Abstract

Metakaolin zeolite-A was synthesized from thermally activated kaolin clay and characterized by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy and X-Ray Diffraction Spectroscopy. The effects of pH (2–10), contact time (10–180 min), initial concentration (5–120 mgL−1), and dosage (0.1–2 g) and their interactions were investigated using response surface methodology following a central composite design. Optimum removal (87.70%) was obtained at pH 6, contact time 180 min, initial concentration 40.0 mgL−1, and adsorbent dosage 1.0 g by Excel Solver using the GRG solving method. The adsorption data fitted best to the Langmuir model with correlation coefficient and Chi-square value . The Freundlich isotherm gave a correlation coefficient and . The adsorption process followed the pseudo-second-order model. The calculated thermodynamic parameters showed that the adsorption process was endothermic and not thermodynamically spontaneous. The studied zeolite-A can therefore be used as a promising adsorbent for the removal of Ca(II) ions from aqueous solutions.

1. Introduction

Zeolites are crystalline, microporous, hydrated aluminosilicates formed by the sharing of oxygen atoms in the framework of aluminum and silicon tetrahedrals [1]. Synthetic zeolites are used commercially more often than natural zeolites due to the purity of their crystalline products, the uniformity of particles, the greater thermal stability, and the fact that they can be engineered with a wide variety of properties and pore sizes [2]. Zeolite synthesis involves the hydrothermal crystallization of aluminosilicate gels in the presence of alkali hydroxides [3]. The type of zeolite is affected by composition of the reaction mixture, the nature of the reactants and their pretreatments, temperature of the process, reaction time, and pH of the reaction mixture. The main problems in zeolite application are availability and cost of raw materials, specifically the silica source [4]. The use of commercial silica in zeolite synthesis is affected by variations in reactivity and selectivity apart from being expensive [5]. Cheaper raw materials such as clay minerals could be an alternative starting material for zeolite synthesis. Kaolin is a cheap clay mineral whose deposits are found vastly around mining areas in Zimbabwe. Many researchers have reported the synthesis of zeolites from kaolin under different conditions [611]. Kaolin is not stable under severe alkaline conditions and as such it is desirable to convert it into a more reactive form (metakaolin) by calcination at elevated temperatures. Because of their unique porous properties, zeolites could be applied in the removal of hardness in domestic water which is mainly due to calcium and magnesium ions. Water supplies with total hardness of more than 500 mg/L are not suitable for domestic consumption [12]. Hard water is responsible for the formation of deposits in boilers, cooling towers, water pipes, and household facilities, as well as diverse influences on the cleaning performance of detergents. Traditionally, water purification plants used lime and soda ash for the removal of hardness. One of the main drawbacks of this process is the generation of large amounts of liquid sludge as well as the need for recarbonation of the treated water [13]. The use of polyphosphates in removing water hardness is also practiced but results in massive discharge of phosphates in water bodies which lead to eutrophication [14].

Various other methods including membrane precipitation, phytoextraction, flocculation, solvent extraction, ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis, electrodialysis, and adsorption have been studied for the removal of a wide variety of cations from water streams including magnesium and calcium [1517]. Most of these are either inefficient or expensive and result in the generation of large amounts of sludge. Activated carbon is considered to be a particularly competitive and effective process for the removal of cations but has been hampered by the high costs associated with production and regeneration of spent carbon. The use of low-cost ion exchangers such as zeolites is an attractive method for the removal of metals from aqueous solutions. In this work, we report on the synthesis of zeolite-A from Zimbabwean kaolin and its application in the sorption of calcium ions from aqueous solutions. All the process independent variables have been optimized collectively by applying response surface methodology (RSM), a mathematical statistical technique which optimizes the process and evaluates the relationship between a set of independent variables [1820]. Moreover, it evaluates the relative significance of the various independent variables even in the presence of complex factor-factor interactions [21]. The adsorbent was characterized using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy and XRD (X-Ray Diffraction) Spectroscopy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Solutions

All chemicals used in this work were obtained from Skylabs (Zimbabwe) and were used as received without further purification. A pH meter (Az-8601, China) was employed for pH measurement and 0.1 M HCl and 0.1 M NaOH were used for pH adjustment. CaCl2 was used for the preparation of stock solution using double deionized water. All glassware used was soaked in 10% (v/v) nitric acid solution for 24 h and cleaned repeatedly with double deionized water.

2.2. Sample Collection and Pretreatment

The kaolin clay used in this study was collected from Chegutu, Zimbabwe. The kaolin clay sample was pulverized and sieved through a 90 μm sieve. The pulverized kaolin clay material was digested in 6 M HCl to remove iron and washed with distilled water followed by drying overnight at 120°C. The treated kaolin clay was exposed to 900°C for 1 h where its structure was destroyed [22]. This removed all incorporated hydrocarbons and was dehydroxylated to form an activated amorphous material called metakaolin, a material which accepts and readily exchanges sodium as a guest in its structure.

