Antiradical and Cytotoxic Activities of Varying Polarity Extracts of the Aerial Part of <i>Euphorbia hirta</i> L.

Perumal, Shanmugapriya; Mahmud, Roziahanim; Piaru, Suthagar Pillai; Lee, Wei Cai; Ramanathan, Surash

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/983253

Journal of Chemistry

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 | Article ID 983253 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/983253

Antiradical and Cytotoxic Activities of Varying Polarity Extracts of the Aerial Part of Euphorbia hirta L.

Shanmugapriya Perumal,¹Roziahanim Mahmud,¹Suthagar Pillai Piaru,¹Wei Cai Lee,¹and Surash Ramanathan²

Academic Editor: Patricia Valentao

Received13 Mar 2013

Accepted19 Jul 2013

Published21 Aug 2013

Abstract

Euphorbia hirta is a well-known ethnomedicinal plant with diverse biological activities. The aim of the present study is to investigate the antiradical activities of various solvent extracts of the aerial part of E. hirta as well as to determine the possible cytotoxicity of these extracts. The aerial part of E. hirta was extracted with different solvent systems in order to increase polarity. The solvents used were hexane, dichloromethane (DCM), ethyl acetate (EA), ethanol (EtOH), and methanol (MeOH). The contents of total phenols and total flavonoids were analyzed by UV spectrophotometry, whereas the potential free radical-scavenging activities of the extracts were evaluated using the stable free radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), the β-carotene-linoleic acid bleaching system, and reducing power. The EtOH extract exhibited the highest total phenolic content ( mg GAE/g), and DCM extract scored the highest total flavonoid content ( mg CE/g). The MeOH extract showed a potent free radical-scavenging activity as evidenced by low EC₅₀ at 42.81 µg/mL. Interestingly, the EtOH extract demonstrated the highest reducing power activity with EC₅₀ value of 6.18 µg/mL. In β-carotene-linoleic acid assay, oxidation of linoleic acid was effectively inhibited by DCM extract with %. All the extracts showed no cytotoxic activity against Vero cells.

1. Introduction

The study of antioxidant from ethnomedicinal plants is producing a medical revolution due to their health-promoting benefits [1]. The increased discoveries in herbs and spices as sources of natural antioxidants have initiated researchers to look for natural antioxidants with low cytotoxicity [2]. In Malaysia, more than one hundred plant species are reported to have medicinal properties and amongst them is Euphorbia hirta with traditional claims in treating various diseases.

E. hirta L. belongs to the family Euphorbiaceae. It is an annual hairy plant that comprises about 300 genera and 5000 species, distributed in the temperate, subtropical, and tropical regions of the world. It is known by its Malay traditional names as “ara tanah” and “gelang susu”. E. hirta is recognized by many vernacular names such as “pill bearing spurge,” “cats hair,” “asthma weed,” “basri dudhi,” “malnommee,” and “fei yang cao”. E. hirta exhibits interesting pharmacological activities and is much used in ethnomedicine in all tropical countries of Africa, Asia, America, and Australia. The plant is well known for the traditional claims in treating gastrointestinal and respiratory disorders such as ulcer, amoebic dysentery, diarrhoea, bronchitis, asthma, and hay fever. It is also used traditionally in the Philippines as a curative for dengue fever.

E. hirta is well acknowledged for its pharmacological activities such as antioxidant [3], antibacterial [4, 5], antifungal [6], diuretic [7], anthelmintic [8], antihypertensive [7], anxiolytic [9], antidiarrhoeal [10, 11], antimalarial [12], anti-inflammatory [13], and anticancer [3]. The current study was performed to investigate the various solvent polarity extracts of E. hirta as a potential antioxidant agent. To authenticate the safe use of these extracts as natural antioxidants for therapeutic application, a cytotoxicity assessment was executed. The findings from this study will help to promote the better human health.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Collection and Authentication

The fresh aerial parts of E. hirta (Euphorbiaceae) were collected from an organic vegetable garden in Sungai Ara, Penang, during the period from January to March 2012. The plant was authenticated at the School of Biological Sciences by the institution botanist Mr. Shunmugam. A voucher specimen (no. 11254) is deposited at the Herbarium Unit of the Universiti Sains Malaysia.

2.2. Extraction of Plant Material

The aerial parts of E. hirta were air dried under sun shade for 5 days. The dried aerial parts were cut and grounded to mesh size no. 40 and macerated in different solvent systems in order to increase polarity. The solvents used were hexane, dichloromethane (DCM), ethyl acetate (EA), ethanol (EtOH), and methanol (MeOH) by ratio of 10 g of ground plant material into 100 mL of extracting solvent. The extraction was done for 3 days under occasional shaking, and the process was repeated three times at the room temperature. The extracts obtained were filtered and concentrated to dryness with a rotary evaporator (Rotavapor R-200, Buchi, Switzerland) under reduced pressure. The extracts obtained were eventually freeze-dried (FreeZone, MO, USA) to remove any residual water. The yield of all the extracts was determined, and the dried extracts were kept at 4°C until use.

2.3. Determination of Antioxidant Activity

2.3.1. Sample Preparation

All the extracts were redissolved in methanol at a concentration 1 mg/mL for determination of antioxidant contents.

2.3.2. Total Phenolic Content

The phenolic content in the extracts was determined using colorimetric assay [14]. Fifty microliters of extract samples were mixed with 1 mL of distilled H₂O in test tubes followed by addition of 0.5 mL of the Folin and Ciocalteu phenol reagent to the mixture. After 3 min, 2.5 mL 20% (w/v) Na₂CO₃ solution was added and the volume was filled up to 10 mL with distilled H₂O. The reaction was kept in the dark for 90 min incubation at ambient temperature after which the absorbance was measured at 735 nm against blank. The same procedure was repeated for standard gallic acid solutions, and total phenolic content was calculated using a calibration curve of gallic acid (0.05–1.0 mg/mL; ; ; is the absorbance; is the solution concentration). The experiment was carried out in triplicate, and the results were expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g of extract.

2.3.3. Total Flavonoid Content

Flavonoid contents were determined according to the method described by Zhishen et al. [15]. A volume of 250 μL of each extract was mixed with 1.25 mL of sterilized distilled H₂O and 75 μL of 5% NaNO₂ solution. A volume of 150 μL of 10% AlCl₃·H₂O solution was added after 6 min incubation. Five hundred microlitres of 1 M NaOH solution were added after 5 min and then the total volume was made up to 2.5 mL with dd H₂O. Following thorough mixing of the solution, the absorbance was read against blank at 510 nm. The total flavonoid content was calculated using a standard curve of (+) catechin (0.06–1 mg/mL; ; ; is the absorbance; is the solution concentration). The results were expressed as mg catechin equivalents (CE)/g extract.

2.3.4. DPPH Free Radical-Scavenging Assay

The free radical-scavenging activities of the extracts were determined as per the method of Shimada et al. [16]. The concentrations of the tested samples ranged from 6.25 to 100 μg/mL. A volume of 50 μL of 1 mM DPPH (Sigma-Aldrich) in absolute methanol was added to 200 μL of each extract solution into the wells of 96-well microtitre plate. The solutions were mixed well, and the plate was incubated at room temperature for 30 min in the dark. The absorbance was measured against blank at 517 nm. Absolute methanol was used to zero the spectrophotometer, DPPH solution was used as blank sample, and BHT was used as a standard for comparison. The DPPH solution was freshly prepared and stored in a flask covered with aluminum foil and kept in the dark at 4°C between measurements. All experiments were carried out in triplicate. The radical-scavenging activities of the tested samples, expressed as percentage inhibition of DPPH, were calculated according to the following formula: , where and are the absorbance values of the blank sample and the test sample, at particular times, respectively [17]. Percentage of inhibition after 30 min was plotted against concentration, and the equation for the line was used to obtain the EC₅₀ value. A lower EC₅₀ value indicates greater antioxidant activity.

2.3.5. Estimation of Reducing Power (RP)

The reducing power was determined according to the method of Oyaizu [18]. The various solvent extracts (31.25–500 μg/mL in methanol) were mixed with 2.5 mL of sodium phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.6) and 2.5 mL of 1% potassium ferricyanide, and the mixture was incubated at 50°C for 20 min. Then, 2.5 mL of 10% trichloroacetic acid (w/v) was added, the mixture was centrifuged at 200 ×g for 10 min. A 100 μL supernatant obtained hereafter was immediately mixed with 100 μL of methanol and 25 μL of 0.1% of ferric chloride, and the absorbance was measured after 10 min at 700 nm against blank. A higher absorbance value indicates higher reducing power. EC₅₀ value (μg/mL) is the effective concentration at which the absorbance was 0.5 for reducing power and was obtained by interpolation from linear regression analysis of graph absorbance at 700 nm versus concentration. The assays were carried out in triplicate, and the results are expressed as mean values ± standard deviations. Ascorbic acid was used as standard for comparison.

2.3.6. β-Carotene-Linoleic Acid Bleaching Assay

In this assay, antioxidant activity of the extracts was determined by measuring the inhibition of volatile organic compounds and conjugated diene hydroperoxides arising from linoleic acid oxidation as described by Tepe et al. [19] with some modifications. A stock solution of β-carotene-linoleic acid mixture was prepared as follows: 0.5 mg β-carotene was dissolved in 1 mL of chloroform (HPLC grade), and 25 μL linoleic acid and 200 mg Tween 40 were added. The chloroform was evaporated using a vacuum evaporator, and 100 mL distilled water saturated with oxygen (30 min 100 mL/min) was added with vigorous shaking. A 2.5 mL of this reaction mixture was dispensed into test tubes, and 350 μL portions of the extracts were added, and the emulsion system was incubated in hot water bath at 50°C for 2 h. The absorbance of these solutions was measured against blank at 470 nm using a Shimadzu UV-120-01 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The antioxidant activity was calculated in terms of percentage inhibition relative to the control. The inhibition percentage (I%) of the samples was calculated using the following equation: /, where is the absorbance of β-carotene after 1 h assay remaining in the samples and is the absorbance of β-carotene at the beginning of the experiments. All samples were assayed in triplicate. Antioxidative capacities of the extracts were compared with those of butylated hydroxyl toluene (BHT) and blank.

2.3.7. Cytotoxic Activity

The varying solvent polarity extracts of E. hirta aerial part were tested for in vitro cytotoxicity, using Vero cells by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay described by Mosmann [20]. Vero cells (ATCC, CCL-81) are mammalian epithelial cell line established from the kidney of the normal African green monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops). Vero cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, penicillin (100 units/mL), and streptomycin (100 μg/mL), and the cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO₂ incubator. Briefly, after being harvested from culture flasks, the cells were seeded at 1 × 10⁶ cells in each well of 96-well plate containing 100 μL of fresh growth medium per well, and cells were permitted to adhere for 24 h. The cells were then treated with 100 μL of culture medium containing the test extracts with various concentrations into each well, with 1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) served as a negative control, whereas the medium only functioned well as a blank. After 48 h of treatment, the media in the wells were aspirated and replaced by 100 μL of 1 : 9 solution of MTT reagent in PBS to culture media. The MTT reagent was prepared as 5 mg/mL in PBS and mixed well with the appropriate amount of the culture medium. Then, the plates were incubated for another at 37°C for 3 h. After incubation, the media were aspirated, and 100 μL of DMSO were added into each well in order to dissolve the formazan crystals formed. The optical density of each well was then read using a microplate reader (Tecan, Switzerland) at a test wavelength of 570 nm and 620 nm as the reference filter. All test concentrations were run in triplicate, and the experiments were repeated thrice. The percentage of inhibition towards various concentrations of each test sample was then calculated using the following: where, is the absorbance of the treated cells at a certain concentration of the extract, is the absorbance of the blank, and is the absorbance of the cells treated with 1% DMSO.

The half maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC₅₀) of each test sample were then determined by plotting the values of percentage of inhibition against their respective concentrations. Consequently, the logarithmic regression equations obtained were used to calculate the IC₅₀. The results were expressed as mean ± SEM ().

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out by utilizing SPSS software version 16.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). All experimental values shown are of mean ± SEM.

3. Results

The yield for each solvent extracts of E. hirta aerial part is shown in Table 1. The percentage of extraction yield declines as the solvent polarity decreases. The total phenolic content of various solvent extracts E. hirta aerial part was reported as gallic acid equivalent concentration (mg/mL). The highest contents of total phenol were found in the EtOH extract (237.9 mg GAE/g) followed by MeOH extract (213.4 mg GAE/g) (Table 1). In contrast, these two extracts possessed lower contents of total flavonoid which were (67.4 mg CE/g) and (62.3 mg CE/g), respectively. DCM extract exhibited the highest content of total flavonoids which was 121 mg CE/g. The hexane extract showed the lowest antioxidant contents (45.9 mg GAE/g for total phenols and 60.8 mg CE/g for total phenols) compared to all other extracts.

Table 2 illustrates the results for all the antioxidant tests performed in this study. In the DPPH test, assessed samples were able to reduce the stable violet DPPH radical to the yellow DPPH-H, reaching 50% of reduction with EC₅₀ values ranging from 42.8 to 237.52 μg/mL. The scavenging effect of E. hirta aerial extracts and standard on the DPPH radical decreased in the order of BHT > MeOH extract > EtOH extract > hexane extract > DCM extract > EA extract. The free radical-scavenging activity of MeOH extract was superior to all other extracts (EC₅₀ = μg/mL) followed by EtOH extract ( μg/mL). The result of the reducing power of E. hirta aerial extracts from different solvents indicated that the EtOH extract had the highest reducing power with the EC₅₀ value of μg/mL. The lowest reducing property was obtained from the hexane, DCM, and EA extracts with EC₅₀ values of , , and μg/mL, respectively. In the β-carotene-linoleic acid bleaching system, oxidation of linoleic acid was effectively inhibited by the nonpolar extracts. DCM and EA extracts show 96.15% and 93.75%, respectively, that is higher than that of the synthetic antioxidant reagent BHT. On the other hand, MeOH extract (90%), EtOH extract (94.32%), and hexane extract (92.86%) displayed higher inhibition percentages which are very close to the BHT (93.2%).

3.1. Cytotoxicity Effect of Plant Extracts

As shown in Figure 1, E. hirta extracts demonstrated no cytotoxic activity against Vero cells as all the IC₅₀ values recorded are above the cytotoxic cut-off value of 20.0 μg/mL. The IC₅₀ values for all the solvent extracts are as follows: MeOH extract (IC₅₀: 84.3 μg/mL), EtOH extract (IC₅₀: 95.6 μg/mL), EA extract (IC₅₀: 73.6 μg/mL), DCM extract (IC₅₀: 102.4 μg/mL), and hexane extract (IC₅₀: 137.8 μg/mL).

4. Discussion

There have been extensive reports on antioxidant properties of E. hirta. Mohammad et al. [21] had illustrated that different parts of E. hirta such as leaves, stems, flowers, and roots contained rich amount of phenols and flavonoids. However, the study on the antioxidant activity of the whole aerial part of E. hirta extracted with different solvent systems in order to increase polarity has not yet been reported elsewhere. Therefore, in this experiment the antioxidant activity of E. hirta aerial extracts was further studied by using solvents of different polarities for maceration such as methanol, ethanol, ethyl acetate, dichloromethane, and hexane, respectively.

Antioxidants are bioactive constituents that neutralize active components produced during metabolism process, such as free radicals which can harm the body [22]. Studies show that dietary consumption with high antioxidant content of phenolic compounds may decrease the occurrence rates of fatal diseases like cancer and cardiovascular [23, 24]. In their mode of action, the antioxidant potential of the aerial part of E. hirta can be mainly attributed to its radical-scavenging ability, reducing power, and singlet oxygen quenching ability. Free radicals are a major cause of the propagation stage of the oxidation process. The high potential for scavenging of free radicals could inhibit spreading of oxidation [25]. The effects of antioxidants of E. hirta aerial part extracts on the DPPH radical scavenging was determined by their hydrogen donating ability. DPPH is a stable free radical and accepts an electron or hydrogen radical to become a stable diamagnetic molecule [26]. It is visualized as a discoloration of the reaction mixture at 517 nm. The MeOH and EtOH extracts of E. hirta exhibited stronger free radical-scavenging activities than nonpolar extracts. When compared to BHT, the MeOH extract is an almost effective radical scavenger. The antiradical activity of plants is mainly contributed by the active compounds present in them. Many naturally occurring antioxidant compounds derived from plant sources have been identified as free radical or active oxygen scavengers [17]. The polarity of the solvent systems used in the extraction process affects the contents of phenolic and flavonoid components. Therefore, the levels of these components that existed in the various solvent extract varied significantly. In this study, the phenolics present abundantly in polar extracts compared to the nonpolar extracts. The data obtained from the total phenolic assay supports the key role of phenolic compounds in free radical scavenging. Phenolic compounds are well known to possess high antioxidant activities. Phenolics play an important role in the DPPH test and are responsible for the overall reactivity of the aerial extracts towards DPPH radical. In addition to phenolic constituents, the effectiveness of MeOH and EtOH extracts, E. hirta aerial part, as free radical scavenger is probably due to the high content of flavonoids, previously identified as a potential antioxidant. According to Agarawal [27], flavonoids are likely to be the most vital polyphenolic compounds that possess a broad spectrum of chemical and biological activities including radical-scavenging properties. The high potential of polyphenols to scavenge free radicals may be due to the presence of many phenolic hydroxyl groups. Thus, the presence of hydroxyl groups in the phenolic compounds makes the compound oxidize very easily.

The capability of certain antioxidants is often associated with their reducing power [28]. The reducing power of a compound depends on its ability in donating electrons and was observed to be concentration dependent. Generally, the extracts show significant reducing power reflecting the reductive ability, which was measured by transformation in presence of test samples [29]. In the present study, the reducing power activity of EtOH extract was almost six times much higher than that of ascorbic acid. The MeOH extract showed comparable activity to that positive control (ascorbic acid) with EC₅₀ value of μg/mL. Therefore, the EtOH extract of E. hirta aerial part possessed the potent antioxidant compounds which are excellent electron donors that could terminate oxidation chain reactions by reducing the oxidized intermediates into the stable form. The EtOH extract also scored the highest phenolics content (Table 1) which may directly contribute to the strong reducing power. According to Kanatt et al. [30], phenolic compounds possess ideal structural properties to donate hydrogen atoms to free radicals.

β-Carotene is a colored molecule synthesized only in plants. β-Carotene bleaching is a free radical-mediated phenomenon, resulting in the formation of hydroperoxides from linoleic acid. In this model system, β-carotene undergoes rapid discoloration due to attack of free radicals formed upon abstraction of a hydrogen atom from the allylic methylene group of linoleic acid [29]. The oxidation reaction occurring in this model system can be spectrophotometrically monitored [31]. In the current study, although the phenolic and flavonoid contents are lower in the nonpolar extracts, the oxidation of linoleic acid may contributed by other secondary metabolites such as volatile oils, carotenoids, and vitamins. However, DCM extract displayed the highest total flavonoid contents of all and hence could be solely responsible for the bleaching activity. Flavonoids as one of the most diverse and widespread group of natural compounds are probably the most important natural phenolics. These compounds possess a broad spectrum of chemical and biological activities including radical scavenging properties [32].

The cytotoxic effect of the varying solvent polarity extracts of E. hirta aerial part on Vero cell line was examined by MTT assay. The extracts displayed dose-dependent cytotoxic effects on Vero cells (Figure 1) with IC₅₀ values above 20 μg/mL. The standard of cytotoxic or noncytotoxic was adapted from the guidelines set by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) which indicated that plant extracts or compounds with IC₅₀ values less than 20 μg/mL are considered to be cytotoxic and noncytotoxic if otherwise [33, 34]. This finding is in good agreement with the traditional use of E. hirta plant extracts.

5. Conclusions

To conclude, the polarity of the extracting solvent plays a significant role in contributing antioxidant activities from E. hirta aerial part. The results from this study hence can be employed as a milestone in the further investigation particularly in isolating and characterizing the active principles that contribute to antioxidant activities. The extensive study will maximize the therapeutic effects of E. hirta as a natural antioxidant for use in pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetic industries.

Conflict of Interests

The authors report that they have no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by Short-Term Research Grant (304/PFARMASI/6312024), Universiti Sains Malaysia and E-Science Fund (305/PFARMASI/613223), and Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI). The authors would like to acknowledge MyBrain15 (Ministry of Education, Malaysia) for providing scholarships.

References

H. Choi, H. Sun Song, H. Ukeda, and M. Sawamura, “Radical-scavenging activities of citrus essential oils and their components: detection using 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 4156–4161, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chatterjee, Z. Niaz, S. Gautam, S. Adhikari, P. S. Variyar, and A. Sharma, “Antioxidant activity of some phenolic constituents from green pepper (Piper nigrum L.) and fresh nutmeg mace (Myristica fragrans),” Food Chemistry, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 515–523, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Mothana, U. Lindequist, R. Gruenert, and P. J. Bednarski, “Studies of the in vitro anticancer, antimicrobial and antioxidant potentials of selected Yemeni medicinal plants from the island Soqotra,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 9, pp. 7–11, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Vijaya, S. Ananthan, and R. Nalini, “Antibacterial effect of theaflavin, polyphenon 60 (Camellia sinensis) and Euphorbia hirta on Shigella spp cell culture study,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 115–118, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Sudhakar, C. V. Rao, P. M. Rao, D. B. Raju, and Y. Venkateswarlu, “Antimicrobial activity of Caesalpinia pulcherrima, Euphorbia hirta and Asystasia gangeticum,” Fitoterapia, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 378–380, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Masood and K. S. Ranjan, “The effect of aqueous plant extracts on growth and aflatoxin production by Aspergillus flavus,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 32–34, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
P. B. Johnson, E. M. Abdurahman, E. A. Tiam, I. Abdu-Aguye, and I. M. Hussaini, “Euphorbia hirta leaf extracts increase urine output and electrolytes in rats,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 63–69, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Adedapo, M. O. Abatan, S. O. Idowu, and O. O. Olorunsogo, “Effects of chromatographic fractions of Euphorbia hirta on the rat serum biochemistry,” African Journal of Biomedical Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 185–189, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
M.-C. Lanhers, J. Fleurentin, P. Cabalion et al., “Behavioral effects of Euphorbia hirta L.: sedative and anxiolytic properties,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 189–198, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Galvez, A. Zarzuelo, M. E. Crespo, M. D. Lorente, M. A. Ocete, and J. Jimenez, “Antidiarrhoeic activity of Euphorbia hirta extract and isolation of an active flavonoid constituent,” Planta Medica, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 333–336, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Tona, K. Kambu, K. Mesia et al., “Biological screening of traditional preparations from some medicinal plants used as antidiarrhoeal in Kinshasa, Congo,” Phytomedicine, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Tona, R. K. Cimanga, K. Mesia et al., “In vitro antiplasmodial activity of extracts and fractions from seven medicinal plants used in the Democratic Republic of Congo,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. D. Singh, P. Kaiser, M. S. Youssouf et al., “Inhibition of early and late phase allergic reactions by Euphorbia hirta L.,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 316–321, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Slinkard and V. L. Singleton, “Total phenol analyses: automation and comparison with manual