Impact of Plasma-Activated Water (PAW) on Seed Germination of Soybean

Guragain, Rajesh Prakash; Pradhan, Suman Prakash; Baniya, Hom Bahadur; Pandey, Bishnu Prasad; Basnet, Niroj; Sedhai, Binita; Dhungana, Santosh; Chhetri, Ganesh Kuwar; Joshi, Ujjwal Man; Subedi, Deepak Prasad

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7517052

Journal of Chemistry

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 7517052 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7517052

Impact of Plasma-Activated Water (PAW) on Seed Germination of Soybean

Rajesh Prakash Guragain,¹Suman Prakash Pradhan,²Hom Bahadur Baniya,³Bishnu Prasad Pandey,⁴Niroj Basnet,¹Binita Sedhai,¹Santosh Dhungana,¹Ganesh Kuwar Chhetri,¹Ujjwal Man Joshi,¹and Deepak Prasad Subedi¹

Academic Editor: Shahid Hussain

Received26 May 2021

Revised07 Dec 2021

Accepted09 Dec 2021

Published29 Dec 2021

Abstract

The present study reports the generation of plasma-activated water (PAW) using dielectric barrier discharge (DBD), its physicochemical properties, and its potential impact on the seed germination and seedling growth of soybean. The results revealed significant changes in physical parameters, such as pH, total dissolved solids, total suspended solids, turbidity, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and chemical parameters, such as calcium, chromium, sodium, manganese, nitrate, nitrites, phosphorus, and sulfur and biological parameter such as E. coli in water after plasma treatment. The concentration of dissolved oxygen, conductivity, nitrate, nitrite, and sulfur was increased with an increase in water treatment time, and the amounts of the other analyzed parameters decreased with the increase in water treatment time. The effects of untreated water and plasma-activated water treated for 20 minutes on soybean germination and growth were studied. The germination rate was found to be higher with plasma-treated water. Shoot lengths, seedlings length, vigor index, and germination rates were increased as compared to those germinated by normal water irrigation. The seedlings irrigated with PAW responded to the abundance of nitrogen by producing intensely green leaves because of their increased chlorophyll a as compared to seedlings irrigated with normal water. However, the content of chlorophyll b and carotenoids was found to decrease in the case of seedlings irrigated with PAW. Based on this report, we conclude that PAW could be used to substantially enhance seed germination and seedling growth.

1. Introduction

Soybean (Glycine max) is a globally important crop that is commonly grown for its edible bean, which can be consumed raw, defatted to produce a proteic animal feed, processed to produce meat and dairy substitutes, and fermented to produce items such as soy sauce [1, 2]. Food and nutritional security are some of the growing challenges worldwide.

In the last decade, a variety of physical, chemical, and combination intervention methods have been used to promote seed germination and sprout development, including gamma irradiation, electromagnetic fields, and UV treatment [3–5]. However, these technologies are linked to several major negative consequences, including expensive costs, long processing times, chemical residues in the environment, and environmental concerns. As a result, developing cost-effective and environment friendly solutions to boost sprout production is indeed necessary. In the context of climate change, crops worldwide are facing diverse environmental stresses. To overcome such challenges, plasma technologies can play an important role in early seedling growth through sterilization and preservation of seeds and fruits, improving seed germination and reducing pathogens in soil [6–12].

Plasma agriculture technology is being used in the sector of agriculture to enhance productivity and optimize resource loss [1, 13–15]. The novel plasma technology promotes sustainable and economic development by providing maximum efficiency at the lowest possible environmental cost [16–18]. Enhancement of seed germination and growth of plants can be achieved either by direct treatment of seeds by plasma or using plasma-activated water for irrigation [18–27].

Furthermore, the recent application of plasma-activated water (PAW) has increased in popularity among plant physiologists due to its appealing characteristics [28–30]. PAW has been proven to promote seed and seedling germination and plant development, limit the proliferation of plant-related pathogenic bacteria, and treat fungus-infected seedling [31–34]. Sivachandiran and Khacef examined the effects of PAW on seed germination and development rates in radish, tomato, and sweet pepper plants and found a significant impact on seed germination and plant growth on all these seeds [14]. Liumin Fan reported that PAW may significantly boost the germination and development of mung bean seeds. The adverse effects of PAW on mung bean seed germination were discovered when the plasma discharge time was increased [3]. Sajib et al. investigated the effect of PAW on black Gram seed germination and reported that the germination rate increased by 10–15% [35]. Naumona et al. reported that PAW treatment of rye seeds for 5 minutes boosted germination rates by 50% [36]. Chiara et al. discovered that PAW may increase the germination of soybean seeds, with the germination rate reaching 100% on the third day [1]. Loganathan et al. and Andreev et al. also discovered that PAW might increase drought tolerance and seed germination rate in radish and other crop seeds [14, 37].

These positive effects of plasma-activated water in agricultural applications are believed to be derived from the synergistic effects of various reactive species (particularly oxygen and nitrogen species) generated during the water treatment by plasma [27, 38, 39]. Moreover, the participation of reactive species in various signaling pathways in plants regulates the metabolic processes, plant development, and response to various stresses, which ultimately lead to enhanced germination and increased plant growth [2, 40, 41]. To fulfill the increased demand for food, it is vital to implement and acquire sustainable modern agriculture technologies. So, in this study, we investigated the potential application of PAW generated by using a low-cost handmade atmospheric pressure dielectric barrier discharge (APDBD) generated at 50 Hz line frequency, utilizing air as a carrier gas, on the proliferation effect of seed germination and growth of soybeans.

2. Materials and Methods

The experimental arrangement used in the present study is shown in Figure 1. The reactor consists of a transparent polycarbonate cylinder with a height of 10 cm, a diameter of 10 cm, and a 0.5 cm thickness. Brass electrodes with dimensions of 5.1 cm × 5.1 cm × 1.0 cm were used in the present study. The interelectrode separation was maintained at 20 mm for all treatments. PINTEX HVP-28HF (1000 : 1) and an oscilloscope probe (Siglent PB470, 70 MHz; 10 : 1) were used for the measurement of voltage and current waveforms. Tektronix TDS 2002, 60 MHz, was used for the analysis of the voltage and current signals. An optical fiber was inserted into an aperture in the cylinder to receive the signal from the discharge. A spectrometer from Ocean Optics Inc. (USB 2000+) was used for the measurement of emission spectra. In this work, a high voltage AC supply of 11.8 kV (r.m.s) operating at 50 Hz was used. A water sample was collected from the water source of Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel, Nepal (27°37′06.486″N and 85°32′23.245″E). For this experiment, 60 ml of water was kept in a borosilicate Petri dish and was inserted into the active plasma region on the dielectric barrier to ensure uniform treatment. Water was treated with plasma during the experiments, with exposure periods ranging from 1 to 20 minutes. After treatment, the water was preserved in sterilized reagent bottles prior to physical, chemical, and biological experiments, and analysis. In this study, pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and total dissolved solids were quantified, using a standard multiparameter probe (Lutron, WA-2015), turbidity was determined by a turbidimeter (Hanna, HI88703) and total suspended solids by the gravimetric technique [42]. Similarly, heavy metals such as chromium, manganese, and sodium were quantified by atomic absorption spectrometry (SavantAA AAS, GBC), and other remaining chemical parameters were analyzed by the UV-visible spectrophotometric method (UV-1800, Shimadzu) following standard protocols [42].

2.1. Growing Condition

Initially, cocopeat was washed with distilled water and cooled at room temperature. After that, a germination tray (pot) with two compartments was taken, and the upper region of the tray (pot) was filled with cocopeat. About 180 ml of untreated water and plasma-activated water (treated for 20 min) were kept in the lower compartment of each tray, and a self-irrigation system was maintained on each tray through capillary action. Seeds of soybean were obtained from the Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Lalitpur, Nepal. Five replicates of 6 soybean seeds were sown in each tray (pot), and various germination parameters, such as final germination percentage (FGP), mean germination time (MGT), mean germination rate (MGR), coefficient of variation of germination time (CV_t), coefficient of velocity of germination (CVG), germination index (GI), and germination (G) value, were studied using the formula reported by various researchers. The seeds were irrigated with normal and treated water (PAW) at regular intervals. The images of the seedlings germinated using normal and plasma-activated water are shown in Figure 2.

2.2. Analysis of Germination Characteristics

Germination percentage (G%) is a measure of the germinability of the seeds [26, 43].

Five replicates of 6 seeds were taken, and the final germination percentage was measured using equation (1) on the 19th day of germination. G% can be relativized using the following equation [44].

Mean germination time (MGT) is a measure of the rate and time spread of germination. It denotes the amount of time spent waiting for the sprout to germinate or emerge. Mean germination rate (MGR) is defined as the reciprocal of the mean germination time. MGT and MGR are calculated using equations (3) and (4) [45].where E is the number of seeds germinated on day y.

Similarly,

The coefficient of variation of the germination time is estimated using the following equation [46].

Similarly, the coefficient of velocity of germination (CVG) indicates the rapidity of germination. Its value increases when the number of germinated seeds increases, and the time required for germination decreases [47].where is the number of seeds germinated in the time, and is the time taken for seeds to germinate at count.

The average daily germination rate (MGD) indicates the average number of seeds germinated per day.

Similarly, germination (G) value is obtained by combining both the speed and completeness of germination into a composite score [48].where PV is the maximum or maximum quotient obtained when all accumulated germination percentages are divided by the corresponding time interval.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

All the experiments were performed with five repetitions, and the findings were expressed as mean ± standard error (SE). The significant difference in the mean of the physicochemical parameters of water was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison analysis using GraphPad Prism 8.0.2. Similarly, the significant difference in the mean of the germination parameters was analyzed by an independent sample t-test followed by a two-tailed analysis using GraphPad Prism 8.0.2. Different letters in the same column and graph indicate the significant difference in mean values at .

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Electrical Characterization of the Discharge

From Figure 3, it is evident that the current waveform consists of a large number of filamentary microdischarges. The existence of such microdischarge is a typical feature of atmospheric pressure dielectric barrier discharge (APDBD) [49].

Lissajous figures are the charge -applied voltage plots, during one period of the applied voltage. The energy dissipated per cycle and the average power dissipated can be calculated from Figure 4 [50].

For volume discharge, the capacitance of the dielectric-air combination is given by the following equation [51].where is the capacitance of air space and is the capacitance of dielectric.

The energy dissipated per cycle E is given by [52]and the average power dissipated is given by [52, 53]. where is the minimum amount of applied voltage necessary to ignite the discharge, is the maximum value of applied voltage, and f is the frequency of input voltage.

From the Lissajous figure, the energy dissipated per cycle is found to be 2.07 mJ, and the average power dissipated (P) is 103.38 mW.

Now, the value of discharge voltage is estimated using the following equation [52–54].

In our case, the value of discharge voltage was found to be 2.46 kV. Using this value, the electric field in the discharge region was found to be 4.92 kV/cm.

Similarly, the estimation of average current was further used for calculating average current density [50].

The value of the average current was estimated to be 0.027 mA.

Now, electron density () can be obtained using the following equation [55].where is the electron conduction current density, is the electronic charge, is the electron mobility, and E is the electric field in the discharge region.

In this work, the electron conduction current density for discharge area of 20.41 cm² is , the electric field (E) in the discharge region is , the electron mobility () estimated form BOLSIG+ is , and the electronic charge (e) is . Using these values in equation (6), the electron density () is estimated to be 1.07×10⁹ cm⁻³.

3.2. Optical Characterization of the Discharge

Figure 5 shows the OES from DBD generated in air at atmospheric pressure.

The line intensity ratio method was used for the estimation of electron temperature [56–58].where and are the ratio and intensity of the spectral lines, are the transition probability, statistical weight, wavelength, and energy of the spectral lines, respectively, and is the Boltzmann constant.

From the spectrum, two lines of N I (493.51 nm, 410.99 nm) and two of N II (478.81 nm, 343.71 nm) were chosen. The corresponding values of were taken from the NIST Atomic Spectra Database [59], and and were taken from the discharge spectrum to estimate the electron temperature .

From Figure 6, the electron temperature () was estimated to be 1.37 eV.

3.3. Physical and Biological Parameters

Physical and biological parameters of DBD-treated water were compared with the control. Several physical parameters such as pH, turbidity, conductivity, and dissolved oxygen, which play an important role in seed dormancy and germination, were measured using a standard protocol described in the Material and Methods sections.

The pH scale is used to measure the acidity and alkalinity of any solution and directly related to the corrosivity of water and changing the shape and structure of proteins in living beings [60]. As given in Table 1, we observed a gradual decrease in pH with the increase in plasma treatment time. Furthermore, DBD-treated water revealed a decrease in solid particles, both dissolved and suspended, that are responsible for the turbidity of water.

With 20 minutes of treatment time, total dissolved solids decreased from 152.00 ± 0.05 to 0.00 ± 0.00 mg/L, total suspended solids decreased from 77.00 ± 0.05 to 0.00 ± 0.00 mg/L, and turbidity decreased from 1.4 to 0.6 NTU (Table 1). Next, we investigated the electrical conductivity of DBD-treated water. Electrical conductivity is an index of salt concentration that is responsible for the availability and movement of ions, which in turn increases the uptake of ions and dissolved oxygen for the overall growth of plant species [61, 62]. From Table 1, it was noticed that as the pH drops, the electrical conductivity of the solution increases, which is due to the higher mobility of H⁺ relative to OH⁻. The introduction of oxygen and other reactive species and ions into water by plasma sources might be responsible for the increase in total dissolved oxygen in PAW [63]. Furthermore, E. coli content in water was evaluated, and the results revealed that the number of colony counts of E. coli was significantly dropped, initially from 100 CFU to 0 CFU with 10 min of water treatment time (Table 1). The formation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RON/ROS) in PAW might be responsible for the decrease in pH, which could be the prominent cause of its antimicrobial properties [64].

3.4. Chemical Parameters

The main principle behind the chemical reactivity of plasma-treated water is the formation of various reactive species of nitrogen and oxygen. Excess nitrate in drinking water, on the other hand, produces a variety of metabolic and physiological problems in humans.

However, because nitrate and nitrite ions are the primary sources of nitrogen for plants, this rise in nitrogen species might be beneficial in agricultural applications [65]. As given in Table 2, nitrate ion concentration was increased from 6.20 ± 0.20 to 9.00 ± 0.20 mg/L and nitrite ion concentration was increased initially from 0.00 ± 0.00 to 1.40 ± 0.03 mg/L. Similarly, the sulfur ion concentration is crucial for plant growth and metabolism. The shortage of sulfur may lead to chlorosis, a decrease in chlorophyll content, and inhibition of protein synthesis [66]. In our study, the concentration of sulfur increased gradually from an initial 0.088 mg/L to a final 0.11 mg/L. Moreover, calcium, sodium, phosphorus, and chromium concentrations decreased significantly with the increase in the water treatment time (Table 2). Calcium is considered a central regulator of plant growth and development as it is crucial for determining the structural rigidity of the cell wall and also serves as a messenger in many developmental and physiological processes of plants [67, 68]. The higher concentration of sodium leads to the inhibition of plant growth [69]. Furthermore, phosphorus is an essential component of nucleic acids, phospholipids, and energy-rich phosphate compounds and plays a crucial role in root growth, fruit and seed development, and disease resistance. However, overapplication of phosphorus will increase the risk of phosphorus losses from soil to water resources and impair water quality through eutrophication [70]. On the same note, chromium negatively impacts plant growth by impairing their essential metabolism. The toxic effects of chromium are correlated with the generation of reactive oxygen species, which cause oxidative stress in plants [71]. Calcium ion concentration decreased from 0.15 ± 0.00 to 0.13 ± 0.00 mg/L. Sodium-ion concentration initially decreased from 48.00 ± 0.00 to 35.00 ± 0.50 mg/L. The phosphorus ion concentration decreased slightly from 0.14 ± 0.02 to 0.11 ± 0.01 mg/L. The chromium ion concentration decreased from 0.95 ± 0.00 to 0.00 ± 0.00 mg/L. Nevertheless, although manganese is essential for all living beings as it acts as an enzyme cofactor in the biological cluster [72], the concentration of manganese remains constant at 4.4 mg/L in our study, as given in Table 2. RONS induced by PAW might cause seed coat cracking and make the seed coat thin, which improves its assimilation of water and nutrients, resulting in enhanced germination rate, germination index, and vigor index [3, 27, 73, 74].

3.5. Analysis of Growth Parameters

Tables 3 and 4 provide the variation of various germination parameters, such as final germination percentage (FGP), relativized percentage (R%), mean germination time (MGT), mean germination rate (MGR), coefficient of variation of germination time (CV_t), coefficient of velocity of germination (CVG), germination index (GI), and germination (G) value between the soybean seeds irrigated using control and plasma-activated water.

From Table 3, it was observed that the final germination percentage and the relativized percentage were found to increase by 11.32% and 18.86%, respectively, in the case of seedlings being irrigated with plasma-activated water. However, there was no significant change in the MGT and MGR of the seedlings germinated using control and plasma-activated water.

In the same way, CV_t decreases by 29.02% when seedlings are irrigated with plasma-activated water, as given in Table 4. In the case of seedlings irrigated by PAW, GI and MDG values both rise by 23.07% and 20.66%, respectively. A significant difference in the G value was observed between the seeds irrigated by control and PAW water. However, no significant change in the CVG was observed in the case of seedlings germinated using PAW.

Figure 7(a) shows that the number of leaves on seedlings irrigated by normal and PAW was the same when counted on the 30th and 37th days after germination. However, on the 44th day following germination, the number of leaves increased by 20% in seedlings that were irrigated with PAW. Also, as shown in Figure 7(b), the fresh weight of seedlings irrigated with PAW is greater than the fresh weight of seedlings irrigated with normal water on the 30th, 37th, and 44th days. On the 37th–44th days, however, no significant changes in the fresh weight of control-control or treated-treated seedlings were identified.

(a)

(b)

PAW activity and chemical composition, i.e., RONS concentrations, were linked to the influence of PAW on germination. Reactive species (RONs) produced in PAW may function as positive signal molecules to ease seed dormancy and accelerate seed germination by involvement in abscisic acid/gibberellic acid signaling pathways, resulting in increased seed germination. These reactive species are thought to play an important role in seed dormancy and germination control [3, 23, 27–29].

