Journal of Chemistry

Journal of Chemistry / 2013 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 473584 | 16 pages |

CO2 Capture in Ionic Liquids: A Review of Solubilities and Experimental Methods

Academic Editor: Veysel T. Yilmaz
Received04 Dec 2012
Accepted15 May 2013
Published15 Jun 2013


The growing concern of climate change and global warming has in turn given rise to a thriving research field dedicated to finding solutions. One particular area which has received considerable attention is the lowering of carbon dioxide emissions from large-scale sources, that is, fossil fuel power. This paper focuses on ionic liquids being used as novel media for CO2 capture. In particular, solubility data and experimental techniques are used at a laboratory scale. Cited CO2 absorption data for imidazolium-, pyrrolidinium-, pyridinium-, quaternary-ammonium-, and tetra-alkyl-phosphonium-based ionic liquids is reviewed, expressed as mole fractions (X) of CO2 to ionic liquid. The following experimental techniques are featured: gravimetric analysis, the pressure drop method, and the view-cell method.

1. Introduction

In recent years, increasing attention has been paid towards the worldwide climate change. Moreover, the exponential increase of carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere from the combustion of fossil fuels, making up the 86% of greenhouse gases [1], does not reflect a sustainable energy model. Entry into the Kyoto protocol has brought about the need to reduce anthropogenic emissions of CO2. Thus carbon capture and storage (CCS) proves to be one of the most important initiatives to mitigate this global warming effect.

CCS is a concept based on the reduction of CO2 emissions into the atmosphere from industrial processes, such as ammonia production, natural gas processing, or cement manufacture, to name a few. This review however will focus on CO2 emissions from fossil fuel power plants, which is seen to be the main contributor to this effect [2]. It has been approximated that, if CCS is fully implemented, its potential by 2050 could be the total capture and storage of 236 billion tons of CO2 [3]. An approach to CCS that holds the greatest promise is the sequestration of captured carbon dioxide, in suitable deep sedimentary formations, for example, oil and depleted gas reservoirs, coal beds, and saline deposits [47]. The challenge is to develop a technology which will allow us to accomplish this task in an environmental, economic, and efficient way in the next years [810]. However the need to assess the environmental impact is great. The potential risks of geological storage to humans and ecosystems are abundant and need to be carefully monitored. Leakage of sequestered CO2 would be the main concern. This could happen along fault lines, ineffective confining layers, abandoned wells, and so forth. The pollution of groundwater and mineral deposits is also a problem and could have lethal effects on plant life and animals. A recent review by Manchao et al. [11] offers a detailed risk assessment of the CO2 injection process and storage in geological formations, with a main focus on abandoned coal mines and coal seams.

An alternative to geological storage of CO2 would be the direct conversion of CO2 into a high-valued product after the initial capture; this is sometimes referred to as carbon capture and usage (CCU). CO2 is used in many industries such as the food industry (carbonation of beverages), electronics industry (surface cleaning and semiconductor manufacture), and the chemical industry (polymers, plastics, and fertilizers). CCU is yet to be a mainstream technology so that many process aspects and methods are being published and reviewed [12, 13].

2. State-of-the-Art CO2 Capture Technologies

The capture of CO2 is achieved through the use of specific materials that interact with the gas in one form or another. The materials that are used depend on the processes in which the flue gas is conditioned (Figure 1) [14].

There are three processes, each of which conditions the CO2 for capture in different ways.

Postcombustion. The separation of CO2 from the flue gas after the combustion of fuel. Air is typically used as the oxidant in this process; therefore the flue gas becomes largely diluted with nitrogen.

Precombustion. The hydrocarbon fuel (in this case gasified coal) is converted into carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen (H2). This forms a synthesis gas. By using water shift conversion, CO is converted into CO2. Finally the CO2 is then separated from the H2.

Oxyfuel CO2 Combustion. It uses pure oxygen as the oxidant instead of air, creating a flue gas mainly consisting of high-concentrated CO2 and steam.

Although CO2 capture and separation is a well-known technology, this technology is just applied in a small scale, so that right now it is not commercially available for being used in large power stations. The most challenging obstacle to overcome in CCS and CCU is finding an effective technique that satisfies environmental and economic factors. Some of the currently studied techniques for capturing CO2 from the three conditioning processes are as follows (Figure 1).

Absorption occurs within the bulk of the material via a chemical or physical interaction. Chemical absorbents react with the CO2, forming covalent bonds between the molecules. The solvent can be habitually regenerated through heating and captured CO2 is released. This mechanism can also be made highly selective by the introduction of specific chemical complexes. Typical compounds used in this process are amines, or ammonia-based solutions. Physical absorbents obey Henry’s law, where gas solubility is directly proportional to the partial pressure of the said gas in equilibrium, at a constant temperature. Typically this is at high CO2 partial pressures and low temperatures. The interaction between CO2 and the solvent is by nonchemical surface forces, that is, Van der Waals interaction. Regeneration of the solvent is achieved by increasing the temperature and lowering the pressure of the system [15]. Selexol and Rectisol are examples of physical absorbents that have been used in natural gas sweetening and synthesis gas treatment.

Adsorption, as opposed to absorption, takes place at the surface of the material. This interaction can also occur chemically (covalent bonding) or physically (Van der Waals). Typical adsorbers are solid materials with large surface areas, such as zeolites, activated carbons, metal oxides, silica gel, and ion-exchange resins. These can be used to capture CO2 by separation, so that flue gas is put in contact with a bed of these adsorbers, allowing the CO2 capture from the other gases which pass through. When the bed is fully saturated with CO2, the flue gas is directed to a clean bed and the saturated bed is regenerated [16]. Three techniques can be employed to the adsorption mechanism: pressure swing adsorption (PSA) introduces the flue gas at high pressure until the concentration of CO2 reaches equilibrium, then the pressure is lowered to regenerate the adsorbent, temperature swing adsorption (TSA) increases the temperature to regenerate the adsorbent, and electric swing adsorption (ESA) is where a low-voltage electric current is passed through the sorbent to regenerate. Adsorption is not yet considered practical for large-scale applications as the CO2 selectivity in current sorbents is low. However, recently new sorbents are being investigated such as metal-organic frameworks and functionalised fibrous matrices that show some promise for the future of this particular technique.

Membrane separation technology is based on the interaction of specific gases with the membrane material by a physical or chemical interaction. Through modifying the material, the rate at which the gases pass through can be controlled. There are wide varieties of membranes available for gas separation, including polymeric membranes, zeolites, and porous inorganic membranes, some of which are used in an industrial scale and have the possibility of being implemented into the process of CO2 capture. However achieving high degrees of CO2 separation in one single stage has so far proved to be difficult; therefore, having to rely on multiple stages has led to increasing energy consumption and cost. An alternative approach is to use porous membranes as platforms for absorption and stripping. Here a liquid (typically aqueous amine solutions) provides the selectivity towards the gases. As the flue gas moves through the membrane, the liquid selects and captures the CO2 [17].

Cryogenic Separation is a technique based on cooling and condensation. This has the advantage of enabling the direct production of liquid CO2, benefiting transportation options. Although a major disadvantage of cryogenic technology in this respect is the high amounts of energy required to provide cooling for the process, this is especially prominent in low-concentration gas streams [18]. This technique is more suited to high-concentration and high-pressure gases, such as in oxyfuel combustion and precombustion.

Within these techniques lie the materials with which research pathways aim to develop more effective CO2 capture mechanisms. Currently the postcombustion process is the most widely researched area for reducing CO2 emissions from power stations. This is mainly because it can be retrofitted to existing combustion systems without a great deal of modification, unlike the other two processes. The flue gas emitted, from the postcombustion of fossil fuels in power stations, has a total pressure of 1-2 bars with a CO2 concentration of approximately 15%. As this process creates low CO2 concentration and partial pressures, strong solvents have to be used to capture the CO2, resulting in a large energy input to regenerate the solvent for further use. This creates the technical challenge of finding an efficient, costeffective, and low-energy-demanding capture mechanism using novel materials.

2.1. Aqueous Amines Used in Postcombustion

The conventional technologies used in this postcombustion process are solvent-based chemical absorbers. The common chemical solvents used for separation are aqueous amines, which are ammonia derivatives, where one or more of the hydrogen atoms have been replaced by alkyl groups. Some common amines used in this process are (Table 1) monoethanolamine (MEA) [19], methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) [20], and diethanolamine (DEA) [21]. Aqueous amines are stated as “conventional absorbers” because they are well-known solvents used in the oil and gas industries, dating back to the 1930s; for example, Gregory and Scharmann investigated the implementation of amine CO2 scrubbers in a hydrogenation plant of the Standard Oil Company of Louisiana in 1937. Today the aqueous amine absorption technology is still used in natural gas sweetening (removal of acidic gases, for example, hydrogen sulphide and carbon dioxide) and has also been applied to some small-scale fossil fuel power plants [22, 23], for example, Fundación Ciudad de la Energía (CIUDEN), Alstom power plant, and so forth.






Briefly, post-combustion capture with amines, seen in Figure 2, involves the CO2 being removed by circulating a flue gas stream into a chamber containing an aqueous amine solution. In the case of primary amines like MEA, the CO2 is captured by a chemical absorption process in which the CO2 reacts with the amine in the form of a carbamate [24]. With secondary and tertiary amines, which do not possess a hydrogen atom attached to a nitrogen atom, they react with CO2 in the form of bicarbonate through hydrolysis. This is a reversible reaction, and at high temperatures the captured CO2 is released and the amine solution recycled. Piperazine (PIPA) is commonly used to improve reaction kinetics of secondary and tertiary amines in the form of an additive; this is because the heat of reaction to form a bicarbonate is low, causing more heat being needed for regeneration and thus higher costs [25].

Amines are so effective for CO2 capture thanks to some of their properties such as high reactivity with CO2, high absorbing capacity (in terms of mass of CO2), relatively high thermal stability, and CO2 selectivity [26]. However there are inherent disadvantages linked with amines, which need to be addressed in order to make a valid and efficient process for CO2 capture. These disadvantages come in the form of high vapour pressure, corrosive nature, and high-energy input for regeneration. The high vapour pressure allows emission of amine gases into the air upon heating. These gases are unstable in nature thus giving them the possibility of producing dangerous toxins such as nitrosamines, nitramines, and amides. Nitrosamines are of the most concern as they are carcinogenic and toxic to humans even at low levels [27]. Amines are also corrosive, especially MEA. They take part in reactions in which waste forms and can eventually corrode the equipment, Kittel et al. [28] investigated the effects of MEA operating pilot plants and found that areas made of carbon steel had corrosion rates of 1 mm year−1; so besides environmental impacts, expense on a large industrial scale is another issue. The recycling/regeneration process leads to high-energy consumption in order to break the chemical bonds formed between the CO2 and amine [29]. This process also causes degradation of the amine which limits its CO2 capture rate, causing them to be replaced frequently.

Much research has gone into developing new solvents with the foresight of being superior to amines. The factors that would allow new solvents to perform better than amines are lower cost, lower volatility, better thermal stability, less degradation, low corrosive nature, and low energy needed for regeneration and adaptability to an existing system. Although amines have high CO2 solubility and selectivity, environmental and economic effects are taken into consideration when selecting the criteria for the most suited CO2 capture mechanism. While continued research into improving the performance of these mature technologies is expected, research into novel materials and technologies could produce the significant breakthroughs required to minimise the environmental and energy penalties of capture.

2.2. Ionic Liquid Media for CO2 Capture

One of these advanced R&D pathways currently conveying great potential in the field of alternative technologies is ionic liquids (ILs). ILs are commonly defined as materials that are comprised of large organic cations and organic/inorganic anions, which demonstrate melting points below 100°C [30]. To date a wide range of ILs has been synthesised through different combinations of anions and cations. It has been stated that the theoretical number of potential ILs is to the order of 1018 [31]. An example of some of the common cations and anions used in IL synthesis can be seen in Table 2.





Quaternary Ammonium473584.table.002dNitrate473584.table.002i

Tetra Alkyl Phosphonium473584.table.002eAcetate473584.table.002j

ILs possess several unique and diverse characteristics such as high thermal and chemical stability, low vapour pressure, large electrochemical window, tuneable/designer nature, and excellent solvent properties for a range of polar and nonpolar compounds. It is due to these characteristics that research into developing and implementing ILs over the past decade has spanned into many sectors of industry [32], for applications such as electrolytes [33], solar cells [34], lubricants [35], electropolishing and electroplating [36], and biomass processing [37], to name a few. This has become possible due to the large number of ILs that can be synthesised in the lab [3840] and purchased commercially. Companies like BASF, Merck, Sigma-Aldrich, Solvionic, Sachem, and IoLitec provide basic ILs and can also aid in the design and development of ILs for specific tasks. Therefore these compounds have created exciting new media for emerging technological applications already commercially available.

2.3. Ionic Liquids in the Scope of CO2 Capture

The aforementioned characteristics are particularly advantageous when applying ILs as solvents for CO2 capture in comparison to current aqueous amine technology:(i)less energy is required when regenerating ILs to remove the captured CO2 [41] due to their physical absorption mechanism,(ii)further efficiency is attained by their low vapour pressure, which allows them to be regenerated and reused with no appreciable losses into the gas stream [42, 43],(iii)ILs have a high thermal and chemical stability; typically they degrade at temperatures >300°C [44] avoiding their reaction with impurities and causing corrosion to the equipment,(iv)the tuneable and designer nature of ILs offers many options concerning the physicochemical properties (viscosities and densities [4547], heat capacities [48], thermal decomposition temperatures [49], surface tension [50], toxicity and health issues [51, 52], and corrosion [53, 54]) in the sense that the anions and cations can be manipulated to create an IL for a specific task.

This designer aspect can also be applied to the anion or cation in the sense that various chemical functionalities and structures can be attached, allowing properties such as absorption and viscosity to be controlled. These are commonly referred to as task-specific ionic liquids (TSILs). Generally ILs fulfil many of the major requirements stated in the green-chemistry principles stated by Anastas and Warner [55], in that they offer a new approach to industrial/chemical processes whereby steps are taken to eliminate hazardous waste in a system before a by-product is formed, thus neglecting the use of volatile organic solvent.

Most development concerning ILs for CO2 capture is at present conducted at laboratory scale, while other technological applications are already in use as it was mentioned before. Conversely, their industrial application and implementation is being constantly investigated in areas of post-combustion [56]. For industrial-scale integration, it is necessary to achieve extensive knowledge of their physical and chemical properties. Therefore the need for experimental techniques and data is critical in enabling the ionic liquid to be the green, viable, and economic carbon capture technique of the future.

The solubility of CO2 in ILs compared to other gases such as methane and nitrogen enables ILs to separate CO2 from the source, be it a power plants’ flue gas or natural gas. Even when there are low concentrations of CO2 in a mixed gas, the IL can be designed to incorporate a functional group, such as an amine, thus rendering it task specific. The capacity for CO2 solubility in ILs originates from the asymmetrical combination of the anion and cation, which results from short-range repulsive forces between their ionic shells. Therefore the more incompatible the ionic constituents are the greater the solubility is.

2.4. Conventional Ionic Liquids

Over the past decade, and at present, research has been built upon measuring the effects of variables such as pressure, temperature, and anion/cation choice. Results have shown high carbon dioxide solubility in what have become known as conventional ionic liquids. They are defined as ILs that do not possess an attached functional group and have been reported by many as portraying the typical behaviour of physical solvents [5759]. This is evident when low-pressure CO2 (1-2 bars) is put in contact with the IL, resulting in low CO2 concentrations in the liquid phase. As the increment of pressure increases, typically to up to 100 bar, the concentration of absorbed CO2 increases. Thus displaying the general characteristics of a physical absorber. As a rule, the solubility of CO2 in ILs increases with increasing pressure and decreases with increasing temperature. The physical absorption mechanism is a result of the interaction between the CO2 molecules and the IL, in which the CO2 occupies the “free space” within the ILs structure through a large quadrupole moment and Van der Waals forces.

2.4.1. Anion and Cation Effects

In order to create an optimal process for capturing CO2 in ILs, assessment of the essential building blocks, that is, cation/anion combinations, needs to be investigated. Synthesising ILs that encompass CO2-philic groups on the anion such as carbonyls or fluorines has proven to increase CO2 capture [60]. In the past decade studies have shown that the origin of high solubility is strongly dependent on the choice of anion [61]. Aki et al. [62] investigated the influence of the anion with seven ILs. They all contained the 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium [Bmim] cation. The results are shown in Table 3.

AnionNomenclatureClassificationSolubility of CO2 in IL

Dicyanamide DCA Nonfluorinated anionsLow
Nitrate NO3

Tetrafluoroborate BF4 Fluorinated anionsRelatively high
Hexafluorophosphate PF6
Trifuoromethanesulfonate TfO
Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl) imide Tf2N
Tris(trifluoromethylsulfonyl) methide methide

Aki and coworkers also systematically investigated the effects of the cation on CO2 solubility; they found that, in general, the increase of the alkyl chain on the cation resulted in a slight increase in solubility, which became more apparent at higher pressures. The effect of increasing the alkyl chain results in the increased volume available for CO2 interaction. Muldoon et al. [60] concluded that adding partially fluorinated alkyl chains on the imidazolium cation does increase CO2 solubility. They compared [hmim][Tf2N] directly to [C6H4F9mim][Tf2N] and found that this increased solubility was due to fluorinating the last four carbons of the alkyl chain. Research on IL CO2 solubility, in general, has focused intensively on imidazolium-based structures. However some groups have focused on using different cations. Recently Carvalho et al. [63] reported CO2 solubilities in two phosphonium-based ILs, [THTDP][Tf2N] and [THTDP][Cl]. They found exceptionally high solubility measurements exceeding those of current imidazolium-based ILs; they go on to conclude that their study shows the highest recorded solubility observed without chemical interactions in the absorption process. Although imidazolium is the most stable and commercially available cation of choice, it is evident that there are further enhancements and possibilities that can be developed from other bases.

To provide further insight into the interactions between CO2 and the constituent anions and cations of RTILs, researches using spectroscopic approaches and molecular simulations have been made. Of which has broadened our understanding of absorption mechanisms and structure-property relationships, Kazarian et al. [64] used ATR-FTIR spectroscopy to analyse the specific interactions of CO2 and ILs [Bmim][BF4] and [Bmim][PF6]. They saw evidence of chemical interactions between the anion [PF6] and CO2. They concluded that they observed weak Lewis acid-base interactions, where the anion acts as a Lewis base. ILs by their nature have intrinsic acid-base properties. These properties can be enhanced with the addition of acidic functions like carbonic or halide acids; likewise, basic functions like amino and fluorine groups can be added. This has shown to create specific Lewis acid-base chemical interactions between CO2 and the IL.

As it can be seen in Tables 4 and 5, fluorination of the anion and in some cases the cation can improve CO2 solubility in RTILs. However the associated disadvantages are cost increase, poor degradability, and a negative environmental impact [65]. Therefore paths to develop ILs with enhanced CO2 solubility without fluorination are also being investigated.

Ionic liquidAcronym (K) (bar)χCO2References

1-N-Octyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphateC8mim PF6 31392.670.7550Blanchard et al. 2001 [86]

1-N-Butyl-3-nethylimidazolium nitrateBmim NO3 32392.620.5300Blanchard et al. 2001 [86]

1-N-Octyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborateC8mim BF4 31392.900.7080Blanchard et al. 2001 [86]

1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium ethyl sulfateEmim EtSO4 33394.610.4570Blanchard et al. 2001 [86]

1-Butyl,3-methyl-imidazolium hexafluorophosphateBmim PF6 31396.670.7290Blanchard et al. 2001 [86]

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium acetateC4mim Ac 333.312.750.2510Carvalho et al. 2009 [87]
323.09755.260.5990Carvalho et al. 2009 [87]

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoroacetateC4mim TFA 293.439.790.2250Carvalho et al. 2009 [87]
293.59436.250.6790Carvalho et al. 2009 [87]

1-Butyl,3-methyl-imidazolium tetrafluoroborateBmim BF4 303100.1461 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]
333100.0895 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

1-Octyl,3-methyl-imidazolium tetrafluoroborateOmim BF4 303100.1873 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]
333100.1213 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

1-Butyl,3-methyl-imidazolium dicyanamideBmim DCA 303100.1434 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]
333100.0997 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium thiocyanateBmim SCN 303100.0978 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]
333100.0664 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

1-Butyl,3-methyl-imidazolium hexafluorophosphateBmim PF6 303100.1662 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

1-Butyl,3-methyl-imidazolium hexafluorophosphateBmim PF6 333100.1012 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium methylsulfateBmim MeSO4 303100.1190 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]
333100.0733 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

1-N-Ethyl-3-mehylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)ImideEmim NTf2 303100.2257 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]
333100.1446 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

1-Butyl,3-methyl-imidazolium hexafluorophosphateBmim PF6 298.156.660.122Kim et al. 2005 [89]

1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphateC6mim PF6 et al. 2005 [89]

1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborateEmim BF4 298.158.750.106Kim et al. 2005 [89]

1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborateC6mim BF4 298.158.990.163Kim et al. 2005 [89]

1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imideEmim Tf2N et al. 2005 [89]

1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imideC6mim Tf2N 298.158.590.236Kim et al. 2005 [89]

1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethane-sulfonate C2mim TfO 303.851490.6260 Shin and Lee 2008 [90]
303.85150.2610 Shin and Lee 2008 [90]

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethane-sulfonateC4mim TfO 303.851600.6720 Shin and Lee 2008 [90]
303.8511.50.2730 Shin and Lee 2008 [90]

1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethane-sulfonateC6mim TfO 303.851800.7170 Shin and Lee 2008 [90]
303.8512.50.2880 Shin and Lee 2008 [90]

1-Octyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethane-sulfonateC8mim TfO 303.851800.7410 Shin and Lee 2008 [90]
303.8515.80.3440 Shin and Lee 2008 [90]

1,3-Dimethylimidazolium methylphosphonateDmim MP 313.35950.4750Revelli et al. 2010 [91]
313.45340.1620Revelli et al. 2010 [91]

1-Butyl,3-methyl-imidazolium tetrafluroborateBmim BF4 293.65730.6100Revelli et al. 2010 [91]
293.2510.50.1410Revelli et al. 2010 [91]

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium thiocyanateBmim SCN 313.65990.4300Revelli et al. 2010 [91]
292.3510.50.1260Revelli et al. 2010 [91]

1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoroacetateEmim TFA 298.119.990.2820Yokozeki et al. 2008 [67]

1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetateEmim Ac 298.119.990.4280Yokozeki et al. 2008 [67]

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoroacetateBmim TFA 298.119.990.3010Yokozeki et al. 2008 [67]

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium acetateBmim Ac 298.119.990.4550Yokozeki et al. 2008 [67]

1-Ethyl-3-methyl-imidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imideEmim Tf2N 298.119.990.3900Yokozeki et al. 2008 [67]

1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluoro-phosphateHmim FAP 298.119.990.4930Yokozeki et al. 2008 [67]

1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imideHmim Tf2N 298.119.740.4330Yokozeki et al. 2008 [67]

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethanesulfonateBmim TFES 29819.90.2850Yokozeki et al. 2008 [67]

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium propionateBmim PRO et al. 2008 [67]

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium isobutyrateBmim ISB 298.2200.4030Yokozeki et al. 2008 [67]

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium trimethylacetate Bmim TMA et al. 2008 [67]

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium levulinateBmim LEV et al. 2008 [67]

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium succinamateBmim SUC et al. 2008 [67]

Bis(1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium) iminodiacetateBmim2 IDA et al. 2008 [67]

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium iminoacetic acid acetateBmim IAAc et al. 2008 [67]

1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphateHmim FEP 283.517.990.5170Zhang et al. 2008 [92]

Ionic liquidAcronym (K) (bar)χCO2References

Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-ammonium acetate(BHEAA)298.1515.150.1076Kurnia et al. 2009 [78]
298.155.480.0391Kurnia et al. 2009 [78]

2-Hydroxy-N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-N-methylethanaminium acetate (HHEMEA) 298.1515.420.0761Kurnia et al. 2009 [78] et al. 2009 [78]

Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-ammonium lactate(BHEAL)298.1515.120.0835Kurnia et al. 2009 [78]
298.153.460.0192Kurnia et al. 2009 [78]

2-Hydroxy-N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-N-methylethanaminium lactate(HHEMEL)298.1515.230.0776Kurnia et al. 2009 [78]
298.153.480.0179Kurnia et al. 2009 [78]

2-Hydroxy ethyl ammonium formate(HEF)30378.90.3083Yuan et al. 2007 [93]
3034.40.0340Yuan et al. 2007 [93]

2-Hydroxy ethyl ammonium acetate(HEA)30390.10.4009Yuan et al. 2007 [93]
3038.90.0687Yuan et al. 2007 [93]

2-Hydroxy ethyl ammonium lactate(HEL)303820.2422Yuan et al. 2007 [93]
3037.80.0410Yuan et al. 2007 [93]

Tri-(2-hydroxyethyl)-ammonium acetate(THEAA)30382.50.2561Yuan et al. 2007 [93]
30310.30.0534Yuan et al. 2007 [93]

Tri-(2-hydroxyethyl)-ammonium lactate(THEAL)30370.90.4617Yuan et al. 2007 [93]
3039.60.1006Yuan et al. 2007 [93]

2-(2-Hydroxyethoxy)-ammonium formate(HEAF)30372.80.1907Yuan et al. 2007 [93]
3036.60.0300Yuan et al. 2007 [93]

2-(2-Hydroxyethoxy)-ammonium acetate(HEAA)30365.70.4860Yuan et al. 2007 [93]
3037.60.0889Yuan et al. 2007 [93]

2-(2-Hydroxyethoxy)-ammonium lactate(HEAL)30373.20.2640Yuan et al. 2007 [93]

2-(2-Hydroxyethoxy)-ammonium lactate(HEAL)30312.40.0704Yuan et al. 2007 [93]

Due to certain limitations of conventional ionic liquid systems, where physical absorption takes place and high solubility is only seen at high pressures, numerous research groups have been developing the ILs designer character, by covalently tethering a functional group to either or both anion or cation. This resulting functionalized IL is capable of chemically binding to CO2, adding chemical absorption to the capture mechanism.

[Bmim][Ac] has been found to be one of these RTILs in which a chemical complexion with CO2 occurs [66]. In 2008, Yokozeki et al. [67] completed CO2 solubility tests for 18 RTILs, eight of which showed chemical absorption mechanisms. They found that RTILs that show strong chemical absorption with CO2 all contain the anion [X-COO], that is, [Bmim][Ac], [Emim][Ac], [Bmim][PRO], [Bmim][IBS], [Bmim][TMA], and [Bmim][LEU]. Their results can be seen in Table 4. In general it is assumed that conventional RTILs with acidic or basic functionalities strongly influence the absorption of CO2.

As discussed, RTILs sufficiently absorb CO2 especially those containing CO2-philic groups like fluorine. These are known as TSILs (task-specific ionic liquids). Widely researched TSILs are those with appended amine group, examples of which can be seen in Table 5. Bates and coworkers [68] synthesized the amine functionalized IL [pNH2Bim][Pf6] and found it to chemically react with the CO2. The CO2 reacts with the amine on the IL, this then reacts with another amine and forms an ammonium carbamate double salt. This form of capture results in one CO2 captured for every two ILs. This 1 : 2 capture mechanism is also observed on the molecular level with traditional aqueous amines. It is theoretically suggested that, when amines are tethered to the anion only, a 1 : 1 ratio can be met allowing a more efficient process.

Evidence has shown that TSILs have the ability to absorb CO2 both chemically and physically. At low pressures (typically below 2 bars) chemical absorption takes place, in the same way as aqueous amines. After the majority of the chemical bonding have taken place, physical absorption dominates the capture mechanism; this is especially relevant at high pressures, whereas aqueous amines reach their absorption limits at low pressure. This shows how the absorption performances of TSILs with amine functionalities merge the characteristics of physical solvents with the attractive features of chemical solvents. In spite of TSILs showing greater CO2 solubility than conventional RTILs, they tend to exhibit high viscosity in comparison to other commercially available absorbents. This poses a large problem for their implementation into large-scale platforms, as the heat required for absorption and regeneration would be a lot larger and energy intensive. In order to reduce the viscosity, some groups have combined mixtures of TSIL and RTIL. Bara et al. [69] dissolved their TSIL in a common RTIL, [C6mim][Tf2N]. Although the solution was stable and capable of absorbing in a 1 : 2 molar ratio, the viscosity was still high. As a whole TSILs and TSILs + RTILs are robust and have a high absorption capacity; however, they are limited by the intensive synthesis that is required, high viscosity, and the fact that the TSIL serves as both the capture material and the dispersant.

Instead of the direct incorporation of amino-functionalized anions and cations, some recent groups have reported using imidazolium-based RTILs with amines added in solution to act as the capture reagent. Camper and coworkers [70] first investigated this concept. They synthesized an [Rmim][Tf2N] RTIL solution containing 16% v/v of MEA and found that this is capable of rapid and reversible capture of one mole of CO2 per two moles of MEA at low CO2 partial pressures. An MEA-carbamate was found to precipitate from the RTIL solution; this helps to drive the capture reaction. They have currently seen that this MEA-carbamate seems to be a consequence of the [Tf2N] anion and does not occur in other [mim][X] RTILs.

2.5. CO2 Solubility Results Reported by Various Experimental Groups

Tables 4, 5, 6, and 7 aim to provide a range of experimental data cited by various experimental groups, for peak CO2 absorption values for different cation-based ILs. This can then be used to characterise an experimental system to ensure correct implementation and method. (K) represents the system’s temperature when measurements were recorded. (bar) is the corresponding pressure of CO2. XCO2 is the solubility of CO2 expressed as a mole fraction, that is, moles of CO2 to moles of IL. The tables also attempt to show the effects of temperature and pressure on ILs as well as different cation and anion combinations.

Ionic liquidAcronym (K) (bar)χCO2References

N-Butylpyridinium tetrafluoroborateN-BuPy BF4 32392.350.5810Blanchard et al. 2001 [86]

Trihexyltetradecylphosphonium chlorideTHTDP Cl 302.55149.950.8000Carvalho et al. 2010 [94]
313.275.170.2000Carvalho et al. 2010 [94]

Trihexyltetradecylphosphonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imideTHTDP NTf2 296.58721.850.8790Carvalho et al. 2010 [94] et al. 2010 [94]

N-Butyl-4-methylpyridinium tetrafluoroborateMeBuPy BF4 303100.1443 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]
333100.0961 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

N-Butyl-3-Methylpyridinium dicyanamideMeBuPy DCA 303100.1436 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]
333100.0683 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

N-Butyl-4-Methylpyridinium thiocyanateMeBuPy SCN 303100.0962 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]
333100.0632 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

1-Butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium dicyanamideMeBuPyrr DCA 303100.1204 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]
333100.0613 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

1-Butyl-1-Methylpyrrolidinium thiocyanateMeBuPyrr SCN 303100.0971 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]
333100.0608 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

1-Butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium trifluoroacetateMeBuPyrr TFA 303100.1674 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]
333100.1030 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

Tetrabutylphosphonium formateTBP FOR et al. 2008 [67]

1-Butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium tri(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphateBmPyrr[FEP]283.518.000.4980Zhang et al. 2008 [92]

AcronymFunctionalizationAnionCation (K) (bar)χCO2References

APMim NTf2 NH2-cationNTf2Im30310.000.27 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

APMim DCA NH2-cationDCAIm30310.000.29 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

APMim BF4 NH2-cationBF4Im30310.000.32 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

AEMPyrr BF4 NH2-cationBF4Pyrr30310.000.28 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

MeImNet2 BF4 NR3-cationBF4Im3034.000.09 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

Bmim Tau NH2-AnionTaureateIm33310.000.43 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

Bmim Gly NH2-AnionGlycinateIm33310.000.39 Galan-Sanchez 2008 [88]

3. Experimental and Measurement Techniques

In order to integrate CO2 separation techniques into large industrial systems, one needs to experimentally determine the ILs gas solubility in order to characterise the carrying capacity and selectiveness. These measurements can be accumulated via a number of experimental techniques, in which factors such as pressure and temperature can be controlled. The variety of techniques used for measuring solubility for high- and low-pressure phase equilibrium is vast and the naming of these techniques tends to vary from author to another. However all the techniques fall into two categories both of which are dependent on the equilibrium phases and mixture composition. If these two factors are unknown, measurements can be carried out analytically (analytical method); if the mixture is prepared with a precisely known composition, the synthetic method can be used. The experimental and measurement techniques reviewed here are gravimetric analysis, pressure drop method, and view-cell method and gas chromatography. All of which are being specifically applied to pure CO2 solubility in ionic liquids. It is important to remember that impurities can occur in the gas and liquid, affecting the accuracy and precision of the results. Therefore degassing the liquid fully before analysis allows an accurate determination of the true solubility of the gas. This also relies on allowing true equilibrium conditions to be met between the gas and the liquid.

3.1. Gravimetric Analysis

Gravimetric analysis is an analytical method which describes the quantitative determination of, in this case, gas solubility by measuring the overall weight change of a sample during absorption. The gravimetric method is most commonly applied when the analyte is converted into a solid; however, as ILs are nonvolatile in nature and exhibit properties such as low vapour pressure, they can be used to a great effect with this method of analysis. Gravimetric gas analysers are used in laboratories conducting both fundamental studies into the physical properties of ILs and applications where the ability to measure gas solubility is of interest. The basic components of a typical gravimetric instrument can be seen in Figure 3.

High-precision gravimetric instruments are commercially available, in the form of thermogravimetric microbalances. These allow in situ measurements of gas absorption that record the mass gain of a sample with a high-precision electrobalance, which is capable of taking readings at high temperature and pressure. Also available are analysers which use magnetic suspension balances rather than an electrobalance [71]. The main difference between these two weighing systems is that, in magnetic suspension, the sample is weighed from the outside. Therefore the balance is not in physical contact with the high temperature and pressures subjected to the sample. This particular system is helpful when working with samples under extreme conditions. Petermann et al. [72] show the use and experimental setup of a magnetic suspension balance in conjunction with a volumetric determination method. The advantages of using magnetic suspension balances are also discussed by Dreisbach and Lösch [73].

Gravimetric analysis systems often measure gas solubility by recording isotherms, isobars, and kinetic sorption data, which can be output through a computer from which the system can be controlled. Hence when a sample is loaded, the operation of the instrument can be fully automated and programmed to carry out isothermal absorption and desorption measurements.

Due to gravimetric balances undergoing constant changes in temperature and pressure during measurements and the high sensitivity in which they operate, readings must be corrected for the changes in buoyant forces on the sample. In some apparatus, a counterweight side, which is symmetrical to the sample side, is used to minimise these effects. However they still need to be considered. Liu et al. [74] show a concise approach to calculate this.

A detailed experimental procedure using the gravimetric balance can be seen in [67]. Also measurements of CO2 solubility for two imidazolium-based ILs using a thermogravimetric microbalance can be found in [75].

3.2. The Pressure Drop Method

The pressure drop method is a synthetic technique that is widely used in this scientific community and is also known as the isochoric method. In this instance the volume of the system is held constant, as well as the temperature, and the pressure difference is recorded during gas absorption into the sample. This method for working out gas solubility is practically suited for ILs as they have negligible vapour pressure, therefore ensuring that the gas phase remains pure, and therefore the assumption can be made that changes in pressure are due to gas sorption. From an initial measurement of pressure, temperature, and volume, and a final measurement of these variables at equilibrium, the amount of gas absorbed by the IL can be calculated. This calculation can be performed using an equation of state to convert all three variables into moles of gas.

The basic principles of this method are as follows: CO2 gas is transferred into a reservoir of known volume and brought to a constant system temperature. An initial reading of pressure is measured. By using a PVT relation, the moles of CO2 in the reservoir are calculated. The IL is loaded into an equilibrium cell/stainless steel reactor and equalized to system temperature. The CO2 is then introduced to the ionic liquid and the pressure drop is recorded when the cell’s pressure remains stable; this is the equilibrium point. From the pressure drop measured, the number of moles of CO2 left in the gas phase can be calculated. The difference between CO2 mole values corresponds to the amount of gas absorbed in the IL. A typical setup for the pressure drop method can be seen in Figure 4.

The moles of dissolved CO2 in the ionic liquid can be calculated by (1).Number of CO2 moles dissolved in the ionic liquid and are the initial pressure and temperature in the gas reservoir. and are the pressure and temperature at equilibrium in the equilibrium cell. is the total volume of the entire apparatus. is the volume of the ionic liquid, assumed to be constant. is the ideal gas constant. is the compressibility factor for CO2; this modifies the ideal gas to account for real gas behaviour. A detailed experimental procedure and full calculations for CO2 solubility measurements using the pressure drop method can be seen in [76, 77].

Further investigations that utilize this pressure drop method to derive gas solubility can be found where alternative experimental setups are shown [7880].

3.3. View-Cell Methods

These involve the preparation of a mixture with a precisely known composition and then the observation of phase behavior inside an equilibrium cell, where measurements are recorded in the equilibrium state, that is, temperature and pressure. Synthetic methods consist of two main techniques, one being with a phase transition, and the other without. In synthetic methods with a phase transition a known amount of gas and IL is loaded into the equilibrium cell. The pressure is then varied at a constant temperature (or vice versa) until a second phase is formed, where the gas dissolves in the ionic liquid causing the vapor phase to diminish, whereby using different gas pressures, solubility can be worked out at various pressure, and temperatures.

In synthetic methods without a phase transition, equilibrium properties like temperature, pressure, density, cell volume, and gas/liquid phase volumes are measured, and the composition of the phase mixtures can be calculated in terms of moles or by a mass balance equation.

As can be seen in Figure 5, a pump releases CO2 at a constant selected pressure and monitors the volume of CO2 flowing into the system. The CO2 is also heated to a constant temperature. By monitoring the volume, a known amount of CO2 is then introduced to the high-pressure view cell, which contains a known amount of IL. In the case of non-phase transition, the amount of CO2 absorbed is calculated by the difference in the amount of gas delivered to the cell and the amount of gas in the vapor phase. The amount of gas in the vapor phase can be calculated using a mass balance, shown in (2), coupled with an equation of state.Equation to calculate amount of gas in the vapor phase: where is the mass of CO2 in the liquid phase, is the mass of CO2 injected into the system, is the mass of CO2 in the gas lines, connecting the pump to the equilibrium cell, is the mass of the gas in the headspace of the cell, is the mass of the gas in the lines after venting the system, and is the mass of gas in the headspace, initially in the system after venting.

A full experimental procedure using a synthetic method without phase transition and demonstrating the use of mass balancing to determine gas solubility is explained in the literature [30, 81, 82].

3.4. Further Techniques

Gas chromatography is an analytical method that boosts high precision and accuracy. When applied to measuring gas solubility in absorption media, the gas chromatograph is usually coupled with a high-pressure reactor cell in which a synthetic or pressure drop method is applied, and at equilibrium, a sample is taken and analyzed [83]. Solubility data from gas chromatography can be achieved by using an extractive technique; here the solvent (IL) is saturated with the solute (CO2) and then coated on a column. Nitrogen, or any other nonabsorbing carrier gas, is directed on to the column in order to extract the CO2 from the IL. The nitrogen is then analyzed in the gas chromatograph. This determines the amount of CO2 removed (per amount of coating). A detailed method for applying gas chromatography can be found in the thesis by Wilbanks [84].

Other analytical techniques can be used in some cases to determine the solubility of specific gases; this may be in the form of a titration; this was demonstrated by Shen and Li [85] with aqueous amine solutions. However this has so far not been applied to ILs. Inline gas sensors also have the potential to be used. A possible scenario could involve linking an electrochemical sensor to measure the difference in CO2 concentration of the vapor phase before and after equilibrium conditions.

Many advantages come from using gravimetric microbalances for solubility measurements. The ability to measure mass change to a high precision is helpful for a variety of reasons. When initially degassing the ionic liquid sample, being able to measure mass decrease allows the experimentalist to see when a constant mass value has been reached, thus allowing the assumption that full degassing has occurred. Also, the mass reading is very important to ensure equilibrium conditions once the CO2 has been introduced. Equilibrium is reached when the mass change is zero. In situ gravimetric balances, that is, when the balance is enclosed in the measuring gas, are limited to lower pressures and temperatures. Disadvantages of gravimetric systems are mainly due to their high retail price, making them impractical for small projects where the funding is restricted.

In comparison to the gravimetric analysis, the pressure drop and synthetic methods are much simpler in design. As samples of any size can be investigated with these methods, a high sensitivity can generally be achieved, however, not a high accuracy. The most significant errors in the pressure drop and synthetic methods are the error calculations of dead space; for gravimetric methods, it is the determination of buoyancy forces. In pressure drop and synthetic methods, the two variables, pressure and gas absorbed, are determined by the pressure sensors and calibrated volumes; this can result in measuring error which is added on each step of the absorption isotherm. With the gravimetric method, all of the variables, temperature, gas pressure, and absorbed gas, are measured independently and the absorption pressure is monitored at each step of the isotherm.

4. Conclusion

The versatility and inherent advantages of ionic liquids in the process of CO2 capture are giving rise to a promising and expansive field. Their potential as physical absorbents is highly attractive, although at present their capture rate is not to the same scale as current aqueous amine technologies; the fact that amines for CO2 capture have been developed through many years and that ILs are a new research field leaves room for further research and improvement.

Solubility data of CO2 in different imidazolium-based ionic liquids are the most often found in the literature. This is especially the case for bmim[BF4] and bmim[PF6], because these ionic liquids were among the first ones commercially available. Therefore an abundant amount of previous data is available and allows the validation of subsequent experimental procedures. Although commercially available, the price of these ionic liquids remains high. Quaternary ammonium and tetra alkylphosphonium bases provide a cheaper alternative. In comparison the synthesis process of these ionic liquids is simpler and the raw materials are accessible. However the lack of experimental data with these solvents means that they are constantly overshadowed.

Although experimental data on CO2 solubility in ionic liquids is available in the literature, more is needed for process design. Here several different methods have been presented in order to obtain this data. These include gravimetric analysis, pressure drop, and synthetic methods, all of which are particularly well suited for the measurement of gases in nonvolatile liquids. In terms of solubility data measurements, gravimetric balances offer the simplest and most precise route; however, their general high prices make them impractical for small research groups conducting initial experiments with ionic liquids. Pressure drop and synthetic methods provide a cheaper alternative and do not need sampling. However these methods depend on the models used to calculate the thermodynamic properties and phase equilibrium. It is important to observe that for some thermodynamic properties, such as excess molar enthalpy, research groups use a test system to check their equipment and methods accuracy. In the case of gas-liquid solubility, however, there is no test system, especially at elevated temperatures and pressures.

The main challenges affecting ionic liquids as green solvent for CO2 capture are availability, cost, purity, and compatibility. These challenges are faced at present on a laboratory scale and must have solutions before expanding to industry. At present the advantages and disadvantages of ionic liquids and amines seem to be equally balanced. The main criteria for ideal CO2 capture mechanisms are high CO2 solubility, low energy input for regeneration, low cost, long-term reusability, and being environmentally benign. At the moment amines have the advantage of having high CO2 solubility and being of low cost. However due to the vast number of ionic liquids that can be developed and different ways in which they can be synthesized, the potential is there. Moreover through increasing research and commercialization of ionic liquids in other areas of industry, the cost is set to decrease.


This work has been supported by FEDER, ACCIO, and the Government of Catalonia (Funding TECRD12-1-0010).


