Journal of Chemistry

Journal of Chemistry / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 846170 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/846170

T. Vijaya Bhaskara Reddy, G. Ramu, A. Biksham Babu, C. Rambabu, "Development and Validation of HLPC Method for the Estimation of Lamotrigine in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Formulations", Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2013, Article ID 846170, 4 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/846170

Development and Validation of HLPC Method for the Estimation of Lamotrigine in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Formulations

Academic Editor: Irene Panderi
Received23 Jan 2012
Accepted07 Jun 2012
Published26 Jun 2012

Abstract

A simple, precise, accurate, and rapid HPLC method was developed to estimate the amount of lamotrigine in bulk and its pharmaceutical formulations. Waters Alliance HPLC system equipped with autosampler, ultraviolet detector, and Symmetry C8 (4.6 mm ID × 150 mm, 3.5 μm, Make: XTerra) column were used for the quantification of the drug. Separation was carried out at a flow rate of 0.7 mL/min. of mobile phase (acetonitrile and potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer of in the ratio 60 : 40 v/v), and the detection was carried out at a wavelength of 215 nm. The retention time of lamotrigine was found to be 2.797 min. The linearity was obeyed in the range of concentration 5–25 μg/mL. The developed method was found to be repeatable and reproducible; hence, it can be used as an alternative method in assay of the lamotrigine in any pharmaceutical industries.

1. Introduction

Lamotrigine (LTG) (Lamictal by Glaxo SmithKline) is an anticonvulsant drug used in the treatment of epilepsy and bipolar disorder. It is generally accepted to be a member of the sodium channel blocking class of antiepileptic drugs [1], but it could have additional actions in as much as it has a broader spectrum of action than other sodium channel antiepileptic drugs such as phenytoin and carbamazepine and is effective in the treatment of the depressed phase of bipolar disorder, whereas other sodium channel blocking antiepileptic drugs are not. In addition, lamotrigine shares few side-effects with other, unrelated anticonvulsants known to inhibit sodium channels, which further emphasizes its unique properties [2]. Lamotrigine is chemically known as 3,5-diamino-6-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-1,2,4-triazine, C9H7Cl2N5, molecular weight 256 g. Emami et al. [3] developed a HPLC method for determination of lamotrigine and related compounds in tablet formulations. Youssef and Taha [4] have developed a spectrophotometric, TLC, and HPLC methods for the determination of lamotrigine in presence of its impurity. A stability indicating LC method was developed for the determination of lamotrigine by Srinivasulu et al. [5]. Sallustio and Morris [6] reported a high-performance liquid chromatography method for quantitation of plasma lamotrigine concentrations in patients with epilepsy. Simultaneous determination of lamotrigine, zonisamide, and carbamazepine in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography was reported by Griner-Sosanko et al. [7]. Several HPLC methods were reported in the literature for the determination of lamotrigine in different biological fluids [819]. A spectroscopic method [20] in UV region (307 nm) was developed for the quantitative determination of lamotrigine in bulk and in dosage form in which linearity obeyed in the concentration range 5–50 mcg/mL. A few visible spectrophotometric methods [2123] were developed for the determination of lamotrigine (LTG) in pharmaceutical dosage forms and urine samples using some chromogenic reagents. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate rapid, simple, and selective liquid chromatography method for LTG quality control in tablets.

2. Experimental

Waters Alliance HPLC system equipped with autosampler, binary gradient pump, and dual wavelength UV-visible detector was applied to perform the analyses. An analytical column; Symmetry C8 (4.6 mm ID × 150 mm, 3.5 μm, Make: XTerra) was used in the analysis. Chromatographic Software Empower was used for data collection and processing.

3. Materials and Chemicals

Lamotrigine LMG (purity 99.7%) was gifted by Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd., Hyderabad. The commercially available formulations of lamotrigine were purchased from the local market. The water of HPLC was prepared by double glass distillation and filtration through 0.45 mm filters. Acetonitrile of HPLC grade was obtained from E. Merck (India) Ltd., Mumbai. Potassium dihydrogen phosphate and sodium hydroxide of analytical grade are purchased from Qualigens Fine Chemicals Ltd., Mumbai.

3.1. Preparation of Buffer Solution

(1)About 7.0 grams of potassium dihydrogen phosphate were weighed accurately, transferred into a 1000 mL beaker, and dissolved in 500 mL of HPLC grade water. The solution was sonicated for 30 min., degassed, and then made to total volume. The pH of the resulting solution was adjusted to 7.0 by adding dilute sodium hydroxide solution and filtered through 0.45 μm membrane filter.(2)The mobile phase was prepared by adding of 600 mL acetonitrile to 400 mL of 0.7% potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer of pH 7.0. The two solutions were mixed well, degassed for 30 min., and filtered through 0.45 μm membrane filter.

3.2. Preparation of Standard Drug Solution

Stock solution of the lamotrigine (LMG) was prepared by dissolving accurately weighed 10 mg of lamotrigine standard in 70 mL of mobile phase in a 100 mL volumetric flask, sonicated, and made up to the mark. Working standard solution of 15 μg/mL was prepared by transferring about 1.5 mL of the above stock solution into a 10 mL volumetric flask and dilute up to the mark with mobile phase, sonicated, and filtered through 0.45 μm filter. A series dilute solutions ranging from 5 to 25 μg/mL were prepared in similar manner and transferred into an auto sampler vial for analysis.

3.3. Analysis of Pharmaceutical Formulations

Five tablets were accurately weighed and finely powdered in a mortar. An amount of tablet mass equivalent to 10 mg was transferred to a 100 mL volumetric flask and dissolved in 70 mL of mobile phase. Then, the flask was placed in ultrasonic bath for 15 min. The resulting suspension was diluted to volume with mobile phase and then filtered through 0.45 μm membrane. Further three different concentration solutions (i.e., 50%, 100%, and 150%) of the target concentration were prepared, and the percent of recovery was studied.

3.4. Chromatographic Conditions

The mobile phase was pumped from the solvent reservoir into the column at a flow rate of 0.7 mL/min. The column was allowed to equilibrate for 30 min. prior to the injection of 20 μL the standard. The detection of the components eluted from the column was monitored at 215 nm. The chromatogram was recorded for the five replicate injections of the working standard solution, and precision was calculated. Calibration graph was constructed by plotting peak area against concentration of five sample solutions. The assay of the drug in different pharmaceutical formulations was calculated at three different concentrations.

4. Results and Discussion

The working standard solution of concentration 15 μg/mL was injected into 20 μL loop, and the chromatogram was recorded. A typical chromatogram was presented in Figure 1. The system suitable parameters such as tailing factor (1.5) and number of theoretical plates (2365) are found to be within the limits. The retention time of the component was found to be 2.647 min. The intraday precision or interday precision of a method was expressed in terms of statistical parameters such as standard deviation and % RSD. The % RSD was calculated for five replicate measurements and found to be less than 2.0. Interday precision of the method was determined by carrying out the experiment on different days using same instrument and same column under similar chromatographic conditions. The results are presented in Table 1. The linearity of the method was studied by injecting 20 μL of working standard solutions of concentration ranging from 5 to 25 μg/mL into the column, and linearity report was obtained. A calibration curve was constructed by plotting concentration against peak area (Figure 2). The correlation coefficient, slope, and intercept were presented in Table 3.The accuracy of the method was determined from recovery experiments. The recovery studies were carried out at three different concentration levels (50%, 100%, and 150% of target concentration). The percentage recovery of the drug at three different concentration levels is presented in Table 2. Robustness of the proposed method is checked by making slight deliberate change in the experimental procedures. In the present method, a deliberate change in the flow rate and mobile phase composition is made to evaluate the impact on the method. The results are summarised in Table 4. The drug obeys linearity in the range of 5–25 μg/mL, and the correlation coefficient is found to be 0.9998. The developed method is found to be accurate and precise as indicated by recovery studies and % RSD not more than 2.0. Recovery studies are performed at 50%, 100%, and 150% concentration levels, and the results are found to be within the limits mentioned as per ICH Guidelines.


Intraday precisionInterday precision
InjectionAreaInjectionArea

Injection-13108761Injection-13139181
Injection-23113250Injection-23126470
Injection-33123530Injection-33135139
Injection-43129896Injection-43143320
Injection-53136552Injection-53143734

Average3122398Average3137569
Standard deviation11483.6Standard deviation7120.1
% RSD0.37% RSD0.23

Acceptance criteria:   the % RSD should be between less than 2.0.

% concentrationAreaAmountAmountPercent ofMean
addedfoundrecoveryrecovery

50%15592425.04.9999.8%99.96%
100%311157010.09.9699.6%
150%465667415.014.999.4%

Acceptance criteria: the percent of recovery for each level should be between 98.0 and 102.0%.

S. no.Concentration 𝜇 g/mLArea of the peak

151025925
2102027807
3153095827
4204058008
5255068723

Slope16351
Intercept78025
Correlation coefficient0.9998

Acceptance criteria: correlation coefficient should be not less than 0.999.

S. no.Flow rate mL/min.Plate countTailing factor% mobile phasePlate countTailing factor

10.62573.01.610% less2250.91.6
20.72365.71.5Actual2365.71.5
30.82461.11.510% high2166.31.5

R e s u l t s for actual flow (0.7 mL/min) have been considered from assay standard.
R e s u l t s for actual mobile phase composition (60 : 40 acetonitrile : buffer) have been considered.

5. Conclusions

The proposed HPLC method for the determination of lamotrigine in pharmaceutical formulation was found to be sensitive, accurate, precise, simple, and rapid. Hence, the present HPLC method may be used for routine analysis of the raw materials and formulations.

Acknowledgment

The author is very much thankful to Pharma Train, an analytical testing laboratory, Hyderabad for providing laboratory facilities.

References

  1. M. A. Rogawski and W. Löscher, “The neurobiology of antiepileptic drugs,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 553–564, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  2. G. Lees and M. J. Leach, “Studies on the mechanism of action of the novel anticonvulsant lamotrigine (Lamictal) using primary neuroglial cultures from rat cortex,” Brain Research, vol. 612, no. 1-2, pp. 190–199, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. Emami, N. Ghassami, and F. Ahmadi, “Development and validation of a new HPLC method for determination of lamotrigine and related compounds in tablet formulations,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 999–1005, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. N. F. Youssef and E. A. Taha, “Development and validation of spectrophotometric, TLC and HPLC methods for the determination of lamotrigine in presence of its impurity,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 541–545, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. P. Srinivasulu, K. Mukkanti, B. R. Reguri, and K. S. V. Srinivas, “Development of a validated stability indicating LC method for lamotrigine,” Chromatographia, vol. 70, no. 1-2, pp. 271–276, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. B. C. Sallustio and R. G. Morris, “High-performance liquid chromatography quantitation of plasma lamotrigine concentrations: application measuring trough concentrations in patients with epilepsy,” Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 688–693, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. E. Griner-Sosanko, D. R. Lower, M. A. Virji, and M. D. Krasowski, “Simultaneous determination of lamotrigine, zonisamide and carbamazepine in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography,” Biomedical Chromatography, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 225–228, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Bompadre, A. Tagliabracci, M. Battino, and R. Giorgetti, “Determination of lamotrigine in whole blood with on line solid phase extraction,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 863, no. 1, pp. 177–180, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. M. Addolorata, B. Francesca, C. Matteo, A. Mario, and M. A. Raggi, “Rapid HPLC analysis of the antiepileptic lamotrigine and its metabolites in human plasma,” Journal of Separation Science, vol. 30, no. 14, pp. 2249–2255, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. Croci, A. Salmaggi, U. De Grazia, and G. Bernardi, “New high-performance liquid chromatographic method for plasma/serum analysis of lamotrigine,” Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 665–668, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. M. Castel-Branco, A. M. Almeida, A. C. Falcão, T. A. Macedo, M. M. Caramona, and F. G. Lopez, “Lamotrigine analysis in blood and brain by high-performance liquid chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 755, no. 1-2, pp. 119–127, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Torra, M. Rodamilans, S. Arroyo, and J. Corbella, “Optimized procedure for lamotrigine analysis in serum by high-performance liquid chromatography without interferences from other frequently coadministered anticonvulsants,” Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 621–625, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. N. R. Barbosa and A. F. Mídio, “Validated high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of lamotrigine in human plasma,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 741, no. 2, pp. 289–293, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Y. Böttiger, J. O. Svensson, and L. Ståhle, “Lamotrigine drug interactions in a TDM material,” Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 171–174, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. E. Vidal, C. Pascual, and L. Pou, “Determination of lamotrigine in human serum by liquid chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 736, no. 1-2, pp. 295–298, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. Angelis-Stoforidis, D. J. Morgan, T. J. O'Brien, and F. J. E. Vajda, “Determination of lamotrigine in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 727, no. 1-2, pp. 113–118, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. K. M. Matar, P. J. Nicholls, S. A. Bawazir, M. I. Al-Hassan, and A. Tekle, “A rapid liquid chromatographic method for the determination of lamotrigine in plasma,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 525–531, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Cociglio, R. Alric, and O. Bouvier, “Performance analysis of a reversed-phase liquid chromatographic assay of lamotrigine in plasma using solvent-demixing extraction,” Journal of Chromatography, vol. 572, no. 1-2, pp. 269–276, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. L. Cheng, C. H. Chou, and O. Y. P. Hu, “Determination of lamotrigine in small volumes of plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 817, no. 2, pp. 199–206, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. N. Saini and K. Saini, “Quantitative determination of lamotrigi1ne in bulk and dosage form by UV spectrophotometry,” Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 113–116, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  21. R. S. Chandan, M. Vasudevan, Deecaraman, B. M. Gurupadayya, and M. Indupriya, “Spectrophotometric determination of lamotrigine using Gibb's and MBTH reagent in pharmaceutical dosage form,” Journal of Pharmacy Research, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1813–1815, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  22. N. Alizadeh, R. Khakinahad, and A. Jabbari, “Spectrophotometric determination of lamotrigine in pharmaceutical preparations and urine by charge-transfer complexation,” Pharmazie, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 791–795, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. N. Rajendraprasad, K. Basavaiah, and K. B. Vinay, “Sensitive spectrophotometric determination of lamotrigine in bulk drug and pharmaceutical formulations using bromocresol green,” Ecletica Quimica, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 55–66, 2010. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 T. Vijaya Bhaskara Reddy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views2603
Downloads812
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.