Table of Contents
Journal of Criminology
Volume 2013, Article ID 284259, 13 pages
Research Article

Integrating Information from Multiple Methods into the Analysis of Perceived Risk of Crime: The Role of Geo-Referenced Field Data and Mobile Methods

Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK

Received 26 June 2013; Accepted 12 November 2013

Academic Editor: Augustine Joseph Kposowa

Copyright © 2013 Jane Fielding and Nigel Fielding. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Innes, “Signal crimes and signal disorders: notes on deviance as communicative action,” British Journal of Sociology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 335–355, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. N. Fielding and C. A. Cisneros-Puebla, “CAQDAS-GIS convergence: toward a new integrated mixed method research practice?” Journal of Mixed Methods Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 349–370, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Spiers, “New perspectives on vulnerability using emic and etic approaches,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 715–721, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Fielding, “Environmental injustice or just the lie of the land: an investigation of the socio-economic class of those at risk from flooding in England and Wales,” Sociological Research Online, vol. 12, no. 4, 2007, View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Dooblo Ltd, “Survey to go software,”
  6. Scientific Software, “ATLAS-ti: the qualitative and data analysis research software,”
  7. Verbi GmbH, “MAXQDA, qualitative data analysis software,”
  8. N. G. Fielding and J. L. Fielding, Linking Data: The Articulation of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Social Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif, USA, 1986.
  9. Department of Health Home Office, Working together under the Children Act 1989: A Guide to Arrangements for Inter-Agency Co-Operation for the Protection of Children from Abuse, Stationery Office Books, London, UK, 1991.
  10. ONS, “Neighbourhood statistics,”
  11. IMD, “Indices of multiple deprivation,” 2010,
  12. D. Vickers and P. Rees, “Creating the UK national statistics 2001 output area classification,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 379–403, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Chainey, “Identifying priority neighbourhoods using the vulnerable localities index,” Policing, vol. 2, pp. 196–209, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  14. SSMR, “Safer woking partnership,” Survey Final Report, Surrey Social & Market Research, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  15. N. Fielding, M. Innes, and J. Fielding, Reassurance Policing and the Visual Environmental Crime Audit in Surrey Police: A Report, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK, 2002.
  16. Google Earth Inc, “Google earth,”
  17. Open Street Map Foundation, “Open street map (OSM),”
  18. R. D. Putnam, “Bowling alone: America's declining social capital,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 6, pp. 65–78, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  19. M. Innes and N. Fielding, “From community to communicative policing: “signal crimes” and the problem of public reassurance,” Sociological Research Online, vol. 7, no. 2, 2002, View at Google Scholar
  20. Home Office, Neighbourhood Policing: Your Police, Your Community, Our Commitment, Home Office, London, UK, 2005.
  21. M. Innes, S. Hayden, T. Lowe, H. Mackenzie, C. Roberts, and L. Twyman, Signal Crimes and Reassurance Policing Volumes 1 and 2, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK, 2004.
  22. M. Innes, S. Hayden, T. Lowe, and C. Roberts, Signal Crimes and Reassurance Policing Volume 3, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK, 2005.
  23. Police UK, “Police UK,”
  24. L. Knigge and M. Cope, “Grounded visualization: integrating the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data through grounded theory and visualization,” Environment and Planning A, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2021–2037, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Economic Policy Centre, “UK crime statistics,”
  26. J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Sage, London, UK, 2009.
  27. T. Morris, The Criminal Area: A Study in Social Ecology, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, UK, 1957.
  28. J. Baldwin, A. E. Bottoms, and M. A. Walker, The Urban Criminal: A Study in Sheffield, Tavistock Publications, London, IK, 1976.
  29. A. Bottoms and P. Wiles, “Explanations of crime and place,” in Crime, Policing, and Place: Essays in Environmental Criminology, D. J. Evans and N. R. Fyfe, Eds., pp. 11–35, Routledge, London, UK, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  30. N. Fielding and R. Lee, Computer Analysis and Qualitative Research, Sage, London, UK, 1998.
  31. T. Lorenc, M. Petticrew, M. Whitehead et al., “Fear of crime and the environment: systematic review of UK qualitative evidence,” BMC Public Health, vol. 13, pp. 496–503, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  32. S. Hawker, S. Payne, C. Kerr, M. Hardey, and J. Powell, “Appraising the evidence: reviewing disparate data systematically,” Qualitative Health Research, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1284–1299, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. Wilson and G. Kelling, “The police and neighborhood safety: broken windows,” Atlantic Monthly, vol. 127, pp. 29–38, 1982. View at Google Scholar