Journal of Chemistry

Journal of Chemistry / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 423254 |

Lin Ye, Yu Liao, Mouming Zhao, Weizheng Sun, "Effect of Protein Oxidation on the Conformational Properties of Peanut Protein Isolate", Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2013, Article ID 423254, 6 pages, 2013.

Effect of Protein Oxidation on the Conformational Properties of Peanut Protein Isolate

Academic Editor: Hani El-Nezami
Received16 Jul 2013
Revised06 Sep 2013
Accepted06 Sep 2013
Published24 Oct 2013


Peanut protein isolate (PPI) was oxidized by peroxyl radicals derived from 2,2′-azobis (2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH), and the conformational properties of oxidized PPI were investigated. Oxidation of PPI resulted in gradual carbonyl generation and free sulfydryl group degradation. The analysis of the maximum emission wavelength indicated change in the tertiary conformation of PPI after oxidation. Lower level oxidation could generate soluble protein aggregates with more flexible structure, while higher level oxidation would induce the formation of insoluble aggregates. Result from dynamic light scattering (DLS) and protein solubility showed that protein aggregation was correlated with protein surface hydrophobicity, indicating that protein oxidation and heat treatment could induce protein aggregation, leading to PPI conformational changes.

1. Instruction

Peanut, as an important oilseeds in China, India, and other countries, is a potential source of proteins [1]. Protein in peanut can be extracted to produce peanut protein isolate (PPI) as food additive [2, 3]. In recent years, peanut protein has been receiving increasing attention in food industry due to their unique flavor and amino acid composition [4].

Protein functional properties as an important food processing factors influence food quality. These properties include the water/oil binding, emulsification, foam formation, viscosity, and gelation. They are governed by the conformational properties, especially the intrinsic factors of protein such as their molecular structure and physicochemical characteristics [5].

Protein oxidation has become innovative issues of research in the food chemistry field [6]. Protein was attacked directly by reactive oxygen species (ROS) or indirectly by reaction with the byproducts of lipid peroxidation which leads to the structural modification [7, 8]. Peanut protein can be also vulnerable to oxidative attack during processing and storage. Physical and chemical changes of peanut proteins during processing have been described in considerable detail [9, 10]. Some researchers had used various kinds of ROS or byproducts of lipid peroxidation to simulate protein oxidation. They found that protein oxidation affected the conformational and functional properties of food proteins, such as meat protein [11] and soybean protein [12]. However, the effect of protein oxidation on the conformational properties of PPI is rarely investigated. The conformational properties of PPI could affect the nutritional and functional properties of the lipid-enriched food based PPI. A better understanding of the relationship between protein oxidation and their physicochemical, conformational properties can give guidance to rational use of PPI in industry process and storage.

Peroxyl radicals (ROO) are a kind of free radicals generated from lipid peroxidation and the key chain-propagating species. Reaction of peroxyl radicals constitutes propagation process in protein chain oxidation reactions by abstracting hydrogen atoms from protein [13]. Thermal decomposition of 2,2′-azobis (2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH) can generate peroxyl radicals (ROO) at a known and constant rate under the stable temperature of 37°C and upon their concentration [14]. Therefore, AAPH-derived peroxyl radicals as the byproduct of lipid peroxidation were used to evaluate the effect of protein oxidation on the conformational properties of PPI in this work.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples and Materials

Low temperature defatted peanut flour was purchased from Tianshen Bioprotein Co., Ltd. (Linyi, Shandong, China). 2,2′-azobis (2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All other chemicals were of analytical reagent grade.

2.2. PPI Preparation

PPI was prepared according to the method with a slight modification [2]. Defatted peanut flour was mixed with 20-fold deionized water, and the pH of the dispersion was adjusted to 8.0 with 2 M NaOH. The mixture was gently stirred at 25°C for 2 h and then centrifuged at 8,000 g for 30 min at 20°C using a CR22G high-speed centrifuge (Hitachi Co., Tokyo, Japan). The supernatant was adjusted to pH 4.5 with 2 M HCl and then centrifuged at 5,000 g for 20 min at 20°C. The precipitate was then redissolved in 5-fold deionized water and adjusted to pH 7.0 with 2 M NaOH. This solution was freeze-dried to produce PPI product (control). The protein content of PPI (88.0 ± 1.0%) was determined by a rapid N cube nitrogen analyser (Elementar Analysensysteme, Hanau, Germany).

2.3. PPI Oxidation

Oxidized PPI was prepared according to the method with a slight modification [12, 15]. PPI solution was adjusted to 25 mg/mL (containing 0.5 mg/mL sodium azide) by 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and mixed with a serial concentration of AAPH (0, 0.04, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 3, and 5 mM). The above solutions were incubated by continuous shaking under air at 37°C in dark for 24 h. The solutions were cooled to 4°C by ice-bathing to stop the reaction and then centrifuged at 8,000 g for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant was dialyzed against deionized water at 4°C for 72 h to remove residual AAPH and salt. Oxidized PPI was obtained by freeze-drying and stored at 4°C until use.

2.4. Protein Carbonyl Measurement

Protein carbonyl was detected according to the method of Wu et al. [15] with a slight modification [12]. Protein concentration of PPI was determined by Biuret method using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard. The results were expressed as nmol of carbonyl groups per milligram of soluble protein with molar extinction coefficient of 22,000 M−1cm−1.

2.5. Free Sulfydryl Groups Measurement

Contents of free sulfydryl groups (free SH) in the PPI were evaluated by Beveridge’s method [16]. Protein concentration of PPI was evaluated by Biuret method. The results were expressed as nmol of SH per milligram of soluble protein with molar extinction coefficient of 13,600 M−1cm−1.

2.6. Particle Size Distribution of PPI

Particle size distribution was detected by dynamic light scattering (DLS) by a Zetasizer Nano-ZS instrument (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). PPI solution was adjusted to 0.2 mg/mL by 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The suspension was magnetic stirred and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min. The supernatant was filtered through cellulose acetate membranes with pore size of 0.45 μm. Then 0.8 mL PPI solution was transferred to a square cuvette for DLS measurement. Results were analyzed by Dispersion Technology Software (DTS) versison 4.20 (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, UK).

2.7. Measurement of Protein Surface Hydrophobicity

Protein surface hydrophobicity was determined using ANS-, according to the method [17]. In brief, a series of dilutions of PPI (0.05, 0.1, and 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg/mL) were made with 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). Each PPI solution (4 mL) was reacted with 20 μL of stock solutions of 8 mM ANS-. Samples were mixed using the vortex mixer for about 5 s. Fluorescence intensity (FI) was measured at wavelengths of 390 nm (excitation) and 470 nm (emission) at 20 ± 0.5°C using a RF-5301 PC fluorophotometer (Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan), with a constant excitation and emission slit of 5 nm. The FI attributed to protein in buffer of each sample was subtracted. The initial slope of the FI versus protein concentration plot was calculated by linear regression analysis and used as an index of surface hydrophobicity.

2.8. Intrinsic Fluorescence Emission Spectra

Intrinsic emission fluorescence spectra of protein samples were evaluated using the fluorescence spectrophotometer (F7000, HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan). PPI solutions (0.2 mg/mL) were made by 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). PPI solutions were excited at 290 nm, and emission spectra were recorded from 300 to 400 nm at a constant slit of 5 nm for both excitation and emission. The maximum emission wavelength of the spectra was recorded for analysis.

2.9. Protein Solubility

PPI dispersions in deionised water (1%, w/v) were stirred magnetically for 30 min. The pH was adjusted to 7.0 with 0.5 M HCl or 0.5 M NaOH. After stirring, the pH was readjusted if necessary. Then the dispersions were centrifuged at 12,000 g for 20 min at 20°C. After appropriate dilution, the protein content of the supernatants was determined by Lowry’s method using BSA as the standard. The protein solubility was expressed as grams of soluble protein per 100 g of protein.

2.10. Statistics Analysis

Statistical calculations were performed using the statistical package SPSS 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for one-way ANOVA. Least-squares difference was used for comparison of mean values among treatments and to identify significant differences ( ) among treatments. All the data were expressed as means ± standard deviations of triplicate determinations.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Oxidized PPI

Carbonylation is generally recognized as one of the most remarkable chemical modifications in oxidized proteins [6]. Protein carbonyl content is one of the most widely used methods for evaluating the extent of protein oxidation. Effect of AAPH on total carbonyl content of PPI is given in Table 1. The carbonyl level of PPI (control) was 3.93 nmol/mg protein. This value was higher than porcine myofibrillar protein [18] and soybean protein [15], but lower than soy-protein isolates [19]. These discrepancies might be due to the difference in raw material used. The addition of the oxidizing agent produced an increase in carbonyl content following a concentration-dependent manner. The carbonyl content of PPI (0 mM) increased significantly ( ) after maintaining the samples at 37°C for 24 h. This phenomenon might be due to the time-temperature combinations of 37°C/24 h [11]. Heat treatment could produce a significant increase in protein carbonyl content [20]. No significant difference of PPI carbonyl content was observed until AAPH concentration reached 1.0 mM. Protein oxidation can alter their secondary and tertiary structures, leading to changes in physical properties of proteins [15].

AAPH (mM)Carbonyl (nmol/mg)Free SH (nmol/mg)


Values in the same row followed by different letters are significantly different .

The content of sulfydryl groups (SH) is another general indicator of protein oxidation. SH can be oxidized to reversible form (protein disulfide and sulfenic acid) or irreversible form (sulfinic and sulfonic acid) in different oxidative environments [21]. In addition, cysteine residues were the most susceptible amino acid residues of proteins to be oxidized, but the carbonyl contents could not reflect oxidation state of cysteine residues. Effect of AAPH on the levels of free SH of PPI is shown in Table 1. The addition of the AAPH resulted in a significant decline ( ) in free SH. It was remarkable that incubation with 5.0 mM AAPH resulted in 43% loss of free SH. Cysteine residues and disulphide bonds play an important role in the structure of proteins [22]. Therefore, loss of free sulfydryl groups induced structural changes of oxidized PPI.

3.2. Analysis of Protein Surface Hydrophobicity

Surface hydrophobicity could monitor subtle changes in chemical and physical states of protein and be used as an important parameter to evaluate protein structural changes [8]. Effect of AAPH on surface hydrophobicity of PPI is shown in Figure 1. Compared to control, surface hydrophobicity of PPI at 0 mM increased significantly ( ). This phenomenon might be also due to the time-temperature combinations of 37°C/24 h. Heat treatment can induce an increase in surface hydrophobicity [23]. Oxidized PPI with increase of AAPH concentration led to a gradual decrease in surface hydrophobicity. This phenomenon can be explained as combined effects of conformational change of PPI. Protein aggregation via hydrophobic association, covalent modification of exposed hydrophobic residues (tryptophan residue), and introduction of new hydrophilic components (protein carbonyls groups) were related to the decline of surface hydrophobicity [15]. This result was in agreement with the reports [15, 24] that protein oxidation resulted in changes of protein surface hydrophobicity. The hydrophobic interactions are considered to play important roles in the functional properties of food proteins. Therefore, surface hydrophobicity could induce changes in conformational properties of oxidized PPI.

3.3. Intrinsic Fluorescence Emission Spectra

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) also could result in oxidation of tryptophan residues of proteins [25]. Tryptophan residues can emit fluorescence in the range 300–400 nm when excited at 290 nm [12]. Tryptophan maximum fluorescence emission wavelength can denote the relative position of the tryptophan residues within proteins and commonly used as a marker for detecting protein conformational change [26]. As shown in Figure 2, the maximum emission wavelength increased appreciably after maintaining the samples at 37°C for 24 h. During oxidation, the maximum emission wavelength increased gradually from 329.0 to 329.8 nm between 0 and 0.20 mM AAPH and then decreased to 328.6 and 327.7 nm, respectively, at 3.00 and 5.00 mM AAPH. Shifts of fluorescence emission to longer wavelengths (red shift) indicate that chromophores (tryptophan residues) become more exposed to a hydrophilic environment while shorter wavelength (blue shift) to a hydrophobic environment [26]. Protein oxidation could induce both red shift and blue shift of the maximum emission wavelength of tryptophan fluorescent spectrum in previous researches [8, 15, 27]. Protein oxidation could lead to increase in structural flexibility, and some initially protected backbone amide groups were exposed [28]. At lower oxidizing agent concentration, PPI might firstly expose more tryptophan residues to the protein surface. With the further oxidation, some of the exposed hydrophobic groups participated in hydrophobic interactions, resulting in formation of insoluble aggregates.

3.4. Oxidation Aggregation of PPI

Dynamic light scattering (DLS) is a quantitative, sensitive, and powerful method to monitor the formation of protein aggregates. Particle size distributions of AAPH modified PPI are shown in Figure 3. After incubation at 37°C for 24 h, the peak of particle size distributions (0 mM) shifted to larger particles. Addition of oxidizing agent 0.04 mM produced an increase in the volume of large particles but a decrease in volume of small particles. When at the concentration 0.20 mM, the particle size distributions became similar to sample of 0 mM. Oxidized PPI shifted to larger molecule within AAPH 0.50 mM. At higher AAPH concentration (1.00–5.00 mM), compared with 0.50 mM, the peak of particle size distributions shifted to small particles.

Only soluble component of sample was investigated in DLS [12]. Results indicated that oxidized PPI at low concentration of oxidant reagent (AAPH ≤ 0.50 mM) could lead to form PPI soluble aggregates. Higher level oxidation could promote insoluble component formation and cleavage of peptide bonds by peroxyl radicals [11, 29]. Therefore, between 1.00 and 5.00 mM AAPH, some larger soluble aggregates broke into smaller soluble peptides, while some shifted to insoluble components through covalent and noncovalent interaction (hydrophobic interactions). Insoluble components were removed by centrifugation. Results from analysis of protein surface hydrophobicity and maximum emission wavelength further confirmed this process (Figures 1 and 2). This was in agreement with the previous studies [30, 31].

Aggregation can lead to loss of protein solubility. Protein solubility at pH 7.0 was obtained to evaluate formation of insoluble aggregates indirectly in this work. As shown in Figure 4, protein solubility first increased with slight increase significantly ( ) at low concentration of oxidant reagent (AAPH ≤ 0.50 mM) and then decreased between 1.00 and 5.00 mM AAPH. Not only nonpolar amino acid groups but also some polar amino acid groups, buried inside protein molecules, could be exposed on the surface of protein molecules after treatment. These exposed polar amino acids may interact with water molecules through hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions, resulting in increased protein solubility. In addition, the intimate relationship of solubility and surface hydrophobicity reinforces the importance of hydrophobic interactions in protein aggregation-insolubilization process. The surface hydrophobicity is determined by the soluble proteins. So the coexistence of high protein solubility with high surface hydrophobicity might be due to two factors: (a) the protein species undergoing aggregation are the more hydrophobic, so that only the hydrophilic ones remain soluble; (b) as the proteins aggregate, they hide or occlude the hydrophobic zones, leaving part of the proteins as soluble aggregates of low surface hydrophobicity. The increase at lower level oxidation might arise from the more soluble aggregates formed. Further oxidation induced formation of insoluble components contributed to the decreased solubility. This result confirmed the analysis of DLS. The modification of lateral chains of amino acid residues responsible for protein repulsion-attraction phenomena induces a loss of surface activity and hence decreases their solubility. This was in agreement with above results of protein carbonyl (Table 1) and surface hydrophobicity (Figure 1).

4. Conclusions

Oxidation could alter the conformational properties of peanut protein isolate. PPI oxidation by peroxyl radicals induced carbonyl generation and free sulfydryl group degradation. Changes in the particle size distributions and protein solubility showed that protein oxidation resulted in soluble or insoluble PPI aggregates depending upon the AAPH concentration. Further work will be carried out to evaluate the functional properties of oxidized PPI.


The authors are grateful to by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (no. 2013AA102201), the National Science-Technology Supporting Project for 12th Five-Year Plan (2012BAD37B08), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31171783) for their financial supports.


  1. S. N. Jamdar, V. Rajalakshmi, M. D. Pednekar, F. Juan, V. Yardi, and A. Sharma, “Influence of degree of hydrolysis on functional properties, antioxidant activity and ACE inhibitory activity of peanut protein hydrolysate,” Food Chemistry, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 178–184, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. Y. Liu, G. Zhao, M. Zhao, J. Ren, and B. Yang, “Improvement of functional properties of peanut protein isolate by conjugation with dextran through Maillard reaction,” Food Chemistry, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 901–906, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. X. Dong, M. Zhao, J. Shi et al., “Effects of combined high-pressure homogenization and enzymatic treatment on extraction yield, hydrolysis and function properties of peanut proteins,” Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 478–483, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. K. Ghatak and K. Sen, “Peanut proteins: applications, ailments and possible remediation,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 369–374, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Yu, M. Ahmedna, and I. Goktepe, “Peanut protein concentrate: production and functional properties as affected by processing,” Food Chemistry, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 121–129, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Estévez, “Protein carbonyls in meat systems: a review,” Meat Science, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 259–279, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. E. Shacter, “Quantification and significance of protein oxidation in biological samples,” Drug Metabolism Reviews, vol. 32, no. 3-4, pp. 307–326, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. W. Sun, M. Zhao, B. Yang, H. Zhao, and C. Cui, “Oxidation of sarcoplasmic proteins during processing of Cantonese sausage in relation to their aggregation behaviour and in vitro digestibility,” Meat Science, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 462–467, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. K. Mcwatters and M. R. Holmes, “Salt concentration, pH, and flour concentration effects on nitrogen solubility and emulsifying properties of peanut flour,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 765–769, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. N. J. Neucere, “Effect of heat on peanut proteins. I. Solubility properties and immunochemical-electrophoretic modifications,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 252–255, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  11. W. Sun, F. Zhou, D. Sun, and M. Zhao, “Effect of oxidation on the emulsifying properties of myofibrillar proteins,” Food and Bioprocess Technology, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1703–1712, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. Chen, M. Zhao, W. Sun, J. Ren, and C. Cui, “Effect of oxidation on the emulsifying properties of soy protein isolate,” Food Research International, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 26–32, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. E. R. Stadtman and R. L. Levine, “Free radical-mediated oxidation of free amino acids and amino acid residues in proteins,” Amino Acids, vol. 25, no. 3-4, pp. 207–218, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Gieseg, S. Duggan, and J. M. Gebicki, “Peroxidation of proteins before lipids in U937 cells exposed to peroxyl radicals,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 350, no. 1, pp. 215–218, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. W. Wu, C. Zhang, X. Kong, and Y. Hua, “Oxidative modification of soy protein by peroxyl radicals,” Food Chemistry, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 295–301, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. T. Beveridge, S. Toma, and S. Nakai, “Determination of SH- and SS-groups in some food proteins using Ellman's reagent,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 49–51, 1974. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. A. Haskard and E. C. Y. Li-Chan, “Hydrophobicity of bovine serum albumin and ovalbumin determined using uncharged (PRODAN) and anionic (ANS-) fluorescent probes,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 2671–2677, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  18. W. Sun, F. Zhou, M. Zhao, B. Yang, and C. Cui, “Physicochemical changes of myofibrillar proteins during processing of Cantonese sausage in relation to their aggregation behaviour and in vitro digestibility,” Food Chemistry, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 472–478, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. G. Liu, Y. L. Xiong, and D. A. Butterfield, “Chemical, physical, and gel-forming properties of oxidized myofibrils and whey- and soy-protein isolates,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 811–818, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  20. V. Santé-Lhoutellier, T. Astruc, P. Marinova, E. Greve, and P. Gatellier, “Effect of meat cooking on physicochemical state and in vitro digestibility of myofibrillar proteins,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1488–1494, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. Eaton, “Protein thiol oxidation in health and disease: techniques for measuring disulfides and related modifications in complex protein mixtures,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1889–1899, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. W. Visschers and H. H. J. de Jongh, “Bisulphide bond formation in food protein aggregation and gelation,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 75–80, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. L. P. Voutsinas, E. Cheung, and S. Nakai, “Relationships of hydrophobicity to emulsifying properties of heat denatured proteins,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 26–32, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. H. Liang, “Fluorescence due to interactions of oxidizing soybean oil and soy proteins,” Food Chemistry, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 103–108, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y. S. Ma, C. C. Chao, and E. R. Stadtman, “Oxidative modification of glutamine synthetase by 2,2′-azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 363, no. 1, pp. 129–134, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Keerati-u-rai, M. Miriani, S. Iametti, F. Bonomi, and M. Corredig, “Structural changes of soy proteins at the oil-water interface studied by fluorescence spectroscopy,” Colloids and Surfaces B, vol. 93, pp. 41–48, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. K. Viljanen, R. Kivikari, and M. Heinonen, “Protein-lipid interactions during liposome oxidation with added anthocyanin and other phenolic compounds,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1104–1111, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  28. S. Saeed, D. Gillies, G. Wagner, and N. K. Howell, “ESR and NMR spectroscopy studies on protein oxidation and formation of dityrosine in emulsions containing oxidised methyl linoleate,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1385–1392, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. J. Davies, “The oxidative environment and protein damage,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1703, no. 2, pp. 93–109, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. W. Wu, Y. Hua, Q. Lin, and H. Xiao, “Effects of oxidative modification on thermal aggregation and gel properties of soy protein by peroxyl radicals,” International Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1891–1897, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Y. Huang, Y. Hua, and A. Qiu, “Soybean protein aggregation induced by lipoxygenase catalyzed linoleic acid oxidation,” Food Research International, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 240–249, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Lin Ye et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.