  1. B. Metz, O. Davidson, H. deConinck, M. Loos, and L. Meyer, IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage, prepared by working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
  2. Carbon Capture and Storage in Industrial Applications: Technology Synthesis Report Working Paper—November 2010, United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
  3. A. Stangeland, “A model for the CO2 capture potential,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 418–429, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. T. Brennan, R. C. Burruss, M. D. Merrill, P. A. Freeman, and L. F. Ruppert, “A probabilistic assessment methodology for the evaluation of geologic carbon dioxide storage,” U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1127, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  5. R. P. Hepple and S. M. Benson, “Geologic storage of carbon dioxide as a climate change mitigation strategy: performance requirements and the implications of surface seepage,” Environmental Geology, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 576–585, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Holloway, “An overview of the Joule II project: the underground disposal of carbon dioxide,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 37, no. 6–8, pp. 1149–1154, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  7. E. T. Sundquist, R. C. Burruss, S. P. Faulkner et al., “Carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change,” U.S. Geological Survey, Fact Sheet 2008-3097, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  8. M. Finkenrath, Cost and Performance of Carbon Dioxide Capture from Power Generation, International Energy Agency, 2011.
  9. R. S. Haszeldine, “Carbon capture and storage: how green can black be?” Science, vol. 325, no. 5948, pp. 1647–1652, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. T. Kuramochi, A. Faaij, A. Ramírez, and W. Turkenburg, “Prospects for cost-effective post-combustion CO2 capture from industrial CHPs,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 511–524, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. H. Manchao, L. Sousa, R. Sousa, A. Gomes, E. Vargas Jr., and Z. Na, “Risk assessment of CO2 injection processes and storage in carboniferous formations: a review,” Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 39–56, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  12. S.-E. Park, J.-S. Chang, and K.-W. Lee, Eds., Carbon Dioxide Utilization For Global Sustainability, Proceedings of 7th the International Conference on Carbon Dioxide Utilization, vol. 153, 2004.
  13. I. Omae, “Aspects of carbon dioxide utilization,” Catalysis Today, vol. 115, no. 1–4, pp. 33–52, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. M. D'Alessandro, B. Smit, and J. R. Long, “Carbon dioxide capture: prospects for new materials,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 49, no. 35, pp. 6058–6082, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. X. Gui, Z. Tang, and W. Fei, “CO2 capture with physical solvent dimethyl carbonate at high pressures,” Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 3736–3741, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. L. Chaffee, G. P. Knowles, Z. Liang, J. Zhang, P. Xiao, and P. A. Webley, “CO2 capture by adsorption: materials and process development,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. A. Scholes, S. E. Kentish, and G. W. Stevens, “Carbon dioxide separation through polymeric membrane systems for flue gas applications,” Recent Patents on Chemical Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 52–66, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Burt, A. Baxte, and L. Baxter, Cryogenic CO2 Capture to Control Climate Change Emissions, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA, 84602 Sustainable Energy Solutions Orem, 84058, 2010.
  19. L. Faramarzi, G. M. Kontogeorgis, M. L. Michelsen, K. Thomsen, and E. H. Stenby, “Absorber model for CO2 capture by monoethanolamine,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 3751–3759, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. P. J. G. Huttenhuis, N. J. Agrawal, E. Solbraa, and G. F. Versteeg, “The solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous N-methyldiethanolamine solutions,” Fluid Phase Equilibria, vol. 264, no. 1-2, pp. 99–112, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. L. Kennard and A. Melsen, “Solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous diethanolamine solutions at elevated temperatures and pressures,” Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 309–312, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  22. H. Lepaumier, S. Martin, D. Picq, B. Delfort, and P. Carrette, “New amines for CO2 capture. III. Effect of alkyl chain length between amine functions on polyamines degradation,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 4553–4560, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. G. T. Rochelle, “Amine scrubbing for CO2 capture,” Science, vol. 325, no. 5948, pp. 1652–1654, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. G. Puxty, R. Rowland, A. Allport et al., “Carbon dioxide postcombustion capture: a novel screening study of the carbon dioxide absorption performance of 76 amines,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 43, no. 16, pp. 6427–6433, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. F. Closmann, T. Ngugen, and G. T. Rochelle, “MDEA/Piperazine as a solvent for CO2 capture,” Energy Procedia, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1351–1357, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. P. W. F. Riemer and W. G. Ormerod, “International perspectives and the results of carbon dioxide capture disposal and utilisation studies,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 36, no. 6–9, pp. 813–818, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  27. M. Karl, R. F. Wright, T. F. Berglen, and B. Denby, “Worst case scenario study to assess the environmental impact of amine emissions from a CO2 capture plant,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 439–447, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Kittel, R. Idem, D. Gelowitz, P. Tontiwachwuthikul, G. Parrain, and A. Bonneau, “Corrosion in MEA units for CO2 capture: pilot plant studies,” Energy Procedia, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 791–797, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. B. Rao and E. S. Rubin, “A technical, economic, and environmental assessment of amine-based CO2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 36, no. 20, pp. 4467–4475, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. G. Mahrer and D. Tuma, “Gas solubility (and related high-pressure phenomena) in systems with ionic liquids,” in Ionic Liquids: From Knowledge to Application, N. V. Plechkova, R. D. Rogers, and K. R. Seddon, Eds., chapter 1, pp. 1–20. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. D. Holbrey and K. R. Seddon, “Ionic liquids,” Clean Products and Processes, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 223–236, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  32. K. R. Seddon, “Ionic liquids: a taste of the future,” Nature Materials, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 363–365, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  33. M. Galiński, A. Lewandowski, and I. Stepniak, “Ionic liquids as electrolytes,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 51, no. 26, pp. 5567–5580, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. P. Wang, S. M. Zakeeruddin, J.-E. Moser, and M. Grätzel, “A new ionic liquid electrolyte enhances the conversion efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 107, no. 48, pp. 13280–13285, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  35. A. E. Jimenez, M. D. Bermudez, F. J. Carrion, and G. Martınez-Nicolas, “Room temperature ionic liquids as lubricant additives in steel-aluminium contacts: influence of sliding velocity, normal load and temperature,” Wear, vol. 261, no. 3-4, pp. 347–359, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. P. Abbott, K. J. McKenzie, and K. S. Ryder, “Electropolishing and electroplating of metals using ionic liquids based on choline chloride,” in Ionic Liquids IV, vol. 975 of ACS Symposium Series, chapter 13, pp. 186–197, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. S. Y. Tan and D. R. Macfarlane, “Ionic liquids in biomass processing,” Topics in Current Chemistry, vol. 290, pp. 311–339, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. V. Dzyuba, K. D. Kollar, and S. S. Sabnis, “Synthesis of imidazolium room-temperature ionic liquids exploring green chemistry and click chemistry paradigms in undergraduate organic chemistry laboratory,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 86, no. 7, pp. 856–858, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. Stark, D. Ott, D. Kralisch, G. Kreisel, and B. Ondruschka, “Ionic liquids and green chemistry: a lab experiment,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 196–201, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. T. Welton, “Room-temperature ionic liquids. Solvents for synthesis and catalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 99, no. 8, pp. 2071–2083, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. J. Earle and K. R. Seddon, “Ionic liquids. Green solvents for the future,” Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 1391–1398, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  42. C. M. Gordon, “New developments in catalysis using ionic liquids,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 222, no. 1-2, pp. 101–117, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. D. Holbrey, “Industrial applications of ionic liquids,” Chimica Oggi, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 35–37, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  44. Q. Gan, D. Rooney, and Y. Zou, “Supported ionic liquid membranes in nanopore structure for gas separation and transport studies,” Desalination, vol. 199, no. 1–3, pp. 535–537, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. C. P. Fredlake, J. M. Crosthwaite, D. G. Hert, S. N. V. K. Aki, and J. F. Brennecke, “Thermophysical properties of imidazolium-based ionic liquids,” Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 954–964, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. K. R. Seddon, A. Stark, and M. J. Torres, “Viscosity and density of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium ionic liquids,” in Clean Solvents, M. Abraham and L. Moens, Eds., pp. 34–49, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  47. R. A. Mantz and P. C. Trulove, “Viscosity and density of ionic liquids. Physicochemical properties,” in Ionic Liquids in Synthesis, P. Wasserscheid and T. Welton, Eds., pp. 56–68, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2nd edition, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  48. J. W. Magee, “Heat capacity and enthalpy of fusion for 1-butyl-3-methyl-imidazolium hexafluorophosphate,” in Proceedings of the 17th IUPAC Conference on Chemical Thermodynamics (ICCT '02), Rostock, Germany, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  49. M. Kosmulski, J. Gustafsson, and J. B. Rosenholm, “Thermal stability of low temperature ionic liquids revisited,” Thermochimica Acta, vol. 412, no. 1-2, pp. 47–53, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. G. Law and P. R. Watson, “Surface tension measurements of N-alkylimidazolium ionic liquids,” Langmuir, vol. 17, no. 20, pp. 6138–6141, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. A. S. Wells and V. T. Coombe, “On the freshwater ecotoxicity and biodegradation properties of some common ionic liquids,” Organic Process Research and Development, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 794–798, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. T. D. Landry, K. Brooks, D. Poche, and M. Woolhiser, “Acute toxicity profile of 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride,” Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 559–565, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. I. Perissi, U. Bardi, S. Caporali, and A. Lavacchi, “High temperature corrosion properties of ionic liquids,” Corrosion Science, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 2349–2362, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. M. Uerdingen, C. Treber, M. Balser, G. Schmitt, and C. Werner, “Corrosion behaviour of ionic liquids,” Green Chemistry, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 321–325, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. P. T. Anastas and J. C. Warner, Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
  56. P. Scovazzo, J. Kieft, D. A. Finan, C. Koval, D. DuBois, and R. Noble, “Gas separations using non-hexafluorophosphate [PF6]-anion supported ionic liquid membranes,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 238, no. 1-2, pp. 57–63, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. R. E. Baltus, B. H. Culbertson, S. Dai, H. Luo, and D. W. DePaoli, “Low-pressure solubility of carbon dioxide in room-temperature ionic liquids measured with a quartz crystal microbalance,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 721–727, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  58. Á. P.-S. Kamps, D. Tuma, J. Xia, and G. Maurer, “Solubility of CO2 in the ionic liquid [bmim][PF6],” Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 746–749, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. B.-C. Lee and S. L. Outcalt, “Solubilities of gases in the ionic liquid 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide,” Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 892–897, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. M. J. Muldoon, S. N. V. K. Aki, J. L. Anderson, J. K. Dixon, and J. F. Brennecke, “Improving carbon dioxide solubility in ionic liquids,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 111, no. 30, pp. 9001–9009, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. C. Cadena, J. L. Anthony, J. K. Shah, T. I. Morrow, J. F. Brennecke, and E. J. Maginn, “Why is CO2 so soluble in imidazolium-based ionic liquids?” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 16, pp. 5300–5308, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. S. N. V. K. Aki, B. R. Mellein, E. M. Saurer, and J. F. Brennecke, “High-pressure phase behavior of carbon dioxide with imidazolium-based ionic liquids,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 52, pp. 20355–20365, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. P. J. Carvalho, V. H. Álvarez, I. M. Marrucho, M. Aznar, and J. A. P. Coutinho, “High carbon dioxide solubilities in trihexyltetradecylphosphonium-based ionic liquids,” Journal of Supercritical Fluids, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 258–265, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. S. G. Kazarian, B. J. Briscoe, and T. Welton, “Combining ionic liquids and supercritical fluids: in situ ATR-IR study of CO2 dissolved in two ionic liquids at high pressures,” Chemical Communications, no. 20, pp. 2047–2048, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. E. J. Beckman, “A challenge for green chemistry: designing molecules that readily dissolve in carbon dioxide,” Chemical Communications, vol. 10, no. 17, pp. 1885–1888, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. M. B. Shiflett and A. Yokozeki, “Solubilities and diffusivities of carbon dioxide in ionic liquids: [bmim][PF6] and [bmim][BF4],” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 4453–4464, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. A. Yokozeki, M. B. Shiflett, C. P. Junk, L. M. Grieco, and T. Foo, “Physical and chemical absorptions of carbon dioxide in room-temperature ionic liquids,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 112, no. 51, pp. 16654–16663, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. E. D. Bates, R. D. Mayton, I. H. Ntai et al., “CO2 2 capture by a task-specific ionic liquid,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 124, no. 6, pp. 926–927, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. J. E. Bara, D. E. Camper, D. L. Gin, and R. D. Noble, “Room-temperature ionic liquids and composite materials: platform technologies for CO2 capture,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 152–159, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. D. Camper, J. E. Bara, D. L. Gin, and R. Noble, “Room-temperature ionic liquid-amine solutions: tunable solvents for efficient and reversible capture of CO2,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 47, no. 21, pp. 8496–8498, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. R. Kleinrahm and W. Wagner, “Measurement and correlation of the equilibrium liquid and vapour densities and the vapour pressure along the coexistence curve of methane,” The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 739–760, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  72. M. Petermann, T. Weissert, S. Kareth, H. W. Lösch, and F. Dreisbach, “New instrument to measure the selective sorption of gas mixtures under high pressures,” Journal of Supercritical Fluids, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 156–160, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. F. Dreisbach and H. W. Lösch, “Magnetic suspension balance for simultaneous measurement of a sample and the density of the measuring fluid,” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 515–521, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  74. H. Liu, J. Huang, and P. Pendleton, “Experimental and modelling study of CO2 absorption in ionic liquids containing Zn (II) ions,” Energy Procedia, vol. 4, pp. 59–66, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. A. N. Soriano, B. T. Doma Jr., and M.-H. Li, “Solubility of carbon dioxide in 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate,” Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 2550–2555, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. J. Palgunadi, J. E. Kang, D. Q. Nguyen et al., “Solubility of CO2 in dialkylimidazolium dialkylphosphate ionic liquids,” Thermochimica Acta, vol. 494, no. 1-2, pp. 94–98, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. J. Palgunadi, J. E. Kang, M. Cheong, H. Kim, H. Lee, and H. S. Kim, “Fluorine-free imidazolium-based ionic liquids with a phosphorous-containing anion as potential CO2 absorbents,” Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1749–1754, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. K. A. Kurnia, F. Harris, C. D. Wilfred, M. I. Abdul Mutalib, and T. Murugesan, “Thermodynamic properties of CO2 absorption in hydroxyl ammonium ionic liquids at pressures of (100–1600) kPa,” The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1069–1073, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. D. Camper, P. Scovazzo, C. Koval, and R. Noble, “Gas solubilities in room-temperature ionic liquids,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 3049–3054, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  80. F. C. Gomes, “Solubility of carbon dioxide, ethane, methane, oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, argon, and carbon monoxide in 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate between temperatures 283 K and 343 K and at pressures close to atmospheric,” The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 490–502, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. W. Ren and A. M. Scurto, “High-pressure phase equilibria with compressed gases,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 78, no. 12, Article ID 125104, 7 pages, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. A.-L. Revelli, F. Mutelet, and J.-N. Jaubert, “High carbon dioxide solubilities in imidazolium-based ionic liquids and in poly(ethylene glycol) dimethyl ether,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 114, no. 40, pp. 12908–12913, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. Z. Lei, J. Yuan, and J. Zhu, “Solubility of CO2 in propanone, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate, and their mixtures,” Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 4190–4194, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. K. E. Wilbanks, Phase behavior of carbon dioxide and oxygen in the ionic liquid 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl) imide [M.S. thesis], 2007.
  85. K. P. Shen and M. H. Li, “Solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous mixtures of monoethanolamine with methyldiethanolamine,” Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 96–100, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  86. L. A. Blanchard, Z. Gu, and J. F. Brennecke, “High-pressure phase behavior of ionic liquid/CO2 systems,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 105, no. 12, pp. 2437–2444, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  87. P. J. Carvalho, V. H. Álvarez, B. Schröder et al., “Specific solvation interactions of CO2 on acetate and trifluoroacetate imidazolium based ionic liquids at high pressures,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 113, no. 19, pp. 6803–6812, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. L. M. Galan-Sanchez, Functionalised ionic liquids, absorption solvents for CO2 and olefin separation [Ph.D. thesis], 2008.
  89. Y. S. Kim, W. Y. Choi, J. H. Jang, K.-P. Yoo, and C. S. Lee, “Solubility measurement and prediction of carbon dioxide in ionic liquids,” Fluid Phase Equilibria, vol. 228-229, pp. 439–445, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. E.-K. Shin and B.-C. Lee, “High-pressure phase behavior of carbon dioxide with ionic liquids: 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate,” Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 2728–2734, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. A.-L. Revelli, F. Mutelet, and J.-N. Jaubert, “High carbon dioxide solubilities in imidazolium-based ionic liquids and in poly(ethylene glycol) dimethyl ether,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 114, no. 40, pp. 12908–12913, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. X. Zhang, Z. Liu, and W. Wang, “Screening of ionic liquids to capture CO2 by COSMO-RS and experiments,” AIChE Journal, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 2717–2728, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. X. Yuan, S. Zhang, J. Liu, and X. Lu, “Solubilities of CO2 in hydroxyl ammonium ionic liquids at elevated pressures,” Fluid Phase Equilibria, vol. 257, no. 2, pp. 195–200, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. P. J. Carvalho, V. H. Alvarez, I. M. Marrucho, M. Aznar, and J. A. P. Coutinho, “High carbon dioxide solubilities in trihexyltetradecylphosphonium-based ionic liquids,” The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, vol. 252, no. 3, pp. 258–265, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Elena Torralba-Calleja et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

12506 Views | 6874 Downloads | 98 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder