Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Chemistry
Volume 2016, Article ID 6731848, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6731848
Research Article

Numerical Simulation and Optimization of Enhanced Oil Recovery by the In Situ Generated CO2 Huff-n-Puff Process with Compound Surfactant

1The State Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
2The Institute of Petroleum Engineering Technology, Jiangsu Oilfield Corporation, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China

Received 2 April 2016; Accepted 23 June 2016

Academic Editor: Jean-Luc Blin

Copyright © 2016 Yong Tang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. Manrique, C. Thomas, R. Ravikiran et al., “EOR: current status and opportunities,” in Proceedings of the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, SPE-130113-MS, Tulsa, Okla, USA, April 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. J. J. Sheng, “Status of surfactant EOR technology,” Petroleum, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 97–105, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. X. Jia, K. Ma, Y. Liu, B. Liu, J. Zhang, and Y. Li, “Enhance heavy oil recovery by in-situ carbon dioxide generation and application in China offshore oilfield,” in Proceedings of the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, pp. 68–73, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, July 2013. View at Scopus
  4. A. Bera and T. Babadagli, “Relative permeability of foamy oil for different types of dissolved gases,” SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. D. Olsen, “CO2 EOR production properties of chalk,” in Proceedings of the SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, SPE, Vienna, Austria, May 2011.
  6. W. Wan and S. Wang, “Determination of residual oil saturation and connectivity between injector and producer using interwell tracer tests,” Journal of Petroleum Engineering & Technology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 18–24, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Ma, X. Wang, R. Gao et al., “Enhanced light oil recovery from tight formations through CO2 huff ‘n’ puff processes,” Fuel, vol. 154, pp. 35–44, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Q. Firouz and F. Torabi, “Utilization of carbon dioxide and methane in huff-and-puff injection scheme to improve heavy oil recovery,” Fuel, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 966–973, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. S. Rivera, K. Mohanty, and M. Balhoff, “Reservoir simulation and optimization of Huff-and-Puff operations in the Bakken Shale,” Fuel, vol. 147, pp. 82–94, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. K. Gutnersky, A. K. Shakhverdiev, and Y. G. Mamedov, “In-situ generation of carbon dioxide: new way to increase oil recovery,” in Proceedings of the SPE European Petroleum Conference, SPE-65170-MS, Paris, France, October 2000.
  11. F. Torabi, A. Q. Firouz, A. Kavousi, and K. Asghari, “Comparative evaluation of immiscible, near miscible and miscible CO2 huff-n-puff to enhance oil recovery from a single matrix-fracture system (experimental and simulation studies),” Fuel, vol. 93, pp. 443–453, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Z. Li and Y. Gu, “Soaking effect on miscible CO2 flooding in a tight sandstone formation,” Fuel, vol. 134, no. 9, pp. 659–668, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. Torabi and K. Asghari, “Effect of operating pressure, matrix permeability and connate water saturation on performance of CO2 huff-and-puff process in matrix-fracture experimental model,” Fuel, vol. 89, no. 10, pp. 2985–2990, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. F. Yang, J. Deng, and Y. Xue, “Jiangsu oil field carbon dioxide cyclic stimulation operations: lessons learned and experiences gained,” in Proceedings of the SPE International Conference on CO2 Capture, Storage, and Utilization, New Orleans, La, USA, November 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. C. Chen, M. Balhoff, and K. K. Mohanty, “Effect of reservoir heterogeneity on improved shale oil recovery by CO2 huff-n-puff,” in Proceedings of the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, pp. 410–425, April 2012. View at Scopus
  16. J. N. F. Martinez, M. Abbaszadeh, R. P. Olguin, E. P. Martinez, and A. R. Figueroa, “Evaluation of CO2-EOR gas injection in a heavy-oil naturally fractured reservoir,” in Proceedings of the SPE Heavy and Extra Heavy Oil Conference, SPE-171054-MS, Medellín, Colombia, September 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. J. J. Sheng, “Comparison of the effects of wettability alteration and IFT reduction on oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 154–161, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Rai, R. T. Johns, M. Delshad, L. W. Lake, and A. Goudarzi, “Oil-recovery predictions for surfactant polymer flooding,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 112, pp. 341–350, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. J. Sheng, “Review of surfactant enhanced oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs,” Advances in Petroleum Exploration and Development, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  20. W. Wan, A. Raj, T.-P. Hsu, P. Lohateeraparp, J. H. Harwell, and B.-J. B. Shiau, “Designing surfactant-only formulations for a high salinity and tight reservoir,” International News on Fats, Oils and Related Materials, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 622–627, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. A. Dehghan, M. Masihi, and S. Ayatollahi, “Phase behavior and interfacial tension evaluation of a newly designed surfactant on heavy oil displacement efficiency; effects of salinity, wettability, and capillary pressure,” Fluid Phase Equilibria, vol. 396, pp. 20–27, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. Babu, N. Pal, A. Bera, V. K. Saxena, and A. Mandal, “Studies on interfacial tension and contact angle of synthesized surfactant and polymeric from castor oil for enhanced oil recovery,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 353, pp. 1126–1136, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. H. Pei, G. Zhang, J. Ge, L. Jin, and L. Ding, “Study on the variation of dynamic interfacial tension in the process of alkaline flooding for heavy oil,” Fuel, vol. 104, pp. 372–378, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. M. F. Hasan, E. L. First, F. Boukouvala, and C. A. Floudas, “A multi-scale framework for CO2 capture, utilization, and sequestration: CCUS and CCU,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 81, no. 8, pp. 2–21, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. M. AlSofi, J. S. Liu, M. Han, and S. Aramco, “Numerical simulation of surfactant–polymer coreflooding experiments for carbonates,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 111, no. 11, pp. 184–196, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. Kumar and A. Mandal, “Studies on interfacial behavior and wettability change phenomena by ionic and nonionic surfactants in presence of alkalis and salt for enhanced oil recovery,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 372, pp. 42–51, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. Q. Liu, M. Dong, S. Ma, and Y. Tu, “Surfactant enhanced alkaline flooding for Western Canadian heavy oil recovery,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 293, no. 1–3, pp. 63–71, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. V. Mirchi, S. Saraji, L. Goual, and M. Piri, “Dynamic interfacial tension and wettability of shale in the presence of surfactants at reservoir conditions,” Fuel, vol. 148, pp. 127–138, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. B. Y. Jamaloei, R. Kharrat, and F. Torabi, “A mechanistic analysis of viscous fingering in low-tension polymer flooding in heavy-oil reservoirs,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 228–232, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Carroll, Y. Hao, M. Smith, and Y. Sholokhova, “Development of scaling parameters to describe CO2—rock interactions within Weyburn-Midale carbonate flow units,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 16, pp. S185–S193, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. B. J. B. Shiau, T.-P. Hsu, B. L. Roberts, and J. H. Harwell, “Improved chemical flood efficiency by in situ CO2 generation,” in Proceedings of the 17th SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium (IOR '10), pp. 1077–1086, Tulsa, Okla, USA, April 2010. View at Scopus
  32. S. Park, E. S. Lee, and W. R. W. Sulaiman, “Adsorption behaviors of surfactants for chemical flooding in enhanced oil recovery,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1239–1245, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. W. Hongyan, C. Xulong, Z. Jichao, and Z. Aimei, “Development and application of dilute surfactant-polymer flooding system for Shengli oilfield,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 65, no. 1-2, pp. 45–50, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. Mehranfar and M. H. Ghazanfari, “Investigation of the microscopic displacement mechanisms and macroscopic behavior of alkaline flooding at different wettability conditions in shaly glass micromodels,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 122, pp. 595–615, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. L. Chen, G. Zhang, J. Ge, P. Jiang, J. Tang, and Y. Liu, “Research of the heavy oil displacement mechanism by using alkaline/surfactant flooding system,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 434, no. 19, pp. 63–71, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Y. Zhu, Q. Hou, G. Jian, D. Ma, and Z. Wang, “Current development and application of chemical combination flooding technique,” Petroleum Exploration and Development, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 96–103, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. P. Cheng, D. Li, L. Boruvka, Y. Rotenberg, and A. W. Neumann, “Automation of axisymmetric drop shape analysis for measurements of interfacial tensions and contact angles,” Colloids and Surfaces, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 151–167, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. F. Yang, J. Deng, and W. Zhu, “Lab experimental study on in-situ carbon dioxide generation to enhance oil recovery,” Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 70–72, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  39. C. Song and D. Yang, Performance Evaluation of CO2 Huff-n-Puff Processes in Tight Oil Formations, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2013.
  40. P. Bikkina, J. Wan, Y. Kim, T. J. Kneafsey, and T. K. Tokunaga, “Influence of wettability and permeability heterogeneity on miscible CO2 flooding efficiency,” Fuel, vol. 166, pp. 219–226, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. R. Safi, R. K. Agarwal, and S. Banerjee, “Numerical simulation and optimization of CO2 utilization for enhanced oil recovery from depleted reservoirs,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 144, pp. 30–38, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. Ma, X. Wang, R. Gao et al., “Study of cyclic CO2 injection for low-pressure light oil recovery under reservoir conditions,” Fuel, vol. 174, pp. 296–306, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus