Research Article
Fault Frequency Identification of Rolling Bearing Using Reinforced Ensemble Local Mean Decomposition
Table 3
Performance comparisons under strong background noise by decreasing SNR to 1/5 of the original data from CWRU dataset.
| Fault | Speed | Fault frequency | Rule of thumb | LMD + FSK | ELMD + FSK | Reinforced ELMD + FSK (proposed) | CFF (Hz) | Error (%) | AFF | CFF (Hz) | Error (%) | AFF | CFF (Hz) | Error (%) | AFF | CFF (Hz) | Error (%) | AFF |
| Inner | 1730 | 156.03 | 181.60 | 16.39 | 0.10 | 210.94 | 35.19 | 0.24 | 181.60 | 16.39 | 0.12 | 158.17 | 1.37 | 102.80 | 1750 | 157.84 | 249.00 | 57.75 | 0.11 | 219.73 | 39.21 | 0.23 | 249.00 | 36.61 | 0.13 | 160.43 | 1.64 | 31.72 | 1772 | 159.82 | 360.40 | 125.50 | 0.10 | 219.94 | 31.99 | 0.24 | 166.69 | 4.29 | 0.11 | 166.69 | 4.29 | 112.20 | 1797 | 162.08 | 219.70 | 26.23 | 0.10 | 199.22 | 22.91 | 0.22 | 194.88 | 20.24 | 0.09 | 161.10 | 0.61 | 117.40 |
| Outer | 1730 | 103.47 | 260.70 | 135.55 | 0.03 | 260.70 | 160.31 | 0.03 | 284.20 | 174.67 | 0.04 | 99.61 | 3.73 | 19.50 | 1750 | 104.66 | 149.40 | 42.75 | 0.07 | 187.50 | 79.15 | 0.21 | 105.50 | 0.80 | 0.03 | 105.50 | 0.80 | 8.50 | 1772 | 105.98 | 184.60 | 74.18 | 0.03 | 199.22 | 87.98 | 0.20 | 184.60 | 74.18 | 0.03 | 108.40 | 2.28 | 8.10 | 1797 | 107.47 | 351.60 | 227.16 | 0.04 | 134.76 | 25.39 | 0.22 | 87.89 | 18.22 | 0.04 | 102.50 | 4.62 | 13.81 |
|
|
CFF denotes the calculated fault frequency. AFF denotes the amplitude at fault frequency.
|