Optimization of Protease and Amylase Production by <i>Rhizopus oryzae</i> Cultivated on Bread Waste Using Solid-State Fermentation

Benabda, Olfa; M’hir, Sana; Kasmi, Mariam; Mnif, Wissem; Hamdi, Moktar

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3738181

Journal of Chemistry

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 | Article ID 3738181 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3738181

Optimization of Protease and Amylase Production by Rhizopus oryzae Cultivated on Bread Waste Using Solid-State Fermentation

Olfa Benabda,^1,2Sana M’hir,¹Mariam Kasmi,^2,3Wissem Mnif,⁴and Moktar Hamdi¹

Academic Editor: Yiannis Kourkoutas

Received11 Jun 2019

Accepted17 Sept 2019

Published21 Oct 2019

Abstract

This research was carried for the coproduction of two industrial enzymes: α-amylase and protease via SSF by Rhizopus oryzae on humidified bread waste. Fermentation time, inoculum size, initial moisture content, salt solutions, and the thickness of the substrate were investigated one by one. Fungus culture was carried out in sterile aluminum trays, and pH was adjusted to 5.5. The main results showed that the highest levels of enzyme production were obtained at 120 h, 65% relative humidity, height media of 1 cm, 10⁵ spore/g, and M-9 solution (g/L): NaH₂PO₄, 12.8; KH₂PO₄, 3; NaCl, 0.5; NH₄Cl, 1; MgSO₄ 7H₂O, 0.5; CaCl₂ 2H₂O, 0.01. α-Amylase (100 U/g) and protease (2400 U/g) produced by SSF from Rhizopus oryzae (CH4) on BW as substrate are of great interest in industries and could be valorized as enhancers of the bread making process.

1. Introduction

Food waste occurs at different stages of production, processing, retailing, and consumption since it is produced throughout the food life cycle [1]. The amount of food waste has increased in the last 25 years due to population and economic growth. These wastes could be considered valuable by-products and could be a valuable resource for the production of value-added molecules [2, 3]. Food waste consists mainly of six types according to their source or origin: vegetable trimmings and pulp, starch-based waste, fruit peels and pulp, spent grains, meat and fish waste, and dairy waste [4, 5].

The high carbohydrate content and the additional nutrients of food waste make them ideal media for microbial growth and enzyme production as well as other high value-added molecules [6]. Bread is among the major food waste in many countries around the world. It is estimated that 1.2 million tons of bread are wasted every year, globally [7]. Actually, in Tunisia, more than 45 billion breads, subsidized by millions of Tunisian dinars (34 million USD), are thrown, annually in the street [8]. Wastage occurs at bakeries, retail outlets with leftovers, and consumer households. So, there is a real need to develop processes for reducing the associated problems with bread waste formation. BW is a good fermentation feedstock also since it is available year round and its availability is not associated with the harvest season [9]. It is used for its high yielding bioenergy substrates mainly for ethanol and biohydrogen production [10]. The work of Pleissner et al. [11] suggested hydrolysed BW for bioplastic production by Halomonas boliviensis. According to the findings of Zhang et al. [12], bakery waste was successfully used as the nutrient-complete hydrolysates for the fermentative production of succinic acid on Aspergillus awamori and A. oryzae. This substrate has also been used to produce amylase [13]. Many studies have tried BW as raw materials for enzyme production such as glucoamylase and protease [9, 13–18] using Bacillus, Thermomyces sp., Aspergillus, or Monascus purpureus. In fact, BW is a successful material for enzyme production for the following advantages: availability, cost, and reduced contamination. Recently, Benabda et al. [19] reported that they successfully used BW containing valuable components as media for microbial growth.

Solid-state fermentation (SSF), an environmentally friendly technique, which uses solid substrates at low moisture levels, requires suitable solid substrate among agroindustrial materials [20]. Various raw materials are used for SSF, for example, winery and brewery waste, olive mill waste, sunflower cake, sugarcane bagasse, fruit’s peels and pulps, cereal brans, and BW [21–25]. In this process, microorganisms grow and produce a wide variety of products such as mushrooms [26], aroma [21, 27], microbial oil [28, 29], preservatives like fumaric acid [30, 31], enzymatic production of wax esters [32], and enzymes [14, 27], thus reducing the cost of production, as reported by these studies.

Among microorganisms, filamentous fungi are the best adapted for SSF due to their mycelia mode of growth as well as their neutral physiological capabilities [33]. In the present work, we used Rhizopus oryzae as filamentous fungi for amylase and protease by SSF on BW. This fungus is able to efficiently grow on a wide variety of substrates under operational conditions, thus furnishing numerous bioproducts of interest, such as enzymes, organic acids, aromatic compounds, and colorants. In previous study, M’hir et al. [34] reported that Rhizopus oryzae produces proteases in mixture with Enterococcus decreasing gluten concentration for celiac persons. Proteases produced could be alternatives to detoxify gluten used in food biotechnology [35]. Given these data, we were interested to use Rhizopus oryzae in SSF for the production of proteolytic enzymes. Moreover, the addition of amylases in bakery products contributes to improve consumer acceptance [36]. Fungal α-amylases were considered as safe additives [37]. Their application is gaining an increasing interest since it produces milder processing conditions, reduced the formation of byproducts, and lowered the refining and recovery costs [38]. Therefore, BW can be used as a substrate for enzyme production as it is carbohydrate-rich waste source. To the best of author’s knowledge, this study is the first considering Rhizopus oryzae for enzyme production on BW.

In this work, we attempt the coproduction of two important industrial enzymes: α-amylase and protease by Rhizopus oryzae through SSF using BW as a substrate. The objective of this study was to optimize the parameters such as fermentation time, initial moisture content, height of substrate, inoculum size, and salts’ addition. All of these affect concomitant hydrolytic enzyme production in solid-state fermentation of BW. These parameters were evaluated by step wise/single parameter optimization.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microorganism

Rhizopus oryzae CH₄, belonging to the Culture Collection of the Laboratory of Ecology and Microbial Technology, was used in this study. The culture was propagated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) (Oxoid) and stored at 4°C.

2.2. Inoculum Preparation

For inoculum preparation, Rhizopus oryzae was grown on the PDA plate at 30°C for 7 days for complete sporulation [34]. 9 mL of sterile distilled water containing 9 g/L NaCl was mixed and was added to the plate, and the spores were scraped with an inoculating loop under aseptic conditions. The spore suspension was used as the inoculum for subsequent fermentation. The spore count was carried out using a Malassez counting chamber. Fermentations were inoculated with spores at different levels.

2.3. Substrate Preparation

Commercial white bread waste was purchased from a local bakery and was aged from 6 days (BW was stored at room temperature in the bakery) (moisture: 15.2/100 g dry basis, carbohydrate 49/100 g db, and starch 47.2/100 g db), ground with a mortar, sieved to obtain a fine powder, and then filtered with a colander (5 mm mesh size). BW was used at the same day of collection to conduct following experiments.

2.4. Fungal Solid-State Fermentation and Condition Optimization

BW powder was taken in rectangular trays of approximate dimension 286 mm × 120 mm × 80 mm (about 250 g of BW in each one). Trays were closed with aluminum foil, autoclaved at 121°C for 15 min, cooled to room temperature, and mixed thoroughly with sterilized distilled water to reach appropriate moisture content. The moistened powder was spread evenly on the tray in layers, typically between 0.5 and 2.5 cm deep in tray with an open top and then inoculated with fungal spore suspension of Rhizopus oryzae CH₄ as described above and recovered with aluminum foil. 1 mL of cryopreserved spores solution of Rhizopus oryzae (1 × 10⁵ spores/mL) was inoculated in the surface of bread waste. Then, the mixture was homogenized with sterile spatula. The operation was carried out aseptically. Trays were incubated at 30°C under static conditions. Figure 1 illustrates the bread waste SSF flow chart.

Factors like incubation period, moisture content, inoculum size, pH, substrate height, and salt effects influencing the secretion of enzymes by R. oryzae under SSF were investigated by adopting the search technique-varying parameters one at a time. Optimization of the fermentation parameters for SSF was carried out to determine the effect of each parameter on enzyme production. α-Amylase and protease production was studied in SSF of BW, by altering various physicochemical and cultural conditions with one at the time.

2.5. Enzyme Recovery and Assay

For isolation of enzymes produced in SSF samples, 5 g of the fermented substrate was suspended in 50 mL of distilled water at room temperature using a kitchen-type blender to form a suspension of 100 g/L. After agitation in a rotary shaker (170 rpm) for 1 hour at 30°C, the slurry was squeezed through wet cheese cloth followed by the centrifuging the whole content at 8000 g, 15 min, and 4°C to remove the insoluble matter, and the clear supernatant obtained was used as the source of enzymes [39].

