Journal of Chemistry

Journal of Chemistry / 2018 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 8418605 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8418605

Synthesis of Al-MCM-41@Ag/TiO2 Nanocomposite and Its Photocatalytic Activity for Degradation of Dibenzothiophene

Academic Editor: Stefano Caporali
Received11 Jun 2018
Accepted16 Oct 2018
Published05 Dec 2018

Abstract

Mesoporous Al-MCM-41@Ag/TiO2 nanocomposites were synthesized successfully by combining the sol-gel method and hydrothermal treatment, using titanium isopropoxide (TTIP), AgNO3, and Vietnamese bentonite as precursors of Ti, Ag, and Si, respectively. The synthesized materials were well characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm measurements, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UV-Vis/DRS), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The photocatalytic activity was evaluated by the photodegradation of dibenzothiophene (DBT) under both UV and visible light irradiation. MCM-41@Ag/TiO2 catalyst exhibited high catalytic activity for the oxidative desulfurization (ODS) of DBT reaching almost 100% conversions at 50°C after 2 h under UV and visible light irradiations. The significant enhanced degradation of DBT over Al-MCM-41@Ag/TiO2 might be due to the synergy effects of high surface area of MCM-41, well-distributed TiO2 anatase, and reduced electron-hole recombination rates due to the dispersion of Ag nanoparticles.

1. Introduction

Dibenzothiophene presenting in diesel is one of the main sulfur-containing organic pollutants in fuel oils and is difficult to be removed [1]. This organic pollutant is difficult to be reduced using the conventional hydrodesulfurization (HDS) due to its steric hindrance [2, 3]. Photocatalytic oxidation is one of the most promising pollution treatments to remove many organic pollutants in water [4] and air steam [5]. Due to more stringent environmental regulations, it is critical to develop effective photocatalysts for the removal of sulfur-containing organic compounds from fuel oils through photocatalytic oxidation processes. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) has been well known and was the most widely studied semiconductor photocatalyst due to its low cost, nontoxicity, and high chemical stability [6]. However, the semiconductor TiO2 has a wide band gap (3.0–3.2 eV) that strongly restricted its application because the material only absorbs a small fraction of the solar photons (the UV light occupies about 5% of the total solar energy). Besides, high recombination between electrons (e) and holes (h+) results in reduced photocatalytic efficiency [7, 8].

The incorporation and doping of noble metal nanoparticles (e.g., Ag, Au, and Pt) into the crystal lattice of TiO2 (metal-TiO2) to absorb the abundant visible light due to their surface plasmon resonance (SPR) have been investigated to overcome this limitation in the TiO2 photocatalyst material [912]. Silver has an advantage of having a lower cost compared with gold or platinum. However, the use of metal-TiO2 powders in the treatment of aqueous organic pollutants has some drawbacks such as difficult recovery and poor adsorption capacity due to its low surface area and agglomeration in suspension [13]. Therefore, noble metal nanoparticles doping on titania with improved crystallinity, surface area, and surface properties to achieve higher adsorption capacity and photocatalytic activity [14] have been studied extensively such as metal-titania nanoparticles coated on the high surface area supports and thermally stable core materials [15, 16]. Nanoporous materials such as ordered mesoporous silica [1719], activated carbon [20, 21], microporous zeolites [22, 23], and metal organic frameworks [24, 25] have been widely used as TiO2 carriers due to their versatile structures and high porosity to achieve more active sites per unit area, consequently, a higher photocatalytic reaction rate. Mesoporous aluminosilicate Al-MCM-41 is one of the most widely used support materials due to its remarkable acidic properties, high thermal and mechanical stability, highly ordered hexagonal structure, and high surface area [2630]. Recent studies have focused on the use of low-cost raw materials, particularly in their natural forms such as bentonite clay to synthesize high value products. The inorganic components consisting of silica and alumina were collected by annealing bentonite with sodium hydroxide at a temperature higher than 500°C to use for the synthesis of Al-MCM-41 [31, 32]. Herein, the Al-MCM-41 mesoporous material was prepared by a hydrothermal method using the Vietnamese bentonite as Si and Al precursors. Then, Ag/TiO2 nanoparticles were deposited on the surface of the Al-MCM-41 material to improve the dispersion of TiO2, and the synthesized Al-MCM-41@Ag/TiO2 nanocomposites were used as a photocatalyst for the oxidative desulfurization of dibenzothiophene under both UV and visible light irradiation.

2. Experimental

2.1. Chemicals

Dibenzothiophene (DBT), triblock Pluronic F127 (EO106PO70EO106, 99 wt%, M = 12.600), titanium (IV) isopropoxide (TTIP, 97 wt%), n-octane (99 wt%), silver nitrate (99 wt%), cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, 98 wt%), ethanol (99.5 wt%), acetic acid (99 wt%), hydrogen peroxide (30%wt), and NaOH (98%wt) were purchased from either Sigma-Aldrich or Merck. Bentonite was obtained from Di Linh, Vietnam, with a chemical composition of 52 SiO2 : 15 Al2O3 : 11 Fe2O3 : 0.8 TiO2 : 2 CaO : 3.5 MgO : 2 Na2O in weight percent and the loss on ignition (LOI) of 13.7%.

2.2. Synthesis of Al-MCM-41 from Vietnamese Bentonite

Firstly, Si and Al precursors were obtained following the protocol described by Ali-dahmane et al. [31]. The Vietnamese bentonite was mixed with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in bentonite : NaOH weight ratio of 1 : 1.2 and heated at 550°C for 3h in air. The fused bentonite obtained was cooled, milled, mixed with distilled water with a weight ratio of 1 : 4, and then stirred at room temperature for 24 h. The supernatant was separated by centrifugation to obtain the Si and Al precursors.

In a typical Al-MCM-41 synthesis, 1.2 g CTAB was added to 20 mL distilled water. Then, 42 mL of the supernatant was added to the above solution and stirred at room temperature for 6 h at pH of about 9-10, which was adjusted by acetic acid. The crystallization step was carried out at 100°C in a stainless steel autoclave for 24 hours. The white precipitate was then filtered and washed three times with distilled water and ethanol and dried overnight at 100°C. Finally, the template CTAB was removed by calcining at 550°C for 6 h in air.

2.3. Synthesis of Al-MCM-41@nAg/TiO2 Nanocomposite

Al-MCM-41@nAg/TiO2 nanocomposite microspheres were synthesized by a sol-gel method. 0.1 g of the synthesized Al-MCM-41 was dispersed in 100 mL ethanol via sonication for 1 h. Then, 0.2 g F127 and 2 mL distilled water were added to the above solution. The mixture was stirred at 50°C for 30 minutes.

A TiO2 precursor (solution A) was prepared by dissolving titanium(IV) isopropoxide (TTIP) in a mixed solvent of ethanol and nitric acid to form a final composition of 1 TTIP : C2H5OH : 2 H2O : 0.2 HNO3. Solution B was prepared by adding n% () moles of AgNO3 into 15 mL ethanol and stirred for 30 minutes. Then, solution A was mixed with solution B and stirred vigorously for 30 minutes. The Ag/TiO2 precursor was added dropwise to the Al-MCM-41 suspension to obtain Al-MCM-41@nAg/TiO2. The temperature was then increased to 80°C under refluxing conditions for 6 h. The solid was collected by centrifugation and washed thoroughly with ethanol and dried at 80°C. Finally, F127 was removed by calcining the obtained solid at 450°C in air for 5 h.

2.4. Oxidative Photodesulfurization of Dibenzothiophene

Dibenzothiophene was dissolved in n-octane to create a model fuel with known sulfur content in ppm. Next, 20 mL of DBT/n-octane solution was placed in a 500 ml three-neck round-bottom flask containing 0.05 g catalyst. The suspension was stirred for 30 minutes in the dark and then was illuminated with two 15 W UV lamps (UV light) or a 165 W tungsten lamp (visible light) at various temperatures (30°C, 50°C, and 70°C) under refluxing conditions for 5 h. 0.5 mL of H2O2 as an oxidative agent was added to the mixture at the reaction temperatures. After certain reaction time, small amounts of the products were taken out, centrifuged, and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Then, peak areas were converted to their corresponding concentrations through the standard curves. The percentage of degradation of DBT () was calculated according to the initial, C0 (ppm), and final, C (ppm), concentrations of DBT in the solution following this equation: = 100 × (C0 – C)/C0.

2.5. Characterization

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a D8-Advance Bruker with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm) as the X-ray source at a scan rate of 0.3°–0.6° min−1. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were taken by a TEM TECNAI G 2 20 with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained on an S4800-Hitachi. Pore size distributions were calculated from N2 isotherms using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) model. Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectra were measured on a JED-2300 instrument. The surface electronic states identified through X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were taken on an AXIS ULTRA DLD Shimadzu–Kratos spectrometer using monochromatic X-rays Al-Kα radiation (1486.6 eV). UV-Vis diffuse reflection spectroscopy (UV-Vis/DRS) was performed on a Shimadzu UV2550 spectrophotometer with a BaSO4-coated integrating sphere in the wavelength range of 200–800 nm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterizations of the Synthesized Materials

Wide-angle XRD patterns of Al-MCM-41, Al-MCM-41@TiO2, and Al-MCM-41@Ag/TiO2 with different Ag concentrations are shown in Figure 1. The XRD pattern of Al-MCM-41 (Figure 1(e)) does not have diffraction peaks in the range of 15o to 30o, indicating a characteristic of amorphous silica walls of the pristine material. In contrast, Al-MCM-41@TiO2 (Figure 1(d)) and Al-MCM-41@Ag/TiO2 (Figures 1(a)1(c)) contain diffraction peaks at 2θ = 25.4°; 37.9°; 48.4°; 54.0°; 55.2°; and 62.8° corresponding to (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), and (204) planes of a typical TiO2 anatase phase, respectively [33]. Al-MCM-41@Ag/TiO2 composites contain obvious diffraction peaks of TiO2, but no typical peaks of Ag were observed. This might be due to the low concentration of Ag, or the typical diffraction peaks of Ag were covered by a (004) diffraction peak of the TiO2 anatase. The presence of Ag in the Al-MCM-41@Ag/TiO2 composites will be discussed later using EDX and XPS methods.

Figure 1 (inset) is the small angle XRD results of Al-MCM-41, Al-MCM-41@TiO2, and Al-MCM-41@Ag/TiO2. Diffraction peaks at 2 = 2.3°; 3.9°; and 4.5° of the Al-MCM-41 sample were assigned, respectively, to (100), (110), and (200) planes associated with a p6mm hexagonal symmetry of a mesoporous material with highly uniform and ordered structure. However, the peak intensities at 2θ = 2.3° were significantly reduced, and the other peaks at 3.9° and 4.5° were not clear (Figures 1(a)1(d) (inset)). This could be due to the existence of TiO2 and Ag/TiO2 inside the channels of Al-MCM-41@TiO2 and Al-MCM-41@Ag/TiO2 materials.

SEM images of Al-MCM-41 and Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2 are shown in Figure 2. The SEM images of Al-MCM-41 revealed irregular spherical particles with a cross-linked network and a particle size of about 120 nm. The average particle size of Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2 (150 nm) was larger than that of Al-MCM-41 nanoparticles, which indicated a possible coverage of TiO2 nanoparticles having a thickness of about 15 nm on the surface of the Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2 nanocomposite.

Figures 3(a) and 3(b) are the TEM images of Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2 catalyst. The TEM images showed that the nanocomposite possesses ordered mesoporous channels with a slight decrease in the orderly porous structure as compared to the parent Al-MCM-41 material, which is in agreement with the XRD result. The Ag/TiO2 particles having the size of about 5–15 nm were well-dispersed on the surface and mesopore of the Al-MCM-41 support.

The UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of Al-MCM-41, Al-MCM-41@TiO2, and Al-MCM-41@nAg/TiO2 composites in the range of 250–800 nm are shown in Figure 4. The strong UV absorption spectrum of Al-MCM-41@TiO2 observed at strong absorption band at wavelengths from 250 to 380 nm, with the sharp absorption edge of about 330 nm, is attributed to the intrinsic band gap absorption of anatase TiO2 [34]. Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2 and Al-MCM-41@0.15Ag/TiO2 containing a high amount of Ag nanoparticles showed a light absorption band in the visible region with peaks at about 435 nm. This could be related to the localized surface plasmon resonance effect of silver nanoparticles [35], which varies with the Ag content of MCM-41@Ag/TiO2 nanostructures. The band gaps of the composite samples were calculated from their UV-Vis/DRS spectra based on the method proposed by Kumar et al. [36] using the following equation:where is the band gap (eV), ν is the light frequency, A is the absorption constant, h is Planck’s constant, and α is the absorption coefficient. The band gap values of Al-MCM-41@TiO2, Al-MCM-41@0.05Ag/TiO2, Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2, and Al-MCM-41@0.15Ag/TiO2 were 3.20, 2.9, 2.83, and 2.81 eV, respectively. These results indicated that the dispersion of silver nanoparticles on TiO2 increases the absorption of light in the visible region and narrows their band gaps. In addition, the Ag nanoparticles acted as electron traps to inhibit recombination [37], which may be beneficial for improving the catalytic activity of the catalysts.

The EDX of Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2 (Figure 5) confirmed the presence of the elements of O, Si, Al, Ti, and Ag with no other impurities observed. The weight percentage of Ag loaded into TiO2 was 6.01% (corresponding to Ag/Ti = 0.095), which is very close to the calculated value of Ag/Ti = 0.1. The EDX analysis of the Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2 sample revealed a Si/Al ratio of about 12. This value confirmed that a fairly high amount of aluminum obtained from the Vietnamese bentonite was incorporated into the structure of silica MCM-41.

The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of Al-MCM-41 and Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2 were typical for type IV, with a hysteresis loop characteristic of mesoporous materials (Figure 6). The calculated specific surface area (SBET) of Al-MCM-41 was 633 m2·g−1 with a pore volume of 0.9 cm3·g−1 and of Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2 was 144 m2·g−1 with a pore volume of 0.3 cm3·g−1. The specific surface area and mesoporous volume of Al-MCM-41 loading Ag/TiO2 were lower than those of the pristine Al-MCM-41, which is due to the blocking of some pores by the doping of Ag/TiO2 nanoparticles.

XPS analysis was carried out to analyze the surface composition and chemical states of Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2 (Figure 7(a)). The spectrum confirmed the presence of O, Si, Al, Ti, and Ag elements without any other impurities. Figure 7(b) is the high-resolution XPS spectrum of Ag 3d of Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2. Two observed energy bands at 367.51 eV and 373.51 eV correspond to Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2 of metallic silver. These bands are slightly lower than the bulk Ag metal at 368 eV and 374 eV indicating a strong interaction between Ag and TiO2. The splitting energy between Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2 is 6 eV, which further confirmed the existence of metallic Ag nanoparticles in the synthesized Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2 material [35, 38]. It is also clearly observed that the presence of two different peaks for Ag 3d5/2 binding energies at 368.1 eV and 367.6 eV were assigned to metallic silver (Ag0) and silver ions in Ag2O (Ag+), respectively [39]. Thus, partially oxidized metallic Ag nanoparticles were deposited on the TiO2 surface during the synthesis. Figure 7(c) is the high-resolution XPS spectrum of Ti 2p of Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2. Ti 2p consists of two peaks at 458.48 eV and 464.18 eV (splitting energy = 5.7 eV) which are in accordance with Ti 2p3/2 and Ti 2p1/2 of Ti4+ in Ag/TiO2 nanostructures, respectively [35, 40].

3.2. Photocatalytic Activity of Nanocomposite

The photocatalytic performance of Al-MCM-41@Ag/TiO2 with different Ag loadings was evaluated by the oxidative desulfurization of DBT in the model fuel under the visible light source in 30 minutes at 70°C. The photocatalyst with low Ag loading (0.5wt% Ag/TiO2) exhibited a weak performance (conversion of DBT∼48%) due to the low concentration of active catalytic sites, whereas the highest efficiency was obtained for Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2 (78% DBT conversion). Due to more silver decorated on the surface of TiO2 for Al-MCM-41@0.15Ag/TiO2 compared with Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2, although they have almost the same band gaps, the overlapping of the plasmonic field region makes the photocatalytic activity of Al-MCM-41@0.15Ag/TiO2 mesoporous structure decline (conversion of DBT is 65%). However, overloading of Ag will reduce the amount of available active sites due to the spatial charge repulsion, thereby affecting the photoactivity. Hence, Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2 as a photocatalyst has the best photocatalytic activity due to its suitable plasma resonance band, narrow band gap, and available active sites, which is also consistent with the literature [4143]. Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2 photocatalyst was then chosen to carry out the next catalytic tests.

For comparison, the degradation of DBT over Al-MCM-41@TiO2 by the irradiation of UV and visible light was carried out. At 70°C and after 2 hours, the Al-MCM-41@TiO2 photocatalyst degraded only about 40% of DBT under UV light (Figure 8), and almost negligible degradation was observed under visible light (not shown). Compared with Al-MCM-41@TiO2 sample, Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2 exhibited remarkably enhanced photocatalytic activities under the same visible light and UV irradiation. The photodegradation efficiencies of DBT increased to almost 100% after 2 h, at 70°C (Figure 8). The improved photocatalytic activity of nanocomposite is due to the strong UV and visible light absorption of Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2 material. The Al-MCM-41 support with a large surface area will increase the ability to disperse the catalytic activity center, which will increase the catalytic activity. The surface plasmon resonance of silver nanoparticles was in the visible light region, leading to efficiently absorbing visible light irradiation. In addition, the excellent conductivity of silver nanoparticles may improve electron mobility to enhance the transfer of surface charge to the boundary and prevent the recombination of electrons and holes. Al-MCM-41 acted as an adsorbent in the reaction. By using the sol-gel method, the TiO2 silver-modified silver nanoparticles were homogeneously distributed in ethanol, thereby well dispersed on the pristine material through an intermediate polymer layer of F-127. F-127 played a very important role in TiO2-coated denaturing with Ag because without F-127 TiO2, nanoparticles are difficult to bond with Al-MCM-41 formed. On the other hand, Al-MCM-41 covered with F-127 to help disperse the TiO2 nanoparticles onto the surface. The F-127 also protected the hexagonal structure of Al-MCM-41 in the core without being broken down during synthesis. Teng et al. [44] showed that SiO2 not only played a role in the dispersion of TiO2 but also protected the Fe3O4 core and prevented the core from dissolving into the solution in the formation of the sandwich structure of Fe3O4@SiO2@TiO2.

The effect of temperature on the oxidative desulfurization of DBT during UV and visible irradiations are shown in Figures 9 and 10. It can be seen that as the temperature increased from 30°C to 70°C under both UV and visible light, the conversion of DBT increased and reached 100% at 70°C after 2 hours. The results are in good agreement with literature that increase in the reaction temperature improves the photodegradation efficiency [45].

After 2 h at the reaction temperature slightly above room temperature (30°C), the deep desulfurization could be achieved with 89% and 81% conversions under UV and visible light irradiation, respectively. This was attributed to the formation of conduction band (CB) electrons (e) and valence band (VB) holes (h+) under irradiation. This indicates that the visible light absorption of TiO2 samples was considerably improved by adding Ag and Al-MCM-41 to TiO2.

Al-MCM-41 has a uniform pore structure and high surface area, which facilitates the high adsorption of DBT. The Ag nanoparticles were photoexcited to enable the generation of electron and Ag+ (h+) due to the surface plasmon resonance effect, and the photoexcited electrons can be further introduced into the conduction band of TiO2 (Equation (2)) [34]. The next possible reaction steps could happen as follows:

Species OH and O2•− obtained in the presence of the photocatalyst and H2O2 as the oxidant under irradiation could effectively oxidize DBT to its corresponding sulfone [46]. Ag+ (h+) ions were reactive radical species, which were able to oxidize DBT and reduce to metallic silver. Thus, Ag could be rapidly regenerated, and the Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2 composites remained stable.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the Al-MCM-41@Ag/TiO2 nanocomposites have been successfully synthesized using the Vietnamese bentonite as Si and Al sources and well characterized by various analytical techniques. Al-MCM-41@Ag/TiO2 composites exhibited much higher photocatalytic activities for degrading DBT under visible light irradiation than Al-MCM-41@TiO2, and Al-MCM-41@0.1Ag/TiO2 was found to have the best photocatalytic performance. Incorporating Ag and TiO2 into Al-MCM-41 substrate had positive effects on the photocatalytic activity of the TiO2, under both visible light and UV irradiations. At a relatively mild condition of 30°C, DBT degraded 90% under UV light irradiation and 81% under visible light after 2h. At higher temperature (70°C), the DBT photooxidative desulfurization efficiency of 100% could be achieved after 2 hours under visible light. The Ag nanoparticle dispersed on Al-MCM-41@TiO2 nanocomposites has shown its superiority and the potential as a promising material for the removal of toxic organic pollutants either in the UV or visible light region.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED)(grant number 105.99-2015.21).

Supplementary Materials

The results of the HPLC analysis of the conversion of DBT were investigated over time at various reaction temperatures under UV and visible irradiation conditions using Al-MCM41@0.1Ag/TiO2 and Al-MCM-41@TiO2 catalysts. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. T. V. Choudhary, S. Parrott, and B. Johnson, “Unraveling heavy oil desulfurization chemistry: targeting clean fuels,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1944–19647, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. Song, “An overview of new approaches to deep desulfurization for ultra-clean gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel,” Catalysis Today, vol. 86, no. 1–4, pp. 211–263, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Otsuki, T. Nonaka, N. Takashima, W. Qian, A. Ishihara, and T. Imai, “Oxidative desulfurization of light gas oil and vacuum gas oil by oxidation and solvent extraction,” Energy and Fuels, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1232–1239, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Y. Lee and S. J. Park, “TiO2 photocatalyst for water treatment applications,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1761–1769, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. A. Kebede, M. E. Varner, N. K. Scharko, R. B. Gerber, and J. D. Raff, “Photooxidation of ammonia on TiO2 as a source of NO and NO2 under atmospheric conditions,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 135, no. 23, pp. 8606–8615, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. A. Henderson, “A surface science perspective on TiO2 photocatalysis,” Surface Science Report, vol. 66, no. 6–7, pp. 185–297, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. Ardo and G. J. Meyer, “Photodriven heterogeneous charge transfer with transition-metal compounds anchored to TiO2 semiconductor surfaces,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 115–164, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. A. Ismail and D. W. Bahnemann, “Mesoporous titania photocatalysts: preparation, characterization and reaction mechanisms,” Journal of Material Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 32, pp. 11686–11707, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Jiang, H. Li, and L. Zhang, “New insight into daylight photocatalysis of AgBr@Ag: synergistic effect between semiconductor photocatalysis and plasmonic photocatalysis,” Chemistry–A European Journal, vol. 18, no. 20, pp. 6360–6369, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. F. B. Li and X. Z. Li, “The enhancement of photodegradation efficiency using Pt–TiO2 catalyst,” Chemosphere, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1103–1111, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. Borensztein, L. Delannoy, A. Djedidi, R. G. Barrera, and C. Louis, “Monitoring of the plasmon resonance of gold nanoparticles in Au/TiO2 catalyst under oxidative and reducing atmospheres,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 114, no. 19, pp. 9008–9021, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. Yu, W. Wen, X. Y. Qian, J. B. Liu, and J. M. Wu, “UV and visible light photocatalytic activity of Au/TiO2 nanoforests with anatase/rutile phase junctions and controlled Au locations,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, Article ID 41253, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. N. Mandzy, E. Grulke, and T. Druffel, “Breakage of TiO2 agglomerates in electrostatically stabilized aqueous dispersions,” Powder Technology, vol. 160, no. 2, pp. 121–126, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Q. Zhang, J. B. Joo, Z. Lu et al., “Self-assembly and photocatalysis of mesoporous TiO2 nanocrystal clusters,” Nano Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 103–114, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Son, S. H. Hwang, C. Kim, J. Y. Yun, and J. Jang, “Designed synthesis of SiO2/TiO2 core/shell structure as light scattering material for highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells,” ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 4815–4820, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Hanprasopwattana, T. Rieker, A. G. Sault, and A. K. Datye, “Morphology of titania coatings on silica gel,” Catalysis Letters, vol. 45, no. 3–4, pp. 165–175, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. Lachheb, O. Ahmed, A. Houas, and J. P. Nogier, “Photocatalytic activity of TiO2–SBA-15 under UV and visible light,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 226, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. W. T. Qiao, G. W. Zhou, X. T. Zhang, and T. D. Li, “Preparation and photocatalytic activity of highly ordered mesoporous TiO2–SBA-15,” Material Science and Engineering C, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1498–1502, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. W. J. J. Stevens, K. Lebeau, M. Mertens, T. G. Van, P. Cool, and E. F. Vansant, “Investigation of the morphology of the mesoporous SBA-16 and SBA-15,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 18, pp. 9183–9187, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Asiltürk and Ş. Şener, “TiO2-activated carbon photocatalysts: preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activities,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 180, pp. 354–363, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. C. Martins, A. L. Cazetta, O. Pezoti, J. R. B. Souza, T. Zhang, and E. J. Pilau, “Sol-gel synthesis of new TiO2/activated carbon photocatalyst and its application for degradation of tetracycline,” Ceramics International, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 4411–4418, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. E. Amereh and S. Afshar, “Photodegradation of acetophenone and toluene in water by nano-TiO2 powder supported on NaX zeolite,” Material Chemitry and Physics, vol. 120, no. 2–3, pp. 356–360, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. T. Kamegawa, Y. Ishiguro, R. Kido, and H. Yamashita, “Design of composite photocatalyst of TiO2 and Y-zeolite for degradation of 2-propanol in the gas phase under UV and visible light irradiation,” Molecules, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 16477–16488, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. Abedi and A. Morsali, “Ordered mesoporous metal–organic frameworks incorporated with amorphous TiO2 as photocatalyst for selective aerobic oxidation in sunlight irradiation,” ACS Catalysis, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1398–1403, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Crake, K. C. Christoforidis, A. Kafizas, S. Zafeiratos, and C. Petit, “CO2 capture and photocatalytic reduction using bifunctional TiO2/MOF nanocomposites under UV–vis irradiation,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 210, pp. 131–140, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. M. V. Phanikrishna, K. V. Durga, and M. Subrahmanyam, “Photocatalytic degradation of isoproturon herbicide over TiO2/Al-MCM-41 composite systems using solar light,” Chemosphere, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 644–651, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. K. C. Park, D. J. Yim, and S. K. Ihm, “Characteristics of Al-MCM-41 supported Pt catalysts: effect of Al distribution in Al-MCM-41 on its catalytic activity in naphthalene hydrogenation,” Catalysis Today, vol. 74, no. 3–4, pp. 281–290, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. Z. Diao, L. Wang, X. Zhang, and G. Liu, “Catalytic cracking of supercritical n-dodecane over meso-HZSM-5@Al-MCM-41 zeolites,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 135, pp. 452–460, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Rodrigues, S. Uma, I. N. Martyanov, and K. J. Klabunde, “AgBr/Al-MCM-41 visible-light photocatalyst for gas-phase decomposition of CH3CHO,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 233, no. 2, pp. 405–410, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Y. Ling, M. Long, P. Hu, Y. Chen, and J. Huang, “Magnetically separable core–shell structural γ-Fe2O3@Cu/Al-MCM-41 nanocomposite and its performance in heterogeneous Fenton catalysis,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 264, pp. 195–202, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. T. Ali-dahmane, M. Adjdir, R. Hamacha, F. Villieras, A. Bengueddach, and P. G. Weidler, “The synthesis of MCM-41 nanomaterial from Algerian Bentonite: the effect of the mineral phase contents of clay on the structure properties of MCM-41,” Comptes Rendus Chimie, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. H. Yang, Y. Deng, C. Du, and S. Jin, “Novel synthesis of ordered mesoporous materials Al-MCM-41 from bentonite,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 47, no. 3–4, pp. 351–355, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. L. Liang, Y. Meng, L. Shi, J. Ma, and J. Sun, “Enhanced photocatalytic performance of novel visible light-driven Ag–TiO2/SBA-15 photocatalyst,” Superlattices and Microstructures, vol. 73, pp. 60–70, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. Q. Xiang, J. Yu, B. Cheng, and H. C. Ong, “Microwave-hydrothermal preparation and visible-light photoactivity of plasmonic photocatalyst Ag-TiO2 nanocomposite hollow spheres,” Chemistry–An Asian Journal, vol. 5, pp. 1466–1474, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Y. Zhang, T. Wang, M. Zhou, Y. Wang, and Z. Zhang, “Hydrothermal preparation of Ag-TiO2 nanostructures with exposed {001}/{101} facets for enhancing visible light photocatalytic activity,” Ceramics International, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 3118–3126, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. V. Kumar, S. Kr. Sharma, T. P. Sharma, and V. Singh, “Band gap determination in thick films from reflectance measurements,” Optical Materials, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 115–119, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. Krejčíková, L. Matějová, K. Kočí, L. Obalová, Z. Matěj, and L. Čapek, “Preparation and characterization of Ag-doped crystalline titania for photocatalysis applications,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 111-112, pp. 119–125, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. L. Zhang, D. Shi, B. Liu, G. Zhang, Q. Wang, and J. A. Zhang, “A facile hydrothermal etching process to in situ synthesize highly efficient TiO2/Ag nanocube photocatalysts with high-energy facets exposed for enhanced photocatalytic performance,” CrystEngComm, vol. 18, no. 34, pp. 6444–6452, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. P. Prieto, V. Nistor, K. Nouneh, M. Oyama, M. Abd-Lefdil, and R. Díaz, “XPS study of silver, nickel and bimetallic silver–nickel nanoparticles prepared by seed-mediated growth,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 258, no. 22, pp. 8807–8813, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. L. Xu, E. M. P. Steinmiller, and S. E. Skrabalak, “Achieving synergy with a potential photocatalytic Z-scheme: synthesis and evaluation of nitrogen-doped TiO2/SnO2 composites,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 871–877, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. K. H. Leong, B. L. Gan, S. Ibrahim, and P. Saravanan, “Synthesis of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) triggered Ag/TiO2 photocatalyst for degradation of endocrine disturbing compounds,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 319, pp. 128–135, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. W. Zhao, L. Feng, R. Yang, J. Zheng, and X. Li, “Synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic properties of Ag modified hollow SiO2/TiO2 hybrid microspheres,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 103, no. 1-2, pp. 181–189, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. D. Lu, S. Ouyang, H. Xu, D. Li, X. Zhang, and Y. Li, “Designing Au surface-modified nanoporous-single-crystalline SrTiO3 to optimize diffusion of surface plasmon resonance-induce photoelectron toward enhanced visible-light photoactivity,” ACS Applied Material and Interfaces, vol. 8, no. 14, pp. 9506–9513, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. Z. Teng, X. Su, G. Chen, C. Tian, H. Li, and L. Ai, “Superparamagnetic high-magnetization composite microspheres with Fe3O4@SiO2 core and highly crystallized mesoporous TiO2 shell,” Colloid and Surface A: Physicochemical Engineering Aspects, vol. 402, pp. 60–65, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. N. A. M. Barakat, M. A. Kanjwal, I. S. Chronakis, and H. Y. Kim, “Influence of temperature on the photodegradation process using Ag-doped TiO2 nanostructures: negative impact with the nanofibers,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 366, pp. 333–340, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. H. Lu, J. Gao, Z. Jiang, Y. Yang, B. Song, and C. Li, “Oxidative desulfurization of dibenzothiophene with molecular oxygen using emulsion catalysis,” Chemical Communication, vol. 2, pp. 150–152, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Xuan Nui Pham et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

895 Views | 371 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.