Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Computer Networks and Communications
Volume 2019, Article ID 5787653, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5787653
Research Article

An Experimental Study of Sub-1 GHz Frequency-Hopping-Based 6LoWPAN Mesh Networking for Smart-Grid Applications

1System Engineering and Marketing, Industrial Systems, Grid Infrastructure, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX 75243, USA
2Embedded Processor, Connected MCU, Low Power RF, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX 75243, USA
3Industrial Accounts Support, Texas Instruments France, Issy-les-Moulineaux 92130, France
4Kilby Labs, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX 75243, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Wonsoo Kim; moc.it@mik.oosnow

Received 12 October 2018; Revised 28 January 2019; Accepted 10 April 2019; Published 16 May 2019

Guest Editor: Amir Rastegarnia

Copyright © 2019 Wonsoo Kim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. Vijayasankar and R. Sandre, Frequency Hopping for Long-Range IoT Networks, White Paper, Texas Instruments Inc., Dallas, TX, USA, 2016.
  2. N. Baccour, A. Koubâa, C. Noda et al., Radio Link Quality Estimation in Low-Power Wireless Networks, Springer International Publishing, New York, NY, USA, 2013.
  3. T. Watteyne, A. Mehta, and K. Pister, “Reliability through frequency diversity: why channel hopping makes sense,” in Proceedings of the 6th ACM Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks, Tenerife, Spain, October 2009.
  4. V. Navda, A. Bohra, S. Ganguly, and D. Rubenstein, “Using channel hopping to increase 802.11 resilience to jamming attacks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2007—26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, Anchorage, AK, USA, May 2007.
  5. P. Popovski, H. Yomo, and R. Prasad, “Strategies for adaptive frequency hopping in the unlicensed bands,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 60–67, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. Moulema, W. Yu, G. Xu et al., “On effectiveness of mesh-based protocols for smart grid communication networks,” ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 59–70, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. Texas Instruments, CC1310: SimpleLink Sub-1 GHz Ultra-Low Power Wireless Microcontroller, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, USA, 2015, http://www.ti.com/product/CC1310.
  8. Texas Instruments, CC1312: SimpleLink Sub-1 GHz CC1312R Wireless MCU, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, USA, 2018, http://www.ti.com/product/CC1312R.
  9. Texas Instruments, MSP432P401R: SimpleLink Ultra-Low-Power 32-Bit ARM Cortex-M4F MCU with Precision ADC, 256KB Flash and 64KB RAM, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, USA, 2015, http://www.ti.com/product/MSP432P401R.
  10. Texas Instruments, AM3358: Sitara Processor Arm Cortex-A8, 3D Graphics, PRU-ICSS, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, USA, 2011, http://www.ti.com/product/AM3358.
  11. Texas Instruments, Simple 6LoWPAN Mesh Data Collector Improves Network Performance Reference Design, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, USA, 2018, http://www.ti.com/tool/tida-01547.
  12. Texas Instruments, Simple 6LoWPAN Mesh End-Node Improves Network Performance Reference Design, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, USA, 2018, http://www.ti.com/tool/tida-010003.
  13. Texas Instruments, Secured 6LoWPAN Mesh End-Node with Enhanced Network Capacity Reference Design, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, USA, 2018, http://www.ti.com/tool/tida-010024.
  14. Texas Instruments, Universal Data Concentrator Reference Design Supporting Ethernet, 6LoWPAN RF Mesh and More, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, USA, 2018, http://www.ti.com/tool/tida-010032.
  15. WiSUN Alliance, Technical Profile Specification, Field Area Network, WiSUN Alliance, San Ramon, CA, USA, 2017.
  16. G. Montenegro, N. Kushalnagar, J. Hui, and D. Culler, “Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.15.4 Networks,” RFC 4944, 2007, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4944.
  17. J. Hui and P. Thubert, “Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4-Based Networks,” RFC 6282, 2011, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6282.
  18. T. Winter, P. Thubert, A. Brandt et al., “RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks,” RFC 6550, 2012, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6550.
  19. H.-S. Kim, J. Ko, D. E. Culler, and J. Paek, “Challenging the IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks (RPL): a survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 4, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. Levis, T. Clausen, J. Hui, O. Gnawali, and J. Ko, “The Trickle Algorithm,” RFC 6206, 2011, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6206.
  21. International Electrotechnical Commission, “Electricity metering data exchange—the DLMS/COSEM suite—part 5-3: DLMS/COSEM application layer,” IEC 62056-5-3:2017, IEC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  22. Z. Shelby, K. Hartke, and C. Bormann, “The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP),” RFC 7252, 2014, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7252.
  23. Texas Instruments, SmartRF Studio, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, USA, 2010, http://www.ti.com/tool/smartrftm-studio.