2.6. α-Amylase Assay

The amylolytic activity was assayed using the DNS method after crude extraction of fermented bread waste powder [40]. α-Amylase activity was determined at 55°C for 30 min by measuring the release of reducing sugar from 1% soluble starch (w/v) as substrate in 25 mM sodium acetate buffer at pH 5 where D-glucose was used as standard. One unit of alpha amylase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that released 1 μmol of reducing sugars, expressed in glucose equivalent, per minute per g of fermented substrate under the specified conditions.

2.7. Protease Assay

The method mentioned by Han et al. [10] was used to quantify protease activity with modification. Exactly, the reaction mixture containing 0.3 mL of 20% (w/v) azocasein (Sigma), 0.1 mL of enzyme preparation, and 0.2 mL of citrate buffer at pH 5.2 was incubated for 4 h at 45°C. The reaction was stopped by adding 2 mL of 10% TCA and stored at 4°C for 10 min, and the test tubes were centrifuged at 3500 g for 5 min at 4°C. One unit of the enzyme activity (U) was defined as an absorbance (440 nm) change of 0.01 after 4 h at 45°C [34, 41].

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The data for all experiments have been calculated from three replications, with the values presented as the mean ± SE (standard error).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Incubation Period

To investigate the effect of the incubation time on the enzymatic activity of R. oryzae under SSF fermentation, the temperature was 30°C, the inoculum size 10⁵ spores/g, the initial moisture content 60%, the substrate height at 1 cm, and the pH at 5.5. In SSF fermentation, several factors are to be optimized since they control the microbial growth and thus the enzymatic production, namely, temperature, fermentation time, moisture content, pH medium, inoculum size, carbon and nitrogen sources, and salt concentrations.

Figure 2 shows the effect of fermentation time on the production of both amylase and protease for 144 h. The amounts of protease and amylase production were of 1260 U/g and 16.2 U/g on 24 h, respectively. The highest activity was achieved within 120 h of fermentation for both enzymes (2412 U/g and 100 U/g, respectively, for protease and amylase). After this fermentation time, the activity fell drastically. In general, long incubation period results in an enzyme production decrease consequent to the reduction of nutrients in the substrate as well as to the release of proteases and the drop in the pH in the substrate [42, 43]. M’hir et al. [34] reported a protease activity value of 2.50 U. According to Hashemi et al. [44], SSF with Bacillus sp. recorded an optimal amylase activity of about 3800 U/L, whereas Ferreira et al. [45] reported a value of 6500 UI/L on SSF using R. oryzae on wheat bran. Enzyme production by microorganisms is highly influenced by media components and physical factors such as temperature, pH, incubation time, and inoculum density [46]. Trying to produce protease by A. flavus using SSF, Johnvesly et al. [47] reported that the maximum protease production occurred during the 7th day of incubation. Protease production from rice mill wastes by Aspergillus niger in SSF increased with the incubation period [48], in accordance with our results. In addition to incubation time, protease production strongly depends on the extracellular pH which affects several metabolic and enzymatic processes and transports various components across the cell membranes, thus influencing the cell growth and metabolite production [49]. Moreover, Nafisa et al. [50] reported a gradual decrease in protease units correlated to an increasing incubation period. This indicated the enzyme’s role as a primary metabolite, being produced in the log phase of the growth of the fungus for using nitrogenous source of BW [51].

(a)

(b)

Concerning α-amylase, the maximal productivity of α-amylase 100 U/g was achieved after 120 h (Figure 2(b)), which is two times higher than the reported result of Han et al. [14] on the 5^th day by A. awamori using BW. Glucoamylase production by A. awamori showed similarity to our results, using pastry waste without nitrogen supplements [52]. In fact, variation levels of glucoamylase activity were influenced by a good balance of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphor [52]. Furthermore, Melikoglu and Webb [25] mentioned that near 95% of the starch has been consumed by 144 hours. The highest enzymatic activities (protease and glucoamylase) were measured during this period.

3.2. Initial Moisture Effect

Initial moisture content of bread waste was adjusted to 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, and 70% levels. Incubation period was 120 h, and the temperature was 30°C with an inoculum size of 10⁵ spores at an inoculation height of 1 cm. The pH was fixed at 5.5. Our results showed that the protease activity ranged from 1150 to 1550 U/g, whereas that of α-amylase varied from 63.42 to 216.66 U/g (Figure 3). A concomitant production for optimal protease and amylase was, respectively, of 1550 U/g and 216.66 U obtained with an initial moisture content of 65%. The lowest ones were associated with a common initial moisture content of 45%.

(a)

(b)

These results were consistent with levels mentioned by Haque et al. [18], where optimum moisture content was about 65% for protease and 55–60% for glucoamylase activities. These authors reported a maximum of 8 U/g of glucoamylase and 116.6 U/g for protease observed with filamentous fungus Monascus cultivated in SSF on bakery waste. The protease activity showed in our study was more than tenfolds higher than those reported by Haque et al. [18]. However, protease values obtained by Haque et al. [18] are six times higher that reported by Liang et al. [53], with the shrimp and crab shell powder medium by Monascus. The most important benefit of using bread waste is its high nutrient content, making it useful without the addition of supplements [19].

Higher initial moisture (180%) content has been reported by Meligoklu et al. [16] with BW using A. awamori, where protease production increased up to 71.6 U/g, decreasing after.

According to Sivaramakrishnan et al. [54], α-amylase production increases with the increase of initial moisture content. A low moisture level is associated with an early sporulation and a low enzyme yield. This may be explained by the nonavailability of nutrients. A high moisture level caused a decrease of particles porosity and a stickiness of substrate, thus resulting in agglomeration and reduction of gas volume and gaseous diffusion inducing as a consequence of low oxygen transfer [16, 55].

Hence, it is important to provide the moisture content at an optimum level. In SSF, water must be available in the fermentation medium for microbial growth and biochemical activity. Indeed, water content influences the physical state of the substrate, nutrient availability, diffusion of nutrients, and oxygen-carbon dioxide exchange in a complex way [56].

3.3. Effect of the Inoculum Size

Inoculum amount is an important biological factor, which determines biomass production in fermentation [57, 58]. Maximum yield of enzyme production should be result of a balance between the proliferating biomass and available nutrients [59]. Figure 4 illustrates enzyme activity. BW was inoculated with varied levels of spore suspension (10⁴, 5.10⁴, 10⁵, and 5.10⁵ spores/g) with a moisture content of 65% and inoculation height of 1 cm with pH 5.5. The results showed maximal activities of 2400 U/g db and 100.32 U/g for both protease and amylase obtained with an inoculum size of 10⁵ spores/g. Tiann and Yuan [43] reported that the inoculum level had no significant influence on enzyme productivity in SSF. However, Meligoklu et al. [16] reported 1.0 million spores/g dry as optimum size. Demir and Tarı [60], determined that 10⁷ spores/g is optimum for enzyme production in wheat bran SSF by Aspergillus. Paranthaman et al. [48] have mentioned that further increase in inoculum volume resulted in a decrease in protease production. This fact could be explained by high amount of inoculum that caused overcrowding of spore thus and decreasing enzyme production [59]. The maximum protease production was noticed at an inoculum size of 2 × 10⁶ spores/mL [61].

(a)

(b)

3.4. Effect of Salts

Experimental studies shown in Figure 5 presented that the optimal values of protease and amylase were 1493 U/g and 90.06 U/g, respectively, for salt solution S3. Previously studies [62–64] have reported that NaCl (only present in S3) enhanced protease production. This salt plays an important role in the stabilization and the protection of the enzyme from undergoing denaturation [64]. Earlier studies reported that other inorganic nitrogen sources increase enzyme production. In fact, when supplemented with potassium nitrate, Aspergillus funiculosus produced maximum protease [65]. Furthermore, El Safey and Abdul Raouf [66] and Karataş et al. [67] reported that ammonium sulfate was the best nitrogen source for protease production. However, Mukhtar and Haq [68] reported peptone as the best nitrogen supplier for protease production by Rhizopus oligosporus. Salt solution S3 with ammonium chloride increases protease production by three times. This result is in agreement with the finding of Rathod and Pathak [69]. Presence of inorganic nitrogenous supplements may improve nutritional quality and consequently affect α-amylase synthesis. α-Amylase yield increased with proper supplementation of C and N sources as they are absolutely necessary for microbial growth [70]. Sindhu et al. [71] have tried solid-state fermentation by Penicillium janthinellum (NCIM 4960) using wheat bran. They reported that α-amylase production was enhanced with ammonium sulfate, whereas ammonium nitrate, ammonium chloride, sodium nitrate, potassium nitrate, and sodium nitrite showed inhibitory effect on its production. However, ammonium chloride induces production of amylase [67]. The inhibitory effects of some of the salts could be due to the pH changes in the medium.

(a)

(b)

3.5. Effect of Substrate Layer Thickness

The thickness of the substrate is an important factor and should be optimized for controlling aerobic conditions for fungi. Protease and amylase activities varied with substrate thickness that ranged from 0.5 cm to 2.5 cm according to Figure 6. The maximum protease and amylase activities were recorded at the layer thickness of 1 cm with respective values of 2400 U/g and 100 U/g. Similarly, results were observed (11 mm thickness) by Demir and Tari [72] with wheat bran SSF by Aspergillus sojae for polygalacturonase production. In fact, an increase of the layer thickness may reduce oxygen for fungus inducing a poor growth [73]. However, the increase of substrate thickness cannot promote fungal growth. On the contrary, the lower thickness has been reported to be unable to support the complete growth of fungus [74]. Dojnov et al. [75] reported that high quantities of substrate enhance fungal growth. The highest α-amylase activity was detected on 32 g of triticale grains (medium substrate height during SSF). According to these authors, glucoamylase production was in correlation with fungal growth and was the highest on 48 g of triticale grains (highest substrate height).

(a)

(b)

4. Conclusion

BW is a good culture medium in SSF in terms of composition and safety. Enzymes production by Rhizopus oryzae such as α-amylase and protease under optimized cultural conditions were as follows: 65% moisture content, inoculum 10⁵ spores/g, and incubation period of 120 h (5 days). Further studies should be continued to test protease and α-amylase stability (thermal, pH, and detergent stability) with the goal of performing their production in pilot scale. Several other biochemical and biophysical parameters like sensitivity towards ions, inhibitors, reaction kinetics, and structural studies should be performed to validate their industrial applications.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Disclosure

This research did not receive specific funding but was performed at the Laboratory of Ecology and Microbial Technology (LETMi).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks are due to all the staff for their cooperation.

References

E. U. Kiran, A. P. Trzcinski, J. W. Ng, and Y. Liu, “Enzyme production from food wastes using a biorefinery concept,” Waste and Biomass Valorization, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 903–917, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. R. Ghosh, D. Fawcett, S. B. Sharma, and G. E. J. Poinern, “Progress towards sustainable utilisation and management of food wastes in the global economy,” International Journal of Food Science, vol. 2016, Article ID 3563478, 22 pages, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Nayak and B. Bhushan, “An overview of the recent trends on the waste valorization techniques for food wastes,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 233, pp. 352–370, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Xue, G. Liu, J. Parfitt et al., “Missing food, missing data? A critical review of global food losses and food waste data,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 6618–6633, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. F. Tsang, V. Kumar, P. Samadar et al., “Production of bioplastic through food waste valorization,” Environment International, vol. 127, pp. 625–644, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Ravindran and A. Jaiswal, “Microbial enzyme production using lignocellulosic food industry wastes as feedstock: a review,” Bioengineering, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 30–52, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Melikoglu, “Production of sustainable alternatives to petrochemicals and fuels using waste bread as a raw material,” The University of Manchester, England, UK, 2008, Ph.D. thesis.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Rabah, Atelier Pour L’élaboration D’unze Harte Nationale Pour la Lutte Contre le Gaspillage Alimentaire, Institut National de la Consommation, Hammamet, Tunisia, 2018, http://inc.nat.tn/sites/default/files/document-files/INC-atelier%20charte%20gasp-septembre2018_VF-zr.
T. Jamrath, C. Lindner, M. K. Popovi, and R. Bajpai, “Production of amylases and proteases by Bacillus caldolyticus from food industry wastes,” Food Technology and Biotechnology, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 355–361, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Han, Y. Hu, S. Li et al., “Simultaneous dark fermentative hydrogen and ethanol production from waste bread in a mixed packed tank reactor,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 141, pp. 608–611, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Pleissner, W. C. Lam, W. Han et al., “Fermentative polyhydroxybutyrate production from a novel feedstock derived from bakery waste,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 819474, 8 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhang, H. Zhao, M. Gan et al., “Application of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) from viscosity reducing of raw sweet potato for bioethanol production at laboratory, pilot and industrial scales,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 4573–4579, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Cerda, M. El-Bakry, T. Gea, and A. Sánchez, “Long term enhanced solid-state fermentation: inoculation strategies for amylase production from soy and bread wastes by Thermomyces sp. in a sequential batch operation,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2394–2401, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Han, W. C. Lam, M. Melikoglu et al., “Kinetic analysis of a crude enzyme extract produced via solid state fermentation of bakery waste,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 2043–2048, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Ozdenefe, S. Dincer, M. U. Unal, F. B. Kayis, H. A. M. Takci, and A. Arkut, “Optimization of culture conditions for alkaline protease production from waste breads using Bacillus subtilis,” Romanian Biotechnological Letters, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 12597–12610, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Melikoglu, C. S. K. Lin, and C. Webb, “Stepwise optimisation of enzyme production in solid state fermentation of waste bread pieces,” Food and Bioproducts Processing, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 638–646, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Melikoglu, C. S. K. Lin, and C. Webb, “Solid state fermentation of waste bread pieces by Aspergillus awamori: analysing the effects of airflow rate on enzyme production in packed bed bioreactors,” Food and Bioproducts Processing, vol. 95, pp. 63–75, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Haque, V. Kachrimanidou, A. Koutinas, and C. S. K. Lin, “Valorization of bakery waste for biocolorant and enzyme production by Monascus purpureus,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 231, pp. 55–64, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Benabda, M. Kasmi, F. Kachouri, and M. Hamdi, “Valorization of the powdered bread waste hydrolysate as growth medium for baker yeast,” Food and Bioproducts Processing, vol. 109, pp. 1–8, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. Soccol, E. S. F. D. Costa, L. A. J. Letti, S. G. Karp, A. L. Woiciechowski, and L. P. D. S. Vandenberghe, “Recent developments and innovations in solid state fermentation,” Biotechnology Research and Innovation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 52–71, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Hamrouni, J. Molinet, L. Miché et al., “Production of coconut aroma in solid-state cultivation: screening and identification of Trichoderma strains for 6-pentyl-alpha-pyrone and conidia production,” Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2019, Article ID 8562384, 7 pages, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Dimou, N. Kopsahelis, A. Papadaki et al., “Wine lees valorization: biorefinery development including production of a generic fermentation feedstock employed for poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) synthesis,” Food Research International, vol. 73, pp. 81–87, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Leite, C. Silva, J. M. Salgado, and I. Belo, “Simultaneous production of lignocellulolytic enzymes and extraction of antioxidant compounds by solid-state fermentation of agro-industrial wastes,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 137, pp. 315–322, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Kachrimanidou, N. Kopsahelis, A. Chatzifragkou et al., “Utilisation of by-products from sunflower-based biodiesel production processes for the production of fermentation feedstock,” Waste and Biomass Valorization, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 529–537, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Melikoglu and C. Webb, “Chapter 4-use of waste bread to produce fermentation products,” in Food Industry Wastes, pp. 63–76, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
P. D. Postemsky, M. A. Bidegain, R. González-Matute, N. D. Figlas, and M. A. Cubitto, “Pilot-scale bioconversion of rice and sunflower agro-residues into medicinal mushrooms and laccase enzymes through solid-state fermentation with Ganoderma lucidum,” Bioressource Technology, vol. 231, pp. 85–93, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Papadaki, V. Kachrimanidou, S. Papanikolaou, A. Philippoussis, and P. Diamantopoulou, “Upgrading grape pomace through Pleurotus spp. cultivation for the production of enzymes and fruiting bodies,” Microorganisms, vol. 7, no. 7, p. 207, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tsakona, N. Kopsahelis, A. Chatzifragkou, S. Papanikolaou, I. K. Kookos, and A. A. Koutinas, “Formulation of fermentation media from flour-rich waste streams for microbial lipid production by Lipomyces starkeyi,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 189, pp. 36–45, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tsakona, A. Papadaki, N. Kopsahelis, V. Kachrimanidou, S. Papanikolaou, and A. A. Koutinas, “Development of a circular oriented bioprocess for microbial oil production using diversified mixed confectionery side-streams,” Foods, vol. 8, no. 8, p. 300, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Papadaki, H. Papapostolou, M. Alexandri et al., “Fumaric acid production using renewable resources from biodiesel and sugarcane production processes,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 25, no. 36, pp. 35960–35970, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Papadaki, N. Androutsopoulos, M. Patsalou et al., “Biotechnological production of fumaric acid: the effect of morphology of Rhizopus arrhizus NRRL 2582,” Fermentation, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 33, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. C. G. Aguieiras, A. Papadaki, A. Mallouchos et al., “Enzymatic synthesis of bio-based wax esters from palm and soybean fatty acids using crude lipases produced on agricultural residues,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 139, p. 111499, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Barrios-González, “Solid-state fermentation: physiology of solid medium, its molecular basis and applications,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 175–185, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M’hir, C. G. Rizello, R. Di Cagno, A. Cassone, and M. Hamdi, “Use of selected enterococci and Rhizopus oryzae proteases to hydrolyse wheat proteins responsible for celiac disease,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 106, pp. 421–431, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M’hir, “Bioconversion du gluten: mise au point d’un ferment mixte et application à la formulation du pain sans gluten,” Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia, 2009, Ph.D. thesis.
View at: Google Scholar
A. A. K. EL-Hadef El-Okki, M. Gagaoua, H. Bourekoua et al., “Improving bread quality with the application of a newly purified thermostable α-amylase from Rhizopus oryzae FSIS4,” Foods, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 1, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Goesaert, K. Brijs, W. S. Veraverbeke, C. M. Courtin, K. Gebruers, and J. A. Delcour, “Wheat flour constituents: how they impact bread quality, and how to impact their functionality,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 16, no. 1–3, pp. 12–30, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Jin, “Amylases-bioprocess and potential applications: a review,” International Journal of Bioinformatics and Biological Science, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 41–50, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hamdi, O. Benabda, F. Kachouri, S. M’hir, and S. Keskes, “Bioprocess for the production of microorganisms and molecules using bakery and pastry by-products as a fermentation substrate,” 2013, Patent TN 2013/2071 Deposited at the National Institute of Standardization and the Patent Rights INNORPI (Tunisia).
View at: Google Scholar
G. L. Miller, “Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugars,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 426–429, 1959.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M’hir, A. Mejri, I. Sifaoui et al., “Improvement of protease production by Rhizopus oryzae CH4 grown on wheat gluten using response surface methodology and its scale-up in a bioreactor,” Archives of Applied Science and Research (Scholars Research Library), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1110–1116, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Bansal, R. Tewari, R. Soni, and S. K. Soni, “Production of cellulases from Aspergillus niger NS-2 in solid state fermentation on agricultural and kitchen waste residues,” Waste Management, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1341–1346, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Tiann and Q. Yuan, “Optimization of phytase production from potato waste using Aspergillus ficuum,” 3 Biotech, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 256, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hashemi, S. M. Mousavi, S. H. Razavi, and S. A. Shojaosadati, “Comparison of submerged and solid state fermentation systems effects on the catalytic activity of Bacillus sp. KR-8104 α-amylase at different pH and temperatures,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 43, pp. 661–667, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ferreira, P. Lennartsson, and M. Taherzadeh, “Production of ethanol and biomass from thin stillage using food-grade zygomycetes and ascomycetes filamentous fungi,” Energies, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 3872–3885, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Muthulakshmi, D. Gomathi, D. G. Kumar, G. Ravikumar, M. Kalaiselvi, and C. Uma, “Production, purification and characterization of protease by Aspergillus flavus under solid state fermentation,” Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 137–148, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Johnvely, B. R. Manjunath, and G. R. Naik, “Pigeon pea waste as a novel, inexpensive, substrate for production of a thermostable alkaline protease from thermoalkalophilic Bacillus sp. JB-99,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 61–64, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Paranthaman, K. Alagusundaram, and J. Indhumathi, “Production of protease from rice mill wastes by Aspergillus niger in solid state fermentation,” World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 308–312, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Ellaiah, K. Adinarayana, Y. Bhavani, P. Padmaja, and B. Srinivasulu, “Optimization of process parameters for glucoamylase production under solid state fermentation by a newly isolated Aspergillus species,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 615–620, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. A. Nafisa, G. M. Shaza, A. A. El Hussein, and M. A. El Siddig, “Optimization of conditions for protease production from Aspergillus niger under solid state fermentation,” Global Advanced Research Journal of Microbiology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 21–29, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Arunachalam and D. Narmadhapriya, “Monascus fermented rice and its beneficial aspects: a new review,” Asian Journal of Phramaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 4, no. 1, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Lam, D. Pleissner, and C. Lin, “Production of fungal glucoamylase for glucose production from food waste,” Biomolecules, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 651–661, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T.-W. Liang, J.-J. Lin, Y.-H. Yen, C.-L. Wang, and S.-L. Wang, “Purification and characterization of a protease extracellularly produced by Monascus purpureus CCRC31499 in a shrimp and crab shell powder medium,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 38, no. 1-2, pp. 74–80, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sivaramakrishnan, D. Gangadharan, K. M. Nampoothiri, C. R. Soccol, and A. Pandey, “α-amylase production by Aspergillus oryzae employing solid-state fermentation,” Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, vol. 66, pp. 621–626, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Singh and S. K. Soni, “Production of starch-gel digesting amyloglucosidase by Aspergillus oryzae HS-3 in solid state fermentation,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 453–459, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Torrado, S. Cortés, J. M. Salgado et al., “Citric acid production from orange peel wastes by solid-state fermentation,” Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 394–409, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Bhatiya and G. R. Jadeja, “Optimization of environmental and nutritional factors for alkaline protease production,” Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 594–599, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Maity, S. Mallik, R. Basuthakur, and S. Gupta, “Optimization of solid state fermentation conditions and characterization of thermostable alpha amylase from Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633),” Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques, vol. 5, p. 4, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
J. J. Abdullah, D. Greetham, N. Pensupa, G. A. Tucker, and C. Du, “Optimizing cellulase production from municipal solid waste (MSW) using solid state fermentation (SSF),” Journal of Fundamentals of Renewable Energy and Applications, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 206, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Demir and C. Tarı, “Valorization of wheat bran for the production of polygalacturonase in SSF of Aspergillus sojae,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 54, pp. 302–309, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Suhad and H. I. Abood, “Effect of some growth factors on protease production by Rhizopus oryzae,” Journal of Al-Nahrain University-Science, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 90–95, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Belmessikh, H. Boukhalfa, A. Mechakra-Maza, Z. Gheribi-Aoulmi, and A. Amrane, “Statistical optimization of culture medium for neutral protease production by Aspergillus oryzae. Comparative study between solid and submerged fermentations on tomato pomace,” Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 377–385, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Meena, A. D. Tripathi, S. K. Srivastava, and A. Jha, “Utilization of agro-industrial waste (wheat bran) for alkaline protease production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in SSF using Taguchi (DOE) methodology,” Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 210–216, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. S. Murthy and M. M. Naidu, “Protease production by Aspergillus oryzae in solid-state fermentation utilizing coffee by-products,” World Applied Sciences Journal, vol. 8, pp. 199–205, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Shumi, T. Hussain, and M. N. Anwar, “Isolation and purification of fungus Aspergillus funiculosus and its enzyme protease,” Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 312–317, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. M. El-Safey and U. M. Abdul-Raouf, “Production, purification and characterization of protease enzyme from Bacillus subtilis,” in Proceedings of the International Conferences for Development and the Environment in the Arab World, pp. 1–26, Assiut University, Asyut, Egypt, March 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Karataş, F. Uyar, V. Tolan, and Z. Baysal, “Optimization and enhanced production of alpha-amylase and protease by a newly isolated Bacillus licheniformis ZB-05 under solid-state fermentation,” Annals of Microbiology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 45–52, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Mukhtar and I. Haq, “Production of acid protease by Aspergillus niger using solid state fermentation,” Pakistan Journal of Zoology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 253–260, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
M. G. Rathod and A. P. Pathak, “Wealth from waste: optimized alkaline protease production from agro-industrial residues by Bacillus alcalophilus LW8 and its biotechnological applications,” Journal of Taibah University for Science, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 307–314, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Pedersen and J. Nielsen, “The influence of nitrogen sources on the α-amylase productivity of Aspergillus oryzae in continuous cultures,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 278–281, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Sindhu, G. N. Suprabha, and S. Shashidhar, “Optimization of process parameters for the production of alkaline protease from Penicillium godlewskii SBSS 25 and its application in detergent industry,” African Journal of Microbiology Research, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 515–522, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Demir and C. Tari, “Bioconversion of wheat bran for polygalacturonase production by Aspergillus sojae in tray type solid-state fermentation,” International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, vol. 106, pp. 60–66, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Radha Krishna, A. K. Srivastava, N. K. Ramaswamy, P. Suprasanna, and S. F. De Souza, “Banana peel as substrate for α-amylase production using Aspergillus niger NCIM 616 and process optimization,” Indian Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 11, pp. 314–319, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
S. P. Yovita, W. F. J. Rahardjoa, S. Haemers, and J. Tramper, “Aerial mycelia of Aspergillus oryzae accelerate α-amylase production in a model solid state fermentation,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 900–902, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Dojnov, M. Grujic, and Z. Vujcic, “Highly efficient production of Aspergillus niger amylase cocktail by solid-state fermentation using triticale grains as a well-balanced substrate,” Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, vol. 80, no. 11, pp. 1375–1390, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2019 Olfa Benabda et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

6766

Downloads

2507

Citations