Research Article

Peptides Trapping Dioxins: A Docking-Based Inverse Screening Approach

Table 1

Top ranked peptides selected after each screening step. Peptide-ligand complex average binding score was calculated using 10 conformers for each peptide versus all the 189 ligands. Peptides were sorted by average binding score over all the 189 ligands. The peptides rank and binding score versus the 113 PCDFs or the 76 PCDDs were also reported (rank and score columns). In parentheses the number of structures selected after each screening stage.

PeptidePCDFsPCDDsTotalPeptidePCDFsPCDDsTotal
RankScoreRankScoreScoreRankScoreRankScoreScore

First screening (top 30 ranked structures)
LFQGW1−3.881−2.74−3.42DFQGW17−0.16151.860.65
TFQGW2−2.152−0.27−1.39WFQGP180.09141.830.79
NFQGW3−1.904−0.03−1.15SFQGW190.13161.950.86
QFQGW7−1.163−0.05−0.71YFQGW15−0.19373.441.27
WFQGF4−1.58111.50−0.34LFQGY220.26222.811.28
WFQGY5−1.4881.36−0.34NFQGD210.24263.031.36
EFQGW6−1.1961.35−0.17YFQGY230.27283.121.42
VFQGW8−1.14101.45−0.10NFQGF240.36293.141.48
IFQGW10−0.7771.350.08WFQGH200.16413.531.52
NFQGY9−1.03181.990.18IFQGY300.74313.241.75
MFQGW14−0.2550.920.22FFQGY260.57403.511.75
AFQGW11−0.5691.440.24GFQGW401.31202.461.77
WFQGW13−0.53131.820.42KFQGW431.34192.441.78
DFQGY12−0.56171.970.46NFQGT270.64433.661.85
PFQGW16−0.17121.750.60DFQGQ290.69423.651.88

Second screening (top 10 ranked structures)Third screening (top 10 ranked structures)
WFQPW1−7.183−4.58−6.13EWFQPW1−13.711−11.44−12.80
NFQPW2−6.852−4.90−6.07QWFQPW2−13.362−11.08−12.45
DFQPW4−6.431−4.93−5.82CWFQPW4−12.923−10.48−11.94
WFQPY3−6.505−4.34−5.63MWFQPW3−12.934−10.35−11.89
WFQPF5−6.306−4.07−5.40NWFQPW5−12.695−10.29−11.73
QFQPW6−5.994−4.38−5.34DWFQPW6−11.976−10.08−11.21
SFQWW8−5.6210−3.28−4.68IWFQPW7−11.597−9.51−10.76
TFQWW7−5.7815−3.03−4.68AWFQPW8−11.218−9.33−10.45
NFQWF9−5.5313−3.13−4.56CNFQPW9−10.899−8.92−10.10
NFQYF12−5.169−3.43−4.46DDFQPW10−10.7710−8.89−10.01