Journal of Chemistry

Journal of Chemistry / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 505407 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/505407

Ill-Min Chung, Mohd Ali, Ye-Seul Yang, Jae-Yeon Yoon, Youn-Pyo Hong, Ateeque Ahmad, "New Steroidal Erythrityl Triesters from the Heat Processed Roots of Panax ginseng", Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2013, Article ID 505407, 6 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/505407

New Steroidal Erythrityl Triesters from the Heat Processed Roots of Panax ginseng

Academic Editor: Lian-Wen Qi
Received07 May 2013
Revised20 Aug 2013
Accepted27 Aug 2013
Published24 Oct 2013

Abstract

Two new compounds stigmasta-3α-ol-3α-(2′R,3′S)-butane-1′,2′,3′,4′-tetraolyl-2′,3′-dioctadec-9/9-enoyl-4′-octadec-9,12-dienoate (1) and stigmasta-5-en-3β-ol-3β-(2′R,3′S)-butane-1′,2′,3′,4′-tetraolyl-2′,3′-dioctadec-9/9-enoyl-4′-octadec-9,12-dienoate (2) along with β-sitosterol-β-D-glucoside were isolated and identified from the heat processed roots of Panax ginseng. The structures of the new compounds were elucidated by 1D and 2D NMR (COSY, HSQC, and HMBC) spectroscopic techniques aided by FAB-MS, ESI FT/MS, and IR spectra.

1. Introduction

Ginseng (Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer, Araliaceae) is one of the most important oriental medicinal plants in Japan, Korea and China [1]. Of the two kinds of ginseng, white ginseng is air dried, and red ginseng is produced by steaming raw ginseng at 98–100°C for 2-3 h. It has been reported that red ginseng is more effective in pharmacological activities than white ginseng [25]. The differences in biological activities and chemical constituents of red and white ginsengs have been reported. Anticancer properties and other pharmacological activities of Panax ginseng [68] have been studied and ginsenosides are recognized as active anticancer compounds [6]. Compared with Asian white ginseng, red ginseng has stronger anticancer activities [9, 10]. Recently, there was a report using a steaming process to treat American ginseng root [5]. In the study, however, the treatment temperature was 100°C and, thus, chemical constituents did not change significantly.

Anticarcinogenic and antidiabetic effects of P. ginseng have been reported [9, 11]. Several other compounds and biological activities have been reported from the ginseng roots of P. ginseng [1214]. The most well-known chemical constituent of ginseng is ginsenosides, which are dammarane glycosides. Dammarane glycosides were reported from many parts of ginseng and heat processed P. ginseng roots [15, 16]. The chemical and morphological variations of Panax notoginseng and their relationship were recently described [17].

In continuation of our previous work [18, 19] on P. ginseng roots, two more new compounds were isolated as natural products. This paper deals with the isolation and structure elucidation of two new compounds, stigmasta-3α-ol-3α-(2′R,3′S)-butane-1′,2′,3′,4′-tetraolyl-2′,3′-dioctadec-9′′/9′′′-enoyl-4′-octadec-9′′′′,12′′′′-dienoate (1) and stigmasta-5-en-3β ol-3β-(2′R,3′S)-butane-1′,2′,3′,4′-tetraolyl-2′,3′-dioctadec-9′′/9′′′-enoyl-4′-octadec-9′′′′,12′′′′-dienoate (2), on the basis of 1H and 13C NMR, spectroscopic studies, including 2D-NMR (COSY, HMBC, and HSQC), FAB-MS, ESI FT/MS, IR spectroscopy, and chemical reactions from the heat processed roots of P. ginseng. This is the first report of the isolated compounds (1 and 2) from the heat processed roots of P. ginseng. Due to the significance of ginseng roots of P. ginseng of this plant as a medicinal, the work in this area has already been done. The aim of the present investigation is to report some of the new findings in the form of natural products from heat processed roots of P. ginseng (Korean red ginseng).

2. Materials and Methods

Optical rotation was measured with an instrument on an AA-10 model polarimeter (Instruments Ltd,. Seoul, Republic of Korea). IR spectra were recorded on an Infinity Gold FT-IR (Thermo Mattson, Waltham, MA, USA) spectrophotometer, which was available at Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Both 1H and 13C-NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker Avance 600 high-resolution spectrometer operating at 600 and 150 MHz, respectively. This NMR machine was available at Seoul National University (SNU), Seoul, Republic of Korea, and all NMR spectra were recorded at SNU (Instrument, Bruker, Germany). NMR spectra were obtained in deuterated chloroform using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard, with chemical shifts expressed in ppm (δ) and coupling constants ( ) in Hz. FAB/MS data were recorded on a JMS-700 (Jeol, Mitaka, Japan) spectrometer instrument which was available at SNU, Seoul, Republic of Korea. All chemicals used were of analytical grade. Hexane, ethyl acetate, chloroform, methanol, ethanol, water, sulphuric acid and vanillin were purchased from Daejung Chemicals and Metals Co. Ltd., Republic of Korea. Precoated TLC plates (layer thickness 0.25 mm), silica gel for column chromatography (70–230 mesh American Society Testing Materials), and LiChroprep RP-18 (40–63 μm) were from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Authentic standards of chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Previously isolated authentic standards of β-sitosterol-β-D-glucoside were available.

2.1. Plant Material

Fresh ginseng (P. ginseng) was cultivated of ground dried roots ginseng (6 years old) in Ganghwado, Republic of Korea. A voucher specimen (No. PG-R-11) has been deposited at the Department of Applied Life Science, Konkuk University. Korean red ginseng was prepared by using nonpeeled fresh ginseng, which was steamed at 98°C for 2 h using an autoclave. The steamed ginseng after drying and powdered 297.8 g was prepared for extraction.

2.2. Extraction of Korean Red Ginseng Powder

The Korean red ginseng powder (297.8 g) was immersed in methanol (  litre) for three days at room temperature and then the supernatant was concentrated under vacuum to yield 30.1 g of the extract, which was suspended in water and extracted with hexane, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol successively to produce 5 g, 8.9 g, and 14.2 g extract, respectively.

2.3. Isolation of the Compounds from Ethyl Acetate Extract

The entire ethyl acetate extract was subjected to normal phase column chromatography over silica gel (500 g) to yield 30 fractions (each of 500 mL) with the following eluants: fractions 1-2 with hexane, fractions 2–4 with hexane-chloroform (9 : 1), fractions 5-6 with hexane-chloroform (8 : 2), fractions 7-8 with hexane-chloroform (7 : 3), fractions 9-10 with hexane : chloroform (6 : 4), fractions 11-12 with hexane : chloroform (1 : 1), fractions 13-14 with hexane : chloroform (4 : 6), fractions 15-16 with hexane : chloroform (3 : 7), fractions 17-18 with hexane : chloroform (2 : 8), fractions 19-20 with hexane : chloroform (1 : 9), fractions 12–22 with chloroform, fractions 23-24 with chloroform : Methanol (9.8 : 0.2), fractions 25-26 with chloroform : Methanol (9.5 : 0.5), fractions 27-28 with chloroform : Methanol (9 : 1), and fractions 29-30 with CHCl3 : MeOH (8.5 : 1.5). All fractions were examined by TLC. Fractions 1–4 were not further separated due to the low amount of the substance. Fractions 25-26 (0.9 g) were crystallized after the purification by column chromatography, yielding β-sitosterol-β-D-glucoside (20 mg) whose identity was confirmed through the comparison of TLC and spectroscopic data with those of an authentic sample. Fractions 23-24 (1.4 g) were rechromatographed over LiChroprep RP-18 (ODS silica gel; 40–63 μm: 100 g; each fraction 100 mL). The elution was sequentially performed with methanol and water to yield 10 fractions fractions 1-2 with H2O : MeOH (1 : 1), fractions 3-4 with H2O : MeOH (2 : 8), fractions 5-6 with H2O : MeOH (1 : 9), and fractions 7–10 with MeOH. Fraction 9 (1.1 g) after rechromatography over silica gel with chloroform and methanol in the ratio of (9.5 : 0.5 and 9 : 1) to yield two new compounds 1 (29 mg) and 2 (23 mg).

2.4. Stigmasta-3α-ol-3α-(2′R, 3′S)-butane-1′,2′,3′,4′-tetraolyl-2′,3′-dioctadec-9′′/9′′′-enoyl-4′-octadec-9′′′′,12′′′′-dienoate (1)

Yellow viscous liquid; 0.34 CHCl3 : MeOH; 9.5 : 0.5;  : 23.7 (MeOH, 0.2); IR (KBr): ν (cm−1): 2924, 2854, 1740, 1733, 1721, 1645, 1458, 1376, 1165, 1073, 721; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): 5.38 (1H, m, H-9′′), 5.36 (1H, m, H-10′′), 5.34 (1H, m, H-9′′′), 5.32 (1H, m, H-10′′′), 5.31 (1H, m, H-9′′′′, H-10′′′′), 5.30 (1H, m, H-12′′′′), 5.28 (1H, m, H-13′′′′), 5.07 (1H, m, H-2′), 4.98 (1H, d,  Hz, H2-4′a), 4.30 (1H, d,  Hz, H2-4′b), 4.13 (1H, m, H-3′), 4.05 (1H, br m,  Hz, H-3 ), 3.72 (1H, d,  Hz, H2-1′a), 3.70 (1H, d,  Hz, H2-1′b), 1.15 (3H, br s, Me-19), 0.93 (3H, d,  Hz, Me-21), 0.89 (3H, d,  Hz, Me-26), 0.87 (3H, d,  Hz, Me-27), 0.85 (3H, t,  Hz, Me-29), 0.84 (3H, t,  Hz, Me-18′′), 0.82 (3H, t,  Hz, Me-18′′′), 0.80 (3H, t,  Hz, Me-18′′′′), 0.70 (3H, br s, Me-18); 13C-NMR (150 MHz CDCl3) see Table 1; FAB-MS (positive ion mode) ( , %): 1312 [M+H]+ (1.1), (C87H155O7), 415 (16.2), 398 (21.2), 282 (11.6), 280 (18.1), 263 (54.5); ESIFT/MS: 1312.1776 [M+H]+ (calcd. for C87H155O7, 1312.1779).


Position (1) (2)

139.037.2
231.431.5
370.871.7
442.340.4
550.9140.7
617.4121.6
731.931.8
834.036.1
951.150.1
1035.936.4
1122.522.6
1239.739.7
1345.745.8
1456.456.7
1524.824.2
1627.128.2
1755.856.0
1811.911.9
1920.821.0
2041.442.2
2119.719.7
2233.533.9
2325.527.1
2446.745.3
2529.329.1
2618.618.9
2718.618.7
2823.023.0
29 11.811.8
1′61.461.4
2′72.071.1
3′64.965.0
4′62.062.0
1′′173.8173.8
1′′′173.6173.2
1′′′′173.3171.8
9′′131.8130.1
10′′128.0129.9
9′′′130.1129.6
10′′′127.8129.2
9′′′′129.7128.0
10′′′′127.0127.0
12′′′′125.3138.2
13′′′′123.6123.6
18′′14.214.0
18′′′14.014.0
18′′′′14.013.6
CH2 (ester units)34.2, 34.1, 33.8, 33.7, 29.6−29.0, 27.9, 25.9, 22.6, 21.1, 21.0, 20.4.35.6, 34.2, 34.1, 34.0, 31.4, 29.6−29.2, 28.8, 26.0−24.3, 22.5

2.5. Stigmasta-5-en-3β-ol-3β-(2′R,3′S)-butane-1′,2′,3′,4′-tetraolyl-2′,3′-dioctadec-9′′/9′′′-enoyl-4′-octadec-9′′′′,12′′′′-dienoate (2)

Yellow semisolid; 0.29 CHCl3: MeOH; 9.5 : 0.5;  : 33.1 (MeOH, 0.2); IR (KBr) ν (cm−1): 2958, 2830, 1745, 1732, 1650, 1460, 1378, 1239, 1053, 754; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 5.72 (1H, m, H-13′′′′), 5.40 (1H, m, H-12′′′′), 5.38 (1H, m, H-10′′′′), 5.35 (1H, m, H-9′′′′), 5.33 (1H, m, H-6), 5.30 (1H, m, H-9′′′), 5.26 (1H, m, H-9′′), 5.14 (1H, m, H-10′′), 5.08 (1H, m, H-10′′′), 5.02 (1H, dd, , 9.0 Hz, H-2′), 4.30 (2H, m, H2-1′), 4.96 (1H, m, H-3′), 4.06 (1H, d,  Hz, H2-4′a), 3.72 (1H, d,  Hz, H2-4′b), 3.51 (1H, br m, = 15.6 Hz, H-3α), 1.01 (3H, br s, Me-19), 0.92 (3H, d,  Hz, Me-21), 0.90 (3H, d,  Hz, Me-26), 0.88 (3H, d,  Hz, Me-27), 0.86 (3H, t,  Hz, Me-18′′), 0.84 (3H, t,  Hz, Me-18′′′), 0.82 (3H, t,  Hz, Me-18′′′′), 0.80 (3H, d,  Hz, Me-29), 0.67 (3H, br s, Me-18); 13C NMR (150 MHz CDCl3) see Table 1; FAB-MS (positive ion mode) (m/z, %): 1310 [M+H]+ (1.1), (C87H153O7), (2.7), 413 (100), 398 (99.8), 395 (98.5), 381 (66.1), 282 (83.0), 280 (21.7), 271 (69.3), 255 (90.2), 213 (92.1); ESIFT/MS: m/z 1310.1619 [M+H]+ (calcd. for C87H153O7, 1310.1622).

2.6. Alkaline Hydrolysis

A solution of compounds 1 and 2 (10 mg each) in 5% dry KOH MeOH (2 mL) was heated under stirring separately at temperature (40–50°C) for 4 h. The reaction mixture was acidified to pH 7.0 and partitioned between MeOH and n-hexane. The n-hexane layer containing the fatty acids was confirmed on the basis of TLC. Each solution after separation of the fatty acids was evaporated to dryness and the residue was dissolved in chloroform to isolate steroids ( -sitosterol was compared by TLC). Each solid residue was identified as erythritol by HPLC, 13 min [23].

3. Results and Discussion

Compound 1 showed IR absorption bands for ester functions (1740, 1733, 1721 cm−1), unsaturation (1645 cm−1), and long aliphatic chain (721 cm−1). On the basis of FAB mass and 13C NMR spectra, the molecular ion peak of 1 was determined at m/z 1311 [M+H]+ consistent with the molecular formula of a steroidal erythrityl triester C87H155O7. The ion peaks arising at m/z 415 [M − erythrityl unit]+ and 398 [415 − OH]+ suggested stigmastane unit in the molecule. The ion fragments generated at m/z 282 [CH3(C16H30)COOH]+, 280 [CH3(C16H28)COOH]+, and 263 [280 − OH]+ indicated that oleic and linoleic acids were esterified with the erythritol unit.

The 1H-NMR spectrum of 1 showed multiple signals from δ 5.38 to 5.28 assigned to eight vinylic protons, oxygenated methine protons of the steroid unit at δ 4.05 with half width of 12.5 Hz ascribed to H-3β, four one-proton doublets at δ 4.33 (  Hz), 4.30 (  Hz), δ 3.72 (  Hz), and 3.70 (  Hz), attributed to oxygenated methylene H2-1′ and H2-4′ protons, and two one-proton multiplets at δ 5.07 and 4.98 accounted to oxygenated methine H-2′ and H-3′ protons, respectively. Nine three-proton signals as broad signals at δ 1.15 and 0.70, as doublets at δ 0.93 (  Hz), 0.89 (  Hz), and δ 0.87 (  Hz), and as triplets between δ 0.85 and, 0.75 were associated with the tertiary C-19, and C-18, secondary C-21, C-26 and C-27, and primary C-29, C-18′′, C-18′′′, and C-18′′′′ methyl protons, respectively, all attached to saturated carbons.

The 13C-NMR spectrum of 1 exhibited signals for ester carbons at δ 173.8 (C-1′′), 173.6 (C-1′′′), and 173.3 (C-1′′′′), vinylic carbons between δ 131.8 and 123.6, steroidal oxygenated methine carbon at δ 68.2 (C-3), erythritol carbons at δ 61.4 (C-1′), 72.0 (C-2′), 64.9 (C-3′), and 62.0 (C-4′), and methyl carbons from δ 20.8 to 11.8. The stereochemistry of the steroids at C-3 oxygenated methine proton was established by coupling interaction of the 1H NMR spectral data and by comparison of the 1H and 13C NMR values of the steroidal carbon frameworks with the reported steroidal data [2022]. The poliol was detected as erythritol by comparing retention time by HPLC [23].

The 1H-1H COSY spectrum of 1 showed correlations of H-3 with H2-2 and H2-4; H-2′ with H-1′ and H-3′; H-9′′/H-9′′′ with H-10′′/H-10′′′ and H2-11′′′′ with H-9′′′′, H-10′′′′, H-12′′′′, and H-13′′′′. The HMBC spectrum of 1 that exhibited interactions of proton carbon relations is shown in Figure 3. The HSQC spectrum of 1 showed correlation of H-3 (δ 4.05), H2-1′ (δ 3.70, 3.72), H-2′ (δ 5.07), H-3′ (δ 4.13), and H-4′ (δ 4.33, 4.30) with the respective oxygenated carbons C-3 (δ 68.2), C-1′ (δ 61.4), C-2′ (δ 72.0), C-3′ (δ 64.9), and C-4′ (δ 62.0) and vinyl and methyl protons with their corresponding carbon signals. The absence of a carbon signal between δ 110 and 90 supported the linkage of erythritol moiety to the steroid. Alkaline hydrolysis of 1 yielded 3-epistigmastanol oleic and linoleic acids (TLC comparable) and erythritol (HPLC comparable). On the basis of foregoing description, the structure of 1 was elucidated as stigmasta-3α-ol-3α-(2′R,3′S)-butane-1′,2′,3′,4′-tetraolyl-2′,3′-dioctadec-9′′/9′′′-enoyl-4′-octadec-9′′′′,12′′′′-dienoate (1, Figure 1). This is a new steroidal erythrityl trimester.

Compound 2 showed distinctive IR absorption bands for ester groups (1745, 1732 cm−1), unsaturation (1650 cm−1), and aliphatic chain (754 cm−1). It had a molecular ion peak at m/z 1309 [M+H]+ determined on the basis of FAB mass and 13C NMR spectra consistent with the molecular formula steroidal erythritol triester, C87H153O7. The ion peaks arising at m/z 413 [M − erythtrityl triester]+, 398 [413 − Me]+, 395 [413 − OH]+, and 381 [398 − Me]+ suggested that β-sitosterol was present as an aglyconic unit. It was also supported by the ion peaks generated at m/z 271 [413 − side chain]+, 255 [271 − OH]+, and 213 [255 − ring D]+. The ion fragments produced at m/z 282 [CH3(CH2)7 CH=CH(CH2)7COOH]+ and 280 [CH3(C16H28)COOH]+ indicated that oleic and linoleic acids were esterified with erythritol unit.

The 1H-NMR spectrum of 2 showed nine one-proton multiplets between δ 5.72 and 5.08 assigned to vinylic protons of the steroid and fatty acid units. A one-proton double doublet at δ 5.02 (  Hz), a two-proton multiplet at δ 4.30, a one-proton multiplet at δ 4.96, and two one-proton doublets at δ 4.06 (  Hz) and 3.72 (  Hz) were ascribed to the erythritol protons H-2′, H2-1′, H-3′, and H2-4′, respectively. A one-proton broad multiplet at δ 3.51 with half width of 15.6 Hz was due to oxygenated H-3α methine proton. Nine three-proton signals as broad singlets at δ 1.01 and 0.67, as doublets at δ 0.92 (  Hz), 0.90 (  Hz), and 0.88 (  Hz), and as triplets at δ 0.86 (  Hz), 0.84 (  Hz), 0.82 (  Hz), and 0.80 (  Hz) were associated with the tertiary C-18 and C-19, secondary C-21, C-26, and C-27, and primary C-18′′, C-18′′′, C-18′′′′, and C-29 methyl protons, respectively, all attached to saturated carbons. The 13C-NMR spectrum of 2 exhibited important signals for ester carbons at δ 173.8 (C-1′′), 173.2 (C-1′′′), and 171.8 (C-1′′′′), vinylic carbons between δ 140.7 and 123.6, oxygenated steroidal methine carbon at δ 71.7 (C-3), and erythritol carbons at δ 61.4 (C-1′), 68.1 (C-2′), 65.0 (C-3′), and 62.0 (C-4′), methyl carbons from δ 21.0 to 11.8. The absence of an anomeric carbon signals from δ 110 to 90 supported erythritol unit attached to the steroid. The stereochemistry of the steroids at C-3 oxygenated methine proton was established by coupling interaction of the 1H NMR spectral data and by comparison of the 1H and 13C NMR values of the steroidal carbon frameworks with the reported steroidal data [2022]. The poliol was detected as erythritol by comparing retention time by HPLC [23].

The 1H-1H COSY spectrum of 2 showed correlations of H-3 with H2-2 and H2-4; H-6 with H2-4, H2-7, and H-8; H-2′ with H2-1′, H-3′, and H2-4′; and H2-11′′′′ with H-9′′′′, H-10′′′′, H-12′′′, and H-13′′′′. The key HMBC correlations of 2 that exhibited interactions of proton carbon relations are shown in Figure 3. The HSQC spectrum of 2 showed correlations of H-3 at δ 3.51 with C-3 at δ 71.22; H2-1′ at δ 5.02 with C-2′ at δ 68.19; H2-1′ at δ 4.30 with C-1′ at δ 61.36; H-3′ at δ 4.13 with C-3′ at δ 65.01, and H2-4′ at δ 3.72 and 3.51 with C-4′ at δ 62.07. Alkaline hydrolysis of 2 yielded β-sitosterol, oleic and linoleic acids, TLC comparable. These lines of evidence led to the formulation of the structure of 2 as stigmasta-5-en-3β-ol-3β-(2′R,3′S)-butane-1′,2′,3′,4′-tetraolyl-2′,3′-dioctadec-9′′/9′′′-enoyl-4′-octadec-9′′′′,12′′′′-dienoate (2, Figure 2). This is a new steroidal erythrityl triestrer.

4. Conclusion

Two new compounds stigmasta-3α-ol-3α-(2′R,3′S)-butane-1′,2′,3′,4′-tetraolyl-2′,3′-dioctadec-9′′/9′′′-enoyl-4′-octadec-9′′′′,12′′′′-dienoate (1) and stigmasta-5-en-3β-ol-3β-(2′R,3′S)-butane-1′,2′,3′,4′-tetraolyl-2′,3′-dioctadec-9′′/9′′′-enoyl-4′-octadec-9′′′′,12′′′′-dienoate (2) were isolated from the methanolic extraction of heat processed roots of P. ginseng. A lot of work already studied P. ginseng compounds and biological activity. Further studies on the P. ginseng compounds and bioactivity are also needed.

Acknowledgment

This work was carried out with the support of Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (PJ0083022011), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Supplementary Materials

The spectral data of compounds 1 and 2 are as supplementary material available on for the user’s.

  1. Supplementary Material

References

  1. M. K. Ang-Lee, J. Moss, and C. S. Yuan, “Herbal medicines and perioperative care,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 286, no. 2, pp. 208–216, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  2. T. Takaku, K. Kameda, Y. Matsuura, K. Sekiya, and H. Okuda, “Studies on insulin-like substances in Korean red ginseng,” Planta Medica, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 27–30, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  3. J. H. Do, H. O. Lee, S. K. Lee, K. B. Noh, S. D. Lee, and K. S. Lee, “Comparisons of acidic polysaccharide contents in various ginseng species and parts,” Korean Journal of Ginseng Science, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 145–147, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  4. W. Y. Kim, J. M. Kim, S. B. Han et al., “Steaming of ginseng at high temperature enhances biological activity,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 1702–1704, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. C. Z. Wang, H. H. Aung, M. Ni et al., “Red American ginseng: ginsenoside constituents and antiproliferative activities of heat-processed Panax quinquefolius roots,” Planta Medica, vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 669–674, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Helms, “Cancer prevention and therapeutics: Panax ginseng,” Alternative Medicine Review, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 259–274, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  7. J. T. Xie, S. Mchendale, and C. S. Yuan, “Ginseng and diabetes,” The Americam Journal of Chinese Medicine, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 397–404, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  8. C. J. Liou, W. C. Huang, and J. Tseng, “Long-term oral administration of ginseng extract modulates humoral immune response and spleen cell functions,” The American Journal of Chinese Medicine, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 651–661, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. T. K. Yun, Y. S. Lee, Y. H. Lee, S. I. Kim, and H. Y. Yun, “Anticarcinogenic effect of Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer and identification of active compounds,” Journal of Korean Medical Science, vol. 16, supplement, pp. S6–S18, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  10. H. H. Yoo, T. Yokosawa, A. Satoh, K. S. Kang, and H. Y. Kim, “Effects of ginseng on the proliferation of human lung fibroblasts,” The American Journal of Chinese Medicine, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 137–146, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. S. Attele, Y. P. Zhou, J. T. Xie et al., “Antidiabetic effects of Panax ginseng berry extract and the identification of an effective component,” Diabetes, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1851–1858, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  12. N. Fukuyama, M. Shibuya, and Y. Orihara, “Antimicrobial polyacetylenes from Panax ginseng hairy root culture,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 377–380, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. C. Rho, H. S. Lee, S. W. Lee et al., “Polyacetylenic compounds, ACAT inhibitors from the roots of Panax ginseng,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 919–922, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. I. H. Park, N. Y. Kim, S. B. Han et al., “Three new dammarane glycosides from heat processed ginseng,” Archives of Pharmacal Research, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 428–432, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  15. N. Baek, D. S. Kim, Y. H. Lee, J. D. Park, C. B. Lee, and S. I. Kim, “Ginsenoside Rh4, a genuine dammarane glycoside from Korean red ginseng,” Planta Medica, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 86–87, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. H. Ryu, J. H. Park, J. H. Eun, J. H. Jung, and D. H. Sohn, “A dammarane glycoside from Korean red ginseng,” Phytochemistry, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 931–933, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. D. Wang, H. I. Koh, Y. Hong et al., “Chemical and morphological variations of Panax notoginseng and their relationship,” Phytochemistry, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 88–95, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. I. M. Chung, M. Y. Kim, N. Praveen, Y. P. Hong, and A. Ahmad, “Fatty acid constituent from the heat processed roots of Panax ginseng,” Asian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1086–1088, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  19. I. M. Chung, M. Ali, Y. P. Hong, and A. Ahmad, “New compound from the heat processed roots of Panax ginseng,” Asian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 4667–4669, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  20. I. M. Chung, M. Ali, T. D. Khanh, M. G. Choung, H. J. Park, and A. Ahmad, “New stigmastane steroids constituents from rice hulls of Oryza sativa and inhibitory activity on radish seed,” Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 93–98, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  21. I. M. Chung, M. Ali, A. Ahmad, J. D. Lim, C. Y. Yu, and J. S. Kim, “Chemical constituents of rice (Oryza sativa) hulls and their herbicidal activity against duckweed (Lemna paucicostata Hegelm 381),” Phytochemical Analysis, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 36–45, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. I. M. Chung, M. Ali, A. Ahmad et al., “Steroidal constituents of rice (Oryza sativa) hulls with algicidal and herbicidal activity against blue-green algae and duckweed,” Phytochemical Analysis, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 133–145, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. T. Shindou, Y. Sasaki, H. Miki, T. Eguchi, K. Hagiwara, and T. Ichikawa, “Identification of erythritol by HPLC and GC-MS and quantitative measurement in pulps of various fruits,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1474–1476, 1989. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Ill-Min Chung et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

944 Views | 622 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.