Journal of Chemistry

Journal of Chemistry / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 3658507 |

Mohamed A. Taha, Adel T. Abbas, Faycal Benyahia, Hamad F. Alharbi, B. Guitián, X. Ramón Nóvoa, "Enhanced Corrosion Resistance of Recycled Aluminum Alloy 6061 Chips Using Hot Extrusion Followed by ECAP", Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2019, Article ID 3658507, 8 pages, 2019.

Enhanced Corrosion Resistance of Recycled Aluminum Alloy 6061 Chips Using Hot Extrusion Followed by ECAP

Academic Editor: Sylvain Franger
Received08 Apr 2019
Accepted05 Sep 2019
Published24 Sep 2019


The oxidation of aluminum machining chips retards the successful recycling through the conventional remelting route. A promising approach to overthrow this problem is the utilization of solid state recycling in converting aluminum machining chips directly into semifinished products to eliminate the cost of the remelting process and reduce CO2 emissions. Therefore, in recent work, chips of aluminum alloy (AA6061) were recycled by compaction and then extrusion conducted at 500°C, followed by equal channel pressing (ECAP) to study the resultant material properties and its microstructure. Moreover, the present investigation explores the influence of ECAP after hot extrusion on the corrosive behaviour of the recycled samples in saline solution (NaCl) by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and linear polarization (LP). The results demonstrated a remarkable enhancement of the recycled chips’ properties subjected to hot extrusion followed by the ECAP process. Furthermore, the successive ECAP passes leads to increased film thickness and decreased corrosion rate.

1. Introduction

Conventional recycling of aluminum scrap through remelting is always accompanied with high energy consumption and material losses up to 20% due to the intensive oxidation of the molten metal [1]. Notably, when dealing with the increase in aluminum machining chips, the losses increased to 50% due to the great surface area to volume ratio [2]. Consequently, solid state recycling through hot extrusion, patented by Stern [3], was implemented to transform aluminum machining chips into semifinished products excluding the undesirable remelting process. Solid state recycling has many advantages over the conventional recycling, for instance, reduced energy consumption up to 5%, lower cost, and few processing steps [4]. Thereafter, many researchers explored the possibility of solid state recycling through different techniques such as extrusion at elevated temperature [511].

Gronostajski et al. [12] applied hot extrusion in the production of composite materials based on Al alloy machining chips and tungsten powder. The results confirmed the dependency of the extruded chips’ mechanical properties on the connection quality between individual chips. Furthermore, Kondoh et al. [13] used repetitively cold extrusion followed by hot forging at 450°C to produce cylindrical samples with a diameter of 35 mm. Nevertheless, the long duration of the process was a significant limitation to be applied in industrial applications. Fogagnolo et al. [14] studied solid-state recycled AA6061 chips by both cold and hot compactions with a subsequent hot extrusion. They approved that the processing route including cold compaction followed by hot extrusion is the optimum in terms of saving energy consumption and time. Hence, Tekkaya et al. [4] studied the influence of level of extrusion on the mechanical characteristics of solid-state recycled aluminum AA-6060 chips mixed with silicon carbide (SiC) particles by cold compaction followed by the hot extrusion process, as recommended in the previous work. The compacted billets were hot extruded under extrusion ratio and temperature of 34.2°C and 500°C, respectively. The yield strength of the extruded chips was about more than 85% of that of the as-received billets extruded under the same conditions [4]. During solid state recycling by hot extrusion, an amount of plastic strain level must be attained to break the surface oxide layers of the chips and achieve a fresh metal surface leading to good bonding [15]. This amount of plastic strain is determined by the extrusion ratio [16]. In order to achieve sound bonding, at least extrusion ratio higher than 25 should be used during the hot extrusion process [13]. Accordingly, the mechanical properties of chip-based profiles are comparable to the mechanical properties of cast materials extruded with the same parameters [17]. However, the downside of using high extrusion ratio for chip extrusion is the narrow size of the cross section of the products for a specific size of the extrusion press. Severe plastic deformation (SPD) techniques impose notably high plastic strain that are capable of refining bulk materials with coarse grain structures. Thereby, in order to increase the level of plastic strain and improve the mechanical properties of the extruded recycled samples, SPD techniques should be combined with the hot extrusion process. Recently, several studies on solid state recycling of machining chips through severe plastic deformation such as ECAP and HPT have been conducted [1820].

Among the various SPD procedures, equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) is the most auspicious one, as it allows a high strain to be repeatedly imposed into the specimen without significant changes in the cross-sectional dimensions [21]. McDonald et al. [22] used ECAP at 590°C for solid state recycling of Ti-6Al-4V machining chips. They favorably produced a fully dense and sound-bonded as-recycled material. However, the presence of chip boundaries covered by oxides decreased the ductility during the tensile test. Hence, a successive annealing heat treatment was conducted to remove the oxide layers. As the process of hot extrusion proved its capability of recycling machining chips without residual porosity [23], Haase et al. [5] investigated the feasibility of hot extrusion integrated with ECAP in one die. The results revealed the exceptional mechanical properties of the chips extruded through the integrated die compared to those of chips extruded through the conventional flat-face extrusion die.

In the reported state of the art, two main lacks are observed: (a) ECAP at room temperature is more efficient in producing high strength materials due to the finer microstructure and lower energy consumption as compared to the same process at a higher temperature; however, almost no one, according to the authors knowledge, has considered the combination of hot extrusion followed by ECAP at room temperature. (b) Moreover, very few works have explored the corrosion behavior of solid-state recycled samples, a piece of information essential for the serviceability of the material. Thus, the present work aims at investigating the feasibility of solid state recycling through cold compaction and hot extrusion followed by ECAP at room temperature and, moreover, exploring the influence of the hot extrusion process and ECAP number of passes on the microstructure development, mechanical properties, and corrosion performance of the as-recycled samples.

2. Materials and Methods

The experimental material used in this work is aluminum alloy AA6061 (as-received) whose chemical composition is shown in Table 1. Moreover, the layout for the experimental work is shown in Figure 1. The used chips were machined through dry turning the as-received bar according to the following cutting parameters: cutting speed, 88 m/min; depth of cut, 1 mm; and feed, 1 mm/rev. The chips were compacted at room temperature and then extrusion at 500°C through the flat-face die with an extrusion ratio of 5.2. After that, the extruded samples were processed up to six passes at room temperature, using an ECAP die channeled at an angle (Φ) equal to 90°, targeting an improvement of their mechanical properties.



Vickers microhardness was conducted under a load of 100 g applied for 15 seconds at room temperature using a Buehler MicroMet 5100 device. In addition, room temperature tensile tests were performed at an initial strain rate of 8.33 × 10−4·s−1 using the LR300K (300 kN) universal testing machine. The tensile test samples were cut in the extrusion and ECAP direction according to ASTM-B557-06. Relative densities of the as-received and solid-state recycled samples were measured using the Archimedes immersion principle (in distilled water). The microstructure study was conducted on ground and polished samples, etched using Keller’s reagent. Zeiss Axio Imager optical microscope was used to investigate the microstructure of the samples made of the original material (as-received) and that after hot extrusion. Moreover, a FEI INSPECT S50 scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to inspect the microstructure post-ECAP process because of the expected finer microstructure.

For the corrosion test, cylindrical-shaped samples in recycled solid state were used, as shown in Table 2. The samples were introduced in a saline solution at a temperature of 20 ± 2°C to study their electrochemical behaviour using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) followed by linear polarization (LP). The samples were coated using cataphoretic coating to control the area exposed to the saline solution. Prior testing, the samples’ surface was renewed with 2000 grit SiC paper and further cleaned with ethanol and water. The corrosion tests were conducted in a standard 3-electrode cell configuration using a large area graphite sheet as the counter electrode, a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as the reference electrode, and the aluminum sample under test was the working electrode. All the potentials in this report are referred to the SCE electrode. The electrolytic solution was a 0.5 mol/l−1 NaCl, prepared from deionized water (ρ > 18 MΩ cm), and analytical grade NaCl salt. As electrochemical instrumentation, an Autolab PGSTAT 30 with FRA module was employed. The EIS measurements were performed in the 10 kHz to 1 Hz frequency window. The frequency was swept from the high to the low frequency limits using seven frequency points per decade. The amplitude of the sinusoidal wave was 10 mV rms. The LP tests were conducted from −200 mV to +200 mV vs the open circuit potential (OCP) at 1 mV·s−1 scan rate. These tests were conducted after the EIS tests because they are considered as destructive.

