Journal of Control Science and Engineering

Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 8595960, 13 pages

https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8595960

## Fault-Tolerant Control of a Nonlinear System Actuator Fault Based on Sliding Mode Control

^{1}College of Electrical and Information Engineering, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, Hunan 412007, China^{2}School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Changfan Zhang

Received 7 December 2016; Revised 28 January 2017; Accepted 5 February 2017; Published 9 March 2017

Academic Editor: Xiao He

Copyright © 2017 Jing He et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

This paper presents a fault-tolerant control scheme for a class of nonlinear systems with actuator faults and unknown input disturbances. First, the sliding mode control law is designed based on the reaching law method. Then, in view of unpredictable state variables and unknown information in the control law, the original system is transformed into two subsystems through a coordinate transformation. One subsystem only has actuator faults, and the other subsystem has both actuator faults and disturbances. A sliding mode observer is designed for the two subsystems, respectively, and the equivalence principle of the sliding mode variable structure is used to realize the accurate reconstruction of the actuator faults and disturbances. Finally, the observation value and the reconstruction value are used to carry out an online adjustment to the designed sliding mode control law, and fault-tolerant control of the system is realized. The simulation results are presented to demonstrate the approach.

#### 1. Introduction

In recent years, theoretical research in fault-tolerant control has made great progress in the practical applications [1–8]. Fault-tolerant control scheme is widely studied in linear systems. Tao and Xu studied the fault-tolerant control of known and unknown parameters of high-speed train dynamics model [9, 10]. Yu and Jiang proposed an innovative strategy for compensating the actuator faults to optimize system performance [11]. Shen et al. presented an integrated design method of adaptive robust control for a linear system with adaptive fault identification [12]. And Zhao et al. studied an adaptive sliding mode control for damage problems [13]. However, most of the actual objects are nonlinear, and some of the working points in the linear systems will enter the nonlinear region when it has a fault. For systems of actuator with random failures and uncertain parameters, Fan et al. studied its stabilization and tracking problem, but they did not consider the disturbance of unknown inputs [14]. Yin et al. presented a fault-tolerant control system scheme for real-time performance optimization, but they did not consider the effect of actuator faults [15]. In view of uncertain overdrive systems, Zhang et al. proposed a robust control allocation algorithm based on pseudoinverse, which is compensated for the negative influence of the failure and stuck fault [16]. Hu et al. presented an adaptive terminal sliding mode control method, found the finite time control of the attitude tracking, and solved the problem of actuator control input saturation [17]. However, these two methods did not obtain accurate fault values.

The concept of sliding mode variable structure control is to design the switching hyperplane of the system according to the expected dynamic characteristics of the system. The variable structure controller is used to drive the system state from the initial state to the switching hyperplane in a finite time and then maintain its state at the switching hyperplane. Once the system state reaches the switching hyperplane, the control function will ensure that the system travels along the switching hyperplane to reach the origin of the system. The system characteristics and parameters are entirely dependent on the designed switching hyperplane but are unrelated to external disturbances. Hence, the sliding mode variable structure control is extremely robust and has been widely applied in studies of nonlinear systems.

Based on the work of Zhao et al. about the adaptive sliding mode control in the literature [13], considering a class of nonlinear systems with actuator faults and unknown input disturbances, this paper innovatively presents precisely a fault-tolerant control method with disturbance and fault reconstruction. To fulfill the above scheme, a fault-tolerant control law with sliding mode control is first proposed here. A fault diagnosis and reconstruction method is used to carry out accurate reconstruction of unknown information, and finally the observation value and the reconstruction value are used to carry out the corresponding adjustment of the control law. The simulation results show that the proposed control method can meet the requirements of control accurately and reliably.

The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the mathematical model of nonlinear systems with actuator faults and unknown input disturbances. Section 3 presents a fault-tolerant control law based on the sliding mode control. The design of observer is discussed in Section 4. Then the fault reconstruction and the disturbance estimation are discussed in Section 5. Section 6 presents an online adjustment of the fault-tolerant control law. Simulation results are presented in Section 7, and conclusion is in Section 8.

