Journal of Chemistry

Journal of Chemistry / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 696098 | 17 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/696098

Competitive and Noncompetitive Batch Sorption Studies of Aqueous Cd(II) and Pb(II) Uptake onto Coffea canephora Husks, Cyperus papyrus Stems, and Musa spp. Peels

Academic Editor: Wenshan Guo
Received20 Jun 2015
Revised17 Aug 2015
Accepted03 Sep 2015
Published04 Oct 2015

Abstract

Coffea canephora, Cyperus papyrus, and Musa spp. were studied for competitive and noncompetitive removal of aqueous Cd2+ and Pb2+. The optimal conditions were pH 4.5 and agitation time 3.0 hours. Biomass constituent ions showed no interference effects whereas cation exchange capacity values corresponded to the sorption efficiencies. XRD spectroscopy revealed surface oxygen and nitrogen groups that provide binding sites for metal ions. The maximum sorption efficiency ranges for metal ions in noncompetitive media were 95.2–98.7% for C. canephora, 42.0–91.3% for C. papyrus, and 79.9–92.2% for Musa spp. and in competitive sorption 90.8–98.0% for C. canephora, 19.5–90.4% for C. papyrus, and 56.4–89.3% for Musa spp. The Pb2+ ions uptake was superior to that of Cd2+ ions in competitive and noncompetitive media. In competitive sorption synergistic effects were higher for Cd2+ than Pb2+ ions. The pseudo-second-order kinetic model fitted experimental data with for Pb2+ ions and for Cd2+ ions. The Langmuir model fitted noncompetitive sorption data with ; moreover the Freundlich model fitted competitive sorption data with . Noncompetitive sorption was monolayer chemisorption whereas competitive sorption exhibited heterogeneous sorption mechanisms.

1. Introduction

The present-day socioeconomic and industrial growths together with world demographic trends continuously dispense toxic trace metal contaminants into the environment. The pollution of the aqueous environmental resources subsequently affects life processes. Although existing conventional remediation techniques have been employed to remove metal ions, reversing freshwater quality to pristine and usable conditions when it deteriorates remains an intricate challenge. In addition, the revelation of detrimental health effects in humans occurs after acute exposure to high levels or chronic consumption of low concentrations of toxic trace metals. Plants usually adapt to toxic trace metals in polluted environments with little or no observable effects on growth and plant health presented but ordinarily animals express notable detrimental health effects after exposure to toxic trace elements. Detailed discussions of health effects of exposure to toxic trace metals have been done by Chang et al. [1] and Krishnani and Ayyappan [2], including kidney dysfunction, growth retardation, bone deformation, testicular atrophy, hypertension, nervous system disorders, anaemia, hypertension, brain damage, and liver and kidney disease as well as cancer among other ailments. Amongst the toxic trace metals in industrial, domestic, and municipal wastewaters, lead and cadmium have been studied for possible removal using low cost biosorbents.

Water provides an avenue for transport and distribution of aqueous metal contaminants in the environment; therefore, the removal of toxic trace metals from wastewater, surface water, and groundwater ensures definite quality of the meagre water resources. Several physical and chemical conventional remediation techniques have been used for removal of trace metals from contaminated environmental matrices for many decades. In their reports, Namasivayam and Ranganathan [3] and Volesky [4] have discussed several conventional techniques of removal of metal ions from the water environment including chemical precipitation, adsorption, evaporation, electrochemical treatment, solvent extraction, membrane separation, reverse osmosis, and ion exchange. The conventional techniques are inadequate in removing metal ions in minute concentrations; moreover they are expensive to install and operate besides generating hazardous sludge. Therefore, in recent decades researchers have intensively studied low cost alternative methods of removal of trace metals from aqueous media using natural materials which are biodegradable, renewable, and environmental friendly. Among the promising techniques of removal of trace metals, Guo et al. [5] and Patnukao et al. [6] reported metal sorption onto biomasses to have substantial capacities for metal ions removal from aqueous media with good recoveries and regeneration of biosorbents in noncompetitive media. Sorption techniques that have been studied using biosorbents are ultimately meant for decontamination of polluted natural water in which toxic trace metal ions exist in association with inorganic and organic species which show synergistic effects on each other during sorption processes. Similarly Kapoor et al. [7] and Chen et al. [8] reported lower sorption capacities for metal ions in competitive sorption studies than those for metal ions in noncompetitive sorption studies. Continuous complex chemical interactions of inorganics, organics, and particulate matter under varying conditions of pH, metal concentration, and organic matter content implore sorption studies for competitive and noncompetitive media in order to explicate sorption performance in natural systems.

Biosorbents have been used in both modified and unmodified forms. Chemical modifications of biosorbents have been done using base solutions and oxidizing agents, as well as organic and mineral acids, to reduce soluble organics and enhance sorption performance [9]. The report by Horsfall Jr. et al. [10] indicated that when cassava tuber bark was treated using nitric acid the sorption intensity for Cd2+ ions improved from 2.7 to 11.5 mg/g. Ye et al. [11] reported that metal ions uptake onto rice husk was enhanced by treatment with sodium hydroxide from 63.4 to 293.3 mg/g for Cd2+ ions and 63.4 to 293.3 mg/g for Pb2+ ions whereas Feng et al. [12] indicated that methyl acetate treatment of orange peels increased Cd2+ ions uptake from 74 to 126 mg/g. In another study, Bakyayita et al. [9] reported enhancement in sorption intensities for sodium hydroxide treated biosorbents for Cd2+ ions onto Albizia coriaria from 1.56 to 1.75 mg/g and Musa spp. peels from 1.49 to 1.74 mg/g. Bakyayita et al. [9] also reported reduction in uptake of Cd2+ ions from 1.74 to 1.44 mg/g for Erythrina abyssinica, and for Pb2+ ions from 1.99 to 1.95 mg/g for Erythrina abyssinica, from 2.07 to 2.02 mg/g for Albizia coriaria, and from 2.02 to 1.98 mg/g for Musa spp. for sodium hydroxide treated biosorbents.

Chemical modifiers that have been used in several sorption studies include sodium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, sulphuric acid, tartaric acid, citric acid, propanoic acid, ethylenediamine, formaldehyde, and methanol as well as hydrogen peroxide to transform the chemical and physical properties of the biosorbents. In the review of modifications of materials in several studies, Rivera-Utrilla et al. [13] observed that oxidation of biosorbents increased the concentration of acid oxygen groups on the activated carbon surfaces resulting in increased polarity and decreased pH of the point of zero charge. Using bases such as NaOH and Ca(OH)2 in modifications is known to convert ester groups to carboxyl groups. Wan Ngah and Hanafiah [14] averred that sodium hydroxide treatment causes swelling and increase in internal surface area, decrease in the degree of polymerization, decrease in crystallinity, and separation of structural linkages between carbohydrates and lignin. Biosorbent modifications using oxidizing agents such as H2O2 were reported by Qiao et al. [15] to have altered the surface chemistry of activated carbon from coconut shell by introduction of surface oxygen groups such as carboxyl, ketone, and ether groups.

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of low cost plant waste materials in removing trace metals from contaminated water through the evaluation of the kinetics and the equilibrium isotherms of the competitive and noncompetitive sorption of Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions under batch conditions with the intention of scaling up conditions to fit water treatment plants. The biosorbents investigated were Musa spp. (cooking banana peels), Coffea canephora (coffee husks), and Cyperus papyrus (papyrus stems). The cooking banana peels are normally removed from the cooking banana just before they are steamed for food and they are salvaged as fodder for domestic animals; however, the coffee husks are recycled as a bedding material in poultry houses, as a source of energy in firing bricks and tiles in kilns, and as manure in plantations whereas the papyrus stem cuttings have no reuse. The main reason for the choice of Musa spp. peels, C. canephora husks, and C. papyrus stems was that their annual production rate in Uganda supersedes the demand for their reuse thence the waste burden in municipalities.

The total ionic content, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), cation exchange capacity (CEC), and pH of the biomass were evaluated and compared to the sorption efficiencies and capacities. Conversely, the evaluation of the effects of solution pH, agitation time, initial metal ions concentration, and competition on the sorption of Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions was studied and the experimental data was fitted to kinetic and equilibrium isotherm models to assess the biosorbents’ performance and predict the sorption dynamics and mechanisms.

The specific objectives were to analyze and evaluate the total cationic content, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the biomass and compare them to the sorption efficacies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Biosorbents

The cooking banana peels were obtained from roadside urban markets where cooking bananas were peeled before steaming whereas the coffee husks were acquired from coffee processing industries in farming districts of Luweero and Nakaseke while the papyrus stem cuttings were collected from local Ugandan craftsmen in Wakiso as by-products. The plant materials were further prepared in the laboratory at Makerere University to a diameter of 2 mm according to the previous method described by Bakyayita et al. [9]. For chemical treatment, 100 g of each plant material was soaked in 250 mL of 20% H2O2 solution for 24 hours. The biomass was then removed from the peroxide solution and thoroughly washed with distilled deionized water before being immersed in 0.25 M NaOH for 2 hours. The NaOH was decanted and the biosorbents were neutralized using 0.25 M HCl to pH . The modified biosorbents were copiously washed with distilled water and oven-dried at 105°C for 48 hours to a constant mass and stored in sealed plastic bags.

2.2. Preparation of Reagents and Biosorbates

The chemicals used were analytical grade reagents from J. T. Baker H, Deventer, Holland. Standard lead and cadmium solutions for atomic absorption spectrometry containing 1,000 mgL−1 were diluted to required concentrations using distilled deionized water. The noncompetitive media were prepared by diluting known portions of the standard metal solutions to the required concentration, and for competitive media mixtures of the known standard metal solutions were made up to the appropriate volume of spiked solutions using distilled deionized water. The initial pH of the contaminated aqueous solution was adjusted to the required value using drops of 0.1 M HCl and 0.1 M NaOH prior to agitation of the mixture.

2.3. Determination of pH of the Biomass

One gram of biomass was mixed with 20 mL of distilled deionized water and shaken in a closed centrifuge bottle for 25 minutes. The bottle and contents were centrifuged at 200 rpm for 15 minutes after which 15 mL of the clear supernatant was transferred to a sample bottle and the pH was determined using a pH/ION meter model pHM95 with sensitivity 97.9%.

2.4. Measurement of Cation Exchange Capacity

For each 1.5 g of biomass placed in a plastic bottle, 100 ml of 0.1 M BaCl2 was added before being capped. The bottles were shaken with a rotary shaker for 6 hours and clear extracts were filtered into clean bottles using coarse filters. To 15 mL of sample solutions, 35 mL of distilled water was added and the exchangeable acidity measured using an autotitrator by successively adding 0.01 M NaOH until pH 7.0 was attained. Another 20 mL of sample was filtered through 0.45 μm filters for metal ions analyses. The experiments were done in triplicate and the mean values were used to calculate the cation exchange capacity (CEC).

2.5. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) Analysis

The identification of chemical composition and crystallographic structures of surface chemical species in untreated biosorbents was achieved by X-ray diffraction analysis. The biomass samples were crushed in a ceramic mortar to fine powder of diameter ≤ 1 mm and consolidated into aluminum holders. The samples were scanned at 35 kV and 40 mA from 10° to 80° of the diffraction interval with a step size of 0.01° and scan duration of 0.5 seconds for exposure time 2θ of 30 minutes for each sample. The diffraction patterns were analyzed using the DIFFRAC Plus software and plotted using Microsoft Excel.

2.6. Nitric Acid Digestion

Nitric acid digestion procedure was used to prepare biomass for total metal constituents analysis. One gram of dry biomass was placed in a 250 mL digestion tube and 10 mL of concentrated HNO3 acid was added. The mixture was heated at 100°C for 2 hours and then treated with hydrogen peroxide. After digestion the clear supernatant was diluted using distilled deionized water to 50 mL. The solution was filtered through 0.20 μm sterile nonpyrogenic hydrophilic filters into plastic sample bottles and analyzed for metal ions using an Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS).

2.7. Sorption Experiments

Kinetic studies for metal ions sorption were carried out in duplicate with 12.5 g/L sorbent dose in 20 mL of synthetic solution containing 20 mg/L of trace metal ions during agitation time, 1–3 hours. The sorption studies were carried out at °C and agitation was done at 60 rpm for 3.5 hours using a rotary shaker. For the assessment of pH dependence, sorption experiments were done at pH 2.5–6.5 because, at pH ≤ 2.0, H3O+ ions prevail in the aqueous solutions and compete for sorption sites on the biosorbent surfaces with the metal ions whereas, at pH ≥ 6.5, the metallic ions under study tend to form a number of hydroxyl complexes which render the accessibility of the biosorbent sorption sites difficult due to the large size of the species. The time dependence experiments were done in 0.5–6.5 hours for metal ion concentration of 20 mg/L for biosorbent dosage of 12.5 g/L. The metal sorption equilibrium experiments were done at the optimal pH 4.5 for initial metal ion concentrations in the range of 5–100 mg/L. The competitive sorption studies were done with increasing mixed metal concentrations in equal proportions of 5–100 mg/L. The equilibrated solutions were centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 20 minutes and then filtered. Sorption studies were carried out with biosorbent dosage of 12.5 g/L and 20 mL of spiked solutions containing 20 mgL−1 of trace metal ions in 50 mL plastic bottles at °C.

2.8. Measurement of Residual Metal Contents and Dissolved Organic Carbon

The filtrates that were to be analyzed using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) for trace metals were preserved using 0.2 mL of concentrated HNO3. The samples for analysis of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were refrigerated until analyses were done using a TOC machine (Shimadzu TOC-5000A Model). All the measurements were done in triplicate to ensure that the experimental data had a reproducibility of ±0.5%.

2.9. Data Analysis

The amount of metal ions that was taken up by the C. canephora, Musa spp., and C. papyrus per gram of biomass, , was calculated from However, the sorption efficiency of the biomass for the metal ions was determined from the expression in where is the volume of aqueous solution (L), is the mass of the biomass (g), is the initial concentration (mg/L), is the equilibrium concentration (mg/L), is the metal ion sorption capacity (mg/g), and is the metal sorption efficiency.

2.10. Sorption Kinetics

The kinetic models are essential in describing the surface properties and predicting the sorption mechanisms. The various premises on which the models were devised predict the particular mechanisms of biosorption when they best fit the experimental data. In order to investigate the kinetics of the sorption processes, the pseudo-second-order kinetic model which is frequently used to predict sorption mechanisms was fitted to the experimental data. The resultant integral of the pseudo-second-order kinetic model [16] that was used can be expressed aswhere is the sorption capacity of the biomass at time , is the sorption capacity of the biomass at equilibrium, and is the pseudo-second-order rate constant (g/mg/min).

2.11. Sorption Isotherms

The sorption isotherms for the uptake of Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions were studied for initial metal concentrations of 10 to 100 mg/L using biomass dosage of 12.5 g/L for C. canephora, C. papyrus, and Musa spp. at the optimal conditions of pH 4.5, agitation time 3 hours, and temperature in competitive as well as noncompetitive solutions.

2.12. Langmuir Isotherm

Langmuir isotherm [17] model is based on three assumptions; namely, metal sorption is a monolayer process, all biosorbent sites are similar and can only accommodate one atom, and the capacity of a site to be occupied by one sorbate atom is independent of the nature of occupancy of sites in its vicinity. The linearized form of Langmuir isotherm shown in (4) was used: where is the maximum monolayer sorption capacity of the biosorbent (mg/g) and is the sorption constant (L/mg).

The Langmuir parameter is related to the separation factor which is used to predict the affinity between sorbate and the biomass surface molecules. The Langmuir parameters can be used to predict the affinity between the sorbate and the biosorbent using the dimensionless separation factor outlined inwhere is the constant from Langmuir equation and is initial trace metal ion concentration. The parameter indicates the shape of the isotherm and nature of the sorption process. According to Horsfall Jr. and Spiff [18] when the it implies that the isotherm is unfavourable; for it shows a linear isotherm, while means that the isotherm is irreversible, and if then the isotherm is favourable.

2.13. Freundlich Isotherm

Freundlich isotherm [19] model is an empirical isotherm which suites sorption onto heterogeneous surfaces. It is based on multilayer sorption process that assumes the biosorbent surface to be heterogeneous and the sorption as nonuniform distribution. The linearized Freundlich isotherm that was used is described bywhere and are the Freundlich isotherm empirical constants.

is the maximum sorption capacity for Freundlich isotherm and predicts the suitability of the model for describing the sorption process. If the value of is greater than unity, it implies favourable adsorption [20] of the trace metal ions.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterisation of Biomass

Characterisation of biomass was done by measuring the pH besides the levels of K, Ca, Mg, Na, and B which are major elements known to contribute to the cation exchange capacity of a material as well as Mn, Fe, Cu, Al, and Zn which are essential trace metals in addition to the nonessential trace metals, Ni, Cd, and Pb. The results presented in Table 1 showed that the biomass contained higher levels of the major elements but lower levels of essential and nonessential trace elements. The nitric acid digestion was done to determine the total amounts of metal components of the materials and to find if the application of the biosorbents in remediation of trace metals in contaminated water would not compromise the water quality. The levels of cadmium and lead are very trace compared to those of copper, manganese, and calcium. Leaching of major metallic ions such as Ca2+ and Mg2+ into the solution during remediation would cause synergistic effects on the sorption of Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions. Al-Ahmary [21] studied retention profiles and reported reduction in sorption capacities of lead and cadmium in the presence of calcium and magnesium ions. However, findings in this study suggest that Ca2+ and Mg2+ constituent ions of the biomass did not leach to water during the sorption of aqueous metal ions in cation exchange and this contributes to the observation that the biomass that contained higher levels of metallic ions showed the highest sorption efficiencies (Figure 2) which indicated occurrence of minimal interference effects of major metallic elements.


CationC. canephoraC. papyrusMusa spp.

Mn11.534.611.7
Fe4.21.981.53
Ni0.90.270.91
Cu18.61.262.93
Zn5.310.9917.79
Cd0.020.040.01
Pb0.460.181.23
Ca1329276198
Mg42093.8278
Na19.541317.3
K772460259030
Al27.52.519.3
B27.52.814.5

From Table 2, the pH of the biomass indicated that the application of the materials in sorption studies would not affect the sorption process since the pH range 4.9–5.9 is that in which metal ions are dominant over hydroxyl ions in solution. There was a reduction in the cation exchange capacities and the total cation exchange capacities of the three biosorbents due to treatment; however the observed values were above 10 cmol/kq which indicated that the materials had a high capacity to hold cations. Untreated materials had a higher potential to hold cations than treated materials. The biomass order from the highest to the lowest negative potential for binding base cations was Musa spp. > C. canephora > C. papyrus for untreated biomass and C. canephora > Musa spp. > C. papyrus for treated materials.


BiomasspHEA (cmol/kg)CEC (cmol/kg)

Musa spp.
 Treated5.490.1953
 Untreated5.221.64142
C. canephora
 Treated5.410.2295
 Untreated4.911.6691
C. papyrus
 Treated5.950.4236
 Untreated5.390.9585

The patterns of the X-ray diffraction analyses of untreated biomass presented in Figure 1 were obtained using the DIFFRAC Plus software and the prominent organic species in the biosorbents’ surface structures corresponding to peaks labelled a–i were identified.

The XRD spectral peaks for untreated biosorbents revealed the presence of 2,2-bipyridine, cyclotetradecaheptaene, 2,2′-bis(2-indenyl) biphenyl, and N-ethyltryptamine in Coffea canephora; 9-methylfluorene, 4-ethylpyrene, sodium cyanurate, 3-beta-hydroxy-cholestan-6-one in Musa spp.; and 2,2′-bis(2-indenyl) biphenyl, N-ethyltryptamine, chalcone oxime, and 1,2-diphenyl cyclohexene in Cyperus papyrus. The notable surface organic species were mainly aromatic ringed structures rich in pi-electrons as well as surface oxygen and nitrogen containing groups, which form ligands that are capable of forming bonds with metallic ions through complexation during the uptake of Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions. The uptake of metal ions, therefore, may take place through cation exchange and complexation with biosorbents’ surface chemical species.

3.2. Comparison of the Biomass Sorption Efficiencies and DOC Released

The sorption efficiencies showed in Figures 2 and 3 corresponded to the observation that the metal uptake was expected to be closely related to CEC results. In Figure 2, the biomass sorption efficiencies for the metal ions and the DOC released into the remediated water samples were compared at different pH levels. The sorption efficiencies and DOC released were observed to vary in the same order for C. canephora husks, Musa spp. peels, and C. papyrus stems. The peak Cd2+ ions sorption efficiency values were 83.9% for C. canephora, 29.3% for Musa spp. peels, and 8.7% for C. papyrus at pH 2.5, while the peak Pb2+ ions sorption efficiencies were 94.3% for C. canephora at pH 5.5, 89.2% for Musa spp. peels, and 99.7% for C. papyrus at pH 2.5. Although the DOC released into remediated water samples was nearly constant with increase in pH, the peak DOC values in Cd2+ remediated solutions were 91.3 mg/L for C. canephora and 69.6 mg/L for Musa spp. peels at pH 3.5 and 48.5 mg/L for C. papyrus at pH 4.5, whereas the peak DOC values in Pb2+ remediated water were 98.0 mg/L for C. canephora at pH 6.5, 94.5 mg/L for Musa spp. peels at pH 3.5, and 97.8 mg/L for C. papyrus at pH 5.5. For all biosorbents, sorption performance for Cd2+ ions was lower than that for Pb2+ ions and nearly linear over the pH range 2.5–6.5. The sorption of Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions in the pH range studied showed that the metal ions were prevailing and preferred over H3O+ ions. The optimal pH for the removal of Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions from aqueous solutions for the biomass studied was between 3.5 and 4.5. The sorption performance for Cd2+ ions was in the order C. canephora > Musa spp. > C. papyrus. The sorption performance for Pb2+ ions was in the order C. canephora > C. papyrus > Musa spp. for noncompetitive sorption. The conditions in batch studies differ from those in column studies, but, for comparison purposes, the results showed that the effects of DOC on the sorption efficiencies of the materials were in agreement with the reports by Nehrenheim [23] and Kalmykova [24] which indicated that DOC had only minor effects on metal sorption and transport in column studies.

In Figure 3, plots for correlations were done to determine the relationship between sorption intensities and DOC released by the materials during sorption. The coefficient of determination for Cd2+ ions uptake was 0.992 for Musa spp. peels and 0.84 for C. canephora; moreover the coefficient of determination for Pb2+ ions was 0.959 for C. canephora and 0.962 for C. papyrus. These coefficients of determination were strong whereas weak coefficients of determination were observed for Cd2+ ions sorption onto C. papyrus, 0.553, as well as for Pb2+ ions sorption onto Musa spp. peels, 0.707. The strong coefficients of determination values showed that there was an association between the amount of remediated metal ions and DOC released from biomass whereas the weak correlations indicated weak relationships.

3.3. Effect of Agitation Time on Metal Ions Sorption Efficiency

The results for sorption efficiencies as a function of agitation time are presented in Figure 4. In Figure 4(a) the time dependence of the sorption efficiencies for Pb2+ ions onto C. canephora varied in the order 96.8–98.4%, for Musa spp. they were 89–95.5%, and for C. papyrus they varied from 69.7 to 84.1% for agitation time 30–180 minutes.

For all biosorbents the maximum sorption efficiencies occurred at agitation time 180 minutes. On the other hand in Figure 4(b), the sorption efficiencies for Cd2+ ions onto C. canephora were 74.8–83.2%, for Musa spp. they were 16.7–25.7%, and for C. papyrus theywere 5.7–10.2% for agitation time 30–180 minutes. The sorption efficiencies of the biomass for Cd2+ ions were lower than that for Pb2+ ions. The maximum sorption efficiency for all biosorbents for Pb2+ ions occurred at an agitation time of 180 minutes and for Cd2+ ions it was 60 minutes.

The results also showed that the range between the minimum and maximum sorption efficiencies was very narrow which implied that the sorption process was too fast and was nearly complete with sorption sites fully occupied throughout the duration of the experiment.

The other implication is that Pb2+ ions sorption is slower but realizes higher efficiencies than the Cd2+ ions sorption most likely due to a difference in the binding mechanism. The highest sorption efficiencies for Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions were in the order of C. canephora > Musa spp. > C. papyrus.

3.4. Competitive Metal Sorption of Cd2+ and Pb2+ Ions

The results of competitive sorption of Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions from binary component solutions onto C. canephora husks, C. papyrus stems, and Musa spp. peels as a function of the solution pH are shown in Figure 5. The plots in Figure 5 show competitive sorption efficiencies for Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions in which a small variation is sorption efficiencies was evident which was similar to trends for noncompetitive sorption shown in Figure 2. Sorption efficiencies of biosorbents in competitive media were lower than those in noncompetitive media which indicated coion effects amongst the metal ions studied. The coion effects in competitive sorption processes are due to sorbate-sorbate and sorbate-sorbent interactions as well as the chemistry of the interacting ions. The reduction in Cd2+ ions sorption efficiency at pH 4.5 was from 2.7 to 0.62 for C. papyrus, 78.25 to 6.30 for C. canephora, and 25.68 to 3.61 for Musa spp. For Pb2+ ions the reduction in sorption efficiency was from 51.20 to 29.51 for C. papyrus, 87.63 to 81.44 for C. canephora, and 80.56 to 61.54 for Musa spp.

The results show that, in competitive sorption, Pb2+ ions uptake was preferred to that of Cd2+ ions for all biosorbents. Indication of effects of ionic interactions on the sorption process may be represented by the ratio of the competitive sorption intensity for a metallic ion to its noncompetitive sorption intensity such that for, adsorption is promoted by the presence of other metal ions,, no observable net interaction effects,, adsorption is suppressed by the presence of other metal ions [25].

Table 3 shows that the sorption intensity ratios for Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions onto C. canephora, Musa spp., and C. papyrus were all below unity over the pH range of the study. This implied that, for both Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions, sorption onto all the biosorbents was suppressed by the presence of other metal ions in the competitive media. The Cd2+ ions sorption exhibited greater synergistic effects than Pb2+ ions with the greatest effects observed in the order C. canephora > Musa spp. > C. papyrus. The synergistic effects may be explained using the chemistry of the metals; cadmium has a lower electronegativity value of 1.69 compared to that of lead of 1.87, and the hydrated ionic radius of Pb2+ is 4.61 Å compared to that of Cd2+ which is 4.01 Å. The chemistry implies that Pb2+ ions were strongly attracted towards the negatively charged surface groups than Cd2+ ions; moreover the bonds formed were stronger for Pb2+ ions due to the size of the hydrated ionic radius and difference in electronegativity which explains the selectivity and higher affinity for Pb2+ ions compared to Cd2+ ions in competitive sorption. The differences in hydrated ionic radii and electronegativities of Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions also explain the difference in binding to sorption sites and suggest disparate sorption mechanisms. On the other hand, the synergistic effects on metal sorption efficiencies indicate how the biosorbents perform in uptake of metal ions when used in remediation of real contaminated natural water from the environment. This study has been compared to other competitive and noncompetitive sorption studies as shown in Table 4.


Sorption intensity ratio for biosorbents
C. canephoraC. papyrusMusa spp.

pHCd2+Pb2+Cd2+Pb2+Cd2+Pb2+
2.50.0060.9950.1540.3080.1410.661
3.50.0710.8940.8820.410.2550.792
4.50.0810.9290.2250.5760.1410.764
5.50.0520.8470.80.5290.0510.69
6.50.080.850.870.4620.190.755


BiosorbentIon sorbedpHCompeting ions and removal efficiency (%)Reference

NonePbCdCu
Aspergillus nigerPb3.812.871.83 [7]
Cd4.02.000.960.33
Cu2.091.051.44
Cd86.668.5

NoneZnCdCu
Date palm waste Cu9087.585 [26]
Cd6.057.55855
Zn37.535.535

NonePbCuZn
Musa sapientumCu6.086.886.887.4 [27]
Zn84.657.984.8

NonePbCd
Coffea canephoraPb98.182.4This study
Cd82.918.8
Musa spp.Pb4.595.270.7
Cd30.616.7
Cyperus papyrusPb98.143.1
Cd11.17.7

3.5. Kinetics of Sorption

The was plotted against agitation time, , and straight lines were fitted by regression.

The plots in Figures 6 and 7 represent the sorption kinetics for Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions onto C. canephora, Musa spp., and C. papyrus. The regression coefficient values of the pseudo-second-order kinetic model show that it fits the sorption data for both Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions for all the biosorbents. The regression coefficient () values were for Cd2+ ions sorption and for Pb2+ ions. The values of the regression coefficient were high and indicated suitability of the pseudo-second-order model in explaining the sorption dynamics of cadmium and lead uptake onto the biosorbents studied. The parameters of the pseudo-second-order model, , the rate constant, and the sorption capacity, , at equilibrium were determined from the slope and intercept of the plots in Figures 6 and 7. For all materials the values presented in Table 5 were in the range of 0.015–0.728 min−1 for Pb2+ ions and 0.113–0.839 min−1 for Cd2+ ions, which implies that the rate of uptake of the metal ions was good and in the order of C. canephora > Musa spp. > C. papyrus. The values were 0.120–1.178 mg/g for Cd2+ ions and 1.560–1.732 mg/g for Pb2+ ions showing that Pb2+ ions were removed from solution more efficiently than Cd2+ ions. The application of this model proposed that the kinetic behaviour of sorption process for Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions onto C. canephora, Musa spp., and C. papyrus is based on chemical interactions between the metal ions and the active sites of the biosorbents’ surfaces. The implication is that the rate controlling step in the sorption process involved the divalent Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions binding onto two monovalent negatively charged sites on the biosorbent surface and the pseudo-second-order model assumes that the rate is proportional to the square of the unoccupied sites. The findings of this study are in agreement with selected sorption studies for metal ions in wastewater reviewed by Wan Ngah and Hanafiah [14] which revealed the pseudo-second-order model as the most followed kinetic model in sorption studies of metal ions removal from contaminated aqueous solutions.


BiomassMetal ion (mg/g) (g/mg/min)

C. canephoraCd2+1.1780.250.9985
Pb2+1.5810.671

Musa spp.Cd2+0.3550.7470.8816
Pb2+1.560.1690.9996

C. papyrusCd2+0.124.1520.8917
Pb2+1.7320.0150.8941

3.6. Sorption Isotherm Models

The two parameter isotherm models, Langmuir and Freundlich models, were employed in this study. Linear forms of Langmuir and Freundlich models were fitted to the experimental data to determine the corresponding parameters. Figures 8 and 9 show the fitting of Langmuir isotherms to metal uptake data from noncompetitive media whereas Figures 10 and 11 show fitting of Freundlich isotherms to metal sorption data from competitive media. The regression coefficients () for the models were used to determine the model that gives the best fit. The regression coefficients () for the Langmuir model for noncompetitive Cd2+ ions sorption were from Figures 8 and 9 whereas for competitive Cd2+ ions sorption the Freundlich model had better regression coefficients of from Figures 10 and 11.

The values for Cd2+ ions were between 0.028 and 5.97 mg/g, whereas the values were between 0.442 and 13.6 which indicated that Cd2+ ions sorption was good over the range of initial metal ion concentration studied. When the values were substituted into (5), values obtained were between 0 and 1. The values of that were determined from parameter were 0.004–0.289 for C. canephora, 0.003–0.070 for Musa spp., and 0.001–0.131 for C. papyrus which indicated that the Langmuir model was suitable to describe the sorption processes and that the metal uptake followed a monolayer distribution mechanism. For the competitive sorption of cadmium ions, the Freundlich values were between 0.256 and 0.639 and the values were between 0.014 and 0.395 which was indicative of suitability of the model to explain the competitive metal sorption processes for Cd2+ ions.

The regression coefficients () values for the Langmuir model for noncompetitive sorption of Pb2+ ions were in the range , whereas those for Freundlich model for competitive sorption of Pb2+ ions were of the order . The values for Pb2+ ions were between 0.732 and 1.231 mg/g.

The values were between 1.324 and 3.895 which indicated that Pb2+ ions sorption was suitable over the range of initial metal ion concentration studied. For competitive sorption of Pb2+ ions sorption the Freundlich values were between 0.174 and 0.507 and the values were between 0.386 and 0.525 which were indicative of suitability of the model to explain the competitive sorption processes Pb2+ ions. The values of the Langmuir parameter that showed high affinity of sorbent surfaces for the metal ions studied and predicted high bond energies when the Langmuir isotherm describes the noncompetitive sorption processes. The Freundlich parameter values were less than unity which indicated that the biomass had heterogeneous site binding affinities for the metal ions and the sorption processes were favourable.

When a model fits the biosorption data, the equation parameters and the underlying assumptions are dependable for description of the biosorption mechanism and sorbent surface properties besides the sorbent-sorbate interactions in the process. The Langmuir model (Figures 8 and 9) fits data for noncompetitive sorption where the metal ions uptake was a monolayer distribution mechanism and the Freundlich model (Figures 10 and 11) fits the data for competitive uptake of Pb2+ and Cd2+ ions onto C. canephora, C. papyrus, and Musa spp. biomass where the metal ions followed a heterogeneous distribution mechanism.

4. Conclusions

Whereas sorption processes are pH, initial metal concentration, and time dependent, the variation in sorption of Pb2+ and Cd2+ ions onto C. canephora, C. papyrus, and Musa spp. with the initial metal concentration, time, and pH dependence of sorption was nearly linear. There were strong correlations between the DOC released and the sorption intensities of the materials which suggested that the metal ions removal had a relationship with DOC released for all the biosorbents in this study. The constituent Ca, K, Mg, and Na ions in the materials contribute to cation exchange capacities of the materials and the sorption efficiencies although the toxic trace metals were in small concentrations and would not contaminate the remediated water. Competitive sorption efficiencies of all biosorbents were lower than the noncompetitive sorption efficiencies and indicated synergistic effects on the sorption of both metal ions. Moreover the synergistic effects were ultimate in the order of C. canephora > Musa spp. > C. papyrus for Cd2+ ions and least in the order of C. canephora > Musa spp. > C. papyrus for Pb2+ ions. The sorption kinetics for both metal ions adequately followed the pseudo-second-order model which predicted chemisorption as the main reaction mechanism of the sorption process. The Langmuir isotherm fitted the noncompetitive sorption data whereas the Freundlich isotherm fitted the competitive sorption data better which inferred that the sorption process was complex and involved several mechanisms. The waste plant materials, C. canephora, C. papyrus, and Musa spp. may be studied further in column studies and pilot scale studies in order to exhaust the conditions under which they may be used to remediate trace metals in contaminated natural aqueous media. Sorption performance was in the order C. canephora husks > Musa spp. peels > C. papyrus stems.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Royal Swedish Government through the Swedish International Development Agency, Sida support to Uganda–Makerere University Bilateral Research Program. The authors are very grateful to the sponsors, the academic and technical staff of Land and Water Resources Engineering at Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm, Sweden, and those of the Department of Chemistry as well as the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

References

  1. A. Chang, A. Page, and T. Asano, Developing Human Health-Related Chemical Guidelines for Reclaimed Wastewater and Sludge Applications in Agriculture, World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland, 1995.
  2. K. K. Krishnani and S. Ayyappan, “Heavy metals remediation of water using plants and lignocellulosic agrowastes,” Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 188, pp. 59–84, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. Namasivayam and K. Ranganathan, “Removal of Pb(II), Cd(II), Ni(II) and mixture of metal ions by adsorption onto ‘waste’ Fe(III)/Cr(III) hydroxide and fixed bed studies,” Environmental Technology, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 851–860, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. B. Volesky, “Detoxification of metal-bearing effluents: biosorption for the next century,” Hydrometallurgy, vol. 59, no. 2-3, pp. 203–216, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. X. Guo, S. Zhang, and X.-Q. Shan, “Adsorption of metal ions on lignin,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 134–142, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. P. Patnukao, A. Kongsuwan, and P. Pavasant, “Batch studies of adsorption of copper and lead on activated carbon from Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn. bark,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1028–1034, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. Kapoor, T. Viraraghavan, and D. R. Cullimore, “Removal of heavy metals using the fungus Aspergillus niger,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 95–104, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Y.-N. Chen, J.-X. Nie, M. Chen, and D.-C. Zhang, “Biosorptional removal of lead and cadmium from water by waste materials,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Management and Service Science (MASS '09), pp. 1–4, IEEE, Ganzhou, China, September 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. G. K. Bakyayita, A. C. Norrström, M. Nalubega, and R. N. Kulabako, “Kinetic studies of Cd (II) and Pb (II) ions biosorption from aqueous media using untreated and chemically treated biosorbents,” Journal of Water Science and Technology, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 2230–2236, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Horsfall Jr., A. A. Abia, and A. I. Spiff, “Kinetic studies on the adsorption of Cd2+, Cu2+ and Zn2+ ions from aqueous solutions by cassava (Manihot sculenta Cranz) tuber bark waste,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 283–291, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. H. Ye, Q. Zhu, and D. Du, “Adsorptive removal of Cd(II) from aqueous solution using natural and modified rice husk,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 101, no. 14, pp. 5175–5179, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. Feng, X. Guo, S. Liang, Y. Zhu, and J. Liu, “Biosorption of heavy metals from aqueous solutions by chemically modified orange peel,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 49–54, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. Rivera-Utrilla, M. Sánchez-Polo, V. Gómez-Serrano, P. M. Álvarez, M. C. M. Alvim-Ferraz, and J. M. Dias, “Activated carbon modifications to enhance its water treatment applications. An overview,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 187, no. 1–3, pp. 1–23, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. W. S. Wan Ngah and M. A. K. M. Hanafiah, “Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater by chemically modified plant wastes as adsorbents: a review,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 99, no. 10, pp. 3935–3948, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. W. Qiao, Y. Korai, I. Mochida, Y. Hori, and T. Maeda, “Preparation of an activated carbon artifact: oxidative modification of coconut shell-based carbon to improve the strength,” Carbon, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 351–358, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Y. S. Ho and G. McKay, “A comparison of chemisorption kinetic models applied to pollutant removal on various sorbents,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 332–340, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. I. Langmuir, “The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 2221–2235, 1916. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Horsfall Jr. and A. I. Spiff, “Effect of metal ion concentration on the biosorption of Pb2+ and Cd2+ by Caladium bicolor (wild cocoyam),” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 191–196, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  19. H. Freundlich, “Adsorption in solution,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 57, pp. 385–471, 1906. View at: Google Scholar
  20. K. Mohanty, M. Jha, B. C. Meikap, and M. N. Biswas, “Biosorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions by Eichhornia crassipes,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. M. Al-Ahmary, “Retention profile of cadmium and lead ions from aqueous solutions onto some selected local solid sorbents,” Journal of Taibah University for Science, vol. 2, pp. 52–61, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. L. Netz and E. Salmonsson, Biomass for purification of metal contaminated water [BSc thesis], MJ153x, Stockholm, Sweden, 2014.
  23. E. Nehrenheim, Industrial by-products in treatment of metals from polluted water: an evaluation of low cost adsorbents [Ph.D. thesis], Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden, 2008.
  24. Y. Kalmykova, Alternative sorption materials for contaminated water treatment [Ph.D. thesis], Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, 2009.
  25. T. C. Tan, C. K. Chia, and C. K. Teo, “Uptake of metal ions by chemically treated human hair,” Water Research, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 157–162, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Ahmed, “Removal of heavy metals from waste water by date palm tree waste,” Engineering and Technology Journal, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 119–125, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  27. M. Ashraf, K. Mahmood, and A. Wajid, Study of Low Cost Biosorbent for Biosorption of Heavy Metals, IACSIT Press, Singapore, 2011.

Copyright © 2015 G. K. Bakyayita et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

600 Views | 342 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.