ConditionDiameter (mm)Active surface (cross section) (cm2)

E1Hot extruded at 500°C70.39
E2ECAP-2 passes70.39
E3ECAP-4 passes80.50
E4ECAP-6 passes70.39

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructure Evolution

Figures 2 and 3 show the samples’ microstructure and grain size, respectively. Originally, the microstructure of the first specimen consists of very coarse-grain structure with a grain size of approximately 48 μm, as shown in Figure 2(a). On the contrary, the microstructure of the extruded specimen at 500°C consists of smaller grain sizes of about 15.9 μm grain size, as shown in Figure 3. The finer grained microstructure can be explained by the intense plastic deformation executed during the machining, hot extrusion, and ECAP processes, as well as chip boundaries that act as obstacles between grains to constrain grain growth [5, 7, 24]. The grain size reduction is in concordance with the previous work presented by Haase et al. [5], and the grain size of AA-6060 recycled samples extruded at 450 and 550°C was smaller than the as-received alloy. Moreover, in the previous work by Hu et al. [7], the original sample’s grain size was 200 μm, while 22, 25, and 11 μm were reached for different sizes of Mg chips recycled through hot extrusion. SEM micrographs of samples that had undergone ECAP after 2 and 6 passes are shown in Figures 2(c) and 2(d), respectively, and in Figure 4. The incremental grain refinement with increasing numbers of ECAP passes is evident. ECAP sample grain sizes processed after 2, 4, and 6 passes were 5, 3.28, and 2.46 μm, respectively.

Table 3 shows some mechanical properties related to the recycled aluminum chips such as relative density, ultimate tensile strength, and the microhardness following the hot extrusion succeeded by ECAP processing after 2, 4, and 6 passes. The obtained values, provided in Table 4, for the properties of the solid-state recycled billets show the success of the recycling of those chips into consolidated bulk materials via the proposed procedure of compaction, followed by extrusion at elevated temperature, and ultimately ECAP. Microhardness has increased from 41 HV after extrusion to around 110 HV for an extrusion coupled with ECAP at 6 passes. Similar interpretation for the improvement of the ultimate tensile strength from 132 MPa to about 400 MPa can be drawn. The drastic increase in the mechanical strength is explained by the high dislocation density added to the grain refinement induced by the large deformation caused by the ECAP. Room temperature ECAP deformation also improved relative to the density.

DescriptionHot extruded at 500°CECAP-2 passesECAP-4 passesECAP-6 passes

Relative density (%)99.699.999.999.9
Microhardness, Vickers4194.5103.5110
Ultimate tensile strength (MPa)132.4288.5349403

mV vs. SCEμA·cm−2mV/decademV/decade


3.2. Corrosion Behavior
3.2.1. LP Results

Although LP is the last technique in the testing protocol, it will be treated first to allow for a broad overview of the process under study. Figure 4(a) clearly shows that all the samples corrode under cathodic control and the zero-current potential (close to the corrosion potential) approaches the pitting potential (fast current increase at potentials above ∼−750 mV). The enlarged area shown in Figure 4(b) reveals that all the Ecorr values allocate in a small window of about 15 mV, which anticipates small differences in the electrochemical behaviour.

Roughly, the data in the ±100 mV vicinity of the corresponding Ecorr were employed.where the parameters icorr, Ecorr, ba, and bc represent the corrosion current, the corrosion potential, the anodic Tafel slope, and the cathodic Tafel slope, respectively.

The data compiled in Table 4 confirm the qualitative observation from Figure 4(a). The corrosion development on all samples proceeds under cathodic control, with Tafel slopes much higher for the cathodic than for the anodic process. The obtained icorr values reveal the positive effect of the extrusion process on the corrosion rate. The presence of the ECAP is more influencing; nonetheless, the number of passes seems uninfluential on the process.

3.2.2. EIS Results

EIS measurements were performed after about 60 minutes of stabilisation of the electrodes in the test solution. During this time, the electrode potential (open circuit potential, OCP) evolves from initial values of about −1.3 to −1.2 V to a final steady state around −0.8 to −0.75 V. This excursion along the cathodic branches presented in Figure 4(a) is due to the passivation of the aluminum alloy, i.e., the building up of an oxohydroxide layer whose characteristics will depend on the structure and chemical composition of the substrate. The coverage of the metallic substrate makes the corrosion rate to slow down with time, which explains the evolution of the recorded OCP, presented in Figure 5. The rapid variation during the first 20′ of immersion is followed by a lower slope period which, in turn, becomes noisier, typical of the increasing influence of the pitting and repassivation events.

Thus, EIS measurements are expected to gather data on the charge transfer resistance associated with not only the corrosion process but also to the series combination of the two capacitances present at the metal-electrolyte interface: the double layer capacitance and that associated with the aluminum oxohydroxide layer produced during the stabilisation period. Under this concept, the interface is considered as a parallel association of the charge transmission resistance with the interfacial capacitance, whose impedance is described as follows:where Re accounts for the electrolyte resistance, R1 for the charge transfer resistance at the metal-electrolyte interface, and C1 to the interfacial capacitance which, in this case, contains the contribution of the double layer (Cdl) and that of the oxide layer (Cox) developing on the metal substrate, arranged in series, according to equation (3). α1 parameter in equation (2) accounts for a Cole–Cole-type dispersion [25] of the R1C1 time constant, which is equivalent to assume a distribution normal to the surface [26]. ω = 2πf and j = (−1)1/2.

