Journal of Control Science and Engineering

Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 982369, 10 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/982369

## On Approximation of Entropy Solutions for One System of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Conservation Laws with Impulse Source Terms

^{1}Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettronica e Ingegneria Informatica, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Via Ponte don Melillo, 84084 Fisciano, Italy^{2}Department of Differential Equations, Dnipropetrovsk National University, Gagarin Avenue, 72, 49010 Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine

Received 9 September 2010; Accepted 18 December 2010

Academic Editor: Yoshito Ohta

Copyright © 2010 Ciro D'Apice et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

We study one class of nonlinear fluid dynamic models with impulse source terms. The model consists of a system of two hyperbolic conservation laws: a nonlinear conservation law for the goods density and a linear evolution equation for the processing rate. We consider the case when influx-rates in the second equation take the form of impulse functions. Using the vanishing viscosity method and the so-called principle of fictitious controls, we show that entropy solutions to the original Cauchy problem can be approximated by optimal solutions of special optimization problems.

#### 1. Introduction

The main goal of this paper is to approximate entropy solutions to a Cauchy problem for the system of nonlinear balance laws with an impulse source term. Conservation laws, taking the form of hyperbolic partial differential equations, appear in a variety of applications that offer control or identification of parameters, including the control of traffic and water flows, the modeling of supply chains, gas pipelines, blood flows, and so forth. The analysis of conservation laws is a very active research area. The main difficulty in dealing with them is the fact that the solution of such systems may develop discontinuities (after a finite time), that propagate in time even for smooth initial and boundary conditions (see [1–3]). Usually such solutions can be formed by the so-called rarefaction or shock waves. Therefore, it makes a sense to consider a more flexible notion of solutions, which are physically meaningful and whose admissibility issue is related to the notions of entropy and energy.

We analyze the following initial value problem for the system of nonlinear conservation laws Throughout this paper we suppose that the structure of the source term is prescribed, namely, where the functions can play the role of control factors, and denote the Dirac measures located at the points .

In the recent applications of the model (1) to the supply chain problem [4], represents the density of objects or the concentration of a physical quantity processed by the supply chain (modeled by a real line ), and is the processing rate. However, to the best knowledge of authors, the existence and uniqueness of entropy solutions to the problems of conservation laws with impulse controls is an open problem even for the simplest situation. Thus our prime interest is to discuss the approximation approach to the construction of entropy solutions for the above problem. To this end, we apply the vanishing viscosity method and the so-called principle of fictitious controls. We prove that entropy solutions to the Cauchy problem (1)–(2) can be approximated by optimal solutions of special optimization problems. Namely, we introduce the following penalized optimization problem subject to the constraints where is a fictitious control. We carry out the analysis of this problem and show that under some additional assumptions every cluster pair (in an appropriate topology) of the sequence of optimal solutions to the penalized problem (3)-(4) is an entropy solution to the Cauchy problem (1).

#### 2. Notation and Preliminaries

Let and be two fixed constants such that . For a given we set and . Let , with , be the locally convex space of all measurable functions such that for all compact sets .

Let be the set of all Radon measures on , that is, if *μ* is a countably additive set function defined on the Borel subsets of such that *μ* is finite on every compact subset of . We say that a sequence of Radon measures converges weakly- to a measure (in symbols ) if

A subset of is called to be bounded if for every compact set we have
where denotes the total variation of *μ*. The following compactness result for measures is well known.

Proposition 1. *Let be a bounded sequence of Radon measures on . Then there exist a subsequence and a Radon measure such that .*

According to the Riesz theory, every Radon measure *μ* on can be identified with an element of the dual space , that is, *μ* is a linear form on and for every compact set there exists a constant depending only on and *μ* such that
As an example of a Radon measure on , we consider the following one. Let and be two sequences in such that . Let be the Dirac measure located at the point , that is, this measure is defined as follows
Since
for every continuous function with compact support , it follows that the linear form
is continuous on . Hence is an element of the space of Radon measures .

Let be a bounded open subset of . Let be an element of . Define According to the Radon-Nikodym theorem, if then the distribution is a measure and there exist a function and a measure , singular with respect to the one-dimensional Lebesgue measure restricted to , such that

*Definition 2. *A function is said to have a bounded variation in if the derivative exists in the sense of distributions and belongs to the class of Radon measures with bounded total variation, that is, . By we denote the space of all functions in with bounded variation.

Under the norm is a Banach space. The following compactness result for -functions is well known.

Proposition 3. *The uniformly bounded sets in -norm are relatively compact in , that is, if and , then there exists a subsequence of strongly converging in to some .*

*Definition 4. *A sequence weakly converges to some , and we write if and only if the two following conditions hold: strongly in , and weakly* in .

In the following proposition we give a compactness result related to this convergence, together with the lower semicontinuity property (see [5]).

Proposition 5. *Let be a sequence in strongly converging to some in and satisfying . Then *(i)* and ; *(ii)* in . *

#### 3. Statement of Problem and Main Motivation

Let be a given finite family of points such that . We focus on the following fluid dynamic model, expressed by the nonlinear inhomogeneous hyperbolic conservation laws: where the source term is subjected to the following constraints: Here are some external distributed sources located at the corresponding points , are data functions, and is a flux function.

We note that a particular case of the initial value problem (14)–(16) is a perturbed model for the supply chain (represented by a real line), where represents the density of objects or the concentration of a physical quantity processed by the supply chain (modeled by a real line ), is the processing rate, and is a source term associated with an influx-rate.

In order to give a precise description of the set of admissible source terms to the Cauchy problem (14)–(18), we note that for any function of type (17), we have

Hence, it is natural to define the following class:

*Definition 6. *Let be a fixed source term. We say that a vector value function is a weak solution to (14)–(16) if the identities
hold true for all -functions and with compact supports in and , respectively. Here
and the symbol denotes the tensor product .

The characteristic feature of the initial value problem (14)–(16) is that even for arbitrary smooth functions , , and smooth external sources , , a weak solution to (14)–(16), is, in general, not unique (see [2, 3]). Hence, in order to select the “physically" relevant solution, some additional conditions must be imposed. Following [2, 3, 6], we can introduce the entropy-admissibility condition, coming from physical considerations.

*Definition 7. *A -function is an entropy for the system (14)-(15), if it is convex and there exists a -function such that
The function is said an entropy flux for . The pair is said an entropy flux pair for the system (14)-(15).

*Remark 8. *Note that the -functions in Definition 7 form a special family of convex entropy pairs. However, any convex function defined on an open set is locally Lipschitz, and therefore is defined almost everywhere. This allows us to call a -function an entropy, if there exists a sequence of -entropies converging to locally uniformly as . Moreover a -function is a corresponding entropy flux, if there exists a sequence of -entropy fluxes of converging to locally uniformly.

As a result, an entropy solution of (14)–(16) for a given can be defined as follows.

*Definition 9. *Let be a given source term with prescribed location . A weak solution to the Cauchy problem (14)–(16) is said entropy admissible if for any constants the entropy inequalities
hold true for all positive functions , provided that

*Remark 10. *Note that the existence and differential properties of entropy solutions to the Cauchy problem (14)–(16) with impulse influx-rate (17) in the sense of Definition 9 are unknown in general. To the best knowledge of authors, the problems (14)–(17) with measure data in the right hand side are not covered by the classical theory of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws. Moreover, we cannot assert that entropy admissible solutions to the above problem are elements of the class
which is a natural functional space for the scalar hyperbolic conservation laws (see [2, 7, 8]). Usually these properties essentially depend not only on the flux function , but also on the properties of the admissible source terms , which typically, in contrast to our case, are supposed to be bounded in and closed in (see [8]).

Taking this motivation into account, it is reasonable to introduce the following concept.

*Definition 11. *Let be a given source term. We say that a vector value function is an approximately entropy solution to the Cauchy problem (14)–(16) in a domain , if is a weak solution in the sense of Definition 6 and there exists a sequence such that (B1) and in as ; (B2)for any constants and for all positive concave functions the entropy inequalities
it hold true for every with , , , and .

#### 4. A Perturbation Framework

As was mentioned above the existence and uniqueness of entropy solutions for nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws (14)–(16) with source terms (17), where for all , and with initial distributions , is not covered by the classical theory. In view of this, we apply in this section the scheme of “vanishing viscosity" method and the principle of fictitious controls.

To begin with, we impose the following assumptions on the flux function:

(A1) the function is locally Lipschitz, that is, , and is a piecewise linear mapping.

*Remark 12. *As was shown in recent works [4, 9–11], a flux function of the fluid dynamic model for supply chains is the following:
Hence, the fulfilment of Hypothesis (A1) is obvious in this case.

Let be a small positive parameter associated with a viscosity coefficient. Then instead of the fluid dynamic system (14)–(16), we focus on the following singular perturbed system of nonlinear PDEs: subjected to the constraints where is a fictitious control. By we denote the set of all fictitious controls satisfying conditions (37).

