Comparison of 304 SS, 2205 SS, and 410 SS Corrosion by Sulfate-Reducing <i>Desulfovibrio ferrophilus</i>

<table class="table-group" id="tab3"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="2"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left">Metal</td><td class="align_center">Weight loss (mg/cm<sup>2</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="2"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">304 SS</td><td class="align_center">Undetectable</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">410 SS</td><td class="align_center">6.2 ± 0.2</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">2205 SS</td><td class="align_center">Undetectable</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="2"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>Weight loss after 7-day incubation (standard deviations from replicate coupons in three SRB bottles).</div>

Journal of Chemistry

tab3

Table 3

Table 3: Comparison of 304 SS, 2205 SS, and 410 SS Corrosion by Sulfate-Reducing <i>Desulfovibrio ferrophilus</i> 

Journal of Chemistry

Comparison of 304 SS, 2205 SS, and 410 SS Corrosion by Sulfate-Reducing Desulfovibrio ferrophilus

Table 3