#### 2. Problem Description

We have an uncertain nonlinear system affected by actuator faults and unknown disturbances:where is the state variables, is the system inputs, and is the outputs. Assume the nonlinear continuous term is known. The unknown nonlinear term models the lumped uncertainties and disturbances experienced by the system, which is assumed to be bounded; that is, a positive constant exists such that . The unknown nonlinear term represents actuator faults, supposed to be norm bounded; that is, there exists a constant such that . , , , , and are known constant matrices with .

#### 3. A Fault-Tolerant Control Law

The active fault-tolerant control for faulty system (1) can be described as follows: If there is no fault, that is, , it is considered to be a nominal system; any appropriate control law is designed to achieve the gradual stability of the nominal system. If there is a fault, that is, , an additional control law is designed to address and fix the fault. Thus, for a faulty system, the control law can be designed:where is the nominal control law for the corresponding fault-free system.

If the specified system state command is defined as , , the system error can be represented asTherefore, the sliding mode surface is represented aswhere is a matrix that will be designed.

From (4), the following equation can be obtained:The control law is designed aswhere parameters and are constant to be designed and is the generalized inverse matrix of . If there is no fault, that is, , the control law of the nominal system isIf there is a fault, that is, , the additional control law is

Lemma 1. *For the nonlinear system described in (1), the designed fault-tolerant control is shown in (6). When and , the system is in the stability condition of a sliding mode.*

*Proof. *Consider the following Lyapunov function:The time derivative of , along with (5), isThe following equation can be obtained by taking the substitution of (6) into (10): When and , the following equation can be obtained:This completes the proof.

It can be seen from the above analysis that the system can satisfy the asymptotic stability requirement; namely, it will be driven to the corresponding sliding mode surface in a finite period of time.

#### 4. Observer Design

Equation (6) contains the system state variable , the disturbance , and the actuator fault , where these variables are often unknown in control law. Therefore, we carry out the system state observations through the method of “designing observer,” where the disturbance and actuator fault are reconstructed accurately again on this basis to obtain the corresponding state observation value and reconstruction values and of the disturbance and fault, which are substituted into (6) to determine the control.

*Assumption 2. * is a column full rank matrix and .

*Remark 3. *If the disturbance distribution matrix is not a column full rank matrix, for example, , then a rank decomposition could be applied, where is a column full rank matrix and could be considered as a new unknown disturbance [18].

*Assumption 4. *The matrix pair is observable.

The matrix is partitioned for (1) to obtain the following equation:where , , , , , , , , , , , and is a nonsingular matrix.

Based on Assumption 2, two transformation matrices, namely, and , exist [19] such thatTherefore, (1) could be converted as follows:whereand is a nonsingular matrix.

The following nonsingular transformation matrix is then constructed [19]:Therefore, the coefficient matrices in (15) are as follows:where , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and .

System (15) is then transformed into the following subsystems:

Two subsystems, (19) and (20), could be obtained from system (1) by matrix transformation. Subsystem (19) is free from any uncertainties but is subjected to system actuator faults; subsystem (20) has actuator faults and uncertainties. The detail design of two sliding mode observers corresponding to the above subsystems will be presented as follows.

*Assumption 5. * and are observable.

*Assumption 6. *The nonlinear functions and are assumed to be known and satisfied the Lipschitz conditions, such thatwhere and are known Lipschitz positive constants.

Based on the transformed systems (19) and (20), the present study proposes the following two sliding mode observers:where superscript “ ” indicates an estimated value and and represent the input signals of the sliding mode observers:where and are the observer gains and and are positive scalars that will be designed.