Since , it is natural to assume that there is a compact interval such that and almost everywhere in . Then taking a sufficiently big open bounded interval including the interval , we can suppose that the rate processing and the density vanish at the ends of . As a result, we can introduce the following boundary conditions into the model (32)–(37):

Since by the initial assumptions the influx-rate and the fictitious control belong to the space of measure data , we make the notion of solution for the problem (32)–(38) precise. To this end, we give the following theorem which plays an important role in the study of partial differential equations (see [12]).

Theorem 13. *Let one defines the Banach spaces:
**
equipped with the norm of the graph. Then, the following properties hold true: *(1)*the embeddings , are compact; *(2)*one has the embedding
where, for or , denotes the space of measurable functions on such that for any and such that the map is continuous; *(3)* for any *(4)*let . Then the following density result holds: for any there exists , such that*

Further we note that by the Friedrichs inequality, we have Hence the bilinear form is bounded on . Moreover, this form is skew-symmetric by the identity which remains valid for all by continuity. Then, we come to the following classical result (see [12, 13]).

Theorem 14. *Assume that and Hypothesis (A1) holds true. Then for every the initial-boundary value problem (32)–(38) admits a unique solution satisfying the integral identities:
**
with a priori estimates
**
where is a constant independent of and are such that , , , and in (the so-called compatibility condition).*

Note that in this case by the embedding (41), and the terms in the right-hand sides of (46)-(47) are well defined, because by the classical Sobolev Embedding Theorem. Moreover, in the one-dimensional case every Radon measure can be identified with an element of , that is, . As a result, the integral identity (47) with a source term can be rewritten as follows:

In conclusion of this section we state the following entropy property of the weak solutions to the initial-boundary value problem (32)–(38).

Lemma 15. *Let be a given source term with prescribed location . Let be a sequence of corresponding weak solutions to the initial boundary value problem (32)–(38) where the small parameter varies in a strictly decreasing sequence of positive numbers converging to 0. Let be a bounded sequence of fictitious controls. Assume that supposition (A1) holds true. Then for every , , and for all positive concave functions , each of the pairs satisfies the following integral inequalities:
**
with , , , and .*

*Proof. *Let be any convex function. We multiply (32) by . Then the equalities
imply the following relation
By the initial assumptions, for every the functions can be zero-extended to the domain . Now let us multiply equality (58) by a test function and integrate it over . Using the integration by parts and the fact that and a.e. in , we transfer all derivatives to the test function :
Since for all and by the classical Sobolev Embedding Theorem, it follows that the following term is well defined:
Further we use the well-known trick. Let be a sequence of -functions approximating the function uniformly on . Substitute in the inequality (59) and pass to the limit as . Note that we can choose in such way that is bounded and for all , . Since in and
it immediately leads us to the entropy inequality (55) from (59). The verification of inequality (56) can be done by similar arguments.

#### 5. The Penalized Optimization Problem

In this section, for every and a given influx-rate , we analyze the following penalized optimization problem associated with the singular perturbed initial-boundary value problem (32)–(38):

*Definition 16. *We say that a pair is admissible to the optimization problem (62)-(63) if and is the corresponding weak solution to the initial boundary value problem (32), (34), and (38).

Let be the set of all admissible solutions to the perturbed problem (62)-(63). As follows from Theorem 13, for every , is a nonempty subset of the space:

*Remark 17. *We note that the cost functional (63) is well defined on for every . Indeed, let be any representative of . By supposition (A1), we have that is a piecewise linear mapping and . Hence is in , and by the definition of the class . Since , we come to the required conclusion.

We define the -topology on as follows: is the product of the weak- topology of and the topology of norm in . Then we have the following topological properties of the set of admissible solutions to the perturbed optimization problem (62)-(63).

Lemma 18. *Assume that supposition (A1) holds true. Then the set is nonempty and sequentially -closed for every .*

*Proof. *For a fixed let be an arbitrary pair of source terms. Then Theorem 14 implies the existence of a unique pair such that and are the corresponding weak solutions to the initial boundary value problem (32)–(34), (38). Since
and , we conclude that and hence .

To establish the -closedness of , we fix an arbitrary -converging sequence of admissible solutions to the perturbed problem (32)–(38) and (62) and show that , where is its -limit.

We have that in and in . Hence and it remains to show that is the corresponding weak solution of the initial-boundary value problem (32), (34), and (38). Indeed, in view of the a priori estimate (48), it is easy to see that the -limit function belongs to the space and satisfies conditions:
This enables us to pass to the limit in the integral identity (46) as with and , and eo ipso to show that the limit function is a weak solution to the parabolic problem (32), (34), (38).

Thus, the pair is an admissible solution to the perturbed optimization problem (32)–(38), (62). The proof is complete.

In conclusion of this section, we prove that the penalized problem (32)–(38), (62) has a nonempty set of optimal solutions.

Theorem 19. *Assume that supposition (A1) holds true. Then for every and there exists at least one pair such that
**
that is, the problem (32)–(38), (62) is solvable.*

*Proof. *Since and the cost functional is bounded below on , it follows that there exists a sequence such that
that is, is a minimizing sequence for the problem (32)–(38), (62).

To begin with, we show that for any the set
is bounded in . Indeed, as follows from inequality (68), the sequence of fictitious controls is bounded in . Hence, we may assume that there exists an element such that in as , that is,
Then having used the a priori estimate (48), we see that form a uniformly bounded sequence in . Hence, we may again assume that, up to a subsequence, there exists an element such that weakly in and strongly in . As a result, by Lemma 18.

Let us show that the -limit pair is an optimal solution to the penalized problem (32)–(38), (62). Indeed, taking into account supposition (A1) and Theorem 14, we have
Using the property of lower semi-continuity for with respect to the -topology, we get
Thus the pair is optimal for the problem (32)–(38), (62).

#### 6. Approximation Properties of the Perturbed Optimization Problem

The aim of this section is to study the asymptotic behavior of the optimal solutions to the penalized optimization problem (32)–(38), (62) as the small parameter tends to zero. To begin with, we note that for every the set of admissible solutions is embedded in the topological space , where and is the product of the weak- topology of and the strong topology of . So, we can take as the main topology for the asymptotic analysis.

Lemma 20. *Let a given source term with prescribed location . Let be a sequence of corresponding weak solutions to the initial boundary value problem (33), (34), (38) when the small parameter varies in a strictly decreasing sequence of positive numbers converging to 0. Let be a sequence of optimal solutions to the penalized problem (32)–(38), (62). Assume that the fictitious controls are bounded in and supposition (A1) holds true. Then subsequences of and of , still denoted by the suffix , can be extracted such that *(a)* in ; *(b)* and weakly in and strongly in ; *(c)* is a weak solution in of the Cauchy problem:*

*Proof. *As follows from the a priori estimates (50)-(51), the sequences and are bounded in
Hence the compactness properties (a)-(b) of the sequences , , and are a direct consequence of the initial suppositions, the Banach-Alaoglu Theorem, and the compactness embedding . Moreover, as follows from estimates (48)-(49), the sequence is bounded in . So, we can suppose that
strongly in and weakly in . In view of estimates (48)-(49), there are elements such that, up to subsequences, we have
In order to verify the item (c), we note that the integral identity (46) leads us to the following relation:
which holds true for every and any test function . Since in as , we can pass to the limit in (79) using the property (77)-(78). As a result, we come to the relation
which gives us the weak formulation of the hyperbolic conservation law (75). As for the initial condition (75), we note that by continuity property (41) the following identity
is valid for every . So, we can pass to the limit in (81) as using the weak convergence of in . As a result, the initial condition for the limit function is satisfied in the following sense:
Thus, is a weak solution to the Cauchy problem (74). By analogy, similar properties for the limit function can be proved. This concludes the proof.

The next result is crucial in this paper. We show that approximately entropy weak solutions to the system of nonlinear conservation laws with impulse controls can be constructed by optimal solutions to the penalized problem (32)–(38) and (62).

Theorem 21. *Let be a given source term with prescribed location . Assume that there exists a sequence of pairs satisfying the following relation:
**
Let be a sequence of optimal solutions to the penalized problem (32)–(38) and (62). Then, under supposition (A1), for every -cluster point of the sequence we has that the triplet is an approximately entropy solution to the Cauchy problem (14)–(16) in the domain and the equality is valid almost everywhere in . Here the distribution is defined by (75).*

*Remark 22. *It is worth to notice that the existence of a sequence satisfying relation (83) is rather important for our further analysis and this assumption is coming from the regularity property of the original Cauchy problem (14)–(18). Here by the regularity of Cauchy problem (14)–(18) we mean that this problem admits at least one entropy solution. Since the existence of such solutions is unknown in general, we must assume it. Only in this case it has a sense to construct an approximation of entropy solutions. So, for the regular Cauchy problem (14)–(18), the sequence can be constructed as follows: for all , and is the corresponding solution of the perturbed problem (32)–(37). As for the general case, we demand the fulfilment of the condition (83).

*Proof. *As Lemma 20 indicates, the sequence is relatively compact with respect to the strong convergence in and the weak convergence in . So, passing to a subsequence, when the occasion requires, we get
where is a weak solution to the Cauchy problem (75). For our further analysis we have to show that
Indeed, let be a fixed test function. Then the following estimate holds:
Hence the sequence is uniformly bounded in . Therefore, in view of (84), we can suppose that and
As a result, applying the arguments of Remark 17, we come to the required conclusion (85).

Let be a sequence with property (83). Then there exist a value and a constant independent of such that the following inequality holds true:
Hence the sequence of optimal fictitious controls is bounded in . Therefore, by Lemma 20 the sequence of optimal pairs is relatively compact with respect to the -topology of . Moreover, every -cluster point possesses the properties (a)–(c) of Lemma 20.

Further we note that the inequality (88) leads to the estimate
Since in (see (85)), in , and , we can pass to the limit in (89) as . Then, in view of the lower semicontinuity property, we obtain
Since this is equivalent to the equality almost every where in , by Lemma 15 it follows that the pair is an approximately entropy solution to the initial-boundary value problem (32)–(38). This concludes the proof.

#### 7. Conclusion

In this article, we have proposed the approximation of entropy solutions for the system of two hyperbolic conservation laws (14)–(16) with impulse source terms. We have considered the case when influx-rates in the second equation (15) take the form of impulse functions (17)-(18). Since the existence of entropy solutions for Cauchy problem (14)–(18) is not covered by the classical theory, we combine the vanishing viscosity method and the so-called principle of fictitious controls in order to show that entropy solutions to the original Cauchy problem can be approximated by optimal solutions of special optimization problems. The main result is given by Theorem 21, where we conclude that every -cluster pair of the sequence of optimal solutions to the penalized problem (32)–(38), (62) is an approximately entropy solution to the Cauchy problem (14)–(16).

#### References

- A. Bressan,
*Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws—The One-dimensional Cauchy Problem*, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2000. - S. Kruzhkov, “First-order quasilinear equations in several independent variables,”
*Mathematics of the USSR-Sbornik*, vol. 10, pp. 217–243, 1970. View at Google Scholar - P. D. Lax,
*Hyperbolic System of Conservation Laws and the Mathematical Theory of Shock Waves*, SIAM, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1973. - C. D'apice and R. Manzo, “A fluid dynamic model for supply chains,”
*Networks and Heterogeneous Media*, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 379–398, 2006. View at Google Scholar - E. Giusti,
*Minimal Surfaces and Functions of Bounded Variation*, Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass, USA, 1984. - M. Garavello and B. Piccoli,
*Traffic Flow on Networks*, vol. 1 of*AIMS Series on Applied Mathematics*, 2006. - G. A. Chechkin and A. Yu. Goritsky, “S. N. Kruzhkov’s lectures on first-order quasilinear PDEs,”
*Analytical and Numerical Aspects of PDEs*, pp. 1–67, 2010. View at Google Scholar - S. Ulbrich,
*Optimal Control of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Conservation Laws with Source Terms*, Fakultät für Mathematik,Technische Universität München, 2002. - D. Armbruster, D. Marthaler, and C. Ringhofer, “Kinetic and fluid model hierarchies for supply chains,”
*SIAM Journal on Multiscale Modeling and Simulation*, vol. 2, pp. 43–61, 2004. View at Google Scholar - S. Göttlich, M. Herty, and A. Klar, “Modelling and optimization of supply chains on complex networks,”
*Communications in Mathematical Sciences*, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 315–330, 2006. View at Google Scholar - C. Kirchner, M. Herty, S. Göttlich, and A. Klar, “Optimal control for continuous supply network models,”
*Networks and Heterogeneous Media*, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 675–688, 2006. View at Google Scholar - J. L. Lions,
*Some Methods of Solving Non-Linear Boundary Value Problems*, Dunod-Gauthier-Villars, Paris, France, 1969. - V. A. Solonnikov, “A priori estimates for equations of second order parabolic type,”
*Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta imeni V.A. Steklova*, vol. 70, pp. 133–212, 1960. View at Google Scholar