Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Control Science and Engineering
Volume 2019, Article ID 6761784, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6761784
Research Article

Nonlinear Voltage Regulation Algorithm for DC-DC Boost Converter with Finite-Time Convergence

1Anhui Vocational College of Press and Publishing, Hefei, Anhui 230601, China
2School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Chun Duan; moc.621@97nuhcnaud

Received 13 November 2018; Accepted 19 March 2019; Published 1 April 2019

Academic Editor: Radek Matušů

Copyright © 2019 Chun Duan and Di Wu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

For the DC-DC Boost converter system, this paper employs the finite-time control technique to design a new nonlinear fast voltage regulation control algorithm. Compared with the existing algorithm, the main advantage of the proposed algorithm lies in the fact that it can offer a fast convergent rate, i.e., finite-time convergence. Based on the average state space model of Boost converter system and finite-time control theory, rigorous stability analysis showed that the output voltage converges to the reference voltage in a finite time. Simulation results demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed method. Compared with PI control algorithm, it is shown that the proposed algorithm has a faster regulation performance and stronger robust performance on load-variation.

1. Introduction

As a kind of important power electronic devices, the main function of DC-DC converters is used to achieve energy conversion, which has been widely applied in many industrial occasions, such as switching power supply, direct current motor drives, and communication equipment. Boost type direct current-direct current (DC-DC) converter is a typical power converter which has many industrial applications such as direct current (DC) motor drives, computer systems, and communication equipment [1]. With the development of distributed power generations, it is required that the DC-DC converter has the high-quality, reliable, efficient power supplies, and other features. However, from the control viewpoint, how to improve the control system performance for DC-DC converter is challenging since DC-DC converters are usually time-varying systems due to their switching operation.

In the past decades, many researchers from automatic control and power electronic have investigated the control problem for this kind of devices. It is well-known that DC-DC power converters are typical switch systems and the Boost type DC-DC converter is non-minimum-phase system, which is a main obstacle for controller’s design.

So far, many researchers have employed different nonlinear control methods to design control algorithms for Boost converter. In [2, 3], based on sliding mode control (SMC) method, some SMC algorithms were given and the analog control circuits were set up. In [4], combining SMC and feedback linearization technique, the corresponding SMC algorithm was also designed. Based on LMI technique and saturation control technique, the work [5] proposed a saturated nonlinear control algorithm. In [6], time-delayed compensation technique was employed to design a time-delayed control algorithm.

Actually, for a control system, the steady-state and dynamical performances (e.g., convergent rate) are two key indexes. Note that the most of existing voltage regulation algorithms for Boost converter system only guarantee that the convergence is at best exponential with infinite settling time. Clearly, in practice, it is more desirable if the output voltage can converges to the reference voltage in a finite time. Motivated by this, finite-time control theory has been introduced and developed in the literate [713], which guarantees that the system states converge to equilibrium in a finite time. Besides faster convergence rates, the closed-loop systems under finite-time control usually have some other nice features such as higher accuracies and better disturbance rejection properties [7, 14]. Because of the advantages of finite-time control, the work [15] employed the terminal sliding mode technique to design the finite-time voltage regulation algorithm for Buck converter. The works [16, 17] considered the finite-time control law for the DC-DC buck converter system. As for the Boost converter, the work [18] designed a class of finite-time voltage control algorithms, where the input voltage and load resistance are assumed to be known.

This paper will also employ the finite-time control technique to solve the voltage regulation problem for DC-DC Boost converter systems. Different from the existing work [18], this paper considers the design of fast finite-time control algorithm. The contribution/novelty of this paper is that a new nonlinear control algorithm is designed, i.e., the finite-time control algorithm. The main advantage of this algorithm is that the fast convergent rate of the closed-loop system can be guaranteed when the state is near the equilibrium. First, since the DC-DC Boost converter system has a nonlinear structure, a coordinate transform based on the total energy storage function is used to the average state space mode. Then the voltage control problem is equivalent to control the total storage energy. Based on the finite-time control theory, a second-order finite control algorithm is given. Finally, a rigorous proof is given to prove the global finite-time stability of the closed-loop system under the proposed controller. At the end, simulation results are provided to show the potentials of the proposed techniques.

2. Preliminaries and Problem Formulation

2.1. System Model

Figure 1 shows a typical boost type DC-DC converter. is a DC input voltage source, is a controlled switch, is a diode, is sensed output voltage, denotes the inductance current, and are the inductance, capacitance, and load resistance, respectively. If the switching frequency for is sufficiently high, the dynamic of DC-DC converters can be described by an average state space model [3]. Based on the average state space model [3], the dynamic equation for the Boost converter iswhere is the duty ratio function (called control input) and . The Boost type DC-DC converters are used in applications where the required output voltage is larger than the input voltage. Let be the desired DC output reference voltage; then the reference current can be described by

Figure 1: DC-DC Boost converter.

Let be the total energy storage function for Boost circuit. Then it can be followed from system (1) that the state satisfiesBased on this model, the reference values for system states areThen, the control objective of this paper is to design a nonlinear control algorithm such that the system’s output can track the reference signal in a finite time. Actually, if there is a time such that , then Meanwhile, note that when the system state is kept steady. As a result, is equivalent to and .

Define the tracking error asthen the error dynamic equation is given as

2.2. Some Useful Definitions and Lemmas

As that in [16, 17], in order to prove that the closed-loop system is finite-time stable, some essential definitions and lemmas are given.

Definition 1 (see [7, 16, 17]). Consider the nonlinear systemwhere is a continuous vector function. The origin is finite-time stable equilibrium if it is Lyapunov stable and finite-time convergence. The finite-time convergence means that there is a function such that and .

The homogeneous theory method will be used in this paper to construct the finite-time controller. The definition of homogeneity is given below.

Definition 2 (see [16, 17, 19]). Consider system (8) and define the dilation with , . Let be a continuous vector field. is said to be homogeneous of degree with respect to dilation if, for any given , where . We can say that the system is homogeneous if is homogeneous.

In addition, the following definition is given to make the controller design convenient.

Definition 3. Denote , where , , and is the standard sign function.

Lemma 4 (see [20]). For the following system,where is a continuous homogeneous vector space and is homogeneous of degree with respect to the dilation . If is the asymptotically stable equilibrium point of the system , and ,then is a locally finite-time stable equilibrium of system (11). In addition, if system (11) is not only globally asymptotically stable, but also locally finite-time stable, then it is globally finite-time stable.

3. Main Results

In this section, we present the main results.

Theorem 5. For system (7), if the controller is designed aswhere , then the states of system (7) will converge to zero in a finite time; i.e., in a finite time.

Proof. The proof can be divided into two steps, i.e., global asymptotic stability and local finite-time stability. The closed-loop system isStep 1 (proof of global asymptotic stability). Choose Lyapunov function as follows:Clearly, the Lyapunov function is positive definite and radially unbounded. Since thenNoticing thatthenDefine the set . It follows from (19) that means that , and further . By (14), it can be obtained that implies that . Thus, based on LaSalle invariant principle [21], it can be concluded that as . That is to say, system (14) is globally asymptotically stable.
Step 2 (proof of local finite-time stability). Rewrite system (14) as follows:where .
Choose Lyapunov function asAccording to (20), the derivative of (21) isSimilar to the proof in Step 1, it can be first proved that system (20) is asymptotically stable.
In addition, note that ; according to Definition 2, it can be verified that system (20) is homogeneous of degree with respect to the dilation .
For any , according to the definition of function , we obtainThus, according to Lemma 4, it can be concluded that system (20) is globally finite-time stable.
By the proposed results in Steps 1 and 2, it can be found that system (7) under the controller (13) is globally finite-time stable. The proof is completed.

Based on this result, we now can design a finite-time voltage regulation algorithm.

Theorem 6. For the Boost converter system (1), if the duty ratio function is designed aswhere , then the output voltage will reach the reference voltage in a finite time.

Remark 7. Note that although the sign function is employed in the controller (24), the combination of the sign function and the term and , i.e., and ), is continuous. In addition, it should be pointed out that there is no singularity problem in the proposed controller (24) since .

4. Numerical Simulations

All the simulation data is based on the PSIM (Power Simulation which is developed for power electronics and motor drive) software.

4.1. Simulation Parameters

The parameters of Boost converter are chosen as follows: input voltage , inductance , capacitance , load resistance , and reference voltage .

To have a comparison, two kinds of control algorithms are used. One is the proposed finite-time control (FC) algorithm (24) in this paper; the other one is PI control algorithm.

For the FC algorithm, the control parameters are chosen as follows: .

For the PI control algorithm, the proportional gain is chosen as and the integral gain .

Respectively, consider the system dynamical response performances under the conditions of boot process, reference voltage change, and load variation.

4.2. Dynamic Responses under Different Reference Voltages

The reference voltage is changed from to at 0.3 seconds, and the other parameters are kept unchanged. Under the two kinds of control algorithms, the response curves of output voltage are shown in Figure 2. By comparisons, the finite-time control algorithm can offer a faster convergent speed than that of PI control.

Figure 2: The response curves for output voltage under two control algorithms: finite-time control (FC) and PI control.
4.3. Dynamic Responses in the Presence of Load Variations

The load resistance is changed as follows:and the other parameters are kept unchanged. Under the finite-time control algorithm and PI control algorithm, the response curves are given in Figure 3. Clearly, the finite-time control algorithm also demonstrates faster regulation speed and stronger disturbance rejection ability.

Figure 3: The response curves for output voltage under two control algorithms in the presence of load variations: finite-time control (FC) and PI control.

5. Conclusion

In this paper, a new finite-time control algorithm has been designed for boost converters. It has been proven that the output voltage can track the reference voltage in a finite time. The effectiveness of the proposed method has been verified through simulations.

Data Availability

No data were used to support this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (61304007).

References

  1. X. Zhang, S. Du, and H. Huang, Power Electronics Techology, Science Press, Beijing, China, 2010.
  2. S.-C. Tan, Y. Lai, C. Tse, and M. Cheung, “Adaptive feedforward and feedback control schemes for sliding mode controlled power converters,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 182–192, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. S. C. Tan, Y. M. Lai, and C. K. Tse, Sliding Mode Control of Switching Power Converters, CRC press, 2011.
  4. J. Le, Y. Xie, Q. Hong, Z. Zhang, and L. Chen, “Sliding mode control of boost converter based on exact feedback linearization,” Proceedings of the CSEE, vol. 31, no. 30, pp. 16–23, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  5. T. Hu, “A nonlinear-system approach to analysis and design of power-electronic converters with saturation and bilinear terms,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 399–410, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. Y. X. Wang, D. H. Yu, and Y. B. Kim, “Robust time-delay control for the DCCDC boost converter,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 4829–4837, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  7. S. P. Bhat and D. S. Bernstein, “Finite-time stability of continuous autonomous systems,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 751–766, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. H. Sun, S. Li, and C. Sun, “Finite time integral sliding mode control of hypersonic vehicles,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 73, no. 1-2, pp. 229–244, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. Y. Cheng, H. Du, Y. He, and R. Jia, “Finite-time tracking control for a class of high-order nonlinear systems and its applications,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 1133–1140, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. Y. Shen and X. Xia, “Semi-global finite-time observers for nonlinear systems,” Automatica, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 3152–3156, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. J.-Y. Zhai, “Global finite-time output feedback stabilisation for a class of uncertain nontriangular nonlinear systems,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 637–646, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. D. Li and J. Cao, “Global finite-time output feedback synchronization for a class of high-order nonlinear systems,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 82, no. 1-2, pp. 1027–1037, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. L. Shi, X. Yang, Y. Li, and Z. Feng, “Finite-time synchronization of nonidentical chaotic systems with multiple time-varying delays and bounded perturbations,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 83, no. 1-2, pp. 75–87, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Li, M. Zhou, and X. Yu, “Design and implementation of terminal sliding mode control method for PMSM speed regulation system,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1879–1891, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. K. Hasan, “Non-singular terminal sliding-mode control of DC-DC buck converters,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 321–332, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. Cheng, C. Yang, G. Wen, and Y. He, “Adaptive saturated finite-time control algorithm for buck-type DC-DC converter systems,” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1428–1436, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. H. Du, Y. Cheng, Y. He, and R. Jia, “Finite-time output feedback control for a class of second-order nonlinear systems with application to DC–DC buck converters,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 2021–2030, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. C. Zhang, S. Li, and J. Wang, “Finite-time control of direct current–direct current boost converters in the presence of coil magnetic saturation,” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 114–121, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. S. P. Bhat and D. S. Bernstein, “Finite-time stability of homogeneous systems,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 2513-2514, 1997. View at Scopus
  20. Y. Hong, Y. Xu, and J. Huang, “Finite-time control for robot manipulators,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 243–253, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. K. Khalil, Nonlinear systems, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 3rd edition, 2002.