Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Control Science and Engineering
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 943795, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/943795
Research Article

Material Selection in Engineering Design Using Choquet Integral-Based Linguistic Operators under Hybrid Environment

Engineering Training Center, Huaihai Institute of Technology, Lianyungang, Jiangsu 222005, China

Received 27 March 2015; Revised 1 July 2015; Accepted 14 July 2015

Academic Editor: Kalyana C. Veluvolu

Copyright © 2015 Anhua Peng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. M. Tawancy, A. Ul-Hamid, A. I. Mohammed, and N. M. Abbas, “Effect of materials selection and design on the performance of an engineering product—an example from petrochemical industry,” Materials & Design, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 686–703, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Khare, M. Dell'Amico, C. Knight, and S. McGarry, “Selection of materials for high temperature sensible energy storage,” Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, vol. 115, pp. 114–122, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K.-P. Lin, H.-P. Ho, K.-C. Hung, and P.-F. Pai, “Combining fuzzy weight average with fuzzy inference system for material substitution selection in electric industry,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1034–1045, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. Anojkumar, M. Ilangkumaran, and V. Sasirekha, “Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 2964–2980, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Wu and D. Barnes, “Formulating partner selection criteria for agile supply chains: a Dempster-Shafer belief acceptability optimisation approach,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 284–293, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Jahan, M. Y. Ismail, S. M. Sapuan, and F. Mustapha, “Material screening and choosing methods—a review,” Materials & Design, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 696–705, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A.-H. Peng and X.-M. Xiao, “Material selection using PROMETHEE combined with analytic network process under hybrid environment,” Materials & Design, vol. 47, pp. 643–652, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. F. Ashby, Y. J. M. Bréchet, D. Cebon, and L. Salvo, “Selection strategies for materials and processes,” Materials & Design, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 51–67, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D.-F. Li and S.-P. Wan, “Fuzzy heterogeneous multiattribute decision making method for outsourcing provider selection,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 3047–3059, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Jahan, F. Mustapha, S. M. Sapuan, M. Y. Ismail, and M. Bahraminasab, “A framework for weighting of criteria in ranking stage of material selection process,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 58, no. 1–4, pp. 411–420, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. Karande, S. K. Gauri, and S. Chakraborty, “Applications of utility concept and desirability function for materials selection,” Materials & Design, vol. 45, pp. 349–358, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H.-C. Liu, L.-X. Mao, Z.-Y. Zhang, and P. Li, “Induced aggregation operators in the VIKOR method and its application in material selection,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 6325–6338, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. G. U. Wei, X. F. Zhao, R. Lin, and H. J. Wang, “Generalized triangular fuzzy correlated averaging operator and their application to multiple attribute decision making,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 2975–2982, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. M.-L. Tseng, J. H. Chiang, and L. W. Lan, “Selection of optimal supplier in supply chain management strategy with analytic network process and choquet integral,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 330–340, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Z. B. Wu and Y. H. Chen, “The maximizing deviation method for group multiple attribute decision making under linguistic environment,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 158, no. 14, pp. 1608–1617, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. F. Herrera and L. Martinez, “A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words,” IEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 8, no. 66, pp. 746–752, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. F. Herrera, L. Martínez, and P. J. Sánchez, “Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 115–132, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Q. Tan, “A multi-criteria interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making with Choquet integral-based TOPSIS,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 3023–3033, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Grabisch, “k-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 167–189, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. J.-L. Marichal, “Entropy of discrete Choquet capacities,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 137, no. 3, pp. 612–624, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. R. V. Rao and J. P. Davim, “A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 35, no. 7-8, pp. 751–760, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J.-Z. Wu, Q. Zhang, and S.-J. Sang, “Supplier evaluation model based on fuzzy measures and choquet integral,” Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 109–114, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Z. S. Xu, “A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations,” Information Sciences, vol. 166, no. 1–4, pp. 19–30, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  24. G.-W. Wei, “A method for multiple attribute group decision making based on the ET-WG and ET-OWG operators with 2-tuple linguistic information,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 7895–7900, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Z. S. Xu, “An overview of methods for determining OWA weights,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 843–865, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. G. Büyüközkan, O. Feyzioğlu, and M. S. Ersoy, “Evaluation of 4PL operating models: a decision making approach based on 2-additive Choquet integral,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 112–120, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S.-J. Chen and S.-M. Chen, “Fuzzy risk analysis based on measures of similarity between interval-valued fuzzy numbers,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1670–1685, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  28. Z. S. Xu, “Induced uncertain linguistic OWA operators applied to group decision making,” Information Fusion, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 231–238, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus