. 749–758, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. V. P. Y. Gadzekpo and G. D. Christian, “Determination of selectivity coefficients of ion-selective electrodes by a matched-potential method,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 164, pp. 279–282, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  30. K. Suzuki, K. Watanabe, Y. Matsumoto et al., “Design and synthesis of calcium and magnesium ionophores based on double-armed diazacrown ether compounds and their application to an ion-sensing component for an ion-selective electrode,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 324–334, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. V. K. Gupta, R. Prasad, and A. Kumar, “Magnesium-tetrazaporphyrin incorporated PVC matrix as a new material for fabrication of Mg2+ selective potentiometric sensor,” Talanta, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 1027–1033, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. Baniwal, S. Chandra, A. Panwar, and A. K. Singh, “Poly(vinyl chloride)-based macrocyclic membrane sensors for magnesium,” Talanta, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 499–508, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. V. K. Gupta, “Potentiometric sensors for heavy metals—an overview,” Chimia, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 209–217, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  34. V. K. Gupta, M. R. Ganjali, P. Norouzi, H. Khani, A. Nayak, and S. Agarwal, “Electrochemical analysis of some toxic metals by ion-selective electrodes,” Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 282–313, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. V. K. Gupta, B. Sethi, N. Upadhyay, S. Kumar, R. Singh, and L. P. Singh, “Iron (III) selective electrode based on S-methyl N-(methylcarbamoyloxy) thioacetimidate as a sensing material,” International Journal of Electrochemical Science, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 650–663, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  36. V. K. Gupta, A. K. Jain, M. K. Pal, S. Agarwal, and A. K. Bharti, “A comparative study on PVC based sensors in determination of molybdenum,” Analytical Methods, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 334–342, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. V. K. Gupta, M. Al Khayat, A. K. Singh, and M. K. Pal, “Nano level detection of Cd(II) using poly(vinyl chloride) based membranes of Schiff bases,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 634, no. 1, pp. 36–43, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. V. K. Gupta, A. K. Singh, M. Al Khayat, and B. Gupta, “Neutral carriers based polymeric membrane electrodes for selective determination of mercury (II),” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 590, no. 1, pp. 81–90, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. K. Singh, V. K. Gupta, and B. Gupta, “Chromium(III) selective membrane sensors based on Schiff bases as chelating ionophores,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 585, no. 1, pp. 171–178, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. A. K. Jain, V. K. Gupta, L. P. Singh, and J. R. Raisoni, “A comparative study of Pb2+ selective sensors based on derivatized tetrapyrazole and calix[4]arene receptors,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 2547–2553, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. V. K. Gupta and S. Agarwal, “PVC based 5,10,15,20-tetrakis (4-methoxyphenyl) porphyrinatocobalt(II) membrane potentiometric sensor for arsenite,” Talanta, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 730–734, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. V. K. Gupta, S. Chandra, and R. Mangla, “Dicyclohexano-18-crown-6 as active material in PVC matrix membrane for the fabrication of cadmium selective potentiometric sensor,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 1579–1586, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. V. K. Gupta, R. Mangla, and S. Agarwal, “Pb(II) selective potentiometric sensor based on 4-tert-butylcalix[4]arene in PVC matrix,” Electroanalysis, vol. 14, no. 15-16, pp. 1127–1132, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. P. K. Tomar, S. Chandra, A. Malik, A. Kumar, and A. Kumar, “Chromium (III) ion selective PVC membrane electrode based on a schiff base ligand, 3-aminoacetophenone thiosemicarbazone,” Analytical & Bioanalytical Electrochemistry, vol. 3, pp. 119–133, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  45. V. K. Gupta and P. Kumar, “Cadmium(II)-selective sensors based on dibenzo-24-crown-8 in PVC matrix,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 389, no. 1-3, pp. 205–212, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. V. K. Gupta, R. Mangla, U. Khurana, and P. Kumar, “Determination of uranyl ions using poly(vinyl chloride) based 4-tert-butylcalix[6]arene membrane sensor,” Electroanalysis, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 573–576, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  47. S. K. Srivastava, V. K. Gupta, and S. Jain, “PVC-based 2,2,2-cryptand sensor for zinc ions,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 1272–1275, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  48. S. K. Srivastava, V. K. Gupta, and S. Jain, “Determination of lead using a poly(vinyl chloride)-based crown ether membrane,” The Analyst, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 495–498, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  49. S. K. Srivastava, V. K. Gupta, M. K. Dwivedi, and S. Jain, “Caesium PVC-crown (dibenzo-24-crown-8) based membrane sensor,” Analytical Proceedings including Analytical Communications, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 21–23, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. A. K. Jain, V. K. Gupta, B. B. Sahoo, and L. P. Singh, “Copper(II)-selective electrodes based on macrocyclic compounds,” Analytical Proceedings, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 99–101, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. A. K. Jain, V. K. Gupta, and L. P. Singh, “Neutral carrier and organic resin based membranes as sensors for uranyl ions,” Analytical Proceedings, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 263–266, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Sulekh Chandra et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.