2.3. Zeolitization Using the Hydrothermal Transformation Method

The zeolite gel was prepared by dissolving metakaolin in sodium hydroxide solutions [23]. Metakaolin (20 g) was refluxed and stirred in 100 mL of sodium hydroxide (1, 3, and 5 M) at a temperature of 100°C at specified reaction times (1, 2, and 4 h) [5]. The metakaolin-sodium hydroxide slurries were filtered by suction filtration and washed several times with deionized water to remove excess unreacted sodium hydroxide. The reaction products were dried at a temperature of 120°C in the oven for 24 h. Triplicate samples were prepared for each NaOH concentration and reaction time.

2.4. Characterization of the Zeolites

The Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy spectra of the metakaolin zeolite (MZ) were obtained using a Thermo Fisher Scientific spectrometer (Nicolet 6700, USA) in the scanning range 4000–400 cm−1. A Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer (Germany) using nickel filtered Cu Kα radiation (40 kV, 40 mA) was used for identification of the structural phases.

2.5. Adsorption Batch Studies

All experiments were carried out in batch mode in 250 mL conical flasks. Several experimental parameters (solution pH: 2–10; contact time: 10–180 min; adsorbent dosage: 0.1–2.0 g; and initial metal ion concentration: 5–120 mg/L) were investigated following a central composite design (CCD). A predetermined adsorbent mass was added to 100 mL solution in a conical flask containing Ca2+ cations at a concentration according to CCD. The mixture was agitated on a shaker at 150 rpm for a specified time at room temperature. After agitation, the solid matrix was separated from the rest of the solution by filtration using Whatman number 42 filter paper followed by centrifugation to get the supernatant solution. The determination of Ca2+ ions in aqueous solution was done by complexometric titration using standardized 0.1 M EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) in the presence of Eriochrome Black T as an indicator. Typically, 100 mL of each supernatant solution was pipetted into a 250 mL conical flask, 4 mL of 1.0 M NH3 solution and 2-3 drops of Eriochrome Black T were added, and the mixture was titrated with 0.1 M EDTA solution until the color changed from pink to blue [12].

The percentage removal () of Ca(II) ions from aqueous solutions was determined using the following equation:The equilibrium adsorption amount () was calculated according to the mass balance equation:where is the equilibrium amount (mg g−1) of Ca(II) ions adsorbed per gram of metakaolin zeolite adsorbent, and are the Ca(II) concentrations (mgL−1) in the solution initially and after adsorption, respectively, is the volume () of the solution, and is the mass (g) of the adsorbent used in the experiment.

The experimental domain used is presented in Table 1. Preliminary experiments were done to obtain the extreme levels of the independent input variables. Design Expert Version 5 (Stat-Ease, USA) was used to generate the CCD experiments, optimize the levels of the independent variables, and evaluate the interactions of the process parameters. In generating the CCD, the experimental domain for independent factors for high and low was entered in terms of alpha value of 2 to give 30 experiments with 6 center points. The percentage removal of Ca(II) ions was taken as the dependent variable. The Design Expert software was also used for statistical, regression, and graphical analysis of the obtained data. The general transformation quadratic model was proposed to bewhere is the percentage removal of Ca(II) ions, is the pH, is the contact time in min, is the initial concentration in mg/L, and is the dosage in g. The optimum values of the independent input variables were obtained by Excel Solver software applying the GRG function.

2.6. Desorption Studies

0.2 g of the adsorbent was left in contact with 100 mL of 30 mg/L of Ca(II) for 180 min at 150 rpm. The spent adsorbent was filtered, washed, and dried at 55°C for 24 h. The dried spent adsorbent was left in contact with different concentrations of NaOH (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 M) for 500 min and then filtered and washed several times with deionized water. The desorbed adsorbent was used for adsorption of the Ca(II) ions and the regeneration percentage was determined.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of the Adsorbent
3.1.1. FTIR

Zeolites were synthesized at different reaction times and different NaOH concentrations and the zeolite that was similar to zeolite-A was selected for use. Figure 1 shows the FTIR spectra of the metakaolin zeolites synthesized at an optimum time of 4 h at different NaOH concentrations. The spectrum of the selected zeolite (C2, Figure 1) had a band at 3458.53 cm−1 corresponding to O-H vibration. There was structural T-O stretching and deformation at 1642.33 cm−1 and a peak at 1021.10 cm−1 that corresponded to internal tetrahedron asymmetrical vibration. A peak at 1421.37 cm−1 might be due to Si-O asymmetric stretching whilst bands at 723.79 and 1072.79 cm−1 were due to internal symmetrical stretching vibration of (Al-Si)-O. The 473.46 cm−1 band was due to internal vibration of (Al-Si)-O bending and the 558.95 cm−1 band corresponded to the formation of double four-membered rings by external linkages [5]. The zeolite-A framework possesses good exchange capacity, making it a good material as an ion exchange agent. It may thus be concluded that IR spectra of the C2 spectra are closely complementary to zeolite-A; therefore, the C2 zeolites were used for batch adsorption studies.

3.1.2. XRD Analysis

The XRD data (Figure 2) showed four crystallographic phases at 2θ degree values of 10.09 (ZON), and 12.69 (MER), 26.69 (Quartz), and 30.28 (CAN) are quite consistent with the two theta values of zeolite-A (LTA) showing that the pure phase of crystalline zeolite-A was produced.

3.2. Adsorption Batch Studies

Adsorption studies using MZ were done on an aqueous Ca(II) solution applying a central composite design [24] developed from the experimental domain presented in Table 1. The investigation was carried out following a full central composite design consisting of 30 experiments, which included several replicate experiments to check for consistency of the adsorption procedure. The average Ca(II) removal from aqueous solutions using the prepared adsorbent over six replicate runs (midpoint experimental conditions) was % (at 95% confidence). The results obtained were consistent as evidenced by the small relative standard deviation (1.04%). The CCD batch method was therefore capable of providing consistent results and hence was suitable for use in the investigation of the adsorption of Ca(II) ions onto MZ.

3.2.1. Response Surface Methodology Modeling

The experimental variable settings used for this investigation together with the actual experimental results are presented in Table 2.

The proposed full transformation model (see (3)) was fitted on the experimental data obtained in Table 2. The least squares regression results for the adsorption of Ca(II) after elimination of the insignificant terms () during stepwise multiple regression are summarized in Table 3.

All the values associated with the coefficients of pH (), contact time (), initial concentration (), dosage concentration (), initial concentration squared term (), and the interaction between contact time and initial concentration term (BC) were smaller than 0.05 (Table 3), indicating a significant effect of these factors on the percentage removal of calcium by metakaolin zeolite. The interaction between contact time and initial concentration (BC) has an antagonistic effect on the removal of calcium as shown by the negative value of the associated coefficient. The final model obtained after elimination of the insignificant term wasThe results of the analysis of variance for the regression model are presented in Table 4.

The value for the model was less than 0.05 (), indicating that the model was statistically significant. Moreover, a higher regression coefficient () supported the significance of the model [25]. Model validity was evaluated by normal probability plot which was produced by the Design Expert software. Figure 3 shows that the residuals were close to the straight line and were scattered randomly around it with no particular pattern, showing no abnormal behavior [26].

The plot of standard residuals versus predicted values showed a random distribution of residuals (difference between the experimental and the predicted values), with no particular pattern showing well behaved residuals (Figure 4) [27]. Moreover, it showed no outliers supporting the statistical validity of the model.

3.2.2. Model Interpretation

A 3-dimensional surface plot gives vital information on the behavior of the experimental design system. This aids the evaluation of the effects of the independent variables on the response factor. Figure 5 shows the effect of pH and contact time on % removal of Ca(II) ions at constant dosage amount and initial Ca(II) concentration. An increase in both pH and contact time increased the percentage removal of Ca(II). Since the sorbent had abundant binding sites, the gradual occupancy of these sites over different times resulted in an increase in the uptake of Ca(II). The lower percentage removal observed in acidic pH medium is due to protonation of adsorbent functional groups or competition of H+ with Ca(II) ions to bind and occupy the active sites of the adsorbent. On the other hand, higher pH medium promotes formation of insoluble metal hydroxides such as Ca(OH)2 which are filtered off.

The linear increase in adsorption efficiency of MZ with increasing adsorbent dosage indicated the accessibility of a larger number of sorption sites at higher dosage to adsorb Ca(II) ions (Figure 6).

The effect of initial metal concentration on the removal efficiency of the zeolite adsorbent is illustrated in Figure 7. The initial concentration-profile plot shows a remarkable decrease in removal efficiency as initial concentration is increased. At low concentration, most of the metal ions in the solution interact with active sites on the adsorbent, resulting in high percentage removal [28].

3.2.3. Effect of Temperature

The amount of Ca(II) adsorbed on MZ as a function of solution temperature is shown in Figure 8. The removal efficiency decreased as temperature was increased from 20 to 40°C, showing that low temperature favors Ca(II) removal from aqueous solutions. The decrease of Ca(II) removal may be attributed to the Ca(II) ions escaping from the solid phase with the rise in temperature of solutions [29]. The optimum temperature of 20°C was used for all further experiments.

3.2.4. Adsorption Thermodynamics

Thermodynamic parameters such as standard Gibb’s free energy change (), the entropy change (), and the enthalpy change () were calculated from the following equations:where is the ideal gas constant, is the temperature in K, and is the thermodynamic equilibrium constant. The parameter is the amount of Ca(II) adsorbed at equilibrium in mg/L and is the equilibrium concentration of Ca(II) ions in the solution. The intercept and the slope of the Van’t Hoff plots of versus were used to determine the and values, respectively. Table 5 shows the thermodynamic parameters. The calculated value was positive, showing that the adsorption process was endothermic. A slightly positive indicated some randomness at the solid/liquid interface during the sorption process. The values were all positive, showing that the sorption of metals was not thermodynamically spontaneous.

3.2.5. Adsorption Isotherms

Adsorption isotherms are useful in determining the nature of the interaction between the adsorbate and the adsorbent. In this study, the Freundlich [30] and Langmuir [31] adsorption isotherms were used to interpret the experimental data.

The linearized form of the Langmuir isotherm model can be represented ywhere is the amount of metal ion adsorbed at equilibrium, is the maximum adsorption capacity (mg g−1), (mgL−1) is the equilibrium concentration, and is the equilibrium Langmuir constant. A plot of versus (Figure 9) gave a straight line with 1/ as intercept and as slope, and hence and could be estimated (Table 6).

Monolayer sorption with a heterogeneous energetic distribution of active sites, coupled by interaction between the adsorbed molecules, is assumed by the Freundlich isotherm. The linearized Freundlich isotherm equation is given bywhere (mg g−1) is the amount of metal ion adsorbed at equilibrium by the adsorbent, (mg g−1) and are constants representing the adsorption capacity and intensity of adsorption, respectively, and (mgL−1) is the equilibrium concentration. A plot of versus (Figure 10) gave a straight line, and and were estimated from the intercept and slope, respectively (Table 6). The calculated values of (3.578) were between 1 and 10 indicating favorability of the adsorption of Ca(II) ions on the adsorbent.

The Langmuir isotherm model correlation coefficient () was significantly closer to unity relative to that of the Freundlich isotherm model (). Moreover, the Chi-square value for the Langmuir model () was lower than that of Freundlich model (), indicating that the Freundlich model could not fit all the experimental data well.

3.2.6. Adsorption Kinetics

In the current study, the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models were used for determining the mechanism of the adsorption process. The pseudo-first-order model which assumes that the rate of adsorption site occupation is proportional to the number of unoccupied sites is expressed by the Lagergren equation [32] (Lagergren, 1898) in the linear form as follows:where and are the amount of Ca(II) adsorbed (mg g−1) onto MZ at equilibrium and at any time , respectively, (min−1) is the rate constant of pseudo-first-order model, and is the time (min). A plot of versus (Figure 11) was used to estimate the values of and from the slope and the intercept, respectively.

The second-order kinetic model can be expressed in the linear form as follows [33]:where is the equilibrium rate constant of pseudo-second-order model (g mg-1 min−1). The values of and (Table 7) were determined from the slope and intercept of the plot of () versus , respectively (Figure 12). The pseudo-second-order kinetic model correlation coefficient was , suggesting the applicability of the model to the adsorption of Ca(II) by MZ. Furthermore, the value (2.81 mg g−1) for the pseudo-second-order kinetic reaction was found to be in better agreement with the value (2.77 mg g−1).

3.2.7. Desorption Studies

The reusability of the spent adsorbent was studied by desorption/regeneration experiments, to evaluate the economical feasibility of the method. Regeneration percentage of the spent adsorbent versus NaOH is illustrated in Figure 13. Maximum recovery of the adsorbed metal ions was achieved at 2 M NaOH concentration leading to 90% desorption of the adsorbed Ca(II).

4. Conclusions

The present study shows that metakaolin zeolite has much potential as an adsorbent for the removal of Ca(II) from aqueous solutions. The influences of pH, adsorbent dosage, contact time, and initial concentration on adsorption of the metal ion and their interactions were investigated by a response surface methodology and ANOVA. The Excel Solver showed that optimum removal (87.70%) was obtained at a pH, contact time, adsorbent dosage, and initial Ca(II) concentration of 6, 180 min, 1.0 g, and 40.0 mg L−1, respectively. Confirmatory experimental analysis under the optimized conditions gave average Ca(II) removal of %. The adsorption process was found to be endothermic and not thermodynamically spontaneous. The Langmuir isotherm model best described the adsorption mechanism with maximum adsorption capacity of 12.61 mg g−1. The kinetic study was performed based on pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order equations and the adsorption followed pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The results obtained showed that metakaolin zeolite can be used as an effective adsorbent for removal of Ca(II) ions from aqueous solutions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Department of Chemical Technology, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe, for providing the research facilities.