Analysis and Remediation of Pollutants in Water and SoilView this Special Issue
Application of an Anaerobic–Anoxic–Oxic–Oxic (AAO/O) Model to the Treatment of Real Domestic Wastewater
Untreated or inadequately treated domestic wastewater has adversely affected the aquatic environment and public health in many cities in Vietnam. A conventional anaerobic–anoxic–oxic (AAO) process is recognized as an easy-to-handle approach that constrains chemical use during the procedure. Herein, we improve an AAO system by adding more oxic orders in association with a biological membrane in order to increase the hydraulic retention time (HRT) of the oxic zone in the system. The investigated system was applied to the treatment of real domestic wastewater during 168 days of operation. The performance of the system reached a stable state after 60 days of operation. The removal efficiency of total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total suspended solids (TSS), biological oxygen demand (BOD5), and chemical oxygen demand (COD) was found to be 93.6 ± 3.0%, 91.9 ± 3.5%, 88.6 ± 1.2%, 82.6 ± 1.4%, and 71.8 ± 0.7%, respectively. After the operation process, the TN, TP, and TSS contents in the wastewater effluents met the A level in accordance with the QCVN 14-MT:2015/BTNMT regulation, and the effluents of COD and BOD5 almost satisfied the requirement, with only some points being slightly higher than the limit values. The obtained data revealed that the AAO/O system was capable of treating domestic wastewater in small and medium-sized domestic wastewater treatment facilities.
Wastewater treatment is one of the most pressing challenges for developing nations [1, 2]. Due to the rapid pace of population growth, organic compounds and nutrients from municipal wastewater have increased day by day and have contaminated the watercourses. More seriously, the untreated wastewater is mostly discharged into sewage sludge systems without any suitable treatment [2, 3]. Disqualified domestic wastewater is the most terrifying cause of water pollution and the leading threat to the global environment . In Vietnam, the full-design capacity of the 24 existing centralized wastewater treatment plants is about 670,000 m3/day; however, only 10% of urban wastewater is treated . As a result, many cities in Vietnam have confronted negative effects not only on the quality of the surface water sources but also on the life and health of the residents . Therefore, the development and application of domestic wastewater treatment before disposal is a necessary and urgent task in this developing country.
The constituents of wastewater originating from households consist of nitrogen, phosphorus, and broad groups of organic matters . Common technologies for the treatment of this type of wastewater are anoxic–oxic (AO) [8, 9], AAO [10–12], University of Cape Town (UCT) [13, 14], the sequencing batch reactor (SBR) [15, 16], and membrane bioreactor (MBR) [13, 17]. When applied to domestic wastewater, they have shown relatively high performance towards several bulk parameters, including COD, TN, TP, and TSS [8, 15, 16]. Many prevalent technologies based on this combination have been developed. Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages. The most appropriate method can be chosen based on cost-efficiency and the properties of the wastewater [18, 19]. Among those techniques, many researchers have indicated the superiority of the AAO process which involves biological processes conducted in anaerobic, anoxic, and oxic conditions . This process has superior properties, such as being simpler than other simultaneous nitrogen, organics, and phosphorus removal processes. It has a short hydraulic retention time, a strong impact load resistance, and low operating management costs .
In the AAO process, the hydraulic retention time (HRT) is a critical operating parameter affecting the biological treatment, the infrastructure, and the operational cost in the design and operation of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) [22, 23]. HRT that is too short can result in less contact time between the substrates and microorganisms, thereby decreasing the treatment efficiency of the pollutants in wastewater [23, 24]. The HRT is influenced by the geometric dimensions of the reactor . In order to increase the HRT in WWTPs, an additional tank volume is normally required , possibly leading to an increase in the overall operational cost and difficulty in controlling the HRT. Modifying a conventional AAO model is, therefore, a promising way to improve the efficiency of the system.
In this study, the AAO model was modified by adding an oxic zone in association with a biological membrane to increase the HRT in order to provide more contact time between the microorganisms and substrates. The investigated system is called the AAO/O model. The designed system was applied for the treatment of real domestic wastewater from a household in Vietnam. The investigated parameters including pH, BOD5, COD, TN, TP, and TSS were evaluated based on the allowable pollution parameters of Vietnamese environmental standards.
2. Materials and Methods
Raw wastewater was collected from the influent waste pipe of a household located in Phu An Commune, Ben Cat town, Binh Duong Province, Vietnam. The influent ranges of pollution parameters in the investigated domestic wastewater are given in Table 1. According to Vietnamese environmental standards, the national technical regulation on domestic wastewater (QCVN 14 : 2015/MT-BTNMT) discharging into the water sources serving the tap water supply is given in Table 1. These values were used to compare and determine whether the influent and effluent of the pollution parameters satisfied the requirement in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the AAO/O system.
2.2. Reactor Setup and Operation
The applied AAO/O model was designed as a small and multisection system with an average treating capacity of 0.5 m3/day, which is suitable for wastewater treatment of 5-member households. The designed specifications, schematic, and simulation diagrams of the studied model are given in Table 2 and Figures 1 and 2, respectively.
In the operation of the investigated AAO/O model, the influent wastewater was first discharged into an anaerobic zone for degradation of the complex organic matter. The next anoxic zone was used to reduce the nitrogen and phosphorus load from the wastewater. Then, the wastewater was further transferred to the two oxic zones in association with the biological membrane. This treatment allowed for the thorough disposal of the remaining organic matter, COD and BOD5 content, and N and P with proportions of nutrients of BOD5 : N : P = 100 : 5 : 1. The membrane offered a complete barrier to sedimentary sludge and suspended solids. At the 4th zone, the activated carbon powder was deployed as an absorbent to remove color and odor in order to enhance the quality of the effluent. Finally, sterilization of the wastewater using ozone was conducted to remove all existing harmful and pathogenic microorganisms.
2.3. Analysis Methods
The investigated parameters in this study included pH, BOD5, COD, TN, TP, and TSS. The system treatment performance was continuously evaluated for 168 days. During this period, a qualitative measurement was carried out every 7 days. The analysis was performed according to the standard method for the examination of water and wastewater (APHA, 2005) . The pH level was monitored using a hand-held Mettler–Schwerzenbach meter (Switzerland). COD, TN, and TP were measured by UV-vis spectroscopy. The BOD5 content was determined based on the annealing method at 20°C for 5 days. TSS was measured by filtering wastewater using 0.45 μm filter paper followed by drying at 150°C.
3. Results and Discussion
The influent and effluent pH of domestic wastewater are shown in Figure 3. The influent pH during the experimental period was in the range of 5.5–7.1, with some points out of the requirement range. These low and fluctuating values of influent pH could be due to the presence of organic matters in the wastewater entering the treatment system. After the removal of organic matters in the anaerobic tank, the pH level of wastewater was more stable for further treating processes. As a prominent parameter that strongly affects the removal capacity, the pH level in the range of 6.5–8.5 is required for the biological treating system to avoid stress on the microbial community and for optimal biological activity in both anoxic and aerobic tanks . After being treated by the AAO/O system, the effluent pH range was 6.9–7.1, which satisfied the environmental standards.
3.2. Performance of the Nutrient Removal
The influent, effluent, and removal rate of TN and TP using the AAO/O system during the 168 days of operation are shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b), respectively. The national technical regulation on domestic wastewater (QCVN 14 : 2015/MT-BTNMT) discharging into the water sources serving the tap water supply for TN (30 mg·L−1) and TP (6 mg·L−1) are also represented by the red dashed line in the figure. The results showed that influents of both TN and TP changed day by day and exceeded the Vietnamese environmental standards. During the first 56 days of operation, the removal rate of TN and TP was not stable, ranging 58.8–94.5% and 64.5–93.0%, respectively. This can be explained by the fact that the domestic wastewater contains high concentration of nutrients , and the ratio of BOD5 : N : P at 100 : 5:1 is required for aerobic treatment [30, 31]. The beginning period of the treatment is therefore usually needed to produce a proper mass of microorganisms in an aerobic condition and to adjust the procedure to ensure the best operating parameters. The removal efficiency of the AAO/O system for TN and TP reached a stable period after 60 days of operation, with values of 93.6 ± 3.0% and 91.9 ± 3.5%, respectively. It is worth noting that effluents of TN and TP were lower than the regulated limit standards. Therefore, the AAO/O system was found to be effective and suitable for removing nutrients in domestic wastewater.
3.3. Performance of the TSS Removal
Figure 5 shows the TSS removal performance of the AAO/O system during 168 days of operation. The influent of TSS was in the range of 16.4–146 mg·L−1, which mainly exceeded the limit value of 50 mg·L−1. Similar to the case of nutrient removal, the system maintained stable profiles after 60 days of operation with a removal efficiency of 88.6 ± 1.2%. The AAO/O system was found to be efficient for TSS removal owing to the fact that the effluent of TSS was lower than the limits of the Vietnamese standards.
3.4. Performance of Organic Removal
The removal of organic matter was mainly based on the activity of microorganisms (activated sludge) in the two oxic zones. The dissolved organic substances can be biodegraded by microorganisms, while nonbiodegradable organic compounds are removed by filtration of suspended particles. The performance of the AAO/O system in removing COD and BOD5 is shown in Figures 6(a) and 6(b), respectively. The BOD5 concentration fluctuated significantly during the investigation period. This is because it depends on personal hygiene needs, such as urination and defecation from time to time of members in the family . The result showed that, similar to other above parameters, both influents of COD and BOD5 were almost higher than the limit values of the national technical regulation on domestic wastewater. In the first 56 days of operating the AAO/O system, the removal rate of COD and BOD5 was not stable, ranging from 61.7 to 72.7% and 68.4–83.0%, respectively. The effluents of COD and BOD5 in this period were higher than the standards. After 60 days of operation, the system became steadier with the removal efficiency of 71.8 ± 0.7% and 82.6 ± 1.4% for COD and BOD5, respectively. With this removal efficiency, the effluents of both COD and BOD5 almost satisfied the requirement, with only some points being slightly higher than the limit values.
The application of the investigated AAO/O system to domestic wastewater treatment yielded promising results. In particular, the removal efficiency of TN, TP, TSS, BOD5, and COD of wastewater were 93.6 ± 3.0%, 91.9 ± 3.5%, 88.6 ± 1.2%, 82.6 ± 1.4%, and 71.8 ± 0.7%, respectively. The removal efficiency of COD was found to be lower than other indices. This was because the biological method was the main technique for the wastewater treatment as the ratio of BOD/COD in the domestic wastewater was above 0.5 [32, 33]. This method is more effective for removing BOD and nutrients than COD, resulting in the higher removal rates for these indices. It should be noted that the performance of the system was not optimal during the first 56 days due to poor adaptation of microorganisms, which can lead to inefficient decomposition of contaminants. However, after around 60 days, their performance was highly optimized with stable variation, as their reproduction and expansion were already ensured. In addition to the advantage of possessing a longer HRT, the increase in the oxic order in the AAO/O model also provided a long sludge retention time that can help to prevent the loss of nitrifying bacteria and to improve the nitrification capacity of the activated sludge.
The AAO/O model was prepared by adding an oxic zone in association with a biological membrane to a conventional AAO system. The system was specifically designed for household wastewater treatment with a discharge capacity of 0.5 m3/day. The removal efficiency of TN, TP, TSS, COD, and BOD5 using the system was relatively high and almost satisfied the Vietnamese environmental standards. The qualified output can be circulated and reused for household sanitation or watering purposes. The obtained results showed that AAO/O exhibited great potential not only in maintaining water reservoirs but also in addressing notorious environmental issues.
The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they no conflicts of interest.
This research was funded by Thu Dau Mot University, Binh Duong Province, Vietnam, under grant number DTHV.21.4–006.
M. A. Massoud, A. Tarhini, and J. A. Nasr, “Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: applicability in developing countries,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 652–659, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
M. Qadir, D. Wichelns, L. Raschid-Sally et al., “The challenges of wastewater irrigation in developing countries,” Agricultural Water Management, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 561–568, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
K. K. Kesari, R. Soni, Q. M. S. Jamal et al., “Wastewater treatment and reuse: a review of its applications and health implications,” Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, vol. 232, 2021.View at: Google Scholar
J. Fito and K. Alemu, “Microalgae–bacteria consortium treatment technology for municipal wastewater management,” Nanotechnology for Environmental Engineering, vol. 4, no. 1, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. B. Pham, T. Kuyama, and Y. Kataoka, Urban Domestic Wastewater Management in Vietnam-Challenges and Opportunities, WEPA, Redwood, CA, USA, 2014.
K. T. Nguyen, H. M. Nguyen, C. K. Truong, M. B. Ahmed, Y. Huang, and J. L. Zhou, “Chemical and microbiological risk assessment of urban river water quality in Vietnam,” Environmental Geochemistry and Health, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 2559–2575, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. G. Lusk, G. S. Toor, Y.-Y. Yang, S. Mechtensimer, M. De, and T. A. Obreza, “A review of the fate and transport of nitrogen, phosphorus, pathogens, and trace organic chemicals in septic systems,” Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 455–541, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Wang, J. Li, D. Bian et al., “Effect of hydraulic residence time and inlet flow distribution ratio on the pollutant removal of low-temperature municipal wastewater in multistage AO process,” Water and Environment Journal, vol. 34, no. S1, pp. 742–752, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-S. Yang, X.-L. Yu, M.-Q. Ding et al., “Simulating a combined lysis-cryptic and biological nitrogen removal system treating domestic wastewater at low C/N ratios using artificial neural network,” Water Research, vol. 189, Article ID 116576, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Zheng, H. Li, S. Wang et al., “Enhanced proteins and amino acids production based on ammonia nitrogen assimilation and sludge increment by the integration of bioadsorption with anaerobic-anoxic-oxic (AAO) process,” Chemosphere, vol. 280, Article ID 130721, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. K. Uan, I. T. Yeom, P. Arulazhagan, and J. Rajesh Banu, “Effects of sludge pretreatment on sludge reduction in a lab-scale anaerobic/anoxic/oxic system treating domestic wastewater,” International journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 495–502, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wang, K. Chon, X. Ren, Y. Kou, K. J. Chae, and Y. Piao, “Effects of beneficial microorganisms on nutrient removal and excess sludge production in an anaerobic-anoxic/oxic (A2O) process for municipal wastewater treatment,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 281, pp. 90–98, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Mannina, M. Capodici, A. Cosenza, and D. Di Trapani, “Carbon and nutrient biological removal in a University of Cape Town membrane bioreactor: analysis of a pilot plant operated under two different C/N ratios,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 296, pp. 289–299, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Li, S. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. Zheng, and J. Zhang, “Assessing biomass activities, sludge characteristics and membrane fouling in the University of Cape Town membrane bioreactor under ferric chloride addition,” Environmental Technology & Innovation, vol. 23, Article ID 101796, 2021.View at: Google Scholar
D. Xu, H. Ji, H. Ren, J. Geng, K. Li, and K. Xu, “Inhibition effect of magnetic field on nitrous oxide emission from sequencing batch reactor treating domestic wastewater at low temperature,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 87, pp. 205–212, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Feng, Z. Li, Y. Zhu et al., “Effect of magnetic powder on nitrous oxide emissions from a sequencing batch reactor for treating domestic wastewater at low temperatures,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 315, Article ID 123848, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Wang, T. C. A. Ng, and H. Y. Ng, “Comparison between novel vibrating ceramic MBR and conventional air-sparging MBR for domestic wastewater treatment: performance, fouling control and energy consumption,” Water Research, vol. 203, Article ID 117521, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. P. Kalbar, S. Karmakar, and S. R. Asolekar, “Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: a scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 113, pp. 158–169, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Bashar, K. Gungor, K. G. Karthikeyan, and P. Barak, “Cost effectiveness of phosphorus removal processes in municipal wastewater treatment,” Chemosphere, vol. 197, pp. 280–290, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fan, T. Tao, J. Zhang, and G. L. You, “Performance evaluation of a modified anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A2/O) process treating low strength wastewater,” Desalination, vol. 249, no. 2, pp. 822–827, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zhang, Y. Li, W. Jiao, L. Qiu, J. Zhong, and W. Sun, “Research on lateral flow treatment technology to enhance phosphorus removal of AAO process,” E3S Web of Conferences., vol. 53, Article ID 04029, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhang, Y. Peng, C. Wang, C. Wang, W. Zhao, and W. Zeng, “Optimization denitrifying phosphorus removal at different hydraulic retention times in a novel anaerobic anoxic oxic-biological contact oxidation process,” Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 106, pp. 26–36, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T.-J. Chang, Y.-H. Chang, W.-L. Chao, W.-N. Jane, and Y.-T. Chang, “Effect of hydraulic retention time on electricity generation using a solid plain-graphite plate microbial fuel cell anoxic/oxic process for treating pharmaceutical sewage,” Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, vol. 53, no. 13, pp. 1185–1197, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhang, Y. Feng, H. Su et al., “Influence of operating parameters on the fate and removal of three estrogens in a laboratory-scale AAO system,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 1701–1708, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. von Sperling, M. E. Verbyla, and S. M. A. C. Oliveira, “Loading rates applied to treatment units,” Assessment of Treatment Plant Performance and Water Quality Data: A Guide for Students, Researchers and Practitioners, IWA Publishing, London, UK, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
UEPA, Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet-Sequencing Batch Reactors, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., USA, 1999.
American Public Health Association, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., USA, 2005.
R. C. Rout and M. L. Devram, Effluent Treatment by Activated Sludge Process, IPPTA, Saharanpur, India, 2004.
P. R. Rout, M. K. Shahid, R. R. Dash et al., “Nutrient removal from domestic wastewater: a comprehensive review on conventional and advanced technologies,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 296, Article ID 113246, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. T. T. Bui, “Some characteristics of treatment of wastewater from paper production and recycling containing lignin in Vietnam,” Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, vol. 9, pp. 133–138, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
T. Weinpel, V. Bakos, and A. Jobbágy, “Co-treatment of a carbon deficient domestic wastewater with a dairy process effluent for a cost-effective global solution,” Periodica Polytechnica - Chemical Engineering, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 432–440, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Deogaonkar, P. Wakode, and K. P. Rawat, “Electron beam irradiation post treatment for degradation of non biodegradable contaminants in textile wastewater,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 165, Article ID 108377, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Al-Sulaiman and B. H. Khudair, “Correlation between BOD5 and COD for Al- Diwaniyah wastewater treatment plants to obtain the biodegradability indices,” Pakistan Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 423–427, 2018.View at: Google Scholar