Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Control Science and Engineering
Volume 2018, Article ID 2198423, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2198423
Research Article

Neural Back-Stepping Control of Hypersonic Flight Vehicle with Actuator Fault

1Department of Computer Science, Guangdong Police College, Guangzhou 510230, China
2School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Qi Wu; moc.621@888iquw

Received 14 October 2017; Accepted 3 January 2018; Published 1 March 2018

Academic Editor: Youqing Wang

Copyright © 2018 Qi Wu and Yuyan Guo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This paper addresses the fault-tolerant control of hypersonic flight vehicle. To estimate the unknown function in flight dynamics, neural networks are employed in controller design. Moreover, in order to compensate the actuator fault, an adaptive signal is introduced in the controller design to estimate the unknown fault parameters. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed approach could obtain satisfying performance.

1. Introduction

Fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant control have been a hot issue since its significance on actual systems with actuator faults. By identifying or estimating unknown faults, the influence of faults could be considered and eliminated in controller design. Representative study on this issue could be found in [1, 2], while in this paper, fault diagnosis have been studied and applied on hypersonic flight vehicle (HFV) whose control methods have attracted a lot of attention. Hypersonic flight vehicle has a much higher speed than traditional aircraft, however due to its special flight environment as well as structure, the controller design of HFV faces more challenges [3].

Currently, most studies on HFV control did not take the actuator fault into consideration. However, unknown fault such as actuator dead-zone is quite common in nonlinear systems and may cause serious consequences [4]. In order to remove the influence caused by actuator fault, several approaches have been studied such as fuzzy control [5], robust control [6, 7], and adaptive compensation [8, 9]. The model of the HFV also contains uncertain nonlinearity. As a result, studies on HFV have concentrated on the estimation of the uncertainty. Among all the methods, neural network has been widely used due to its good performance in approximating unknown nonlinear functions [10].

The model of HFV is highly nonlinear; meanwhile the altitude subsystem could be considered as a strict-feedback system [11]. Therefore, back-stepping method [1214] in HFV control has been widely studied. To eliminate continuous derivatives of each virtual control in back-stepping design, multiple methods such as dynamic surface control [15] and differentiator [14] are combined with back-stepping which makes the approach practicable. It is noticed that in [16] the multiple actuator fault is considered and the robust design is presented to guarantee the system stability. Moreover, in [17], the input dead-zone is considered where the Nussbaum design is included to make the adaptive design available. In this paper, we try to estimate the parameters of system fault in the hypersonic flight dynamics and then the “dynamic inversion” of the actuator fault can be included in the control signal. The whole design is using a back-stepping control law with neural networks and adaptive method.

The paper is organized in 6 parts. In Section 2, the control-oriented model (COM) of HFV considered in this paper is simply introduced. In Sections 3 and 4, the back-stepping controller based on neural networks and adaptive fault estimation is designed and system stability is analysed. The simulation results of the designed controller are shown in Section 5. Finally the summary is given in Section 6.

2. Longitudinal Dynamics of HFV with Actuator Fault

The COM in [18] is employed for study:The detail of the dynamics can be found in [18].

Consider the following actuator fault model:where is the designed control input and is an unknown fault parameter to be estimated.

Remark 1. In HFV systems, the fault will cause error between designed and actual control input and it will result in tracking error or even flight instability.

3. Adaptive Back-Stepping Controller

The strict-feedback form altitude subsystem based on the hypersonic flight dynamics is consideredwhere , , and . , are nonlinear functions of the HFV model.

Assumption 2. In altitude subsystem (3), is a bounded function.

Flight path angle (FPA) tracking error is defined aswhere is the command signal of FPA which is designed via altitude reference signal.

Step 1. Choose virtual control of aswhere is the control gain.
To avoid the continuous derivative of virtual control, the following first-order differentiator is designed:where and are positive designed parameters.

Step 2. Define the tracking error :Choose virtual control of aswhere is the control gain.
The following first-order differentiator is designed:where and are positive designed parameters.

Step 3. Define the tracking error :Due to the uncertainty caused by imprecise model, the nonlinear function may be unknown. Therefore its NN-based estimation value is employed in the control law:where is the control gain and is the estimation of the optimal NN weights , which is obtained via adaptive law:where and are positive parameters. is obtained via radial basis function. Define .

In order to eliminate the influence of unknown constant , signal is introduced in controller design to compensate the actuator:

The adaptive law is designed aswhere and are positive designed parameters. Define the estimation error .

Remark 3. In previous work on HFV dead-zone fault control [17], the paper regarded the dead-zone as a part of the compound disturbance, where robust technique is employed. In our paper, we proposed an adaptive law to estimate the unknown fault parameter and added a compensating signal in the controller so that the influence of dead-zone fault could be directly eliminated, which is shown by Figures 3 and 5 in our manuscript.

Define the velocity tracking error as where is the reference signal. Then the following PID controller is designed:

4. Stability Analysis

Theorem 4. Consider the HFV altitude system (3) with control laws (5), (8), (11), and (13) and adaptive laws (12) and (14); all of the error signals are uniformly ultimately bounded.

Proof. The Lyapunov function candidate is chosen aswhereThe derivative of is obtained asAccording to the conclusion in [19], , in differentiators (6), (9) could estimate and to arbitrary accuracy. Therefore there existswhere , is a positive constant. Substitute the control laws and adaptive laws into (19); there existswhere is the bounded inevitable NN reconstruction error satisfying , where is a positive constant. Define ; consider Assumption 1; is a bounded signal satisfying , where is a positive constant.
The following inequalities hold:The derivative of satisfieswhere and . Then all of the signals in are uniformly ultimately bounded. This completes the proof.

5. Simulation

Let altitude increase m from the initial value; notice that the signal will pass the following filter to make sure the reference signal is smooth enough for tracking:where , , and . The FPA command signal is obtained as where , , is the altitude tracking error, and is the altitude reference signal.

The parameters in the controller are set as , , , , , and . The parameters of first-order differentiator and adaptive laws are chosen as , , , , , , , and . Take the initial states as m, m/s, deg, deg, and deg/s. The fault parameter is set as . The results are as follows.

Figure 1 indicates that the designed controller could obtain good performance on trajectory tracking. Figure 2 shows that the all state variables are bounded. The response of designed adaptive signal and NN weights norm are shown in Figures 3 and 4. The designed control input and actual control input are shown in Figure 5, respectively. The results verify that the adaptive compensation design could eliminate the influence of actuator fault.

Figure 1: Altitude.
Figure 2: FPA, pitching angle, and pitching rate.
Figure 3: Response of .
Figure 4: NN weights norm.
Figure 5: Control input.

6. Conclusion

This paper proposes an adaptive back-stepping control law with NN learning for HFV control. The influence of actuator fault is eliminated by constructing an adaptive compensation signal. Meanwhile, the unknown nonlinearity is estimated by neural networks. The simulation results clearly present the consequence of the above design and verify that the approach could reach the desired tracking performance when actuator fault and model uncertainty exist.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. P. M. Frank, “Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using analytical and knowledge-based redundancy: a survey and some new results,” Automatica, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 459–474, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Xu, B. Jiang, and P. Shi, “Robust NSV fault-tolerant control system design against actuator faults and control surface damage under actuator dynamics,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 5919–5928, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Xu, M. D. Mirmirani, and P. A. Ioannou, “Adaptive sliding mode control design for a hypersonic flight vehicle,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 829–838, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Ibrir, W. F. Xie, and C.-Y. Su, “Adaptive tracking of nonlinear systems with non-symmetric dead-zone input,” Automatica, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 522–530, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Q. Shen, B. Jiang, and V. Cocquempot, “Fault diagnosis and estimation for near-space hypersonic vehicle with sensor faults,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, vol. 226, no. 3, pp. 302–313, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Li, S. Tong, Y. Liu, and T. Li, “Adaptive fuzzy robust output feedback control of nonlinear systems with unknown dead zones based on a small-gain approach,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 164–176, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Zhao, Y. Wang, Y. Li, and S. X. Ding, “H∞ fault estimation for 2-D linear discrete time-varying systems based on krein space method,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Systems, vol. PP, no. 99, Article ID 2723623, pp. 1–10, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Zhao, D. Shen, and Y. Wang, “Fault diagnosis and compensation for two-dimensional discrete time systems with sensor faults and time-varying delays,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 27, no. 16, pp. 3296–3320, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. Y. Wang, D. Zhao, Y. Li, and S. . Ding, “Unbiased minimum variance fault and state estimation for linear discrete time-varying two-dimensional systems,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 5463–5469, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  10. S. Zhang, C. Li, and J. Zhu, “Composite dynamic surface control of hypersonic flight dynamics using neural networks,” Science China Information Sciences, vol. 58, no. 7, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J.-L. Wu, “Stabilizing controllers design for switched nonlinear systems in strict-feedback form,” Automatica, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1092–1096, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. Xu, X. Huang, D. Wang, and F. Sun, “Dynamic surface control of constrained hypersonic flight models with parameter estimation and actuator compensation,” Asian Journal of Control, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 162–174, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. B. Xu, D. Wang, Y. Zhang, and Z. Shi, “DOB based neural control of flexible hypersonic flight vehicle considering wind effects,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 8676–8685, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. B. Xu, D. Yang, Z. Shi, Y. Pan, B. Chen, and F. Sun, “Online recorded data-based composite neural control of strict-feedback systems with application to hypersonic flight dynamics,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. PP, no. 99, Article ID 2743784, pp. 1–11, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Swaroop, J. K. Hedrick, P. P. Yip, and J. . Gerdes, “Dynamic surface control for a class of nonlinear systems,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 1893–1899, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. B. Xu, Y. Guo, Y. Yuan, Y. Fan, and D. Wang, “Fault-tolerant control using command-filtered adaptive back-stepping technique: application to hypersonic longitudinal flight dynamics,” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 553–577, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. B. Xu, “Robust adaptive neural control of flexible hypersonic flight vehicle with dead-zone input nonlinearity,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 1509–1520, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. T. Parker, A. Serrani, S. Yurkovich, M. A. Bolender, and D. B. Doman, “Control-oriented modeling of an air-breathing hypersonic vehicle,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 856–869, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Levant, “Robust Exact Differentiation via Sliding Mode Technique,” Automatica, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 379–384, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus