Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Chemistry
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 171570, 4 pages
Research Article

Inhibitory Effects of 4-(4-Methylbenzamino)benzoate on Adipocyte Differentiation

1Korea Food Research Institute, Seongnam 463-746, Republic of Korea
2Korea University of Science and Technology, Daejeon 305-350, Republic of Korea
3College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Republic of Korea

Received 12 June 2015; Revised 23 July 2015; Accepted 29 July 2015

Academic Editor: Bartolo Gabriele

Copyright © 2015 Jin Taek Hwang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The potent suppression of adipocyte differentiation by 4-(4-methylbenzamino)benzoate was discovered during the search for new antiobesity compounds. 4-(4-methylbenzamino)benzoate was observed to suppress adipocyte differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells by 96.8% at 50 μM without cytotoxicity. In addition, 4-(4-methylbenzamino)benzoate reduced the cellular expression of fatty acid synthase in a concentration-dependent manner, as well as suppressing PPAR-gamma activity, which controls fatty acid storage and glucose metabolism. Based on these results, 4-(4-methylbenzamino)benzoate shows potential as an antiobesity material.

1. Introduction

Obesity, a major factor in the development of heart disease, cancer, hypertension, diabetes, and degenerative arthritis, is induced by adipocyte differentiation due to hormonal changes and imbalances in energy metabolism caused by excessive fat intake [15]. Adipogenesis in the body is the process of cell differentiation by which preadipocytes become adipocytes during fat accumulation. Mature adipocytes are differentiated from immature adipocytes such as fibroblasts and form lipid droplets inside cells [6, 7].

Studies have shown that natural compounds, resveratrol and genistein, have antiobesity effects [811]. Resveratrol and genistein are contained in grapes and beans, respectively. Although some antiobesity drugs are currently available, such as orlistat, sibutramine, or sertraline, several side effects have been reported [12]. Thus, studies are being conducted on compounds with antiobesity effects to replace these drugs. In this study, the potent adipogenesis-suppressing activity of 4-(4-methylbenzamino)benzoate (MBAB, Figure 1) was observed in 3T3-L1 cells without cytotoxicity, during the search for new antiobesity substances. MBAB exhibited higher adipogenesis-suppressing activity compared to resveratrol or genistein. Therefore, MBAB show great potential as a new antiobesity substance.

Figure 1: Chemical structure of MBAB (a), resveratrol (b), and genistein (c).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

MBAB was synthesized using a previously reported method [13]. Resveratrol and genistein, which were used as positive controls, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The 3T3-L1 cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and the FAS antibodies from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA).

2.2. Cell Culture and Differentiation

3T3-L1 cells were cultured in DMEM culture medium with 10% FBS, at 37°C, and 5% CO2 conditions. For the differentiation, 3T3-L1 cells were grown in a 48-well plate until confluence, and differentiation was induced by incubation with a hormonal cocktail containing 10 µg/mL insulin, 0.5 µM dexamethasone, and 0.5 µM IBMX for 24 h. The cells were then incubated with a normal medium containing 10 µg/mL insulin in the presence or absence of MBAB, resveratrol, and genistein for 8 days.

2.3. Cell Viability

After differentiation was completed, 0.5 mg/mL of MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] was added and incubated at 37°C for 4 hours. After eliminating the MTT solution, 200 μL of DMSO was added and absorbance at 540 nm was measured to determine cell viability.

2.4. Oil Red O Staining and TG Assay

When differentiation was complete, the cells were washed with PBS twice and fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde. After incubating the cells for 1 hour using Oil Red O dye, isopropanol was added, and the absorbance was measured at 510 nm to determine the amount of triglycerides.

2.5. Fatty Acid Synthase (FAS) Expression

The 3T3-L1 cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and then lysed with a lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM NaF, and 0.2% protease inhibitor cocktail, pH 7.2). The collected protein was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 5 minutes, and the supernatant was collected for protein quantification. Then, 30 μg of protein was loaded in 10% SDS-PAGE for electrophoresis, after which it was transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and reacted with FAS antibodies (1 : 1000), anti-mouse antibody (1 : 1000), and detected by ECL.

2.6. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR-) Transcription Activity

The effect on PPAR- activity in 3T3-L1 cells was measured using a PPAR- transcription factor assay kit (Cayman Chemical). The 3T3-L1 cells were treated with rosiglitazone and each concentration of MBAB, and then the cell extract was added to a dsDNA sequence-coated plate. The PPAR- antibodies and the secondary antibodies were reacted in order, and then a detection reagent was added and absorbance was measured at 450 nm.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The significance of the differences between groups was tested using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effects on Cell Viability

The MTT assay showed that MBAB did not cause significant cell death at a concentration of less than 50 μM, whereas resveratrol and genistein reduced the cell viability in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 2). Therefore, our results indicate that MBAB has lower cytotoxicity compared to resveratrol and genistein.

Figure 2: Effect on cell viability in 3T3-L1 cells. The cell viability of the vehicle was set at 100%. The data represent the mean ± SD of the triplicate experiments.
3.2. Inhibitory Effects on Adipocyte Differentiation

After confirming the absence of cytotoxicity in 3T3-L1 cells treated with MBAB at concentrations of less than 50 μM, the effect on adipocyte differentiation was measured. As shown in Figure 3, MBAB suppressed the adipocyte differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells in a concentration-dependent manner after they were induced to differentiate after being treated with a hormone mixture. MBAB strongly suppressed adipocyte differentiation at a concentration of 50 μM, which was similar to the control group. In particular, MBAB exhibited a higher adipocyte differentiation suppressing activity at all concentrations compared to the same concentrations of resveratrol or genistein. Figure 4 shows photographs of 3T3-L1 cells treated with MBAB and stained with Oil Red O.

Figure 3: Inhibitory effects on 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation. Induction: hormone mixture, MBAB: hormone mixture + MBAB, Res: hormone mixture + resveratrol, and Gen: hormone mixture + genistein. Three independent experiments were conducted. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD of absorbance at 510 nm. and represent significant differences when comparing the hormone treatment group (induction group).
Figure 4: Photographs of 3T3-L1 adipocytes after Oil Red O staining. (a) Normal (control); (b) induction (hormone mixture); (c) induction (hormone mixture) + 12.5 μM of MBAB; (d) induction (hormone mixture) + 25 μM of MBAB; (e) induction (hormone mixture) + 50 μM of MBAB; (f) induction (hormone mixture) + 50 μM of resveratrol. Scale bar = 50 μm.
3.3. Inhibitory Effects on FAS Expression

Fatty acid is synthesized by the action of fatty acid synthase (FAS), an enzyme with a molecular weight of 250 kDa, using malonyl-CoA as substrate [1417]. FAS is known as important factor in the regulation of fat biosynthesis and obesity. Thus, FAS inhibitors can effectively reduce fat production and suppress obesity.

The effect of MBAB on the intracellular expression of FAS was measured as shown in Figure 5. MBAB inhibited the increase in FAS production in 3T3-L1 cells that were induced by a hormone mixture in a concentration-dependent manner. Therefore, it is considered that MBAB impairs lipid production by suppressing fatty acid biosynthesis through FAS reduction.

Figure 5: Effect on intracellular FAS expression. N: normal; IN: hormone mixture; MBAB: hormone mixture + MBAB.
3.4. Inhibitory Effects on PPAR- Activity

PPAR- regulates fatty acid storage and glucose metabolism [18]. Since the PPAR- signaling pathway is known to be a major target for the development of antiobesity drugs, the effect of MBAB on PPAR- transcriptional activity was measured. The results show that MBAB suppressed rosiglitazone induced PPAR- transcriptional activity in a concentration-dependent manner, and the degree of inhibition at 50 μM was 55% compared to control (Figure 6).

Figure 6: Inhibitory effect of MBAB on rosiglitazone induced PPAR-γ transcriptional activity. Res: resveratrol. The data are the mean ± SD values of the three experiments. , compared with the induction group (control).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. K. F. Adams, A. Schatzkin, T. B. Harris et al., “Overweight, obesity, and mortality in a large prospective cohort of persons 50 to 71 years old,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 355, no. 8, pp. 763–778, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. B. Horwich and G. C. Fonarow, “Glucose, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes relevance to incidence of heart failure,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 283–293, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. Strazzullo, L. D'Elia, G. Cairella, F. Garbagnati, F. P. Cappuccio, and L. Scalfi, “Excess body weight and incidence of stroke: meta-analysis of prospective studies with 2 million participants,” Stroke, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. e418–e426, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. C. T. Field, O. B. Chaudhri, and S. R. Bloom, “Obesity treatment: novel peripheral targets,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 830–843, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Roth, A. L. Szulc, and A. Danoff, “Energy, evolution, and human diseases: an overview,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 875–883, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. D. Rosen and B. M. Spiegelman, “Molecular regulation of adipogenesis,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 16, pp. 145–171, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. Kiess, S. Petzold, M. Töpfer et al., “Adipocytes and adipose tissue,” Best Practice & Research: Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 135–153, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Zhang, K. Ikeda, J.-W. Xu, Y. Yamori, X.-M. Gao, and B.-L. Zhang, “Genistein suppresses adipogenesis of 3T3-L1 cells via multiple signal pathways,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 713–718, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Szkudelska and T. Szkudelski, “Resveratrol, obesity and diabetes,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 635, no. 1–3, pp. 1–8, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. A. Baile, J.-Y. Yang, S. Rayalam et al., “Effect of resveratrol on fat mobilization,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1215, no. 1, pp. 40–47, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. N. Behloul and G. Wu, “Genistein: a promising therapeutic agent for obesity and diabetes treatment,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 698, no. 1–3, pp. 31–38, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Li and B. M. Cheung, “Rise and fall of anti-obesity drugs,” World Journal of Diabetes, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 19–23, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. S. Hwang, S. Y. Choi, J. H. Lee et al., “Identification of a potent and noncytotoxic inhibitor of melanin production,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 15, pp. 5602–5609, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Kreuz, C. Schoelch, L. Thomas, W. Rist, J. F. Rippmann, and H. Neubauer, “Acetyl-CoA carboxylases 1 and 2 show distinct expression patterns in rats and humans and alterations in obesity and diabetes,” Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 577–586, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. J. Wakil and L. A. Abu-Elheiga, “Fatty acid metabolism: target for metabolic syndrome,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 50, pp. 138–143, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. V. Ronnett, E.-K. Kim, L. E. Landree, and Y. Tu, “Fatty acid metabolism as a target for obesity treatment,” Physiology & Behavior, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 25–35, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. J. Wolfgang and M. D. Lane, “The role of hypothalamic malonyl-CoA in energy homeostasis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 49, pp. 37265–37269, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. I. Anghel, E. Bedu, C. D. Vivier, P. Descombes, B. Desvergne, and W. Wahli, “Adipose tissue integrity as a prerequisite for systemic energy balance: a critical role for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 41, pp. 29946–29957, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus