Changes in Antioxidant Enzyme Activity and Transcript Levels of Related Genes in <i>Limonium sinense</i> Kuntze Seedlings under NaCl Stress

Zhang, Xia; Yin, HaiBo; Chen, ShiHua; He, Jun; Guo, ShanLi

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/749047

Journal of Chemistry

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusion Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Antioxidants in Disease and Aging

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 749047 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/749047

Changes in Antioxidant Enzyme Activity and Transcript Levels of Related Genes in Limonium sinense Kuntze Seedlings under NaCl Stress

Xia Zhang,¹HaiBo Yin,¹ShiHua Chen,¹Jun He,¹and ShanLi Guo¹

Academic Editor: Wang Zhenhua

Received11 Apr 2014

Accepted09 Jun 2014

Published19 Jun 2014

Abstract

The halophyte Limonium sinense Kuntze is used in traditional Chinese medicine for clearing heat and for detoxification. To examine the detoxification and salt-tolerance mechanisms of this plant, we analyzed antioxidant enzyme activities and transcript levels of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes in L. sinense seedlings under salt stress (500 mmol/L NaCl). Catalase showed the largest increase in activity, peaking on day 4 of the 7-day NaCl treatment. Peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities also increased, peaking on days 2 and 3 of the NaCl treatment, respectively. The activities of antioxidant enzymes decreased as the duration of the NaCl treatment extended. The transcript levels of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes were upregulated under NaCl stress. The peak in the LsCAT transcript level was earlier than the peaks in LsAPX and LsGPX transcript levels. The malondialdehyde content only slightly increased in L. sinense seedlings under NaCl stress. This was indicative of a low level of lipid peroxidation, consistent with the increased antioxidant enzyme activities and gene transcript levels. These results show that, under NaCl stress, the antioxidant system of L. sinense is activated and effectively scavenges reactive oxygen species. This reduces oxidative damage and allows the plant to maintain growth under NaCl stress.

1. Introduction

Salt in soils is the main environmental factor restricting the growth and productivity of agricultural crops [1]. Salt tolerance in plants is a complex process that involves changes in the structures of numerous tissues and organs and many physiological and biochemical processes [2]. In plants, salt stress results in increased generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). These highly reactive substances can alter normal cellular metabolism via oxidative damage to membranes, proteins, and nucleic acids. They can also cause lipid peroxidation, denature proteins, and mutate DNA [3, 4].

Plants have developed a complex ROS-scavenging system to prevent sensitive cellular components from ROS-induced damage. This system comprises enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants. The sum of the activities of all of the enzymes that make up the enzymatic antioxidant system represents the antioxidant capacity of plants. Catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) are important antioxidant enzymes that play key roles in eliminating superoxide () and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂).

Limonium sinense Kuntze is a perennial herb with strong tolerance to salt, aridity, and drought. This salt-secreting halophyte is used in traditional Chinese medicine for clearing heat and dampness, for hemostasis, and for detoxification. Its close relative, Limonium gmelinii (Wildl.) Kuntze, grows in salt meadows and has abundant salt glands on the adaxial and abaxial sides of the leaf [5]. The salt-tolerance mechanisms of L. sinense include its salt-secreting glands and its ability to compartmentalize ions in cells and regulate osmotic status. Early studies on this species focused on the structure of its salt glands and on methods for its tissue culture, rapid propagation, and artificial cultivation [6, 7]. Less attention has been paid to the physiological mechanisms of stress resistance in L. sinense. The aim of this study was to investigate ROS scavenging and the protective effects of the antioxidant enzyme system in L. sinense seedlings by detecting changes in CAT, POD, and SOD activities and in the transcript levels of the genes encoding these enzymes, under NaCl stress.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions

Seeds of L. sinense were obtained from the halophyte garden of Dongying City, Shandong Province. Seeds were germinated in a growth chamber at 20°C. After 20 days of growth, seedlings were transplanted into soil in pots (5 seedlings/pot) and then grown in a greenhouse for 50 days under the following conditions: 12 h light/12 h dark photoperiod, 25°C, and 65% relative humidity.

2.2. Experimental Design

In each pot, seedlings were treated with 50 mL 500 mmol/L NaCl solution for 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days. On each sampling day, the leaves of three seedlings in each group were harvested, weighed to determine fresh weight, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then used for enzyme activity assays and gene expression analyses. All assays and measurements were conducted in triplicate.

2.3. Determination of Enzyme Activity and Isoenzyme Composition

The activities of CAT, POD, and SOD were assayed as described by Gao et al. [8]. Malondialdehyde (MDA) content was determined using the thiobarbituric acid reaction [9]. All values shown are the mean values of three assays. Differences between mean values of NaCl-treated samples and untreated controls were considered significant at . The isoform composition of CAT, POD, and SOD was determined as described by El-Mashad and Mohamed [10].

2.4. Determination of Gene Expression Level

RNA isolation, reverse transcription, and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) were conducted as described by Zhang et al. [11]. Sequence information was based on sequences in the Limonium sinense plasmid cDNA library. The qPCR primers used to amplify genes encoding catalase (LsCAT), ascorbate peroxidase (LsAPX), glutathione peroxidase (LsGPX), and actin (LsActin) were designed using Primers3 (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/). The sequences were as follows (F for forward, R for reverse).

The primers for LsCAT (BXC35): F: 5′-CACATCCTCCTGTTGTTTCGGGTAG-3′; R: 5′-ACAGGCTCAACGTCAGACCAACC-3′;

The primers for LsAPX (BXC1267): F: 5′-TCCAAGGACCCTCAAAGCCAG-3′; R: 5′-CCCTGACGCAAAGAAAGGAAATG-3′;

The primers for LsGPX (BXC0933): F: 5′-ATGAAGGAAAGCAACGGGAAGAC-3′; R: 5′-AGTAGCCAAGCCAAACAGATCAGAC-3′;

The primers for LsActin: F: 5′-CAGTTTTCCCGAGTGTTGTTGGTAGG-3′; R: 5′-ACCTCTTTTGGATTGTGCTTCGTCA-3′

To confirm specificity, primers and amplicons for each gene were compared with sequences in GenBank/NCBI. The gene LsActin was used as the reference gene. Relative expression of genes was calculated using the 2^−ΔΔCt method [12]. The experiments were repeated twice with three replicates.

2.5. Data Analysis

All data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA with entries and sampling dates as factors. Mean separation processes were performed using a Fisher’s protected LSD test at the level of probability. For RT-qPCR, the 2^−ΔΔCt method is used to determine the changes of target gene expression based on normalization with the reference gene and one-way ANOVA was used to analyze differences between treatments’ dates. The Pearson correlation analysis was made by SPSS software.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Antioxidant Enzymes’ Activities and Isoenzymes of Seedlings

We measured the activities of antioxidant enzymes to evaluate the mechanisms of salt tolerance in L. sinense. The activity of CAT differed significantly between salt-stressed and untreated (day 0) seedlings. As shown in Figure 1, CAT activity showed the largest increase among all the antioxidant enzymes assayed. Compared with that on day 0, CAT activity increased by 0.7%, 68.7%, 154.6%, 336.2%, and 70.5% after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days, respectively, of the 7-day NaCl treatment. The activity of CAT peaked on day 4 and then decreased as the duration of the NaCl treatment extended. The activity of SOD also showed a large increase under NaCl stress and peaked on day 3 of the 7-day salt treatment. Its activity decreased as the treatment time extended. Similarly, POD activity peaked on day 2 of the 7-day NaCl treatment (38.8% higher activity than that on day 0) and then decreased. The phenotype of L. sinense seedlings under NaCl stress was shown in Figure 2, which was in general accord with the activities of antioxidant enzymes.

As shown in Figure 3, the isoenzyme analysis revealed four CAT isoenzymes, six SOD isoenzymes, and five POD isoenzymes in L. sinense. The number of CAT, SOD, and POD isoenzymes changed under salt stress. The largest number of isoforms was on days 3-4 of the NaCl treatment for CAT, on day 2 for SOD, and on days 6-7 for POD. These results were consistent with the patterns of antioxidant enzyme activity during the NaCl treatment.

In plants, the activity of one or more antioxidant enzymes generally increases under stress conditions. This increase in antioxidant enzyme activity correlates with increased stress tolerance [13]. Antioxidant enzymes cooperate to remove excess ROS, thereby protecting the structures and functions of cellular components. SOD, which catalyzes the dismutation of superoxide into oxygen and hydrogen peroxide, is an essential component of the antioxidant defense system in plants [14]. Several studies reported that SOD activity increased in response to excess salt in potato, switchgrass, and Brassica juncea [15–17], consistent with our results.

Our results suggested that the H₂O₂ produced via SOD activity was effectively consumed by CAT and/or POD. CAT, which is located in peroxisomes, catalyzes the dismutation of excess H₂O₂ into oxygen and water and maintains H₂O₂ at a low level. At low concentrations, H₂O₂ is mainly cleared by POD [14]. POD is widely distributed in plant tissues and is involved in diverse growth, development, and senescence processes in plants. Our findings suggested that the increased POD activity in L. sinense under salt stress might be sufficient to protect proteins and lipids against ROS. Induction of CAT and POD activities under salt stress has also been reported in tomato, sugar beet, and Plantago [18]. Our results showed that the activities of these antioxidant enzymes decreased as the duration of the salt stress treatment extended, even to levels below that in untreated samples. A similar result was reported for potato under salt stress [15].

3.2. Changes of Related Genes Expression of Seedlings

To investigate the molecular mechanism of salt tolerance in L. sinense, we used real-time qPCR to evaluate changes in the transcript levels of three genes: LsCAT, LsAPX, and LsGPX. The relative transcript levels of these three genes changed significantly under NaCl stress (Figure 4). After 3 days of NaCl stress, the transcript level of LsCAT was 100-fold than in the untreated control (Figure 4(a)). This gene was induced more strongly than the other two genes analyzed. The transcript levels of LsAPX also increased markedly under NaCl stress, to a maximum of 20.9 times than in the control after 5 days of NaCl stress. After 7 days of NaCl stress, the transcript level of LsAPX decreased to below the control level (Figure 4(b)). The transcript levels of LsGPX peaked at 6.13 times than in the control after 4 days of NaCl stress and then decreased to the control level or even lower as the duration of the NaCl treatment extended (Figure 4(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

To protect plant cells from oxidative injury caused by abiotic stresses such as salt stress, several genes encoding antioxidant enzymes including CAT, APX, and GPX are upregulated [19]. Therefore, analyses of the transcript levels of antioxidant defense genes can reflect the contributions of their products to the salt stress response in plants [20]. Our results showed that the peak in LsCAT transcript levels on day 3 was earlier than the peaks in the transcript levels of LsAPX and LsGPX (days 4-5). Additionally, the LsCAT transcript level was higher in NaCl-treated samples than in untreated samples throughout the treatment period. Induction of CAT gene expression under other abiotic stress conditions has been reported for other plant species [21]. We also observed that the upregulated transcript level of LsCAT was consistent with the increase in CAT enzyme activity, suggesting that CAT might play a key role in scavenging excessive ROS in NaCl-treated L. sinense.

Like CAT, APX has a high affinity for H₂O₂. In other studies, APX activity was shown to increase in response to a number of stress conditions, including salt stress [22, 23]. The transcript levels of LsAPX increased during the NaCl treatment, reaching peak levels on day 5 and then declining thereafter. Compared with transcription of LsCAT, that of LsAPX responded more slowly to salt stress. Similar results have been reported for other APX genes, for example, Ec-apx1 from Eleusine coracana, in response to drought-induced oxidative stress [23].

The LsGPX transcript levels were higher in NaCl-treated seedlings than in untreated seedlings at most sampling times. Increased GPX activity could protect plant cells against the H₂O₂ released from the reaction catalyzed by SOD. In another study, it was reported that the transcript levels of GPX in Panax ginseng increased alongside an increase in GPX activity during abiotic stress [21].

3.3. MDA Content of Seedlings

The MDA content in leaves of L. sinense seedlings increased slightly throughout the duration of the NaCl treatment (Figure 5). The change in MDA content was not visible at the early stage (day 2), but after 3 days of salt treatment, it had increased to a level slightly higher than that in the control. The highest MDA content (twice that in the control) occurred after 6 days of NaCl stress. A significant negative correlation was observed between MDA content and SOD and POD activity (, , resp., ), while no significant correlation was observed between MDA content and CAT activity (, ).

Increased levels of lipid peroxides are indicative of enhanced ROS production [24]. MDA is a major cytotoxic product of lipid peroxidation, and therefore MDA content is another index to evaluate the extent of injury in plants under stress. It has been used as an indicator of free radical production in other studies [11]. The MDA content in seedlings of L. sinense only slightly increased under salt stress, suggesting that there was a low level of lipid peroxidation in these seedlings under salt stress. This might be because of the protective function of antioxidant enzymes in L. sinense seedlings, especially during the early phase of the salt stress response. These results indicate that the synergistic effect of various ROS-scavenging enzymes can effectively improve the antioxidant capacity of plants, thereby reducing the degree of oxidative injury.

4. Conclusion

The findings of this study indicate that the ability of L. sinense to cope with salt stress depends on antioxidant stress defense mechanisms. An increase in antioxidant enzyme activity and the resulting increase in ROS-scavenging capacity can improve the salt tolerance of plants [25]. This relationship between salt tolerance and increased activities of antioxidant enzymes has been demonstrated in pea [26], Arabidopsis, and rice [27]. Our results show that there were increases in antioxidant enzyme activity and in the transcript levels of genes encoding these enzymes under salt stress. These findings suggest that the response of L. sinense to salt stress involves CAT, SOD, APX, POD, and GPX. These results increase our understanding of how L. sinense responds to salt stress and provide evidence for the effectiveness of its detoxification mechanisms. At present, we are cloning and functionally analyzing CAT and GPX genes of L. sinense to investigate their regulation patterns in this salt-tolerant plant.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence their work; there is no professional or other personal interests of any nature or kind in any product, service, and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31000128), by the Promotive Research Fund for Excellent Young and Middle-aged Scientists of Shandong Province (BS2010SW036), by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (no. ZR2011CQ013), and by the Key Technologies R&D Program of Shandong Province of China (no. 2010GNC10937).

References

A. Hediye Sekmen, I. Türkan, and S. Takio, “Differential responses of antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation to salt stress in salt-tolerant Plantago maritima and salt-sensitive Plantago media,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 399–411, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. J. Bohnert, R. G. Jensen, T. J. Flowers, and A. R. Yeo, “Metabolic engineering for increased salt tolerance—the next step,” Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 661–667, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
J. A. Imlay, “Pathways of Oxidative Damage,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 57, pp. 395–418, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Melchiorre, G. Robert, V. Trippi, R. Racca, and H. R. Lascano, “Superoxide dismutase and glutathione reductase overexpression in wheat protoplast: photooxidative stress tolerance and changes in cellular redox state,” Plant Growth Regulation, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 57–68, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X.-F. Fan, Y.-L. Yang, and L.-X. Liu, “Tissue culture and rapid propagation of Limonium gmelinii (Willd.) Kuntze,” Plant Physiology Communications, vol. 44, no. 3, p. 509, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Ding and B. S. Wang, “Effect of NaCl on salt gland development and salt-secretion rate of the leaves of Limonium sinense,” Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, vol. 26, pp. 1593–1599, 2006 (Chinese).
View at: Google Scholar
L. L. Zhou, P. Liu, and J. H. Lu, “A SEM observation of the salt-secreting structure of leaves in four species of Limonium,” Bulletin of Botanical Research, vol. 26, pp. 667–671, 2006 (Chinese).
View at: Google Scholar
S. Gao, R. Yan, M. Cao, W. Yang, S. Wang, and F. Chen, “Effects of copper on growth, antioxidant enzymes and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activities in Jatropha curcas L. seedling,” Plant, Soil and Environment, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 117–122, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
R. L. Heath and L. Packer, “Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 189–198, 1968.
View at: Google Scholar
A. A. A. El-Mashad and H. I. Mohamed, “Brassinolide alleviates salt stress and increases antioxidant activity of cowpea plants (Vigna sinensis),” Protoplasma, vol. 249, no. 3, pp. 625–635, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhang, S. Zhou, Y. Fu, Z. Su, X. Wang, and C. Sun, “Identification of a drought tolerant introgression line derived from Dongxiang common wild rice (O. rufipogon Griff.),” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 62, no. 1-2, pp. 247–259, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Livak and T. D. Schmittgen, “Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2^−ΔΔCT method,” Methods, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 402–408, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pilon, S. E. Abdel-Ghany, C. M. Cohu, K. A. Gogolin, and H. Ye, “Copper cofactor delivery in plant cells,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 256–263, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Mittler, “Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 405–410, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Aghaei, A. A. Ehsanpour, and S. Komatsu, “Potato responds to salt stress by increased activity of antioxidant enzymes,” Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 1095–1103, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Wang, C. Wu, B. Xie et al., “Model analysing the antioxidant responses of leaves and roots of switchgrass to NaCl-salinity stress,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 58, pp. 288–296, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Mittal, N. Kumari, and V. Sharma, “Differential response of salt stress on Brassica juncea: photosynthetic performance, pigment, proline, D1 and antioxidant enzymes,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 54, pp. 17–26, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Demiral and İ. Türkan, “Comparative lipid peroxidation, antioxidant systems and proline content in roots of two rice cultivars differing in salt tolerance,” Environmental and Experimental Botany, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 247–257, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Lu, D. Liu, and S. Liu, “Two rice cytosolic ascorbate peroxidases differentially improve salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1909–1917, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. de Carvalho, M. K. F. de Campos, D. S. Domingues, L. F. P. Pereira, and L. G. E. Vieira, “The accumulation of endogenous proline induces changes in gene expression of several antioxidant enzymes in leaves of transgenic Swingle citrumelo,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 3269–3279, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Meyer, G. Sathiyaraj, O. R. Lee et al., “Transcript profiling of antioxidant genes during biotic and abiotic stresses in Panax ginseng,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 2761–2769, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Asada, “Ascorbate peroxidase, a H₂O₂ scavenging enzyme in plants,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 85, pp. 235–241, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Bhatt, S. C. Saxena, S. Jain, A. K. Dobriyal, M. Majee, and S. Arora, “Cloning, expression and functional validation of drought inducible ascorbate peroxidase (Ec-apx1) from Eleusine coracana,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 1155–1165, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Liu, Z. Xiong, T. Li, and H. Huang, “Bioaccumulation and ecophysiological responses to copper stress in two populations of Rumex dentatus L. from Cu contaminated and non-contaminated sites,” Environmental and Experimental Botany, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 43–51, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. G. Alscher, J. L. Donahue, and C. L. Cramer, “Reactive oxygen species and antioxidants: relationships in green cells,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 224–233, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Hernández, A. Jiménez, P. Mullineaux, and F. Sevilla, “Tolerance of pea (Pisum sativum L.) to long-term salt stress is associated with induction of antioxidant defences,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 853–862, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Dionisio-Sese and S. Tobita, “Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress,” Plant Science, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Xia Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

5126

Downloads

1836

Citations