It is also worth nothing to mention here that the EIS measurements were not performed at the OCP, but about 25 mV cathodic to this potential. This is due to the nonlinearity of the polarization curve at Ecorr (Figure 4). The imposed ±10 mV AC voltage brings the system in some cases into the pitting region, which produces highly scattered impedance spectra in the low frequency region. Thus, the small potential displacements chosen allow obtaining reliable impedance spectra with minimal disturbance of the cathodic reaction, as derived from Figure 4. This approach has already been described in the literature [27]. Figure 6 provides an illustration of the impedance spectra obtained. The fitting of the experimental data to the model equation (2) is also represented. The fitting was performed using a simplex method already described [28]. The best fitting parameters are collected in Table 5 where the fitting quality parameter χ2 is also included. Perfect fitting corresponds to χ2 = 1 because 1% error in measurements was assumed as default value. Very good agreement is obtained between the experimental and fitted data, as visually shown in Figure 6 and the χ2 values in Table 5 confirm.

Ω cm2kΩ cm2μF·cm−2


The impedance function is given in equation (2).

According to the arguments presented above, C1 shall be regarded as the series combination of Cdl and Cox following equation (3). Thus, assuming Cdl as constant, any increment in C1 values shall be understood with the increase in Cox, i.e., decreasing of the oxide film thickness, according to the following equation:where consistent to the capacitance of a flat condenser, is the dielectric constant of the oxide, ε0 is the dielectric permittivity of vacuum, and S and d are the geometrical factors surface and thickness, respectively.

The C1 values reported in Table 5 suggest that, overall, the film thickness settled on the extruded samples is thinner than that developed on the parent sample. Moreover, C1 is inversely proportional to the number of extrusion passes, which suggest the thickening of the passivation layer. This result seems reasonable due to high level energy stocked in the alloy increasing its reactivity, in the sense of self-passivation ability. The kinetic parameter R1, inversely proportional to the corrosion rate, reveals the protective capacity of the passive layer especially for the extruded samples. In addition, R1 increases from E1 to E4 (the only unexplained exception is E3), which is in agreement with the variation observed for C1: the thicker the oxide film, the higher the associated resistance.

4. Conclusion

The recycling process using the route of compaction followed by extrusion at elevated temperatures and then ECAP up to six passes was performed. The sample ECAP processed up to six passes exhibited the top-notch ultimate tensile strength and microhardness due to the achieved fine microstructure. The AA6061 alloy experiences spontaneous passivation in 0.5 M NaCl solution although the corrosion potential achieves the pitting potential, which makes self-passivation kinetics a critical parameter. The self-passivation ability seems to increase after extrusion. The successive ECAP passes lead to increased film thickness and decreased corrosion rate.

Data Availability

This paper contains all experiments data, and if any researcher requests any extra data, it will be available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors would like to extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this work through the Research Group no. RGP-1440-101.


  1. J. Gronostajski and A. Matuszak, “The recycling of metals by plastic deformation: an example of recycling of aluminium and its alloys chips,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 92-93, no. 35–41, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. S. Sharma, T. Nakagawa, and N. Takenaka, “Recent development in the recyclingof machining dwarfs by sintering and powder forging,” CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 121–125, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  3. M. Stern, “Method for treating aluminum or aluminum alloy scrap,” 1945, US Patent 2391752. View at: Google Scholar
  4. A. E. Tekkaya, M. Schikorra, D. Becker, D. Biermann, N. Hammer, and K. Pantke, “Hot profile extrusion of AA-6060 aluminum chips,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 209, no. 7, pp. 3343–3350, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Haase, N. Ben Khalifa, A. E. Tekkaya, and W. Z. Misiolek, “Improving mechanical properties of chip-based aluminum extrudates by integrated extrusion and equal channel angular pressing (iECAP),” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 539, pp. 194–204, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. I. Selmy, M. I. Abd El Aal, A. M. El-Gohry, and M. A. Taha, “Solid-state recycling of aluminum alloy (AA-6061) chips via hot extrusion followed by equal channel angular pressing (ECAP),” Egyptian International Journal of Engineering Sciences and Technology, vol. 21, no. 33–42, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  7. M. Hu, Z. Ji, X. Chen, and Z. Zhang, “Effect of chip size on mechanical property and microstructure of AZ91D magnesium alloy prepared by solid state recycling,” Materials Characterization, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 385–389, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. S. Khamis, M. A. Lajis, and R. A. O. Albert, “A sustainable direct recycling of aluminum chip (AA6061) in hot press forging employing response surface methodology,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 26, pp. 477–481, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. B. L. Chan and M. A. Lajis, “Recycling of aluminum 6061 Chip through cold compression,” International Journal of Engineering & Technology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 43–47, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  10. J. R. Duflou, A. E. Tekkaya, M. Haase et al., “Environmental assessment of solid state recycling routes for aluminium alloys: can solid state processes significantly reduce the environmental impact of aluminium recycling?” CIRP Annals, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 37–40, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. I. Abed El Aal, M. A. T. Abbas, A. I. Selmy, A. M. El-Gohry, and H. S. Kim, “Solid state recycling of aluminum AA6061 alloy chips by hot extrusion,” Materials Research Express, vol. 6, no. 3, Article ID 036525, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  12. J. Z. Gronostajski, H. Marciniak, and A. Matuszak, “Production of composites on the base of AlCu4 alloy chips,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 60, no. 1–4, pp. 719–722, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. K. Kondoh, T. Luangvaranunt, and T. Aizawa, “Morphology-free processing of magnesium alloys,” Materials Transactions, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1254–1257, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. B. Fogagnolo, E. M. Ruiz-Navas, M. A. Simón, and M. A. Martinez, “Recycling of aluminium alloy and aluminium matrix composite chips by pressing and hot extrusion,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 143-144, pp. 792–795, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. Gronostajski, H. Marciniak, and A. Matuszak, “New methods of aluminium and aluminium-alloy chips recycling,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 106, no. 1–3, pp. 34–39, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. V. Güley, A. Güzel, A. Jäger, N. Ben Khalifa, A. E. Tekkaya, and W. Z. Misiolek, “Effect of die design on the welding quality during solid state recycling of AA6060 chips by hot extrusion,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 574, pp. 163–175, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. Y. Chino, T. Hoshika, J.-S. Lee, and M. Mabuchi, “Mechanical properties of AZ31 Mg alloy recycled by severe deformation,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 754–760, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. T. Aida, N. Takatsuji, K. Matsuki, S. Kamado, and Y. Kojima, “Homogeneous consolidation process by ECAP for AZ31 cutting chips,” Journal of Japan Institute of Light Metals, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 532–537, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. T. Takahashj, Y. Kume, M. Kobashi, and N. Kanetake, “Solid state recycling of aluminum machined chip wastes by compressive torsion processing,” Journal of Japan Institute of Light Metals, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 354–358, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. T. Peng, Q. D. Wang, and J. B. Lin, “Microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg-10Gd-2Y-0.5Zr alloy recycled by cyclic extrusion compression,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 516, no. 1-2, pp. 23–30, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Q. Shi, “Recycling of titanium alloys from machining chips using equal channel angular pressing,” Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK, 2015, Ph.D. thesis, View at: Google Scholar
  22. D. T. McDonald, E. W. Lui, S. Palanisamy, M. S. Dargusch, and K. Xia, “Achieving superior strength and ductility in Ti-6Al-4V recycled from machining chips by equal channel angular pressing,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 4089–4102, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Mabuchi, K. Kubota, and K. Higashi, “New recycling process by extrusion for machined chips of AZ91 magnesium and mechanical properties of extruded bars,” Materials Transactions JIM, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1249–1254, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. I. Selmy, A. M. El-Gohry, M. I. Abd El Aal, and M. A. Taha, “Characteristics of solid state recycling of aluminum alloy (AA6061) chips by hot extrusion,” in Proceedings of the International Conference of Engineering Sciences and Applications, vol. 1, pp. 316–323, Aswan, Egypt, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  25. K. S. Cole and R. H. Cole, “Dispersion and absorption in dielectrics I. Alternating current characteristics,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 341–351, 1941. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. E. Orazem, I. Frateur, B. Tribollet et al., “Dielectric properties of materials showing constant-phase-element (CPE) impedance response,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 160, no. 6, pp. C215–C225, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. F. Mansfeld and J. C. S. Fernandes, “Impedance spectra for aluminum 7075 during the early stages of immersion in sodium chloride,” Corrosion Science, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 2105–2108, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. M. Abreu, M. Izquierdo, M. Keddam, X. R. Nóvoa, and H. Takenouti, “Electrochemical behaviour of zinc-rich epoxy paints in 3% NaCl solution,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 41, no. 15, pp. 2405–2415, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Mohamed A. Taha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles