Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Control Science and Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 9517385, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9517385
Research Article

A Bayesian Approach to Control Loop Performance Diagnosis Incorporating Background Knowledge of Response Information

Department of Automation, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Sun Zhou; nc.ude.umx@nusuohz

Received 20 June 2017; Accepted 3 August 2017; Published 28 September 2017

Academic Editor: Chunhui Zhao

Copyright © 2017 Sun Zhou and Yiming Wang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. Zhang, R. Gonzalez, B. Huang, and G. Ji, “Expectation-maximization approach to fault diagnosis with missing data,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 1231–1240, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Gonzalez, B. Huang, F. Xu, and A. Espejo, “Dynamic bayesian approach to gross error detection and compensation with application toward an oil sands process,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 44–56, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Ahmed, B. Huang, and S. L. Shah, “Validation of continuous-time models with delay,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 443–454, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. Huang, “Bayesian methods for control loop monitoring and diagnosis,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 829–838, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Yin, S. X. Ding, A. Haghani, H. Hao, and P. Zhang, “A comparison study of basic data-driven fault diagnosis and process monitoring methods on the benchmark Tennessee Eastman process,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1567–1581, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. Jiang, R. Patwardhan, and S. L. Shah, “Root cause diagnosis of plant-wide oscillations using the concept of adjacency matrix,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1347–1354, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. F. Qi, Bayesian approach for control loop diagnosis [Ph.D. dissertation], University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada, 2011.
  8. V. Venkatasubramanian, R. Rengaswamy, K. Yin, and S. N. Kavuri, “A review of process fault detection and diagnosis part I: quantitative model-based methods,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 293–311, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. V. Venkatasubramanian, R. Rengaswamy, and S. N. Kavuri, “A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: part II: qualitative models and search strategies,” Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 313–326, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. V. Venkatasubramanian, R. Rengaswamy, S. N. Kavuri, and K. Yin, “A review of process fault detection and diagnosis part III: process history based methods,” Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 327–346, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. Peng, B. Wang, and J. Dong, “An efficient quality-related fault diagnosis method for real-time multimode industrial process,” Journal of Control Science and Engineering, vol. 2017, Article ID 9560206, 13 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Sun and Z. Liang, “Fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control for non-Gaussian singular time-delayed stochastic distribution systems with disturbance based on the rational square-root model,” Journal of Control Science and Engineering, Article ID 9563481, Art. ID 9563481, 11 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. G. Mani and J. Jerome, “Intuitionistic fuzzy expert system based fault diagnosis using dissolved gas analysis for power transformer,” Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 2058–2064, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. Pulido, V. Puig, T. Escobet, and J. Quevedo, “A new fault localization algorithm that improves the integration between fault detection and localization in dynamic systems,” in Proceedings of 16th International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis, 2005.
  15. M. Daigle, X. Koutsoukos, and G. Biswas, “Multiple fault diagnosis in complex systems,” in Proceedings of 17th International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis, 2006.
  16. M. Askarian, R. Zarghami, F. Jalali-Farahani, and N. Mostoufi, “Fault diagnosis of chemical processes considering fault frequency via Bayesian network,” Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 2315–2325, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. X.-X. He, L.-T. Chen, and H.-T. Jia, “Building cognizance rule knowledge for fault diagnosis based on fuzzy rough sets,” Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2327–2333, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F. Asghar, M. Talha, and S. H. Kim, “Neural network based fault detection and diagnosis system for three-phase inverter in variable speed drive with induction motor,” Journal of Control Science and Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 1286318, 12 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Y. Zhang, H. Wei, R. Liao, Y. Wang, L. Yang, and C. Yan, “A new support vector machine model based on improved imperialist competitive algorithm for fault diagnosis of oil-immersed transformers,” Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 830–839, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. F. Sales, R. Vitale, S. M. de Lima, M. F. Pimentel, L. Stragevitch, and A. Ferrer, “Multivariate statistical process control charts for batch monitoring of transesterification reactions for biodiesel production based on near-infrared spectroscopy,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 94, pp. 343–353, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Yu and S. J. Qin, “Statistical MIMO controller performance monitoring. Part II: Performance diagnosis,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 18, no. 3-4, pp. 297–319, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Pernestal, A Bayesian Approach to Fault Isolation with Application to Diesel Engines [M.S. thesis], School of Electrical Engineering, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, 2007.
  23. F. Qi, B. Huang, and E. C. Tamayo, “A Bayesian approach for control loop diagnosis with missing data,” AIChE Journal, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 179–195, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. Gonzalez and B. Huang, “Data-driven diagnosis with ambiguous hypotheses in historical data: a generalized Dempter-Shafer approach,” in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of Information Fusion (FUSION '13), pp. 2139–2144, July 2013. View at Scopus
  25. R. Gonzalez and B. Huang, “Control loop diagnosis with ambiguous historical operating modes: Part 2, information synthesis based on proportional parametrization,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1441–1454, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. Gonzalez and B. Huang, “Control-loop diagnosis using continuous evidence through kernel density estimation,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 640–651, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. S. Niculescu, T. M. Mitchell, and R. . Rao, “Bayesian network learning with parameter constraints,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 7, pp. 1357–1383, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. O. Nasri, I. Gueddi, P. Dague, and K. Benothman, “Spacecraft actuator diagnosis with principal component analysis: application to the rendez-vous phase of the mars sample return mission,” Journal of Control Science and Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 204918, 11 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. Geiger and D. Heckerman, “A characterization of the Dirichlet distribution through global and local parameter independence,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1344–1369, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  30. A. O’Hagan and J. Forster, Kendall’s Advanced Theory of Statistics, Arnold, London, UK, 2004.
  31. A. Pernestal, Probabilistic fault diagnosis-with automotive applications [Ph.D. dissertation], Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 2009.
  32. L. Wang, S. Sharkh, A. Chipperfield, and A. Cruden, “Dispatch of vehicle-to-grid battery storage using an analytic hierarchy process,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 2952–2965, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar