Optimal Control, Safety Technology, and Electromagnetic Compatibility in the Driving System of Electric Vehicle
View this Special IssueResearch Article  Open Access
Backstepping Control with Disturbance Observer for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Abstract
For the speed tracking control problem of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM), a disturbance observerbased (DOB) backstepping speed tracking control method is presented in this paper. First, to reconstruct the load disturbance, a slowly timevarying disturbance observer for PMSM is constructed. Next, by stability theory, the norm of the observation error and disturbance observer design method are obtained. On the basis of these, through the designing of the virtual control input that include the reconstruction disturbances, and using backstepping control strategy, the DOB controller of the closedloop system is proposed. The obtained controller can achieve high precision speed tracking and disturbance rejection. Finally, some results of evaluative experiments verified the effectiveness of the proposed method for highperformance control and disturbance rejection for the PMSM drive.
1. Introduction
Permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) is receiving increasing attention in highperformance industrial servo applications due to its advantages such as high torque to current ratio, super power density, and fast response, as well as low noise [1, 2]. However, PMSM is a typical high nonlinear, multivariable coupled system. It is sensitive to load disturbance, unmodeled dynamics, nonlinear uncertainties, and parameter uncertainties.
Over the last decades, various design methods have been developed for PMSM control systems, such as adaptive control [3], robust control [4], neural network control [5], predictive control [6], and so on. Recently, to improve the control performances in PMSM systems, much attention has been given to disturbance rejectbased control method [7], which are insensitive to parameter variations and external disturbances. In [8, 9], the fractional order slidingmode control (SMC) scheme has been proposed. The proposed control system not only obtained high control performance but also was robust against to external load disturbance and parameter variations.
To further improve the disturbance rejection performance of SMC, extended slidingmode disturbance observer was proposed in [10, 11], and the estimated system disturbance is considered as the feed forward compensation part to compensate slidingmode speed controller. In [12], an improved SMC scheme to solve timevarying parameters and disturbances for PMSM drive system was proposed. The new speed controller was designed by the nonsingular terminal SMC strategy with the disturbance observer. In [13], a new speed controller is designed by the nonsingular terminal SMC strategy with disturbance observer. The controller can make the motor speed reach the reference value in finite time, accompanied with a faster convergence and a better tracking precision. It is worth noting that one obvious disadvantage of SMC method is the chattering phenomenon, which is caused by discontinuous control law and frequent switching action near sliding surface. Besides, as the upper bound of lumped disturbances is not easy to be determined in advance, which could cause a large amount of chattering of SMC strategy in PMSM system.
Recently, disturbance observerbased (DOB) [14] control methods have been applied to PMSM system for better robustness against system disturbance. In [15], a DOB state feedback controller was designed for PMSM system. By using the same disturbance observer, a sensorless control method for PMSM drive was developed in [16]. The proposed DOBC method involved the use of a back electromotive force observer and a torque observer to estimate rotor position and compensate for load torque disturbance, respectively. For the mismatched disturbance, in [17], a DOB integral slidingmode control approach for linear systems with mismatched disturbances was presented. The disturbance observer is proposed to generate the disturbance estimate, which can be incorporated in the controller to counteract the disturbance.
Backstepping is a wellknown recursive and systematic design methodology for the feedback control of uncertain nonlinear system with matched uncertainties [18]. The key point is to use the virtual control variable to make the original highorder system simple; thus the final controller can be derived through Lyapunov stable theorem. In [19], an adaptive backstepping speed controller was proposed for the speed control of PMSM. The controller is robust against stator resistance, viscous friction uncertainties, and load torque disturbance. However, this approach uses the feedback linearization. By means of a nonlinear and adaptive backstepping design method, a speed and current control scheme for PMSM was presented in [20], in which all the parameters in both PMSM and load dynamics were considered unknown. In [21], a new nonlinear and full adaptive backstepping speed tracking control scheme was developed for an uncertain PMSM. Except for the number of pole pairs, all the other parameters in both PMSM and load dynamics were assumed unknown. Taking into account the unobservable of the systems states, a backstepping control method for speed sensorless PMSM based on slide model observer was proposed in [22], in which the slide model observer was designed by using slide model control technique and phase loop lock (PLL) method. In [23], a backstepping control algorithm based on disturbance observer was proposed. The minimumorder observer was established to observe the disturbance value of load inertia. Furthermore, the estimated disturbance value was used to identify the load inertia. Based on the identification results, the backstepping controller was designed. However, the above observer and controller are designed separately.
Motivated by the discussions above, in this paper, we mainly investigate backstepping speed control for PMSM based on disturbance observer. A nonlinear disturbance observer is first constructed to estimate the external slowly timevarying disturbance. Then, based on the backstepping control theory, the PMSM rotor speed and current tracking backstepping controllers are designed. Meanwhile, global asymptotic stability is guaranteed by Lyapunov stability analysis.
The rest of this paper is structured as follows. In Section 2, the mathematic model of PMSM and problem formulation are presented. The nonlinear disturbance observer design and stability analysis are derived in Section 3. In Section 4, the DOB backstepping controller design method is obtained. Section 5 presents the numerical simulation and experimental results. Finally, some conclusions are drawn in Section 6.
2. Mathematic Model of PMSM and Problem Formulation
Assume that magnetic circuit is unsaturated and hysteresis and eddy current loss are ignored. With above standard assumptions, the mathematical model of a conventional surface mounted PMSM with mismatched external disturbances can be given in the frame as follows [20, 22]:where is the rotor speed, and are the axis currents, and are the axis voltages, and are external disturbances. and denote the stator resistance and inductance per phase, respectively, is the number of pole pairs, is the permanent magnet flux, is the rotor moment of inertia, is the viscous friction factor, and also represents the applied load torque disturbance.
To formulate the design problem, according to system (1), the state space model of the PMSM can be rewritten as the following nonlinear system:where and
For the PMSM control system (2), we give the following assumptions.
Assumption 1. The external disturbance is assumed that , where is a positive constant.
Assumption 2. For all the nonlinear term in system (2) satisfieswhere is Lipschitz constant.
The main control objective is to design a DOB backstepping controller to keep all the signals in the closedloop system bounded and ensures global asymptotic convergence of the desired speed and current tracking errors to zero eventually.
3. Nonlinear Disturbance Observer and Stability Analysis
Motivated by the disturbance observers in [14–16], the following disturbance observer for system (2) can be employed:where , is the estimation of , is the internal variable vector of the observer, and is a Hurwitz matrix chosen by designer. For simplicity, we assume . Define the disturbance estimation error as
To show that the disturbance can be observed asymptotically by observer (5), we first give the following lemma.
Lemma 3. For nonlinear system (2), suppose that the disturbance observer holds form (5); then the disturbance can be observed asymptotically.
Proof. It can be obtained thatwhich implies that Therefore, we haveDefine a monochromatic Lyapunov function asClearly,Since is Hurwitz, thenwhich implies the error dynamics (8) is asymptotically stable. This completes the proof.
Remark 4. It follows from Lemma 3 that parameter in the disturbance observer (5) can change the rate of convergence of the observer and should be selected as large enough.
4. DOB Backstepping Controller Design
In the backstepping procedure, a virtual control state is firstly defined and then it is forced to become a stabilizing function. By defining a corresponding error variable and using Lyapunov stability theory, the related control input can be obtained to stabilize the error dynamics [21]. In this paper, the overall control design can be established by three steps in the following order.
Step 1. In the first step of the backstepping control design, a fictitious control input for the rotor speed has to be determined. Let be the desired trajectory. Furthermore, the trajectory of is sketched to be smooth and . Define the speed tracking error . The speed tracking error dynamics can be obtained asThe first positive definite Lyapunov function can be defined asDifferentiating with respect to time and using the results of (11) and (12), the time derivative of is given as In order to stabilize the speed tracking error dynamics, define the stabilizing virtual control input:where is a real constant. Therefore, this definition leads to which guarantees that the tracking error for rotor speed will converge asymptotically.
Step 2. In order to realize the complete decoupling and speed tracking of PMSM, the virtual input current can be chosen asDefine the tracking error of axis current as The time derivative of iswhere
Choose the second Lyapunov function to stabilize axis current tracking error dynamics asBy some mathematical manipulation, the time derivative of is given bySettingwhere and using the generic inequality , it yieldswhere If parameters and are properly selected such that and , then , which indicates the tracking error for axis stator current will converge asymptotically to zero.
On the other hand, from (21), the stabilizing control law can be designed to stabilize axis current tracking error dynamics as follows:
Step 3. As to design of command input for , define the tracking error with being the desired stator current of axis. The time derivative of iswhere
Choose the last Lyapunov function candidate as which results inIf the stabilizing control law for is defined asthen the following result is obtained:Again, based on the generic inequality, inequality (30) can be rewritten as follows:If parameters and are properly chosen to make the following conditions hold: then Consequently, the tracking error for axis stator current will tend to zero eventually. The objective of tracking control of PMSM is completed.
5. Numerical Simulation and Experimental Results
In this section, the numerical example and experimental results are presented to demonstrate the validity of the proposed method.
(1) Numerical Simulation Results. The motor parameters used are listed in Table 1. The MATLAB/Simulink model of the proposed DOB backstepping PMSM control system is shown in Figure 1. The initial rotation speed of the motor is r/min, and the rotation speed is 1000 r/min at . The initial load torque of the motor is 0Nm and the load disturbance torque is 10Nm at . The parameters of the DOBbackstopping controller are selected as , , , , .

In this simulation, to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, the phase traces by the conventional backstepping (BS) method [22] and the proposed DOB backstepping (DOBBS) method are simulated and compared. The numerical simulation results are shown in Figures 2–4. Figure 2(a) indicates the actual rotation speed of the motor with BS method and the proposed DOBBS method in the presence of the above disturbances load, respectively. Figure 2(b) shows the rotation speed response between , during which the PMSM motor just started. Figure 2(c) shows the rotation speed response between . In this time period, the reference rotation speed has a sudden change at . Figure 2(d) shows rotation speed response between , in which the external disturbance load is added at . From Figure 2, it can be seen that the rotation speed of the proposed DOBBS method can rapidly track the reference rotation speed with smaller stability error, faster response, and smaller overshoot than that of the conventional BS method.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 3 shows the threephase current of the stator. The current amplitude is proportional to the rotation torque and changes rapidly as the load torque varies. The current frequency is inversely proportional to the rotation speed. Figure 4 shows the variation of electromagnetic torque as the load torque changes. Obviously, the DOBBS method gives less load torque fluctuations.
(2) Experimental Results. To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, a threephase PMSM control system is set up. The experimental platform configuration is shown in Figure 5. The main chip of the inverter adopts the TMS320F28335 digital signal processor (DSP). The initial rotation speed of the motor is r/min, and the rotation speed is 600 r/min at . The initial load torque of the motor is 0Nm and the load disturbance torque is 5Nm at .
The results of the experiment are shown in Figures 6–8. Figure 6(a) shows the speed response of the closedloop system under the BS and DOBBS schemes. It can be seen that the settling time of the DOBBS method is shorter than that of the BS method. The experimental results of antiload disturbance of the two control schemes are shown in Figure 6(b). After the speed output of PMSM system (without load) is in the steady state, a step disturbance load, i.e., a rated torque of 10N.m at , is added suddenly. Clearly, the DOBBS method has a less speed drop, i.e., a better disturbance rejection capacity when the disturbance load is added.
(a)
(b)
The load torque and current responses of DOBBS method is shown in Figures 7 and 8, which illustrates the quick response and low ripple.
From these results, it can be observed that the proposed DOBBS method is effective under different operating conditions and has a better performance at most conditions than that of BS method.
6. Conclusion
In this paper, a disturbance observerbased (DOB) backstepping speed tracking control method has been presented for the speed tracking control PMSM. Through disturbance estimation, the DOB backstepping control strategy can achieve high precision speed tracking and disturbance rejection performance. Both simulation and experimental results have shown the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper. There have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that will influence our work, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service, and/or company that could be construct as influencing the position presented in or the review of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61573298), Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department (15B238), and the Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computing and Information Processing of Ministry of Education.
References
 S. Bolognani, R. Oboe, and M. Zigliotto, “Sensorless fulldigital pmsm drive with ekf estimation of speed and rotor position,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 184–191, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Chen, M. Tomita, S. Doki, and S. Okuma, “New adaptive sliding observers for positionand velocitysensorless controls of brushless dc motors,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 582–591, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Yi, D. M. Vilathgamuwa, and M. A. Rahman, “Implementation of an artificialneuralnetworkbased realtime adaptive controller for an interior permanentmagnet motor drive,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 96–104, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Lei, T. Wang, J. Zhu, Y. Guo, and S. Wang, “Systemlevel design optimization method for electrical drive systems—robust approach,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 4702–4713, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M.S. Wang, I. N. Syamsiana, and F.C. Lin, “Sensorless speed control of permanent magnet synchronous motors by neural network algorithm,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, pp. 1–7, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
 X. Wu, H. Wang, X. Yuan, S. Huang, and D. Luo, “Design and implementation of recursive model predictive control for permanent magnet synchronous motor drives,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, pp. 1–10, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
 H. Wang, R. Zhao, F. Cheng, and H. Yang, “Active disturbance rejection control for PMSM servo system applied in industrial sewing machines,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering, ICECE 2010, pp. 3249–3252, China, May 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 B. Zhang, Y. Pi, and Y. Luo, “Fractional order slidingmode control based on parameters autotuning for velocity control of permanent magnet synchronous motor,” Isa Transactions, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 649–656, 2012. View at: Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 J. Huang, H. Li, Y. Chen, and Q. Xu, “Robust position control of PMSM using fractionalorder sliding mode controller,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2012, no. 4, pp. 473–505, 2014. View at: Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 J. Yang, S. Li, and X. Yu, “Slidingmode control for systems with mismatched uncertainties via a disturbance observer,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 160–169, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Ginoya, P. D. Shendge, and S. B. Phadke, “Sliding mode control for mismatched uncertain systems using an extended disturbance observer,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1983–1992, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. G. Zhang, L. Z. Sun, K. Zhao, and L. Sun, “Nonlinear speed control for PMSM system using slidingmode control and disturbance compensation techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1358–1365, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Xu, Y. J. Jiang, and C. X. Mu, “Novel composite sliding mode control for PMSM system based on disturbance observer,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 12905–12910, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W.H. Chen, “Disturbance observer based control for nonlinear systems,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 706–710, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. A. Apte, V. A. Joshi, R. A. Walambe, and A. A. Godbole, “Speed control of PMSM using disturbance observer,” IFACPapers OnLine, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 308–313, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Xiaoquan, L. Heyun, and H. Junlin, “Load disturbance observerbased control method for sensorless PMSM drive,” IET Electric Power Applications, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 735–743, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. Xia, Z. Zuo, and Y. Wang, “Disturbance observerbased integral slidingmode control for systems with mismatched disturbances,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 7040–7048, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. V. Kokotovie, “The joy of feedback: nonlinear and adaptive,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 7–17, 1992. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Zhou and Y. Wang, “Realtime nonlinear adaptive backstepping speed control for a PMSM,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1259–1269, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Karabacak and H. I. Eskikurt, “Speed and current regulation of a permanent magnet synchronous motor via nonlinear and adaptive backstepping control,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 53, no. 910, pp. 2015–2030, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Karabacak and H. I. Eskikurt, “Design, modelling and simulation of a new nonlinear and full adaptive backstepping speed tracking controller for uncertain PMSM,” Applied Mathematical Modelling: Simulation and Computation for Engineering and Environmental Systems, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 5199–5213, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 C.X. Chen, Y.X. Xie, and Y.H. Lan, “Backstepping control of speed sensorless permanent magnet synchronous motor based on slide model observer,” International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 149–155, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Chen, X. Wang, M. Li, and X. Liu, “Disturbance observerbased backstepping control for permanent magnet synchronous motor,” in Proceedings of the 2017 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), pp. 1–5, Jinan, China, October 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 YongHong Lan and LeiZhou. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.