*Assumption 7. *The existing arbitrary matrices and and symmetric positive definite matrices and will satisfy the following equations:From Assumption 5 we know that the existing matrices and will make and become stable matrices:If the state estimation errors are defined as , , and and the output estimation errors are defined as and , then, from (19), (20), and (23), the state estimation errors dynamical systems are described by

Lemma 8. *Considering the error dynamics system (27) and (28) and Assumptions 6 and 7, if the following LMI is satisfiedand the parameters and satisfythen and are asymptotically convergent; that is,where is a positive constant and is a q-dimensional identity matrix.*

*Proof. *Consider the following Lyapunov function:The derivative of along with the error dynamic systems (27) and (28) isLetthenSince the inequality is true for any scalar , thenFrom Assumption 7, the following equation can be obtained:Equations (36) to (37) are substituted into (33) to obtain turns out to be negative definite by imposingThe linear matrix inequality is satisfiedsuch thatso that will make a global asymptotic convergence to zero; that is,This completes the proof.

*Remark 9. *Lemma 8 implies that and are bounded; that is, will exist if where , , and are three finite positive scalars.

Lemma 10. *Choose the sliding mode surfaces and . Suppose Assumptions 6 and 7 and inequality (43) hold; besides, is chosen sufficiently large to satisfy Then the error system (27) and (28) will be driven to the corresponding sliding mode surface in finite time. and are positive constants.*

*Proof. *(1) We select the Lyapunov function as follows:The time derivative of along the trajectories of system (27) is given byFrom and (43), it follows that We design which satisfiesthen(2) Consider a Lyapunov function candidateThe time derivative of along the trajectories of system (28) is given byBy the same reasoning as in the proof of the previous steps, it follows thatWe design which satisfiesthenThis completes the proof.

This result shows that the sliding mode reachability condition is satisfied. As a consequence, based on the sliding mode equivalent principle, an ideal sliding motion will take place on the surface and after some finite time.

#### 5. Fault Reconstruction and Disturbance Estimation

When the system reaches the sliding mode surface, according to the sliding mode equivalent principle [20]. The following equations are obtained:

##### 5.1. The Reconstruction of Actuator Fault

From (55), we obtain the following:

From (42), it follows thatThe sigmoid function was used to replace to weaken the chattering problem of the sliding mode, where the reconstructed value of the actuator fault iswhere is a positive constant to be designed.

##### 5.2. The Estimation of the Unknown Input Disturbance

From (56), we obtain the following:

From (42), it follows thatThe sigmoid function was used to replace to weaken the chattering problem of the sliding mode, where the reconstruction value of the disturbance iswhere is a positive constant to be designed.

#### 6. Adjustment of the Fault-Tolerant Control Law

In view of the control law designed for the faulted system in (1), the observed value of the system state, the reconstructed values from (62), and from (59) of the disturbance and fault, respectively, were substituted into (6). The adjusted control law becomes

At this point, the control law in (7) adjusted to a nominal system isThe additional control law in (8) is adjusted toStability analysis is as follows.

Consider the following Lyapunov function:The time derivative of along with (5) and (63) is

It follows from (43) thatFinally, if the positive constant is chosen such thatwe obtain

It can be seen from the above analysis that the system can satisfy the asymptotic stability.

#### 7. Simulation Example

Consider a robot arm whose motion equation is as follows [21]:where and are the link displacement and the rotor displacement, respectively. The link inertia , motor rotor inertia , elastic constant , link mass , gravity , connecting rod length* l*, and viscous friction coefficients and are all positive constant parameters. The control is the torque delivered by the motor. The robot parameters are , , , , , , and .

From (1), the parameter matrixes areThe transformational matrix isThe transformational matrix isSet the matrices as

In the control law of (63), the constants are taken to be and . The robotic arm system (71) is a dual input system, where the input signal 1 is and the input signal 2 is . Two square signals were chosen as the “unknown” input disturbance, where one had a period of 1 s and an amplitude of 1 and the other had a period of 2 s with an amplitude of 2. The initial values of the system state variable were taken as 0.6, 0.3, −1.5, and 0.5, respectively. For faultless systems, the simulated experimental results are as follows.

Figures 1 and 3 show two states of and used to separately track the two input signals in the case of different initial values; the given input values were reached quickly, and they remained stable. The errors, and , shown in Figures 2 and 4, prove the point that the tracking effect is good. Figures 5 and 6 are two output signals of the control law, respectively.