From Figure 8, it was seen that there was an increase in the shoot length and seedling length that were irrigated by PAW. As measured on the 30th, 37th, and 44th days after germination, TSL was found to increase by 21.75%, 22.92%, and 30.78%, respectively, than CSL. However, the root length of the seedings irrigated by PAW is found to decrease by 9.61% and 7.33% as measured on the 30th and 37th days after germination. But TRL was found to increase on the 44th day by 12% as compared to CRL. It was further noticed that the overall length of the seedlings was found to be greater in the case of TPL as compared to CPL by 1.69% and 16.01% as measured on the 37th and 44th days after germination. It has been reported by various research that the nitrate present in PAW absorbed through the roots of the seedlings is mainly responsible for the plant growth as it acts as a plant growth enhancer [23, 27, 33].

The sum of those properties of the seed that determine the potential level of activity and performance of the seed during germination and seedling emergence is known as “seed vigor.” The vigor of seedlings was calculated using the following equation [2].

It was noticed that the VI I of seedings irrigated by PAW was found to be increased by 26.92% as compared to the seedlings irrigated by normal water. This increment positively correlates with the seedling length and fresh weight, which agrees with the results documented by various researchers. The changes in germination and early seedling growth observed in the experiment might be explained by the stimulation of certain natural signals, hormones, and enzyme activities [2].

3.6. Estimation of Chlorophyll and Carotenoids Contents

The chlorophyll a and b contents, as well as the total carotenoids content, were measured spectrophotometrically using the acetone extraction method and equation developed by Wellburn in 1994 [75]. Leaves contain chlorophyll, carotenoid, and anthocyanin and important pigments which play a critical role in plant growth and contribute greatly to the appearance of plants. Chlorophyll is the pigment that gives plants their characteristic green color and occupies a unique role in the physiology and productivity of green plants [76]. Chlorophyll is essential for the conversion of light into chemical energy, which helps in determining the photosynthetic rate and primary productivity in plants The amount of chlorophyll in the environment changes as a result of various external environmental factors. Therefore, it has been extensively used as an indicator for plant growth studies [77]. Although, leaf color and chlorophyll content play a critical role in plant growth and its appearance, very few studies have been carried out in the examination of the effects of plasma-activated water on plant growth activity concerning chlorophyll content.

In this study, we analyzed the change in chlorophyll and carotenoid contents of plants grown with 20 min treated water with plasma. As shown in Figure 9, our results indicate the increase in chlorophyll a content with the treatment time. But chlorophyll b and total carotenoid levels decreased slightly with the treated water supply. Chlorophyll a content increased from 24.55 ± 0.06 mg/g to 43.59 ± 0.04 mg/g. In contrast, chlorophyll b was dropped from 30.83 ± 0.35 mg/g to 7.01 ± 0.08 mg/g and total carotenoids also decreased from 30.05 ± 0.17 mg/g to 12.48 ± 0.13 mg/g. As carotenoid indicates the yellow color during chlorophyll degradation, our findings point to a higher accumulation of chlorophyll content in plant leaves, which may aid in increasing plant growth rate.

4. Conclusion

In this study, reactive nitrogen and oxygen species were generated in well water employing a dielectric barrier discharge operating at 50 Hz. Here, the electron temperature and density were found to be 1.37 eV and 1.07 × 10⁹ cm⁻³, respectively. The energy dissipated and power consumed by the discharge was estimated to be 2.07 mJ and 103.38 mW. Compared with ordinary water, this plasma-activated water (PAW) improved the germination rate, vigor index, and plant development of soybean. The use of PAW to irrigate seedlings resulted in positive physical and chemical changes in the plants. These plants respond to nitrogen availability by producing a strong green color in their leaves, which is consistent with the increase in chlorophyll content. Based on our findings, much greater yield could be achieved in a short time with the assistance of irrigation using PAW.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge all the researchers of Kathmandu University Plasma Physics Laboratory and Aquatic Ecology Centre, Kathmandu University, Nepal, who provided valuable help and suggestion for the completion of the work. The corresponding author was partially supported by the Nepal Academy of Science and Technology (NAST), Nepal, for providing Ph.D. fellowship (2076/077).

References

C. Lo Porto, D. Ziuzina, A. Los et al., “Plasma activated water and airborne ultrasound treatments for enhanced germination and growth of soybean,” Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, vol. 49, no. May, pp. 13–19, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Pérez-Pizá, L. Prevosto, P. E. Grijalba et al., “Improvement of growth and yield of soybean plants through the application of non-thermal plasmas to seeds with different health status,” Heliyon, vol. 5, no. 4, Article ID e01495, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Fan, X. Liu, Y. Ma, and Q. Xiang, “Effects of plasma-activated water treatment on seed germination and growth of mung bean sprouts,” Journal of Taibah University for Science, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 823–830, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. J. Rifna, K. Ratish Ramanan, and R. Mahendran, “Emerging technology applications for improving seed germination,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, January, vol. 86, pp. 95–108, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. E. Noble, “Effects of UV-irradiation on seed germination,” The Science of the Total Environment, vol. 299, no. 1–3, pp. 173–176, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. D. Weltmann, J. F. Kolb, M. Holub et al., “The future for plasma science and technology,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1800118–1800129, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Ranieri, N. Sponsel, J. Kizer et al., “Plasma agriculture: review from the perspective of the plant and its ecosystem,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 18, no. 1, Article ID 2000162, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Lee, Y. Y. Lee, Y. S. Kim et al., “Enhancement of seed germination and microbial disinfection on ginseng by cold plasma treatment,” Journal of Ginseng Research, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 519–526, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Song, S. B. Kim, S. Ryu, J. Oh, and D. S. Kim, “Emerging plasma technology that alleviates crop stress during the early growth stages of plants: a review,” Frontiers of Plant Science, vol. 11, p. 1, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Puač, M. Gherardi, and M. Shiratani, “Plasma agriculture: a rapidly emerging field,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1700174-1700175, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Škarpa, D. Klofáč, F. Krčma, J. Šimečková, and Z. Kozáková, “Effect of plasma activated water foliar application on selected growth parameters of maize (Zea mays L.),” Water, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 3545, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. N. Misra, S. Oliver, and P. J. Cullen, Cold Plasma in Food and Agriculture, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherland, 1st edition, 2016.
U. Cvelbar, J. L. Walsh, M. Černák et al., “White paper on the future of plasma science and technology in plastics and textiles,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 16, no. 1, Article ID 1700228, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Sivachandiran and A. Khacef, “Enhanced seed germination and plant growth by atmospheric pressure cold air plasma: combined effect of seed and water treatment,” RSC Advances, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1822–1832, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. P. Guragain, H. B. Baniya, S. P. Pradhan et al., “Impact of non-thermal plasma treatment on the seed germination and seedling development of carrot (Daucus carota sativus L.),” Journal of Physics Communications, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Jiang, X. He, L. Li et al., “Effect of cold plasma treatment on seed germination and growth of wheat,” Plasma Science and Technology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 54–58, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Attri, K. Ishikawa, T. Okumura, K. Koga, and M. Shiratani, “Plasma agriculture from laboratory to farm: a review,” Processes, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1002–1020, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Bormashenko, R. Grynyov, Y. Bormashenko, and E. Drori, “Cold radiofrequency plasma treatment modifies wettability and germination speed of plant seeds,” Scientific Reports, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Šerá and M. Šerý, “Non-thermal plasma treatment as a new biotechnology in relation to seeds, dry fruits, and grains,” Plasma Science and Technology, vol. 20, no. 4, Article ID 044012, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Zhou, J. Li, R. Zhou, X. Zhang, and S. Yang, “Atmospheric-pressure plasma treated water for seed germination and seedling growth of mung bean and its sterilization effect on mung bean sprouts,” Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, vol. 53, pp. 36–44, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zhang, A. Rousseau, and T. Dufour, “Promoting lentil germination and stem growth by plasma activated tap water, demineralized water and liquid fertilizer,” RSC Advances, vol. 7, no. 50, pp. 31244–31251, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Zhang, J. O. Jo, D. L. Huynh et al., “Growth-inducing effects of argon plasma on soybean sprouts via the regulation of demethylation levels of energy metabolism-related genes,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Thirumdas, A. Kothakata, U. Annapure et al., “Plasma activated water (PAW),” Chemistry, Physico-Chemical Properties, Applications in Food and Agriculture, vol. 77, Elsevier Ltd, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Sery, A. Zahoranova, A. Kerdik, and B. Sera, “Seed germination of black pine (pinus nigra arnold) after diffuse coplanar surface barrier discharge plasma treatment,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 939–945, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Zahoranová, M. Henselová, D. Hudecová et al., “Effect of cold atmospheric pressure plasma on the wheat seedlings vigor and on the inactivation of microorganisms on the seeds surface,” Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 397–414, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Bormashenko, Y. Shapira, R. Grynyov, G. Whyman, Y. Bormashenko, and E. Drori, “Interaction of cold radiofrequency plasma with seeds of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris),” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 66, no. 13, pp. 4013–4021, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Guo, H. Liu, L. Zhou, J. Xie, and C. He, “Plasma‐activated water production and its application in agriculture,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 101, no. 12, pp. 4891–4899, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zambon, N. Contaldo, R. Laurita et al., “Plasma activated water triggers plant defence responses,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. S. G. Subramanian, J. Anandanarasimha, H. Rao, A. M. Shivapuji, P.-L. Girard-Lauriault, and L. Rao, “Plasma-activated water from DBD as a source of nitrogen for agriculture: specific energy and stability studies,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 129, no. 9, Article ID 093303, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Stoleru, R. Burlica, G. Mihalache et al., “Plant growth promotion effect of plasma activated water on Lactuca sativa L. cultivated in two different volumes of substrate,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Adhikari, M. Adhikari, B. Ghimire, B. C. Adhikari, G. Park, and E. H. Choi, “Cold plasma seed priming modulates growth, redox homeostasis and stress response by inducing reactive species in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum),” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 156, pp. 57–69, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Waskow, A. Howling, and I. Furno, “Mechanisms of plasma-seed treatments as a potential seed processing technology,” Frontiers in Physics, vol. 9, Frontiers Media S.A., 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. P. Guragain, H. B. Baniya, S. P. Pradhan, B. P. Pandey, and D. P. Subedi, “Influence of plasma-activated water (PAW) on the germination of radish, fenugreek, and pea seeds,” AIP Advances, vol. 11, no. 12, Article ID 125304, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. P. Guragain, H. B. Baniya, S. Dhungana et al., “Effect of plasma treatment on the seed germination and seedling growth of radish (Raphanus sativus),” Plasma Science and Technology, vol. 24, no. 1, Article ID 015502, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Sajib, M. Billah, S. Mahmud et al., “Plasma activated water: the next generation eco-friendly stimulant for enhancing plant seed germination, vigor and increased enzyme activity, a study on black gram (Vigna mungo L.),” Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 119–143, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. K. Naumova, A. I. Maksimov, and A. V. Khlyustova, “Stimulation of the germinability of seeds and germ growth under treatment with plasma-activated water,” Surface Engineering and Applied Electrochemistry, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 263–265, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. N. Andreev, L. M. Apasheva, M. K. Ashurov et al., “Production of pure hydrogen peroxide solutions in water activated by plasma of an electrodeless microwave discharge and their application for controlling plant growth,” Doklady Physics, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 222–224, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. F. L. M. Hoeben, P. P. Van Ooij, D. C. Schram, T. Huiskamp, A. J. M. Pemen, and P. Lukeš, “On the possibilities of straightforward characterization of plasma activated water,” Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, vol. 39, no. 3, 626 pages, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Hefny, C. Pattyn, P. Lukes, and J. Benedikt, “Atmospheric plasma generates oxygen atoms as oxidizing species in aqueous solutions,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 49, no. 40, Article ID 404002, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Lamichhane, M. Veerana, J. S. Lim et al., “Low-temperature plasma-assisted nitrogen fixation for corn plant growth and development,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 22, no. 10, p. 5360, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Sarinont, R. Katayama, Y. Wada, K. Koga, and M. Shiratani, “Plant growth enhancement of seeds immersed in plasma activated water,” MRS Advances, vol. 2, no. 18, pp. 995–1000, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Brandi and L. Wilson-Wilde, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Water Environment Federation, American Public Health Association , American Water Works Association, Virginia, USA, 23rd edition, 2013.
A. Fercha, A. L. Capriotti, G. Caruso et al., “Shotgun proteomic analysis of soybean embryonic axes during germination under salt stress,” Proteomics, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1537–1546, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Ranal, D. G. d. Santana, W. R. Ferreira, and C. Mendes-Rodrigues, “Calculating germination measurements and organizing spreadsheets,” Revista Brasileira de Botânica, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 849–855, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Orchard, “Estimating the parameters of plant seedling emergence,” Seed Science & Technology, vol. 5, pp. 61–69, 1977.
View at: Google Scholar
M. A. Ranal and D. G. D. Santana, “How and why to measure the germination process?” Revista Brasileira de Botânica, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. W. Jones and D. C. Sanders, “The influence of soaking pepper seed in water or potassium salt solutions on germination at three temperatures,” Journal of Seed technology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 97–102, 1987.
View at: Google Scholar
F. J. Czabator, “Germination value: an index combining speed and completeness of pine seed germinationle,” Forest Science, vol. 8, pp. 386–396, 1962.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Nersisyan and W. G. Graham, “Characterization of a dielectric barrier discharge operating in an open reactor with flowing helium,” Plasma Sources Science and Technology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 582–587, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. C. Manley, “The electric characteristics of the ozonator discharge,” Transaction of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 16, no. 1909, pp. 450–460, 1943.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Kriegseis, B. Möller, S. Grundmann, and C. Tropea, “Capacitance and power consumption quantification of dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma actuators,” Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 302–312, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. E. Wagner, R. Brandenburg, K. V. Kozlov, A. Sonnenfeld, P. Michel, and J. F. Behnke, “The barrier discharge: basic properties and applications to surface treatment,” Vacuum, vol. 71, no. 3 SPEC, pp. 417–436, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Tao, R. Lu, and H. Li, “Electrical characteristics of dielectric-barrier discharges in atmospheric pressure air using a power-frequency voltage source,” Plasma Science and Technology, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 723–727, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. C. Manley, “The electric characteristics of the ozonator discharge,” Transactions of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 84, no. 1, p. 83, 1943.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Kim, Y. H. Choi, and Y. S. Hwang, “Electron density and temperature measurement method by using emission spectroscopy in atmospheric pressure nonequilibrium nitrogen plasmas,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 13, no. 9, Article ID 093501, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Balcon, A. Aanesland, and R. Boswell, “Pulsed RF discharges, glow and filamentary mode at atmospheric pressure in argon,” Plasma Sources Science and Technology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 217–225, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. P. Guragain, H. B. Baniya, S. Dhungana et al., “Characterization of dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) produced in air at atmospheric pressure and its application in surface modification of high-density polyethylene (HDPE),” The Journal of Technological and Space Plasmas, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27–35, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. B. Baniya, R. P. Guragain, G. P. Panta et al., “Experimental studies on physicochemical parameters of water samples before and after treatment with a cold atmospheric plasma jet and its optical characterization,” Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2021, Article ID 6638939, 12 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kramida, Y. Ralchenko, J. Reader, and N. A. Team, NIST Atomic Spectra Database, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 2020, [Online].
View at: Publisher Site
A. C. Dumetz, A. M. Chockla, E. W. Kaler, and A. M. Lenhoff, “Effects of pH on protein-protein interactions and implications for protein phase behavior,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Proteins and Proteomics, vol. 1784, no. 4, pp. 600–610, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Ding, Y. Jiang, H. Zhao et al., “Electrical conductivity of nutrient solution influenced photosynthesis, quality, and antioxidant enzyme activity of pakchoi (Brassica campestris L. Ssp. Chinensis) in a hydroponic system,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 8, Article ID e0202090, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Suyantohadi, T. Kyoren, M. Hariadi, M. H. Purnomo, and T. Morimoto, “Effect of high consentrated dissolved oxygen on the plant growth in a deep hydroponic culture under a low temperature,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 43, no. 26, pp. 251–255, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Laurita, D. Barbieri, M. Gherardi, V. Colombo, and P. Lukes, “Chemical analysis of reactive species and antimicrobial activity of water treated by nanosecond pulsed DBD air plasma,” Clinical Plasma Medicine, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 53–61, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Oehmigen, M. Hähnel, R. Brandenburg, C. Wilke, K.-D. Weltmann, and T. Von Woedtke, “The role of acidification for antimicrobial activity of atmospheric pressure plasma in liquids,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 7, no. 3-4, pp. 250–257, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. D. M. C. D. Brito, C. D. Dos Santos, F. V. Gonçalves, R. N. Castro, and S. R. De Souza, “Effects of nitrate supply on plant growth, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium accumulation, and nitrate reductase activity in crambe,” Journal of Plant Nutrition, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 275–283, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. P. Resurreccion, A. Makino, J. Bennett, and T. Mae, “Effects of sulfur nutrition on the growth and photosynthesis of rice,” Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 611–620, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. K. Hepler, “Calcium: a central regulator of plant growth and development,” The Plant Cell, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 2142–2155, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Thor, “Calcium-Nutrient and messenger,” Frontiers of Plant Science, vol. 10, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. S. Abdul Qados, “Effect of salt stress on plant growth and metabolism of bean plant Vicia faba (L.),” Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zhu, M. Ozores-Hampton, Y. Li, K. Morgan, G. Liu, and R. S. Mylavarapu, “Effect of phosphorus rates on growth, yield, and postharvest quality of tomato in a calcareous soil,” Hort Science, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 1406–1412, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sharma, D. Kapoor, J. Wang et al., “Chromium bioaccumulation and its impacts on plants: an overview,” Plants, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 100–117, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Alejandro, S. Höller, B. Meier, and E. Peiter, “Manganese in plants: from acquisition to subcellular allocation,” Frontiers of Plant Science, vol. 11, no. March, pp. 1–23, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Dobrin, M. Magureanu, N. B. Mandache, and M.-D. Ionita, “The effect of non-thermal plasma treatment on wheat germination and early growth,” Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, vol. 29, pp. 255–260, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Adhikari, M. Adhikari, B. Ghimire, G. Park, and E. H. Choi, “Cold atmospheric plasma-activated water irrigation induces defense hormone and gene expression in tomato seedlings,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Wellburn, “The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution,” Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 307–313, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Palta, “Leaf chlorophyll content,” Remote Sensing Reviews, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 207–213, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, Y. Sun, J. Jiang, and J. Liu, “Spectroscopic determination of leaf chlorophyll content and color for genetic selection on Sassafras tzumu,” Plant Methods, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Rajesh Prakash Guragain et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1818

Downloads

1266

Citations