methods,” American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Zhishen, T. Mengcheng, and W. Jianming, “The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals,” Food Chemistry, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 555–559, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Shimada, K. Fujikawa, K. Yahara, and T. Nakamura, “Antioxidative properties of xanthan on the autoxidation of soybean oil in cyclodextrin emulsion,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 945–948, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Yen and P. Duh, “Scavenging effect of methanolic extracts of peanut hulls on free-radical and active-oxygen species,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 629–632, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Oyaizu, “Studies on products of the browning reaction. Antioxidative activities of browning reaction products prepared from glucosamine,” Japanese Journal of Nutrition, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 307–315, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Tepe, D. Daferera, A. Sokmen, M. Sokmen, and M. Polissiou, “Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of the essential oil and various extracts of Salvia tomentosa Miller (Lamiaceae),” Food Chemistry, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 333–340, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Mosmann, “Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 65, no. 1-2, pp. 55–63, 1983.
View at: Google Scholar
A. B. R. Mohammad, Z. Zuraini, S. Sasidharan, L. Y. Latha, and S. Amutha, “Assessment of Euphorbia hirta L. leaf, flower, stem and root extracts for their antibacterial and antifungal activity and brine shrimp lethality,” Molecules, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 6008–6018, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Safaei-Ghomi, A. H. Ebrahimabadi, Z. Djafari-Bidgoli, and H. Batooli, “GC/MS analysis and in vitro antioxidant activity of essential oil and methanol extracts of Thymus caramanicus Jalas and its main constituent carvacrol,” Food Chemistry, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 1524–1528, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Kris-Etherton, K. D. Hecker, A. Bonanome et al., “Bioactive compounds in foods: their role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 113, no. 9, pp. 71–88, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Ramaratnam, T. Osawa, H. Ochi, and S. Kawakishi, “The contribution of plant food antioxidants to human health,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 75–82, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Tachakittirungrod, S. Okonogi, and S. Chowwanapoonpohn, “Study on antioxidant activity of certain plants in Thailand: mechanism of antioxidant action of guava leaf extract,” Food Chemistry, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 381–388, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Soares, T. C. P. Dinis, A. P. Cunha, and L. M. Almeida, “Antioxidant activities of some extracts of Thymus zygis,” Free Radical Research, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 469–478, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
P. K. Agarawal, Carbon-13 NMR of Flavonoids, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1st edition, 1989.
P. Duh, “Antioxidant activity of burdock (Arctium lappa linné): its scavenging effect on free-radical and active oxygen,” Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 455–461, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Shanmugapriya, M. Roziahanim, P. P. Suthagar, W. C. Lee, and R. Surash, “Potential antiradical activity and cytotoxicity assessment of Ziziphus mauritiana and Syzygium polyanthum,” International Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 535–541, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
S. R. Kanatt, R. Chander, and A. Sharma, “Antioxidant potential of mint (Mentha spicata L.) in radiation-processed lamb meat,” Food Chemistry, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 451–458, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wang, G. Cao, and R. L. Prior, “Total antioxidant capacity of fruits,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 701–705, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Miliauskas, P. R. Venskutonis, and T. A. Van Beek, “Screening of radical scavenging activity of some medicinal and aromatic plant extracts,” Food Chemistry, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 231–237, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. I. Geran, N. H. Greenberg, M. M. Macdonald, A. M. Schumacher, and B. J. Abott, “Protocols for screening chemical agents and natural products against animal tumors and other biological systems,” Cancer Chemotherapy Reports, vol. 3, pp. 51–61, 1972.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Bézivin, S. Tomasi, F. Lohezic-Le Devehat, and J. Boustie, “Cytotoxic activity of some lichen extracts on murine and human cancer cell lines,” Phytomedicine, vol. 10, no. 6-7, pp. 499–503, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2013 Shanmugapriya Perumal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1820

Downloads

2083

Citations